>if you are attracted to this, you are a pedophile and a monster

>this thread again

WHY does your sexual deviance have to interfere in the lives of those that have nothing to do with you?

File: IMG_5786.jpg (330KB, 1125x2001px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1125x2001px

God forbid I am attracted to something cute. Crazy, right?

where can i cop that popcorn patch tho

>>34987770
>>34987818
What if I contacted this girl's parents and told her a creepy guy on 4chan is lusting after their daughter? What would you do?

Not threatening you, honest question.

File: bjv8I9j.png (542KB, 625x343px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 625x343px

>>34987770
>>34987818
You have to be attracted to Real Woman TM, or you are a creepy loser evil degenerate rapist jew.

>>34987845
He'd probably not care and fap.

File: IMG_9421.png (1MB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x1136px

>>34987845
Im sure there are aspects of you your friends don't like. In fact, if you share every single truth about yourself, sooner or later everyone will find something they don't like about you.

People don't need to like every aspect of you or know every dark side of your personality.

At face value, I'm sure her and her parents would show me mutual respect. They don't need to know everything wrong with me for me to say that.

>>34987803
fpbp

Understand that you are not well and that your attraction can potentially harm innocent people that can be damaged to the point of suicide.

Your dick will ruin lives. Cumming is not worth that price but you are selfish and refuse to get help. That is why you must die.

Pedos are not innately monstrous, so long as they control themselves, and acknowledge that acting on their desires would be harmful to the child. And refrain from viewing and circulating CP.

Fyi OP, when most people see a cute young girl it invokes more of a little sister/urge to protect type feeling, as opposed to attraction. That is not to say people cannot be attracted to the ones they want to protect, but in the case of children, they are not attracted. In fact, the urge to protect them is the reason most people hate pedos.

File: IMG_6507.jpg (231KB, 1125x2001px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1125x2001px

>>34988147
Hey, you are attracted to normal fully grown women right? Well your attraction can potentially harm innocent people that can be damaged to the point of suicide.

Since your attraction could lead you to raping a woman. See how ridiculous that sounds? I'm not some monster on the verge of bursting out into raping a little girl. Rape is a turn off for me. I want a girl who actually consents and wants me because she loves me. That will never happen legally, I'm fine with that. But it doesn't mean the attraction is inherently wrong or unnatural.

In fact it's very normal and natural. This knee jerk reaction is a social construct.

I realise there needs to be AoC, but the following situation fucks with my mind

Being attracted to someone a few seconds before they reach the age of consent
>EWWW you fucking sicko you need to be hung she's too young to make her own decisions you sick pedo...
A few seconds after the person reaches the age of consent
>...I see nothing wrong with this, she is old enough to make her own decisions, good luck

It enters deeper realms of mindfuckerry when you think about a country that had the age of consent lengthened/shortened

>>34988309
You're attracted to people that are not developed enough in any way to understand human sexuality and are very sensitive to trauma that can define their emotional development for life.

Fully grown adult women are developed, have life experiences, and are better equipped to handle emotional trauma than someone that is still growing and is simply too young to understand anything.

The difference between my attraction and yours is that I can fulfill every sexual fantasy I have and I would never break the law; you can't do that. Do you know why so many priests are rapists? It's because they have no sexual release. You have no sexual release, and you are more likely to do something very stupid.

>>34988309

>who actually consents and wants me because she loves me

Did you understand love at 10 years old? Does anyone? Why is that suddenly a reasonable expectation for a human just because you want to put your dick in them?

>>34988444
>Implying you have sex
GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE
RRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>34988444
>Do you know why so many priests are rapists? It's because they have no sexual release. You have no sexual release, and you are more likely to do something very stupid.

nice 19th century pseudo-science.

File: 2a6.png (758KB, 1185x1029px) Image search: [Google]

758KB, 1185x1029px

>>34987770
BECAUSE YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE YOU FUCKING HERETIC

>>34988309
The problem there is that a little girl isn't developed enough to consent to that kind of thing. They're vulnerable, and impressionable, to try and be in a relationship with one is just unethical.

Also, it is genuinely unnatural. Outside of 4chan, most people in developed countries are repulsed by it, and are not just pretending to be in order to save face.

>>34988444
To be fair, they do have lolicon, and their imagination. Even if it's off putting to think about, the pedos that stick to imaginary things are at least less likely to harm real children.

>>34988533
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sex_abuse_cases_by_country

Believe me when I say that contrarians are the fucking worst and you are an idiot for not understanding this. This is a long list.

>>34987770
Theres nothing morally wrong about being attracted to kids. You only get into trouble when you violate the law (ie possession/distribution of cp or actual sexual molestation). In all honesty, if you're a non-offending pedo then frankly its none of my concern that you like kids.

>>34988592
Understanding what? Your pseudo-scientific gibberish from the 19th century?

>>34988690
Why is that list so long?

And why do you keep dismissing this as old? This is the 21st century expectation for religious figures that do not have sex.

>>34988496
ANSWER THIS

>>34988753
Is it long relative to the size of the catholic church compared to the rest of the world?

Are celibate people more likely to commit rape? Show me the evidence.

File: 1486586297904.jpg (43KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x640px

cute G O I L S

>>34987770
they're right you degenerate

>>34988903
7/10 you almost derailed me

All law-abiding pedophiles are sexually repressed. Sexually repressed people eventually do break the law and commit a sex crime.

It's the REPRESSION

File: 1487388352930.jpg (96KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1080x1080px

>>34988925
you arent a pedo for likin' cuties

>>34988951
>All law-abiding pedophiles are sexually repressed. Sexually repressed people eventually do break the law and commit a sex crime.

Where is the evidence for this absurd claim? I understand that this is what 19th century psychologists believed, but why do you believe it?

>>34988977
Wait a second, where is the evidence for your yours?

Pedophiles are the scourge of human existence, do you need a study to tell you that?

All pedophiles are perceived as dangerous. Regardless as to whether or not it's true, that perception should be your one and only reality because you are outnumbered and people would gladly kill you even at the suggestion of any wrongdoing toward children.

http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/winnipeg-bus-driver-stabbed-to-death-by-passenger-was-facing-trial-for-allegedly-molesting-five-year-old-girl

It doesn't matter what you think or if what I am saying is bullshit, but if I think that you are going to lash out one day, you are going to lash out.

>>34988951
>Sexually repressed people eventually do break the law and commit a sex crime.
By that logic the majority of 4chan posters will end up raping someone.

>>34989194
>Wait a second, where is the evidence for your yours?

I don't think you quite understand the burden of evidence, my simple-minded friend.

>>34989306
I don't think you understand that most people don't and that doesn't stop vigilante justice.

>>34989274
Let me be the first to say welcome to 4chan

>>34989331
So people who hold certain attractions are going to be targetted by criminals in vile hate crimes? Yikes.

How do the criminals figure out who's a pedo and who isn't?

File: IMG_8984.png (1MB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x1136px

>>34988444
My release is saving pics. Just because I have the attraction doesn't mean I will break the law. What's so hard to understand about this
>>34988496
Before the 1900s it was perfectly normal worldwide. 12 years old is considered an adult in tons of places. They can understand.

>>34989501
Are you an alien?

I posted a story of a man who was *accused* of a sex crime against a five year old who was stabbed to death. That is how people perceive pedos.

>How do the criminals figure out who's a pedo and who isn't?
I know you're just playing dumb with me but it doesn't matter, it's only if they think you are a pedo that matters. And these are regular people, not criminals.

>>34989585
>12 years old is considered an adult in tons of places
are any of those places the place where you live?

>>34987770
So are you saying that people who disagree with the idea of saying certain types of people are undesirable members of society who need to be exterminated are retarded? Just ship them to Siberia?

spain sexual consent age is 13

File: 1487532157826.png (47KB, 632x852px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 632x852px

>>34989585
>Even little girls are Snapchat whores
There's no hope

being attracted to young girls is weird, but fine

having sex with young girls is wrong because they aren't developed psychologically enough to understand the decision to have sex.

>inb4 women never develop psychologically
in the field of developmental psychology, yes they do, on average, around the age of 18

>>34989964
is this spain?

>>34989366
That reply doesn't even make sense

>>34989728
did they catch the faggot murderer

File: The Bad Guy.jpg (22KB, 367x500px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 367x500px

>>34988563

"So you summoned me, eh?"

>>34988444
pretty sure there's actually evidence that children are less likely than adults to acquire PTSD after going through a traumatic experience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posttraumatic_stress_disorder
>Children are less likely than adults to develop PTSD after trauma, especially if they are under ten years of age.

>>34990250
did you read the article?

>>34990270
how less likely, and what to do in the cases where it still develops?

>>34990160
>uuuu
He's saying that 4chan is evil because no one here has any lives. We're all repressed and it makes us le '''evil'''' ''''trolllz''''

>>34990422
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56490/ here's the cited study if you're interested in further reading. it sounds like they're not 100% sure about this and think that it's possible that they are just not very good at detecting PTSD in people younger than 10.
>Most epidemiological studies have been of older young people and adults. Giaconia et al (1995) reported a lifetime prevalence of 6% in a community sample of older young people. Kessler et al (1995) reported a lifetime prevalence of 10% using data collected from older young people and adults in the US National Comorbidity Survey. In contrast, the British National Survey of Mental Health of over 10 000 children and young people (Meltzer et al, 2000) reported that 0.4% of children aged 11-15 years were diagnosed with PTSD, with girls showing twice the rate of boys. Below the age of 10 years, PTSD was scarcely registered.

>>34990055
>in the field of developmental psychology, yes they do, on average, around the age of 18
citation fucking needed. no, you cannot cite the law or cultural beliefs, you just name dropped a scientific field, i'm going to need to see a scientific study for that

Saying loving a loli is wrong because of her judgement, is like saying stupid people should have sex.

File: cVAYXJ0.jpg (100KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 800x800px

>>34989728
People who commit crimes are criminals.

File: 1485398274900.jpg (27KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 540x540px

>>34987770
>>34987818
LITERAL BABY

Lauren is a qt though. I read your story about your trip. Sounded nice.

>>34987770
Not attracted to that and also not a pedophile. Coincidence??

>>34987770
Well yes you are a pedophile but as long as you don't touch her I won't hang you. She is a child, a young child and has no sexual characteristics. If you like her you have deep issues you should take a look at.

Just think about it, you like the cute innocence and you want to violate that, ask yourself why?

File: genocyber-51.jpg (76KB, 1621x1038px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1621x1038px

>>34992398
>you like the cute innocence and you want to violate that, ask yourself why?

In doing so, you surplant God, and become a master of this reality.

>>34992398
>has no sexual characteristics
what about


you know

her pussy or ass? lol

File: 1484712644954.jpg (6KB, 200x194px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 200x194px

>>34987770
Life's too short, just calle a pedo and let me fuck that tight white pussy

>>34987991
>>34988912
>>34989585
i'll never understand this: everybody would agree those are cute little girls, and is okay to find them aesthetically pleasant

however, there's a clear relationship between being cute and being sexually attractive: a heterosexual male will never find another male "cute", and will never be attracted to a female that isn't "cute"

>>34987770
I want to teach her how to ride a bicycle and take her to school


Also she has to call me supreme overlord

>>34992117
>is like saying stupid people should have sex.
i'm going to assume you meant to say shouldn't. honestly, i'm not totally averse to that idea. maybe it's time we brought eugenics back

File: IMG_7955.jpg (297KB, 1013x1802px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1013x1802px

>>34992360
Lol. Thanks man.
>>34992398
I don't want to violate innocence. I want to celebrate it and love every bit of her innocence. I don't even necessarily always want to have sex with these girls. Just love them, kiss them, make them happy.
>>34992941
Never thought of this. Great point

File: 1487546938820.jpg (99KB, 857x1202px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 857x1202px

what did he mean by this?
it make me think

>>34988444
>trauma that can define their emotional development for life.
You do realize that this is solely because of societies views on child rape, right? When a boy fucks his teacher everyone tells him he's cool as shit and he grows up just fine. I understand that people shouldn't be fucking children but if you really cared about children you'd stop making rape sound as if it's the absolute worst thing that can happen to someone and afterwards their life will never be the same. It's literally just an unwanted dicking.

>>34993632
>unwanted dicking

I disagree with you that this is "no big deal", but in the case of statutory rape, it need not even be unwanted. I know a girl who was hitting on older boys/grown men when she was a preteen, and she knew perfectly well what she was doing and what she wanted.

>tfw I didn't know her back then

>>34993511
>I don't even necessarily always want to have sex with these girls
>I don't even necessarily always
So sometimes? Really makes me think.

>>34992941
this

>>34993774
It will remain an issue until people treat it differently.

>>34989194
Did you read the article?

>Police say Fraser, who was 58, died after being stabbed by a passanger who had fallen asleep on the bus and didn't want to get off at the end of the route.

>>34989585
>Before the 1900s it was perfectly normal worldwide.
Having sex with PREPUBESCENT girls has NEVER been normal, stop lying to yourself.

>deserve to hung
ALREADY AM, WOOOOOO

>Humans reach sexual maturity at around 13
>Humans reach cognitive maturity at around 25
>Legal age of sexual content is 16-18
???
Where is the logic behind this?
Why isn't the age of consent one of the numbers that have actual scientific backing instead of some random bullshit number?

Pedophilia does not equate child molestation or rape. There was no trauma in my life that lead me to be attracted to young girls, I was born this way and I think it's fucked up you would judge me even though I understand the law and would never harm anyone regardless of their age but you would be so quick to hang me from the nearest tree. Not all pedophiles are child molesters/rapists and not all child molesters/rapists are pedophiles. Of course I would never fulfill my sexual desires but that doesn't mean I'm a ticking time bomb of rape. What of a man with sexual desires of woman his own age, who can't get laid? Shouldn't he be held to the same scrutiny?

>>34994029
women used to hit puberty way later due to worse nutrition, though. and at the same time the age of consent was way lower. meaning there was most certainly some loli fucking happening

>>34987770
Pedophilia is the way of the future

>>34994114
obviously they averaged those first two numbers to arrive at the latter

this is the only era in human history when being attracted to 13 year olds is considered wrong. god i hate living in these foul modern times, filled with puritanical backwards idiots

>>34994250
You know full damn well that's not what they actually did and even so that's still not logical.

File: 1475113320679.png (191KB, 477x768px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 477x768px

Jimmy rustlers will rustle jimmies, shame on you people for posting on this shit thread

>>34994132
I respect that. Here's a stream that might interest you, where some normies tried to reason with a pedophile that justifies child rape:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKdaFnru0Ko

>>34994288
just a joke senpai, but i couldn't help but notice that it was pretty close to being an average of the two

>>34987770
Pedo upraising when?