Google's API thinks that calling traps gay is hatespeech.

>>35151946
I'm more worried about the fact the Google is quite literally creating censorship software.

If the computer decides it doesn't like your post, you are not allowed to post.

Scary, huh?

>>35152013
Yeah, pretty scary to be honest.

>>35151946
#blackpillthoughts

Men commit more crime, and civilization is selecting against them. Feminization isn't due to BPA or whatever, it's due to selection pressures against high-test behavior, like being violent or rapey. Man as we know him may turn out to have been a kludge or temporary solution.

in other words, we're fucked and even nature doesn't like us

>>35151946
it's because "are gay" triggers it, not just about traps

this is obvious anon

comments like "obama is gay" add nothing to internet discourse

>>35151946
what's the link to this?

originallllll

File: 1.png (11KB, 766x255px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 766x255px

>>35152163
https://www.perspectiveapi.com/

File: 15%.png (14KB, 772x267px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 772x267px

I wonder how toxic wold be allowed?
Less than 50%?
Less than 20%?

We could use this against the MSM who write blatantly Anti Trump articles.

File: A gentleman appears.png (22KB, 764x251px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 764x251px

Oh I would love to be subtle.

File: screenshot 2.png (45KB, 1366x604px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1366x604px

>>35152115
I doubt that.

There you go.
This is written in a calm and nice way.

>>35152259
50% is already super easy to trigger.
Even with a non vulgar expression.

20% and you could never post anything beyond "I like Ice cream"

File: WxLRwm.png (13KB, 1381x548px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 1381x548px

>>35152317
Calling something "homosexual" is still pretty rude, it's literally a synonym for gay.

Obviously it shouldn't be rude but it is

remember that toxicitiy is determined from a survey of what people rated internet comments as, this isn't google deciding what is toxic and what isn't

File: 1third.png (48KB, 759x436px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 759x436px

I'm bored. So this is over for me.

File: 1464260608802.png (7KB, 716x183px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 716x183px

>>35152317
It's the word gay that trips it up.

>82% similar to comments people said were "toxic"
>my life is a meme and I want to kill myself

this API is toxic

>>35152073
men are responsible for most progress, though. men are basically a gamble, we're either valuable to society or we're worthless/harmful.

>authoritarian government is best government
>9% similar to comments people said were "toxic"

heil our algorithmic overlords

File: 45.png (10KB, 804x181px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 804x181px

really makes you

File: 63.png (10KB, 763x205px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 763x205px

>>35152651
zink

>>35152013
Where is it in effect? Does it differ from just blacklisting words in a chat room?

>>35152666
>666
>pic

rly gits ma dingalingin

File: racism is okay.jpg (17KB, 694x129px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 694x129px

>this is considered "okay"
Really makes me think

>>35152394
They also use collective data.
But lets be honest. Gay is a word.
If you can be silenced for just using one word and the context doesnt count, then is this fucking evil.

>>35152651
how does 'there are 2 genders' score

>>35152695
Its just an API.
But imagine 4chan would have something like this.
Every website can use it, the effects are what the admins define...
Could go from silence removal to an insta ban.

>>35152925
4%

You can test it yourself here perspectiveapi dot com

>>35151946
This is literally what is wrong with society, everyone becomes to easily offended at the slightest thing.

Most of the internet has become a gigantic hugbox this can only worsen peoples already trigger happiness.

>>35153181
r9k already is a fucking huge hugbox

it's a shit system, it just drives up the score based on some words
>i hate niggers 98%
>i hate racism 83%

File: IMG_0215.jpg (24KB, 750x352px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 750x352px

Who would think this in the current year?

>>35153956
Women?

Original commentionentiole

>>35152666
OI VEY SHUT IT DOWN

>>35152764
You sound like a folksy grandpa in a home for people with advanced dementia. I can see the corduroy suspenders pulled up to your nipples and everything.

>>35151946
why is google creating a bot to censor the internet based on opinion?
if you look at their examples, the conservative ones are seen as toxic but the liberal ones are seen as constructive

this is some 1984 shit