What is the most intelligent philosophy? What is the most mind-blowing

File: 1483986395604.jpg (233KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 1200x800px

That you can fuck your brain

>>35081239
idk about intelligent but conceptualism really fucked with my mind

File: 1449407759469.jpg (15KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x225px

>>35081239
mega:///#F!MQBRHBJA!L_on3h-XUrtbc719UaMygw
Find out for yourself.

File: smart.jpg (46KB, 480x401px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 480x401px

I wouldn't dare tell a brainlet such as yourself about it. Your mind would fry instantly.

>>35081271
Originally explain?

>>35081239
Hyper capitalism. It's so turbo it means you can fuck intangible assets

That such thoughts do not matter. Only the laws of the universe matter. For without them, we could not exist as we are now.

File: shimoseka III.jpg (75KB, 800x445px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 800x445px

>>35081239
Anything is possible. Whether you choose to acknowledge it or not, if you can fathom it, it can become a reality if your truly determined.

>>35081239
Not giving a shit about philosophy is the best philosophy.

>>35081297

it's the idea that concepts (i.e., "apple", "chair", "pencil", etc) only exist within the mind and don't correspond to objective reality. essentially, there are only individual objects (this apple, this chair, this pencil) rather than "universal concepts" that physically exist in the broader world. concepts are convenient for survival, they speed up information processing, but they aren't "real" in the way a singular apple is real. but you can stretch it further- even a singular, individual apple has an arbitrary beginning and end, solely defined by humanity.

it's a problem of identity. what separates a dog from a cat apart from arbitrary constructs of language and information processing? what makes something identical to itself? what makes a concept universal? the answer is, identity and universality are illusions crafted by human intelligence to aid survival.

>>35081239
Greg Egan's Dust Theory in Permutation City

Antinatalism

Prove me wrong, faggot, thats what i fuckin thought

>>35081775
I hate this sort of shit. The human perspective is the only one to exist and by definition we cannot see outside so why bother propping up some objective truth that's outside our grasp?

>>35082428

you're right, which is why I eventually settled on pragmatism as an ultimate worldview. I would actually say the human mind is built for pragmatism (see Jordan B. Peterson's lectures on youtube).

regardless though I don't think too deeply about philosophical questions these days, it's a rabbit hole with no foreseeable conclusion and all it does is force me into episodes of derealization. I probably just don't have the mind for it, not intellectually but emotionally.

File: escher-mc-hand-with-globe-7400026.jpg (50KB, 340x500px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 340x500px

>>35081239
Anti-Realism

File: 4961a98231394ce1bc6db5f4f419f0b8f20d4203639ccf63ddf0841ed2e4ce0c.jpg (318KB, 1244x776px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1244x776px

Marxism, the Frankfurters also took me on a wild ride.

>>35082487
r/iamverysmart

Original nigger

>>35081239

don't know pretty hard to beat darwinism.

>>35082664
if you can't take the heat get the fuck out brainlet

File: 1482630409144.gif (1MB, 273x322px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 273x322px

Love me some Stirner

ultimately, I believe>>35081542 in that nature is the only truly objective thing we can cling to, and all the philosophical thought experiment wankery we do is more for fun/attempting to understand the absurdity of this reality than anything

I just think Stirner's thoughts on how we function were very in touch with the animal instinct within all of us, regardless if that's comforting to acknowledge or not

Not really mindblowing or all that intelligent, but absurdism is another favorite of mine

>>35081775
You think what is basically common sense is mind -blowing philosophy? In a world populated by philistines, you are probably right, too.

>>35082905

It's not really common sense, it certainly isn't intuitive in any way. you have to realize that just because you've come to the same conclusion I have doesn't make it an "obvious" or "blatant" idea, it just means we came to the same conclusion. most people are morons friend.

people have been debating about nominalism for thousands of years.

>>35081239
mgtow, once redpilled you learn everything about human nature

>>35083018
>people have been debating about nominalism for thousands of years.

Only because some people are too stupid to realize Plato was full of shit.

Nominalism is simply nothing but common sense. Anyone thinking about the nature of concepts in a rational manner will reach the same conclusion.

>>35082698
Being this butthurt
Originale

>>35083070

I'll agree that once you start rationalizing about concepts *at all*, conceptualism becomes obvious, but most people are too intellectually lazy to even do the work in the first place.

>>35081662
i like to phrase it
"if the mind can imagine it, the universe is capable of it"

File: 1464985838698.jpg (78KB, 499x499px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 499x499px

Absurdism and scientific realism are the only valid philosophies

time cube
gene was a genius

>>35081239
that literally nothing matters

this is all there is. theres nothing else after this

suffering is beauty

>>35082428
>other people thinking about things makes me angry

lol kiddo

the CTMU is the clearest picture of reality i've found

File: stoicforrobots.jpg (14KB, 480x250px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x250px

Stoicism is the most healthy philosophy for robots, I believe.

File: C42S0n5UcAANlGx.jpg (43KB, 420x298px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 420x298px

the answer to both is hermeticism

>>35082851
objectivity is a spook

>>35083128
The simpler it sounds, the better.