>tfw when all i want to do is club fascist (both /Pol/acks

File: Antifa_USA_Logo.gif (26KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 900x900px

>>35559820
Freedom of speech on college campuses would be our first concern as most of the new members would be young people who care about freedom to say think and believe anything you want and not be punished by the state (like in public universities).

>>35559820
if i ever go for a high score, antifa is my target

>>35559820
I know some of these words.

>>35561014
Killing for political/social reasons is retarded. It's a good way to strengthen whatever cause you target.

>>35559820
Honestly, at this point I just wanna club people, and maybe if I get lucky I'll club a few fascists

I don't think I have it in my to actually cause lasting pain to people, but violence seems cathartic

>>35561038
good point, i will join antifa then allah akbar them and the media will report that antifa is killing antifa

do you have anymore advice?

Sorry, but actual antifa is FAR-left, as in anarchist or similar. Most people aren't conscious fascists anyway, so if you want to oppose fascism you should support causes that oppose the roots of fascism, that is, that oppose the deterioration of capitalism, i.e. socialism, basically.

>>35561117
If you're going to join them, you might as well destroy them from within. Urge them to do larger acts of violence, possibly towards govt agencies or allied groups.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Antifa is un-American.

>>35561164
i was thinking more along the lines that i wait for a big gathering/protest or whatever and then bring an allah akbar backpack. but only if there is at least 200+

>>35559886
this DEFINITELY doesn't sound like a honeypot for leftists
(or on the off chance it isn't intended to be one, you've designed a movement to alienate the left, right, and centre. Good work!)

>>35561164
you seem cool though, so dont go to any ca antifa events

>>35561217
You can do that, but again it's going to be viewed as a crime against whatever group you target. If that's your intent, then don't let me hold you back.

>>35561241
Thanks guy. Truth be told, ideologically I'm more in line with the antifas, I just think radicalism is silly.

>>35559820
>Any /americanantifa/ here?
Fuck off, I hope you die painfully you scum.

sounds fucking retarded

Why not just accept all the race realism science and use it as a means to justify welfare or universal income

Invent a new Jesus movement for the 21st century

>>35561164
>tries to destroy the movement from within
>ends up carrying true antifa ideology into concrete action

good advice anon

>>35561219
I think you;re right, this wont work. But i am radically centrist and socially liberal. My blood jsut boils at the sight of censorship and almost no protection against govt. monitoring makes me want to burn an american flag. This isn't the america we need. this is the america the eleties want

what do i do?

File: 1481667282195.jpg (113KB, 702x536px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 702x536px

>>35559820

I'm a fascist, op. Wanna meet up? What state you live in?

>>35561428
but you're only one person and might fucking shoot me. getting in a fight with one fascist by myself isn't gonna change shit. The most that'll happen is we might trend on worldstar

>>35561385
Higher visibility plus violent acts against govt/allied organizations have always been used to discredit movements.

>>35559820
>centrist
>wants to hurt everyone who has other opinions

Way to go

>>35561428
>Testosterone and broad shoulders are bad
Horsey is such a cuck, it's unbelievable.

>>35561150
They're a fucking living contradiction. They're Anarcho Communists. How the fuck anyone can say with a straight face "I embrace communism" and "I believe we need to destroy the state!" in the same breath is completely beyond me.

>>35561465
ever heard of the Bolshevik revolution anon

>>35561417
That would be hillariously delicious though. Could you imagine people who are against Anti-Fa having to defend them from the likes of Islam? It's so fucking absurd.

File: 1469648424544.png (634KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

634KB, 1280x1280px

>>35561447
so what's your plan then? Fight a group of them? or to sucker punch any random person you deem "fascist" and run away like the little bitch that you are

>>35561150
>if you defend a terrible, unstable system then the terrible system won't degenerate
>this means you win somehow

do I need to tell you that you're retarded ?

File: 1465214656322.jpg (89KB, 731x420px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 731x420px

>>35559820
Tbh I'd love to just club race mixers on site. Would love to start a movement, make those traitors scared and punish them.

I really hate both sides. I believe we need to unite as a nation not class. Jesus these spooks attacking people for wearing hats is disgraceful. I got suckered punched by some ass just for "looking like trump" no hat or anything. I can't wait to see these pricks getting thrown in prison or killed off.

>>35561496
I'm no little bitch. Grew up poor as shit and got in a fight also every two week in middle school. Got my shit straight and now in college but I'm still rough.

I don;t really like to do any actually violence anymore I just made this thread to see if anyone else cared about what i care about, to feel less alone among the great divide between left and right

If a far right group was formed like this that is violent, reaction would be larger. These people hit Milo and nobody batted an eye. Hillary is partly to blame for new far left groups. Using racism to get votes was used by her, ironically. Trump is just not politically correct, not racist. Big difference. When Hill used racism to get black votes, I knew I was voting for Trump.

>I got suckered punched by some ass just for "looking like trump" no hat or anything
>I got suckered punched by some ass

This, my friends, is all you need to know about the "glorious" alt-right movement

>>35561470
> totally missing the point of a simple comic
lol m8

>>35561477
Communism is stateless by definition. It sounds like you've been fooled by Soviet AND American propaganda unfortunately, which is certainty understandable. The USSR claimed it was communist because communism had a certain moral appeal and America claimed they were communist because communism was (is) an evil bogeyman. Communism is stateless, classless and moneyless.

>>35561561
It was some Hispanic guy. Not some alt right dweeb. Voted trump and proud of it.

>>35561582
lmao you missed the point so hard

>>35561552
New to politics, I see.

>>35561570
Explain to a poor autist please.

>>35561577
Communism is authoritarian in nature. It cannot exist without a large scale structure to ensure EVERYONE follows the rules evenly. Otherwise you have a broken "honor system" where anyone who wants to be bad will be.

>Communism is stateless, classless and moneyless.

And that's the fucking problem. You remove any nuance, you remove any differences between people and boil them down to the most basic aspects of what they are and reduce us all to the weakest, smallest, dumbest pieces of shit on thisplanet all in the name of "Equity". (And don't you fucking care call it equality.)

If you attempt to create an "honor system" all it takes is one person breaking the vow for the entire system to collapse. So how do you maintain that system? Oh geeze, it sounds like you'll need a fucking huge authoritative system in place, almost like, what's the word again? Oh yeah, a state.

>Antifas
>Fighting feminazis
Good joke m8

>>35561577
>moneyless
Which is stupid. It's not like you guys are protesting fiat currency, money was just a way to streamline the bartering system by attaching a numerical value to precious metals. Or do you actually think people will stop coveting gold, silver etc in your fantasy utopia?

>>35561648
Barter--->money is simply a myth, and a deeply ingrained one. Money as we know it is the invention of contingent authoritarian state structures.

>>35561735
Surprise, the state tends to become more notable when society reaches a certain size. Two chickens for a tool is a sufficient system for a village. Not so much for a city.

>>35561623
Lol, as if one person could destroy an entire society. You underestimate the power of upbringing and social exclusion in response to anti-social behavior.

>>35561773
>Lol, as if one person could destroy an entire society.

All it takes is an idea and conviction to follow through, people will follow that person to the freedom they desire. Most people on this earth are followers who will espouse rhetoric they've heard others say as though it were gospel. It isn't hard to shape the world.

>You underestimate the power of upbringing and social exclusion in response to anti-social behavior.

You seem to think me a normie. I've been an outcast ever since 9/11 hit. I'm one of those ambiguously dark skinned white looking guys. You think I don't know the power? You're implying I give a fuck. I know for a fact there are others out there who are like me and value freedom over slavery. We will always be able to create a crowd, there will always be rebellion against a so-called utopian existence.

But good job actually tackling any of my points and not making a completely irrelevent judgement call on my character. Really sticking it to me there.

>>35559820
This is the 2nd thread I've seen on /r9k/ today talking about "starting a political party". The problem is you wanting to "start" a political party shows you are nothing but an insincere poseur.
There are already antifa political parties in existence OP, why don't you show you aren't bullshitting and join one which already has history, strategy, community ties, organisation skills and membership?
It's because you're just a delusional dweeb who secretly harbours power fantasies of becoming a celebrity, rather than wanting to put in the hard work as a rank-and-file activist, making connections with likeminded people and building a movement as part of a team.
If your answer is "b..b..but the existing organisations are not effective!", how do you think adding another small, ineffective organisation to the list to split the movement even more is going to help the cause?

tldr, your a larping fag

>>35559886
anti fa literally burn free speech signs. anti fa are inherently anti free speech

>>35561813
You're a product of captitalism, like everyone today. You're a minority in this society and you still would be in a communist society.

>>35561914
>You're a product of captitalism, like everyone today.

What does that even mean? It's like you're talking through a stroke. At least try and make sense you worthless faggot.

>You're a minority in this society and you still would be in a communist society.

Of course I'm a minority. Most of you fuckers on this planet want to serve, you want to kneel. Life is too hard, being responsible for your own happiness is too strenuous, it means you have to accept you fail or succeed on your own merits. The idea that you could fail because you're a failure is too much for your frail sense of self, so you turn towards communism, no one can fail or we all fail, no ONE person can succeed, we all must. It's disgusting. If you want to be a follower so bad, go right the fuck ahead. You have every imperitive to do so, but get the fuck out of here with that communism bullshit. It helps no one and only serves to bring everyone who isn't the new Bourgeoisie down. People like me are dangerous to that cancerous ideology. Of course I'd fight against it, if it came to pass i'd be one of the first that got round up because I wouldn't stay silent, I wouldn't just accept it. The price of freedom is paid in blood, be it yours or mine I don't care.

>>35561852
Wow, this, but a little less aggressive. Also, there are no antifa parties, only antifa groups. Anarchists aren't into parties and they're a tiny minority, so they couldn't really form a party anyway.

>>35561975
>Anarchists aren't into parties
Then they will never have any meaningful impact.

>>35561527
America will never unite. It's too diverse and full of too many opposing ideas and cultures. America was literally founded on complete individualism and a lack of a unified cohesive community like in some small countries in Europe. Colonists didn't come here to unite together once they arrived, they came here to escape oppression from European countries. The only time they truly united was during the American revolution. They then founded America and were united until the civil war. Sure, there were the federalists and anti-federalists and the left and right side but nothing as completely divisive as later on.. After the civil war, America was permanently divisive like it is today. It's left vs right region by region. Cali is a left paradise and Texas is a right paradise