Why are women even allowed to attend university? All they have to do is write their name correctly and the administration just goes "u go gurlll :) A+ for you sweetie". It just inflates their ego even more and creates a shit learning environment.
Cuz marxist brainwashing is most effective on the holes
>>35119019
Women get better grades then men, stay mad :)
>>35119019
I know there's no point, but do you have even the slightest shred of evidence for this idea or is it something you make up in your head to get you mad.
>>35119019
>tfw you can't tell if this is real or satire when it comes to this board
>>35119442
He's failing his courses.
Next semester, draw up a schedule in accordance to all of your syllabi- remember that for every hour of class you should devote at least another hour to out of class study, reading, or homework.
Because when they're at university, they're not reproducing.
While they're at university, they are exposed to Jewish brainwashing, so they won't reproduce afterwards either.
>>35119442
even if you had more evidence than the prosecution for OJ Simpson had, you wouldn't change a damn thing.
i dunno why people keep acting like it's a non-thing when it gets brought up a shit ton and people baby women IRL like they're dumb too.
>>35119419
>then men
Ok retard
>>35119494
I went to an Ivy-league college. Women were not babied. Many of them succeeded.
>>35119514
Yea cause they choose shit majors that my dog could graduate in
>>35119419
>>35119442
>>35119514
Women have lower test results than men in maths, even though them have higher grades. This also goes for SAT scores.
>>35119554
>women do better on one test, but worse on another
The grades are actually a better indicator, because they include long-term projects and, at the graduate level, actual research. What you're demonstrating is that men are better at taking tests.
>>35119529
I majored in computer science. There were multiple women in my classes. I worked with them. They were skilled.
>>35119573
>The grades are actually a better indicator,
No, subject is. Now fuck off
>>35119582
>it's an anecdotal evidence episode
>>35119019
>It just inflates their ego
Literally everyone I met at university took their enrolment there as some kind of inflation to their ego.
>OMG!!! I got into <insert college here>, I'm so intelligent! XD
>>35119573
>grades
Grades are literally subjective thing. If teacher likes you, he writes more.
>>35119514
is "succeeding" at college considered an achievement now? should you get a nobel peace prize and John Dalton award now?
who the fuck cares anymore.
>>35119606
So when I ask for evidence I get this >>35119494
The circle keeps on jerking around here.
>>35119637
he was talking about evidence for your Ivy League, women in my comp sci class fables, not necessarily the other bit.
but yeah, everything you say is just as relevant because no evidence derp.
>>35119573
So SAT scores are unreliable?
women are dumb