Should you shout at women when they're being cunts? Ex

>>35507002
It's his car. He's not a chauffeur, he's trying to earn a living.

>>35507042
Yeah. But did he overreact.....or was it proportionate?

>>35507071
No, the drunk bitches overreacted.

I wouldn't drive some dumb drunk sluts around after they insulted me.

File: tumblr_nnxsixAf4w1us00yto1_1280.jpg (86KB, 706x431px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 706x431px

>>35507151
But they're women. Can you just sperg out on women like that?

>>35507192
Of course you can, it's fun.

They always pull out the "You know I'm just a woman, right? omggggggggggg"

>>35507002
>"Are you serious? You're talking to women here."
What did she mean by this?

RROOOOOOOOOASTIEESSSSSSSSSS

File: 1489077319328.jpg (34KB, 587x347px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 587x347px

>>35507213
He just denied them their pussy pass and RUINED their night out.

>>35507002
That's the same Uber driver who freaked out at that woman he was driving to the hospital....

>>35507042
>>35507151
But it's his job. You're not supposed to react to customers like that. It's highly unprofessional and bad business.

>yelling at somebody
>okay
>get the fuck out
>okay
>to a woman
>OMFG NO WTF YOU CANT DO THAT
They're assholes just like anybody else, they don't get to fucking get away with not being scolded like a child when they deserve it

>>35508378
Piss off you dumb cunt.

>>35508417
This is why none of you have jobs. You're completely unemployable and incapable of handling harsh work conditions. You're socialist fucks with an entitlement complex, and fail to understand that the world doesn't owe you anything, even respect. The second you sign onto the work force, especially jobs working with the general public like these, is the second you sign away your dignity and civil rights, all because that's what the job requires. Can't handle it? Then you're nothing more than one of those Marxist leeches who keep sucking the tits of people like Bernie Sanders in the vain hopes of getting a handout.

>>35507002
>Tell you what... get the fuck out of my car.
Just another night in Chicago.

>>35508526
Yeah, we're incapable of holding and getting jobs because dumb drunk sluts won't get off their entitlement horses and out of people's fucking property. Get real.

>>35508526
> neets are Marxists

They tend to be drawn to right of centre ideologies.

>>35508567
They're the customers, they're why you have a job, they're effectively who you work for. Get over it or fuck off to some socialist shit hole.

File: 1488946281112.jpg (411KB, 1234x1522px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 1234x1522px

>>35508610
America is the shittest and you lost in Vietnam

>>35508610
Are you retarded? First of all he doesn't have to drive around anyone who insults him and second of all it's his fucking car. Quit being such a stupid bitch.

>>35508580
>neetbux
Marxist.
>feeling of entitlement towards 'good' jobs
Marxist.
>entitlement towards jobs in general
Marxist.

Real right wing ideologues would go out of their way to work for and earn respect and better working conditions. Not expect them right off the bat.

>>35507002

>Should you shout at women

Yes.

File: images-1.jpg (3KB, 200x126px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 200x126px

>>35508653
I know it's contradictory....but look at /pol/. They're a bunch of neet fuckups with not much love for marx

>>35507002
>Should you shout

No.

Only if you want to make yourself come off as immature and emotionally if not psychologically unstable.

>>35508643
Then he shouldn't be working in the job if he can't handle customers. He's not, you're not, entitled to a better job because of muhfeelings. You put up with this shit because that's what the job requires. Like being a female celebrity and having stalkers. Or radiology and cancer. It comes with the territory. Something you Sanderfags can't understand.

>>35508677
Only because they only know of "Marxism " when it's preceded by "cultural".

If a chick is being violent, put her in her place
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czb4rImsph0

If she's just being bitchy, ignore it.

>>35508677
/pol/ is mainly motivated by personal prejudice and Americanised views on Marxism, Capitalism, Democracy, &c. Thrown with the fact US culture is still pretty right-leaning in general. Even democrats like Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton lean more to the right than democrats in other parts of the world.

File: 1489119555746.jpg (46KB, 368x660px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 368x660px

>>35508697
>Then he shouldn't be working in the job if he can't handle customers.

...what the fuck are you fucking going on about? If you can't handle customers you kick the customers out of your car, that's what you do. You're not entitled to a ride and you're definitely not entitled to one after repeatedly insulting the person who is giving you a ride. I'll tell you again because maybe you're not getting it through your thick skull: he doesn't have to drive anyone he doesn't need to.

This may come as a surprise, but losing out on two drunk slut's money isn't life and death for this guy.

>He's not, you're not, entitled to a better job because of muhfeelings.

You're not entitled to anyone's services. You're not entitled to receive rides from people who want you gone and out of their own property and you're not entitled to have Christian bakers bake you your faggot cake.

>You put up with this shit because that's what the job requires

You put up with that if it's your prerogative, but I've kicked rude customers out of my store for the sole purpose of being rude. I don't owe you anything. Hell, I can refuse service to anyone for ANY REASON.

>Something you Sanderfags can't understand.

You don't even fucking know what Communism, Socialism or Marxism are. I'm not even a Communist, a Socialist or a Marxist, you're delusional and fucking stupid. I'm the one saying you're not entitled, you're the one saying you are.

Kill yourself.

>>35508785

This is not a bad thing.

The Green Party in Germany thinks the government should buy hookers for geezers in retirement homes, FFS.

>>35507002
>Was the "get the fuck out" a bit much?
How about a spoiler tag you motherfucker?

>>35507192
More reason to. The fact that they think they're immune to criticism or negativity because they have a vagina should be incentive enough to treat them like that. They need to learn.

>>35507002
His first mistake was accepting a drunk woman's offer, many things could go wrong in an instant with that scenario. But to answer your question, he had every right to do what he did. That's his car, he's a private driver, and as such he has the power to accept and/or decline offers, and if it escalates kick them out, especially if they've been repeatedly fucking with the driver. Shit like that should never be tolerated by anyone. And you damn well know the only issue people would have with that is that she is le womanzzzz, if it was a dude no one would give two shits. And it's that mentality that is fucking things up today.

>>35508803
>If you can't handle customers you kick the customers out of your car, that's what you do.
Then you're fired, Sandersfag.

>You're not entitled to a ride and you're definitely not entitled to one after repeatedly insulting the person who is giving you a ride.
They are entitled to services they're willing to trade money for. And it's the service operator's job oblige. Or else don't work in that job, Sandersfag.

>he doesn't have to drive anyone he doesn't need to.
Then he should be fired for not doing his job.

>You're not entitled to anyone's services.
You are to services that are willing to give them you in exchange for monetary goods. That's how capitalism works, Herr Marx.

>You put up with that if it's your prerogative, but I've kicked rude customers out of my store for the sole purpose of being rude.
Then socialists like you should be fired for not doing your job properly.

>Hell, I can refuse service to anyone for ANY REASON.
No you cannot, Marxo.

>>35508813
>The Green Party in Germany thinks the government should buy hookers for geezers in retirement homes, FFS.
I have a boner now...

File: what.jpg (8KB, 185x153px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 185x153px

>>35508957
>YOU HAVE TO SERVE MEEEEEEEEEEE!
>CHRISTIAN BAKERS MUST BAKE MY LGBTFAGGOT2 CAKE
>calling others commies


helicopter yourself

>>35508803
then you suck at your job and shouldn't be working.

File: 2bdf7b17717ec92e243ef04e6d9765c8f6058d549d3669168fd09082faa3e2bb.jpg (55KB, 625x351px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 625x351px

>>35508957
You sound like a bit of a penis tbqhwy

>>35508957
Holy fuck you are retarded dude.
People arn't entitled to a service. If you're acting like a rude cunt store owners can kick you out. How is running a business the way you want communist? If anything it's the opposite. Neck yourself.

>>35509008
You can pretend to be two poster all you want, you are not entitled to my services and all your pathetic bitching and moaning isn't going to change that.

You should probably learn what socialism is before you call other people socialists.

>>35507002

Should have dragged that cunt out of the seat by her hair

>>35509115
Should've turned off the camera and raped them both with a big hunting knife desu

>>35509074
>People arn't entitled to a service.
They are if the service is willing to provide them with it. Otherwise don't have the service at all.

>If you're acting like a rude cunt store owners can kick you out.
Then that's socialism in practise. And you're a Sandersfaggot who think his life has more value than it does in the job world. You're just nothing more than a waiter or butler to whoever is paying you.

>>35509218
>They are if the service is willing to provide them with it. Otherwise don't have the service at all.
>They are if the service is willing to provide them with it.
...And if the service refuses to provide them with it they're not entitled to it..? You just proved my point.
>Then that's socialism in practise.
>allowing a company to do what they want is socialism
This has got to be bait.

>>35509080
basically if you're putting the worker's right ahead of the customer and business owner, it's socialism. usually enforced by law or government. favoring the respect of the worker instead of everyone else is the same philosophy as socialism or marxist ideas. when really you have to work hard and earn that respect and dignity. not given it at the beginning.

>>35509270
>basically if you're putting the worker's right ahead of the customer and business owner, it's socialism.

You're actually a moron.

>>35509262
Then the service itself ceases to exist.

Making your customer more valuable than the company or worker will always be Marxism. If you don't want to put up with 'shitty' customers, then change jobs.

>>35509270
>>35509218
>>35509008
>>35508957
>>35508697
>>35508653
>>35508610
The Randroidism is strong with these two.

>>35509310
>Making your customer more valuable than the company or worker will always be Marxism.
If the customer is being a rude cunt and is in the way of potential profit, you tell them to fuck off so other customers can give you money instead.
That's capitalism.
You have a terrible understanding of business and political beliefs, please graduate high school before posting such things.

>>35509353
Turning your customers away for any reason gets in the way of profit. They're what your economy is going to be based off of. They have the right of way.

>>35509218
> that's socialism in practise

You don't understand what you're saying.
Stop it. It's embarrassing.
Nationalizing your country's industry and infrastructure is socialism in practice. A centralized government micro-managing the economy is socialism in practice.
An angry guy shouting at a self-entitled bitch is an angry guy shouting at a self-entitled bitch.

2/10. You can't be this stupid. Well played.

File: 1467593591867.jpg (214KB, 345x336px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 345x336px

>>35509409
Respect of your being outweighs substantial profit from a drunk sluts.

>>35509451
Excuse me, that should be unsubstantial*

>>35508526
This is actually an example of the advantages of capitalism. This man owns his own car and is operating his own business. It allows him the freedom for who he wants to serve and when he wants to serve them. If this were socialist conditions he would be forced to drive these cunts home because of "equality"

>>35509409
>customer holding up line having a bitchfit about some bullshit that doesn't matter
>several more customers behind her in line waiting
You have two options here,
A.) Cut your losses and tell them to fuck off, this allows the line to start moving again so the rest of your customers can be satisfied
B.) Sit and put up with their bullshit thus holding up the line even longer, this pisses off the customers behind her. This could result in even more of a loss as some may just leave or not come back in the future.

Kill yourself.

>>35509435
Nationalisation and micro-managing are just practical applications of socialism.

But the philosophy behind Marxist ideologies is that the worker is more important than the customer, business, employer, and the average citizen. That's always been the MO of Marxism.

>An angry guy shouting at a self-entitled bitch is an angry guy shouting at a self-entitled bitch.
... is an example of putting the worker ahead of everyone else because of muhfeelings, when really he can work somewhere else. Hence the socialism.

>>35509479
>This man owns his own car and is operating his own business.
He doesn't own the car and is working for someone else. Even then, refusing customers is unethical in capitalist conditions, since it's putting the worker's 'freedom' above everyone else's.

>>35509561
>He doesn't own the car and is working for someone else.
If it's Uber then yeah, he does own the car.
If a customer is detrimental to profit then there's nothing unethical about it. Why are you so stupid

>>35509561
>He doesn't own the car

He does own the car, you'd know this if you actually watched the video because he says it multiple times. These drunk fucking dumb asses didn't get to the ride in time and he canceled their trip. Do you even understand how Uber works?

I tell women to fuck off when I'm drunk and they're being cunts at the bar. Haven't been beat up yet, thankfully.

File: 4a3c3e9ddb89babe1ae32689dd958171.jpg (38KB, 720x621px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 720x621px

>>35509511
You've got sand in your vagina and have spent too much time on the interwebs.
Socialism revolving around putting the employee before the customer, and getting so worked up about it, is a misreading on your part that leads me to think that you have issues.

> this is you

I'm laughing at you

>>35509590
>If it's Uber then yeah, he does own the car.
He works for a business that isn't his. He doesn't own anything.
>If a customer is detrimental to profit then there's nothing unethical about it.
Turning away customers in general is detrimental to both profits and capitalist liberties like economic freedom.

File: nigga on the moon.jpg (223KB, 1213x1617px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1213x1617px

>>35507002
You should yell at someone if they're worth being yelled at

That's what equality is

Female privilege is acting like an obnoxious twat like that and not being thrown out of the vehicle by your throat

>>35509660
>He works for a business that isn't his. He doesn't own anything.
He owns the car. He pays the insurance. He pays for gas. He pays for tune ups. It is his car. Uber is a taxi service that lets people use their own cars.
>Turning away customers in general is detrimental to both profits and capitalist liberties like economic freedom.
As a capitalist liberty he can turn away a customer, even if he risks getting in trouble with the employer.
You don't know anything.

File: 1471730371351.png (317KB, 642x792px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 642x792px

>>35509660
>He works for a business that isn't his. He doesn't own anything.

File: 220px-Karl_Marx.png (53KB, 220x276px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 220x276px

>>35509511
>But the philosophy behind Marxist ideologies
Is based on a flawed understanding of human nature, a simplistic understanding of economic determinism and a dogmatic approach to materialism and idealism......the resulting teleological, deterministic undressing of history is dumb also.

FTFY

Why do you grey so angry about things you don't understand, fucknut

>>35509706
>As a capitalist liberty he can turn away a customer
No he doesn't, because turning away your main source of profit is anti-capitalist and, therefore, socialism.

>>35509772
You seriously do not understand what you're trying to talk about. Let me be as nice as possible by saying you're a knuckle dragging halfwit.

>>35509772
The whole thing about captialism is being able to run a business how you see fit, isn't it? Denying customers is part of running a business.
Literally everyone itt has proved you wrong

File: 1487883864542.gif (2MB, 399x221px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 399x221px

>>35509772
>turning away your main source of profit is anti-capitalist and, therefore, socialism.

Where were you "educated"? You've GOT to be American

>>35509811
>The whole thing about captialism is being able to run a business how you see fit, isn't it?
Capitalism is economic freedom to the capitalist. People who work for you are not that. And they're entitled to the same rights as you and me, or any rights they haven't earned. To believe otherwise, practise otherwise, is socialism -- the antithesis of capitalism and liberty.

>>35509866
But what about positive v negative liberty?

>>35509772
>>35509660
>>35509511
>>35508526
>>35508697
It's because of people like you I have a hatred for libertarians.

>>35509866
What if a store owner hangs up a sign that says, "We reserve the right to refuse service for any reason"
It's his business, and under capitalism he can do such a thing, even if it hurts his profits.

>>35509923
If we're talking small business: unethical and potentially socialist. If big business: I don't see an issue there.

File: You+re+wasting+my+time+godamnit+reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee+_86b7f923177b2ff92083faddd82d7a00.jpg (10KB, 324x325px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 324x325px

> be obnoxious customer
> get refused service and asked to leave

>"REEEEEEEE YOU COMMIE FUCK"
> has asthma attack and pissed himself a bit in all the excitement

File: what.png (783KB, 802x523px) Image search: [Google]

783KB, 802x523px

>>35509959
>If we're talking small business: unethical and potentially socialist. If big business: I don't see an issue there.
How the fuck is there even a difference? You have no clue what socialism even is. This has to be a troll there's no way someone is this stupid.

>>35510006
Small businesses are more likely to be socialist in nature because of how tight knit everyone involved is. Big businesses are more likely to be capitalist because of their broader ranch and distinct influences on the economy.

File: 5150830+_3e9da41619f60301dbfdcac264abe632.png (1MB, 1200x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x750px

>>35510065
>Small businesses are more likely to be socialist in nature because of how tight knit everyone involved is. Big businesses are more likely to be capitalist because of their broader ranch and distinct influences on the economy.

yeah man whatever you say

>>35510065
It doesn't matter the reasoning, it is a benefit of capitalism that businesses, both big and small, are allowed to decline service for whatever reason. Your logic is so flawed it doesn't even make sense.

>>35509660
Business model for Uber is everyone of their drivers is actually seen as its own entity, they run their own business

if you are fucking stupid and dont know how to google that isnt any of our problems, you are wrong and fucking retarded

>>35510065
you are insane ahah holy shit

>socialist in nature
>not capitalist because small
>im an art major
hurr motherfucking durr

STOP SHITTING UP MY THREAD YOU TURBO-AUTISTS.

>>>/pol/

>>35510065
>giant corporations accepts Government contracts and bail outs
>small buisnesses are socialist

from what i see the driver is in the wrong here for not being at the right spot just because "too many cars". He then proceed to cancel the trip after the bitches have arrived, probably because of some previous arguments on the phone.

He should've either just told them to fuck off on the phone and drove away or just shut up and drive them since they're already here anyways.

The bitch that refused to get off the car is pretty obnoxious for pushing it after being told to gtfo though