What is up with these shitty articles on sites popular with women?

File: wtf.png (779KB, 1102x714px) Image search: [Google]

779KB, 1102x714px

This article contradict itself starting from the fucking title...

File: 777.png (2MB, 1920x800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x800px

frustrated mainstream normies

>why is it so hard to find a guy with a perfectly sculpted body and jawline, a beautiful symmetrical face, mounds of flowing dark hair, piercing blue eyes, sunkissed skin, who is over 6 feet tall, makes over 200k a year, is willing to settle down and have children with me in spite of my inferior genes and let me stay independent and pay to have the children raised by someone else so I can keep living my life like i didn't just win the lottery in finding the perfect man? why is that so hard?
>this is all society's fault, and men's fault, for being picky and not my fault for having such incredibly unrealistic standards
>it's the men's whose standards are unrealistic!!!!!! im a woman and i deserve to have all my dreams and fantasies come true!!!!!

File: again.png (2MB, 1445x738px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1445x738px

All of them are the same. I don't understand the people who reads this shit.

>>35375799
lmao bitter virgin manchild

It's hard to find a good man for the same reason it's hard to find a good woman: because you're a garbage tier entitled piece of shit expecting someone far out of your league.

That article reads like a /r9k/ tfwnogf whine thread with genders reversed.

>>35375693
>even if we take all our delusions we have about standards and expectations off the table, society is still to blame
Why do women always try to play the victim? Is this biological?

File: lel.png (865KB, 1481x829px) Image search: [Google]

865KB, 1481x829px

How do they define success? The number of likes on their shitty blog posts?

>>35375864
I wouldn't want to date a person who brags about their success all the time. Or someone who has to mention every single time they did something good. Be humble and not a braggart vain piece of shit.

File: news.png (657KB, 944x683px) Image search: [Google]

657KB, 944x683px

Damned be geopolitical issues and current events.

File: 1454539725098.jpg (5KB, 500x261px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 500x261px

It's written by and for women so that they feel less guilty for sleeping around and being shallow. They couldn't care less about good men, most good men aren't Chads with footlong cocks.

Also, these articles are also written to give """nice guys""" the idea that they still have a chance if they continue to be nice and around. It gives them the idea that they are actually what girls want and that they are desperately needed, when in fact girls really don't want a good guy. They want Brett's 13 inch cock and Mercedes.

>>35375815

Bitterness comes with the territory here.

But you didn't refute anything he said, so at least you both agree. That's nice.

>>35375858

>Is it biological?

It has to be at this point.

Thing is, the true absolute Chads (rich, tall, built, confident, etc) will sleep with plenty of average and below average women. Why not after all, they're easy to him and still enjoyable to fuck.
So now because these basic bitches have been CHADDED the idea of going back is almost unbearable. I know hypergamy is a meme term almost exclusively used online, but it does exist to an extent, ending up with someone less desirable than you have been with before (even if had saw it as a mere fuck and chuck) is a fucking devastating feeling.
They feel like they fucked up on a deep primal level. The male equivalent would be knowing on your deathbed that you had no children and will be forgotten swiftly.
Hook up culture has had different effects on not only men and women, but on different types of men and women as well.

>spend previous 10 years rewarding men who are attractive and promiscuous
>wonder why there is a shortage of men who are attractive and want to settle down