Who is more of a robot, someone who can get laid but turns down

>>34982546
>implying any true robot would go full normie once he has a gf
>implying they wouldn't hold onto dear life to his gf
>implying they wouldn't kill themselves immediately if they broke up

Oh Sam, my dear Sam.

Turning girls down implies girls being attracted to said "robot", while being disfigured or at least unattractive is a base robot trait. I think that true robots are the ones that repel women the same way they repel deodorant.

being a robot is now something people strive to be and compete over eachother for who is more of a robot

>>34982546
Being a robot isn't a choice.

Robots dont hate women because they are worth hating, they hate them because women hate them.

I think the real question is:

Schizoid Personality Disorder
vs
Avoidant Personality Disorder

Who is more of a robot?

people don't like you if you have integrity and stay consistent, it means they have to abide by your standard in a way and they will have no part of that.

that's 90% why my friendships don't last. people notice that i actually am a good person, so it makes them realize that they are shit people.

but you can't say stuff like this because it makes you look arrogant and self-righteous.

False dichotomy. There are four categories

1. Those who can and attempt to get laid (chad / normies)
2. Those who can and do not attempt get laid (smug pepe?)
3. Those who attempt to get laid but cannot (wojak?)
4. Those who cannot and do not attempt to get laid. (gondola)

I can have sex with fat sluts but it makes me unhappy.

>>34982570
Being unattractive isn't a base robot trait. Robot is entirely mental state, which is why people like Elliot exist and why fat ugly people can get laid