post yourself as a D&D character
Half orc wizard
STR: 16
DEX: 8
CON: 16
INT: 16
WIS: 11
CHA: 15
>>35765602
Human Dark Spellsword
STR: 13
DEX: 10
CON: 12
INT: 17
WIS: 10
CHA: 8
>>35765602
Human Wizard
STR: 7
DEX: 9
CON:10
INT: 18
WIS: 15
CHA: 5
>>35765602
Human Wizard
STR: 13
DEX: 10
CON: 15
INT: 17
WIS: 8
CHA: 6
Favourite spell: Tasha's Hideous Sperging(on self)
Neutral Humanlet Wizard
STR: 3
DEX: 5
CON: 10
INT: 18
WIS: 1
CHA: 4
Intrinsics:
* cold resistance
* sleep resistance
* insulin resistance
Known spells:
* conjure waifu
* summon mommy
* dispose of semen
STR: 8
DEX: 7
CON: 5
INT: 17
WIS: 12
CHA: 10
>human novice
str 2
dex 3
con 8
int 3
wis 3
cha 2
luk 2
>>35766232
What would 129 be?
Also you used the wrong symbol for greater than.
>>35766120
Maybe I should add some items, too.
Wand of Autism +3
Endless Decanter(tea instead of water - I'm a refined gentleman)
>>35765602
Human Monk, Level 4
Genderbender Archetype
STR: 12
DEX: 13
CON: 10
INT: 15
WIS: 8
CHA: 17
Feat: Autism
>>35766232
>tfw you have a high INT but low CON so you're an underachiever
In after you colossal morons rate your INT as anything higher than 10.
>>35765602
Lawful Neutral Human Illusionist/Backpacker
STR: 9
DEX: 8
CON: 9
INT: 9
WIS: 9
CHA: 9
Carrying luggage around for other people is realistically the most useful thing I could do unless magic was very easy to learn in the setting. I took a quiz a while back that gave me Lawful Neutral as my alignment but I was pretty close to True Neutral, they also gave me Bard/Sorcerer as my class which may suit me better, but I don't think I would have the talent.
Human Rogue in 5e, fighter in 3.5/pf
http://www.kevinhaw.com/add_quiz.php
>>35766359
Can't speak for anyone else, but I perform quite well in school with relatively little effort, and I can memorize useless nerd trivia effortlessly, so I have a good memory at least. INT in D&D measures just that.
Wish WIS and CHA were higher, though.
>>35766543
No. Skill points measure that. People here think that just because they're educated they have 15+INT.
STR: 5
DEX: 8
CON: 2
INT: 18
WIS: 20
CHA: 5*random number generator between 1 and 4
Chaotic Neutral Half-ogre Wizard
STR: 10
DEX: 2
CON: 6
INT: 14
WIS: 9
CHA: 1
>>35765602
Elf Cleric
STR: 10
DEX:9
CON:9
INT:12
WIS:16
CHA:12 (Curse of Gender-Selective Autism: -4 Modifier on rolls taken against the female sex)
>>35765602
str:10
des:16
con:12
int:12
wis:10
cha:10
>It's a "anon thinks he has high INT and low CHA" episode
Face it, intelligence correlates with what is generally accepted as charisma and the outliers that actually are intelligent enough to be uncharismatic (autistic) are immersed enough in their research that they wouldn't browse /r9k/ in the first place.
>>35766588
High INT makes it easy, though.
Also, skills represent specialization(otherwise, someone without any knowledge skills would be a total blank slate).
This anon >>35766828 is completely right. Anything above a 12 is denial.These are the only acceptable answers.
>>35766264
>>35766435
>>35766690
>>35766704
>>35766916
Having high skill points makes it easy too. You wouldn't be nearly as accomplished in academics without years of studying.
Most modern people who bothered in school work have skill points in academics but they are not necessarily inherently intelligent.
>>35766828
>implying robots aren't autistic
Are you arguing that we have higher CHA than we think we have, or lower INT?
>>35767056
Lower INT, obviously.
>>35766984
What, so a stranger on the internet knows my stats better than I do?
By that logic I could just assert that you have INT 8, because that one argument you made that I can trace back to you is dumb.
Stupid way to think, innit?
>>35767177
An INT of 12 would mean you are more intelligent than about 75% of the population. Most people here who put INT 12+ have it around 16-18 which would be genius levels.
>>35765602
Prolly a gnome sorcerer
>chaotic good
>tries his best, but wild magic so somewhat unpredictable
>str 8
>dex 13
>con 10
>int 16
>wis 13
> cha 16
>>35767177
We're on /r9k/. The place where autists circle jerk into telling themselves autism is a trade of Intelligence for Charisma but in reality it's lower intelligence and lower charisma. I'm sure you think you're a damn genius who just needs a bit of a shove, but in reality you're just well read on trivial shit. I'm literally fine with 8 points in INT, I graduated and can have genuine intellectual discussions with actually smart people. That's all you need.
Straight 9s. Literally just an unremarkable human NPC. Might have a quest for you in which you set me up with a qt wife but the Bard will probably get in there first before dumping her on me and she will always think about him when I fuck her. Your reward might be some handy piece of info I found out since I'm good at overhearing things.
>>35765602
human wizard
chaotic nuetral
STR: 8
DEX: 8
CON: 8
INT: 8
WIS: 8
CHA: 8
the most average wizard you've ever met, so average you pretty forget him 5 minutes after meeting him, although you're convinced you constantly run into him for sometime after that, though you can't remember his name and his facial features are so common you may just be mistaking him for someone else so you never say anything.
>>35765602
/who/ here always wanted to play dnd but never had any friends to play it with
>>35765602
human wizard (necromancer)
LG
STR: 12
DEX: 8
CON: 14
INT: 17
WIS: 14
CHA: 12
>>35767437
An INT of 8 would mean you would be a wizard without spells. Just like real life.
>>35767486
I don't even want to begin reading the rules but I'd love to play. It's unbelievably long I've heard just to understand them.
>>35767389
I never said I was a genius, or that you had 8 INT, sorry if I came across like that.
But you are aware that autism is a catch-all term for several disorders, right? High-functioning autists and those with Asperger's do trade charisma/wisdom for intelligence.
>>35767688
The trade off isn't as good as most people ITT think. They see it as -2 CHA +8 INT when it's really something like -6 CHA +2 INT
>>35767316
12 is just one point above average(10-11), and it only gives +1.
This is only a rough estimate, but 16 would be around IQ 140(assuming you actually interpret it as intelligence, and not just memory).
>>35767774
When taken the 3d6 distribution, 12 means more intelligent than ~74% people. It's irrelevant how much + it gives, or how many points above average it is.
>>35767734
I would have put my CHA as 4 instead of 6, but I seem to have some kind of endearing quality that makes people like and trust me. If only the same could be said for my appeal as bf material...
>>35765602
Human Warlock
STR: 9
DEX: 12
CON: 10
INT: 13
WIS: 13
CHA: 5
Unforunatley for me, I'd make an awful warlock because they cast with charisma for whatever reason.
>>35767916
Maybe it's that they just WILL the magic into existence after learning how from their patron.
>>35767854
And this is only the best case scenario. An INT of 12 means a minimum of 62.5%.
>>35767486
I feel it
Tried to get a group of my friends together to play, literally all of them flaked except one
Frogman Trash
STR: 1
DEX: 1
CON: 1
INT: 1
WIS: 1
CHA: 1
Literally any other answer in this thread is self deception (unless you're a chad, reee).
>>35768115
INT 1 is Gelatinous Cube level. How did you type this?
>post yourself as a D&D character
>any ability score above 10
>>35768158
With great self-loathing (and the adventurer I ate).
>>35768179
>He doesn't have 20 CON from drinking to drown his sorrows