>tfw I cant make my thrads interesting enough to illicit abstract contribution
>havent learned/lack the will to spew clickbait and diminish nature of thread
>just not smart enough
>>34968176
shhhhhh have a (you), but don't spend it all at once mister
>>34968265
OP does mot get you.
>>34968275
No, I don't get you
>>34968176
>havent learned/lack the will to spew clickbait and diminish nature of thread
I disagree, anon. This thread is pure "I DON'T GET REPLIES TO MY POSTS/THREADS, FEEL BAD FOR ME ROBOTS! I BET THIS ONE WON'T GET ANY REPLIES, EITHER!"
I'd say you've learned quite well, honestly. You went with the pity, beggar method.
>>34968444
>the pity, beggar method
I cheked. I did not aware.
All I wanted to do was make an autismo nonsense thred that toyed with the idea of making contact with some extradimensional/alien entity that was technically female by our sciences but sustained itsself on brainwaves and emotion.
It agrees to be yor "gf" but only because yor thoughts taste how this picture looks
I realized it didnt carry enough substance to have any merit on this r9k today