Do you think Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe hate her for getting

File: 1475606958_maxresdefault-825x510.jpg (39KB, 825x510px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 825x510px

Daniel Radcliffe has done much better in his movie career in terms of quality tho.

>while they get next to nothing

daniel radcliffe made like 70 mil off the HP series. i think he's probably satisfied.

File: 1439791746513.png (22KB, 509x524px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 509x524px

emma watson is a hot female
daniel radcliffe is an albino manlet
rupert grint is a ginger
how did you think this was going to play out?

File: emma watson boob job.jpg (64KB, 700x811px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 700x811px

>>35635178
up to date pic of emma

>>35635199
>>35635200
Maybe he's made a better film since, but there is no denying Watson is getting 100 times more attention and adoring, slavish fans and many more opportunities than them. She spoke at the fucking UN for gods sake. It may have been a bullshit speech about feminism but even so

>>35635212
I know. Hence I bet those guys hate her because she is given so many opportunities because of what she was born as. And then she has the audacity to go and preach about fucking privilege, patriarchy and sexism. Jesus fuck

>>35635212
she's actress hot - pretty face and sexless body

>>35635225
>up to date
I wish it was. She has the body of transitioning 20 year old guy.

I think Rupert and Daniel would rather not get up on a soapbox and preach lefty bullshit

Isn't the Ron dude a famous singer now?

Daniel fucks qts leagues above that slag and has an actual movie career instead of being a literal cock sock for disney movies and feminist talkshows.

The ginger on the other hand is probably jealous.

>>35635178
All 3 of them are more than set for life financially after HP alone. Daniel picks projects he's interested in because he doesn't need commercial success, dunno what Rupert does but if he's just enjoying his money without having to work for it then it can't be too bad. Emma is more famous because she's doing more work to get herself in the spotlight, they could do the same if they were so inclined.

>>35635270
Literally the only thing he has been noticed for in the last 5 years is looking similar to Ed Sheeran, a shitty whingy little faggot who plays guitar and normies fawn all over

>>35635260
Still be fucking irritating seeing a girl you grew up with and were tied together with so long fucking off and doing that and generally becoming world famous while you gradually fade into obscurity

>>35635276
>Daniel fucks qts leagues above that slag

Does he...? He's fucking 5'3 isn't he?

>>35635281
> Emma is more famous because she's doing more work to get herself in the spotlight, they could do the same if they were so inclined.

No, that's the point. They aren't female and attractive. They could never reach the levels of fame and attention she has clawed herself up to

>>35635293
>Does he...? He's fucking 5'3 isn't he?

height is only an issue for us mortals, he's literal Harry Potter with billions to his midget face. Last I heard he lost his virginity shooting those movies at 14 with cute models, did they care he was 5'3?

I would like to see her publicly executed.

>>35635310
>Last I heard he lost his virginity shooting those movies at 14 with cute models, did they care he was 5'3?

Sounds like some faggots fantasy. There's no way an adult model would want to bounce up and down on some midget pre teen boys little dick

>>35635293
>hating Ed Sheeran, national treasure, and gentle soul
>implying Dan Radcliffe hasn't had a better movie career post-Potter
>Rupert Grint being capable of hate

OP, you are a sad, strange little man, and you have my pity.

File: emma-watson-at-good-morning-america-in-new-york-03-10-2017_1.jpg (132KB, 1200x1531px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1200x1531px

But where are the nudes?
Heck post clothed HD pics here please

>>35635330
Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe is clearly trying hard to ditch his boy wizard image.

The 19-year-old actor confessed in a revealing interview to losing his virginity to an older woman - whose age would raise eyebrows.

Radcliffe admitted he celebrated reaching the age of consent, 16, in the customary manner with a much older girlfriend.

But although he insisted the age difference 'wasn't ridiculous', he did say it 'would freak some people out'.

>>35635379
"She was only 60!" the former wizard proclaimed.
"She would always say she wanted to 'stretch her legs around me'" the boy added.

>>35635409
It was JK

>>35635225
>up to date pic of emma
lol what? Those leaked pictures show she has the body of a 12 year old boy.

>>35635293
>Still be fucking irritating seeing a girl you grew up with and were tied together with so long fucking off and doing that and generally becoming world famous while you gradually fade into obscurity
Swiss Army Man was a pretty low key movie. I'm pretty sure he doesnt want the fame.

>>35635447
No, I think he was serious

You delusional woman-hating losers are all the same. Any time an attractive woman reaches some level of success you spaz out like retards. What about the countless attractive men who have done the same? What about your boy bands and your Brad Pitts, Matt Damons, Ben Afflecks, George Clooneys? Why are you so easily triggered? Why do you give a shit that out of three actors in a kid's movie, the girl happened to become especially successful? I can assure you that the boys don't give a shit.

>>35635520
I don't think you understand where we're coming from, you're trapped in your own pattern of thinking and are clearly incapable of seeing things from others' perspectives.

The point is that the three of them started as equals, but once the HP series was over Watson was given many, many more opportunities than the other two purely due to the fact that she was a female, and attractive. In other words, privileged. From there, she had the audacity to go on and lecture the whole world about privilege and sexism, conveniently forgetting that it was the very reason she had risen to sufficiently dizzying heights to be invited to the UN in the first place.

So kindly fuck off or learn to be open minded and understand that yours is not the only perspective or means of understanding the world. This is why people hate feminism - their way of thinking is so intolerant of alternatives, bluntly refusing to accept different interpretations, patterns of thought or different approaches to problems. The frustrating sophistry makes it difficult and long winded to dispel feminist created myths - so called facts that appear simple proof of female oppression, but in actual fact are evidence of issues that are far more complex that are not examples of female oppression whatsoever.

KYS

I doubt it worries them too much, they are both wealthy. Radcliff is a better actor, has broken into theatre a bit and has picked better roles even if they aren't as high profile so he's probably pretty satisfied and I think Rupert Grint bought am ice cream truck or something for fun and was doing that for awhile so he probably doesn't care much about being in the lime light or what she's doing.

On the other hand they also know her personally and had to work closely with her through their formative years and beyond so maybe they do think she's holier than thou bitch or something, they're probably the most qualified people to make such a judgment out there.

>>35635520
I'd like to point out that leonardo dicaprio is the same kind of hollywood attractive as emma watson.
cute face, shitty body

>>35635569
>you're trapped in your own pattern of thinking and are clearly incapable of seeing things from others' perspectives
You mean like all of the angry alt-right robots on this board?

>The point is that the three of them started as equals, but once the HP series was over Watson was given many, many more opportunities than the other two purely due to the fact that she was a female, and attractive
Attractive, yes. Female? Empty conjecture. I listed several men whose success can be easily linked to their attractiveness and you're conveniently silent about them. Show business favors the attractive and this is news to no one. You make it into a sex thing because that's all you're capable of doing.

>learn to be open minded and understand that yours is not the only perspective or means of understanding the world
Great advice for robots who can do nothing but screech at women, minorities, 'normies' and basically anyone who is not exactly like them.

>KYS
Nice closing statement, Mr. Open-Minded.

>>35635581
Good example, another attractive person successful in Hollywood. This one's male so robots don't shit their pants in rage at him.

>>35635655
Why didn't Daniel and Grint get as famous as her?

>>35635688
For one thing, they're less attractive.

>>35635688
For another, The lack of millions of fans lusting after their underage bodies,
They probably only had thousands

>>35635655
>You mean like all of the angry alt-right robots on this board?

Great job not actually defeating my point but going for a "tu quoque" instead.

>Attractive, yes. Female? Empty conjecture
Nope. The female part had a LOT to do with it. Just look at all the feminist stuff she's done and the attention and praise she's received for it. With regard to the male actors you mentioned, of course, almost all Hollywood actors are attractive. It's just how it is.

This is about both her being attractive and female, two privileges she has that have advanced her, and ironically she preaches about the evils of privilege and is blind to her own.

>Nice closing statement, Mr. Open-Minded.
Telling you to do that doesn't detract from my point you fool


Anyway, you're probably a bitter, angry little woman, you're deluding yourself and ignoring anything that threatens your worldview and ideology (see >>35635688, try and answer that). I don't know why you people even come to this board.

>>35635897
>Great job not actually defeating my point but going for a "tu quoque" instead.
I just think it's funny when one of the most isolated, hateful, closed-minded communities on the internet has the temerity to call someone else closed-minded.

>Just look at all the feminist stuff she's done and the attention and praise she's received for it
So you're saying she's more famous and successful than her potterbros because she's a feminist? I find that conclusion much more tenuous than the simpler one of her being more attractive.

>With regard to the male actors you mentioned, of course, almost all Hollywood actors are attractive. It's just how it is.
So why are you reaching for alternative explanations as to why the most attractive co-star became the most successful? Could it be because you're desperate to make everything about sex and 'female privilege'?

>Anyway, you're probably a bitter, angry little woman
I'm a man.

>see >>35635688, try and answer that
I did, see the first reply.

>I don't know why you people even come to this board.
Why wouldn't I?

File: 1481060390558.jpg (51KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 500x333px

>>35635977
Are you this dense?

In a nutshell, I said: she is more successful because she is female and attractive. She has privilege and is a hypocrite because she goes to the UN and prances all over the world preaching about (white) male privilege and sexism. I then wondered if Rupert and Daniel were pissed off at this state of affairs.

All you've done is autistically rage at me calling me a robot woman hater while actually agreeing with my points.

>>35636006
I don't agree with your points. I'm saying she's successful because she's attractive, not female.

>>35636030
And I'm saying she's successful for both of those reasons

So we are 50% in agreement, we only need to debate the latter half.

How can you deny the female part? She's been in modelling mags and all sorts for photoshoots. People jizz over her daily on the internet. Porn fantasies have been made of her. Female sexuality sells far better than male sexuality.

>>35636066
Because the most successful male actors also tend to be wildly attractive.

>>35636086
As I said we've already agreed on attractiveness being one of the reasons for her success, and there is no need to debate that side of the issue any longer

>>35636390
I'm saying that attractiveness is all that's needed to explain her success relative to her Harry Potter costars. Attractive male actors are in photoshoots all the time as well.

File: ....png (45KB, 147x122px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 147x122px

>>35635178
Last I heard of Rupert is that he's been sitting rich off of the HP money and bought an Ice Cream truck since it was his dream to always own one. He sold it later, though, because he noticed it made him look like a pedophile.