Hypothetically if age of consent was completely removed and girls of all ages were free game, what would be the lowest you would have relations with?
18. Anything under is absolutely blasphemous. Why would one engage with a child?
The absolute lowest I would fuck is 9. I would aim for 11-13 mainly though.
>>35381003
This nigga ere doin gods work
15 is legal here, I suppose that.
18-21 is probably best though.
>>35381003
>willingly denying yourself Prime Teen Pussy
Dipshit.
>>35380963
Young kids don't do it for me.
I'm only turned on by older women. Like milfs or m(ale)ilfs
I'd go full babyfuck, there would always be white trash mothers selling their kids for meth/heroin money.
29 year old turning 30 in August. The youngest I would go for is probably 19 or 20. High schoolers feel too much like kids to me, and anyone younger than that actually is a child.
reminder not to reply to pedoposting, some demented pedos are hellbent on posting the same shit over and over on /r9k/ for whatever reason, luckily they are too stupid to do it creatively and it is blatantly obvious
they are not true robots as pedos blend in with normies to reduce suspicion, they should not be here and they make us look like creeps so ignore them
>>35381010
Pretty much this. That 10-13 sweet spot is so fucking delicious now since girls are developing super early but they retain that cuteness and petite frame. My dick is fucking diamonds.
26 yo male. Wouldn't fuck below 16. Not developed enough to be attractive.
15-18 is ideal
>>35381159
>>35381092
>>35381060
>>35381010
Hahaha nice one bros!
>>35381159
Dude. I saw this skinny rich girl jump out of her mom's Audi SUV one day. She was 10 max. Wearing the smallest pair of yoga pants I'd ever seen. Either a thong or no panties. I was overcome with the need to eat her ass and I'm not even into that.
>>35381010
same tbhtbhtbh
>>35381290
You forgot this pedo: >>35381152
If there's grass on the feild, play ball
>>35380963
18. Not for religious reasons, anyone under the age of 18 can't consent no matter what the law says, whether it's legal or not. It wouldn't matter if the law says you're not a pedophile, you'd be a pedophile either way.
>>35381153
This is the real bait right here.
>>35381290
LEAVE MY BOARD NORMIE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!! FUCK IVE BEEN NOW MUTED FOR 8 SECKNDS REEEEE
>>35380963
>would have relations
>>35380963
I'm gonna go ahead and say 16 because all the girls I knew at that age had sex with guys in their 20s.
I was disgusted back then, but now that I'm older I understand that women think older men are better for whatever stupid reason.Women don't make sense and are irrational as hell
>>35381349
You are a special kind of dumb.
>>35380963
In today's society, maybe 14 or 15. Most young girls nowadays are turbo-staceys so I would probably still stick to older girls, but if I could find a younger one around that age range that I like I would go for it.
>>35380963
Probably 14 at lowest, but realistically I'm only going for girls one year younger than me.
Ignore the trolling in this thread. Robots aren't programmed to be pedophiles.
>>35381456
>Robots aren't programmed to be pedophiles.
Anyone can be a pedophile you dunce. Do you know what the word means?
>>35380963
i abhor chestlets of any age, so wouldnt go that low
nothing better than a h.s stacy cheerleader with huge tits
>>35381547
>he doesn't recognize chestlets as the masterrace.
Begone normie
12 because my sister is 12 and she's super hot.
>>35381632
>chestlets as the masterrace
into the ovens with you and all chestlets
chestlet holocaust cant come soon enough