If it were legal to watch porn starring girls as young as 13 would you do it?
If that were the case wouldn't the legal age of connect be 13 as well?
absolutely not
18+ only
>>35769658
No. Porn is acting and child actors are usually terrible, ergo a shit wank.
>>35769658
It actually should be 21+.
18 is too young.
And 13 is utterly sick and revolting.
>>35769658
Wow. Its like the FBI isnt even trying anymore lol
WHY NO ANON, I CERTAINLY WOULD NOT DO ANY SUCH ACT AS THAT IS IMMORAL
HEAR THAT FBI? THAT'S A BIG NO TO PORN UNDER 18
BIG OLLLLLLLE NO!!!
>>35769927
t. roastie kike
>>35769658
>porn starring girls as young as 13
I already do
really op? why you even ask this shit
>>35770550
What's kike got anything to do with it? If anything they would encourage that shit.
>>35769658
Porn should be 25+
Women are literally not mentally able enough to make good choices until 25.
Of course not. In fact, I think sex shouldn't even be legal until you're 25. Anything below that age is just disgusting and pedophilia.
>>35769658
man she has the body of a fucking man. How is anyone attracted to that?
I never understood why the porn age is so high. If a 45 year old man can legally stick his penis in a 16 year old girl in some countries, why can't he take a picture?
>>35770945
Because young people are retarded and older people can take advantage of that, it's too early for them and they can ruin their lives for doing that.
Of course being 18 doesn't make you automatically responsible.
Just take Kelly wang as an example.
>not fapping exclusively to hentai
I lost my virginity to this girl when she was 15.
I have a cousin who was doing double penetration when she was 14.
Little whore might as well have gone into porn.
>>35770921
>Women are not mentally able
Anon, women are done maturing mentally around 16-18. They are permanently children. You're thinking of men, who do take a full 25 or so years to mature mentally.
welcome to the internet, where men are women, women are men, children are the fbi and the fbi are children
get off my board underageb&
I don't even think you should be allowed to see your own genitalia until you are 21
>>35769927
Agreed 100%. Looking back at how stupid I was at 18 I can't imagine if I was a dumb roastie the amount of trouble I'd get in.
>>35770921
To be fair that is the case or women for most of their reproductive age lives but my general rule is
>no crows feet no dick meat
Unless she's at least 35 or older she's too younger
>>35770933
britbogs grew up with her and as such have emotionally attach themselves to her.
Nah, although I find the idea of restricting sexual urges counter productive and a useless exercise.
Maybe I would set porn age at the age of consent tho
>>35769658
Of course I would, agent. Uh.. I mean OP.
Naw but seriously. Of course I would. That's hot as fuck and women are worthless anyway. We should keep them as exchangeable sex slaves.
Anyone who disagrees is a fag
>>35769658
nah, not developed yet.
>>35771384
Agreed. It would probably be pretty boring porn. No tits, no ass. I'm not sure on the logistics of vaginas but it might be bad to put it in there. I know it's dangerous with little kids but it's probably safe by 13, physically speaking. I think 18-ish is a solid age for porn either way. You go much younger and they're still undeveloped and probably not very good at porn stuff. But 18 is still young enough that if you're into flat chests and stuff you can find pornstars who fit that.
>>35769658
No, there is no way they'd enjoy it and they are too young to act good enough.
Also pedophiles are worse than niggers.
>>35769658
yes, but im not typing this, fbi, it's someone else