>defendants can hire private defense attorneys >prosecution

Because 'murrica that's why

Because who would hire the prosecution? Isn't the plaintiff typically the state or county?

File: image.jpg (102KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 720x1280px

>>35406470
The victim or their family?

>>35406406
How would the rich otherwise get away from their crimes?

>>35406406
Because the State inherently has power in this dynamic?

>>35406493
What about victimless crimes? What about when there are many victims? Do they all pool their money and agree to pick the same prosecutor?

>police can't just firebomb your house and hose you down with a mini-14

How the fuck do they expect us to breed a passive, collectivist slave race if the only eugenic tool we're allowed is prison? These goddamn reptoids have no idea what ground conditions are like, here. Their demands are completely fucking unreasonable.

>>35406555
This, the state always has favorable outcome assuming your innocent

>>35406406

As far as I understand in civil cases both sides (defendant and plaintiff) can have attorneys representing them, but in criminal cases the victim is the State/Law itself, and prosecutors are merely defenders of the Law.

>>35406406
Corruption
Businessmen do why is profitable and not what's right. Gangs would just pay the firm the prosecutor comes from to drop cases. I would be super easy to do