Why are women such pieces of shit? As soon as you meet them,

>>34879914

just jerk off and call it a night

yeah

how many women care about a man having a job?
how many men care about a woman having a job?

i hate women
there is no love only suffering

File: alexjones-gun.jpg (50KB, 474x354px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 474x354px

>>34880935
women can have little to giant tits, big to small ass, they can be any height, even if they were fat even some men would still like thick women and they can use makeup to cheat on their appearance

men need a 6 to 8 inch penis, to be between 6'0 and 6'5, 100 lbs of muscle, a nice personality, lots of money, lots of friends and a nice car

its unfair that men are seen as the insensitive assholes and women as flawless, innocent cupids

women have it so easy and they treat us like garbage

>>34879914
Pretend all day every day, women are throwing themselves at you. So much that you don't even know if you can trust your female friends. Would you just take whatever slob walked in front of you or would you start filtering through them to find the best one possible?

I have a serious question to any women who might be on here reading this. When some guy who contacts you or talks to you isn't up to your standards and you find some weak excuse to blow him off, block him on whatever social media, or just ghost him with no reason given: do you feel guilty?

Like, do you actually feel bad that there is another human being on the other end of this who has to experience this, or does that not even enter your mind?

>>34881272
I'd pick the one I like the most, not the one who makes the most money or the one with the bigger social influence.

File: sad-panda.jpg (244KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1280x800px

>>34881272
i would take the one who understands my feelings, sadly women have no feelings for anyone but themselves
ive never dated a woman because of her looks
she still broke my heart and it hurts even more
theyre all the same


they only reflect their narcissism on you, that is the love you see from them.

>>34881416
Oh please. You'd pick the sexiest one with biggest tits and perfect feet. Maybe the one who dressed like anime. I don't know what you're into but you would definitely go for whoever turned you on the most.

>>34881312
So you think that women actually like you the most but go for alphas because they just want social influece?

>>34881461
Not that guy, but the only woman I've dated was well below my league in terms of looks, had small tits (she was insecure about them), but I loved her all the same because of who she was.

She left me after more than 2 years together because she didn't want to put effort into the relationship.

Personally I care relatively little for looks, I've realized from rate threads on here and /soc/ that I have really low standards. As long as a woman is easy to talk to and is probably like a 3 or 4 or above, I'll give her a chance. Period.

>>34881474
i never said that. if i was inferring anything, it was the fact that i believe women are attracted to money and social influence.

>>34879914
>Why do they only care about the material wealth and not the things that matter?

What matters is both being a good person AND the ability to support yourself and a potential family.

>>34881273
>do you feel guilty?
>Like, do you actually feel bad that there is another human being on the other end of this who has to experience this

You don't honestly believe anyone should care about the fee fees of some random thirsty omega, do you? The belief someone owes you attention is utterly pathetic.

Fuck, I hate failed normie threads.

>>34881461
i dont even like sex that much
i dont give a fuck about looks

>>34881547
>You don't honestly believe anyone should care about the fee fees of some random thirsty omega, do you?
So you believe that someone who you arbitrarily deem a "thirsty omega" is not even a human being worthy of empathy and a basic level of respect and decency?

>>34881612
>So you believe that someone who you arbitrarily deem a "thirsty omega" is not even a human being worthy of empathy and a basic level of respect and decency?

Not giving any impression other than fuck off, not interested, don't contact me ever again is affording you the respect you deserve. There's no mixed messages, no confusion, you know exactly where you stand and can move the thirst elsewhere.

A lack of empathy is when they give you the faintest hint of hope. You sound like you're desperate to be an orbiter.

>>34881654
not that anon, but do you have a vagina?

>>34881654
>Not giving any impression other than fuck off, not interested, don't contact me ever again is affording you the respect you deserve.
So in other words the answer to my question is yes. You do not believe that anyone who is not up to your standards is worthy of basic human decency.

Good to know.

>>34881705

>failed normie 100% confirmed.

>>34881712

No, you abject sperg, I'm saying you cannot expect anything from people who objectively owe you nothing. Do you actually read, or do you prefer to reframe the words so they fit your narrative?

Human decency doesn't cover your pwecious failed orbiter fee fees getting and owie, numale.

>>34881712
(s)he just answered your question, unwittingly.

maekt thins

File: 1484213427657.jpg (94KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 700x700px

>>34881768
I was about to try reasoning with you, but I know it's going to fail on deaf ears as the case was already layed out before, so I'm just going to post this instead.

>>34881807

>gets absolutely btfo
>le u r le girl
>le my fee fees
>le my human decency

This failed normie shit is embarrassing. Just admit you don't have an argument and move on with your life having learned something to make you a better person.

>>34879914
>Why do they only care about the material wealth and not the things that matter?
some do. you just have to know what kind of person they are.

File: 1461296095293.jpg (2MB, 3552x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3552x2000px

>>34881864
I wasn't the one talking to you.

I didn't read the rest of your post.

What have you to offer or what qualities are they supposed to like in you? I don't like their obsession with status and social but I understand why they like good look and money.

>>34881272
I'd fuck as many as humanly possible, and set up the rest with friends of mine. Physical attractiveness wouldn't be an issue, but clinginess, disease and sexual openness/endurance/experience would be.

Sluttiness is only considered a negative quality when they reject large amounts of men.

You have to consider the fact that:

A. women have more difficulty orgasming than men, and
B. women are less likely to look for sex (particularly from regular frumpy people) than men

>>34882116
Yes they should do an effort and let us have some sex.

>>34882157
people forget that most sex happens with the lights off

>>34881932

>It just so happens I'm going to join the conversation to tell you you're wrong without actually telling you why you're wrong.

Come on, this is entry level and you should be ashamed.

File: 1464295090979.jpg (219KB, 1242x950px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1242x950px

>>34882190
Have some modesty. You're not some psychic that can differentiate between anonymous posters.

File: IMG_0074.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>34879914
>>34881228
First of all this is simply not true and a complete generalizing bs statement.
>5'10
>no muscle skelly
>5in dick
>4/10 half asian with shitty skin issues
>barely middle class - earn bottom percentile for my age
>old car with no power anything and rust everywhere
And have dated a handful of women with long term relationships. Stop hanging out with shitty women.

Second you are comparing men and women and ignoring the fact that because of male thirst they can and have to be more choosey when it comes to a partner.

Imagine nearly every single woman wants to be with you and asked you out whenever you are in public - that's what 5/10+ women have to deal with daily so of course they have the luxury of sizing men up as would you or anyone in their situation. Do you simply want her to fuck every man that asks? No seriously I want to know how you think a woman who gets asked out by 50 dudes a month should handle that.

Her blowing you off and not leading you on is the best thing for a thirsty dude like you.

>>34882186
What baffle me is that many feminist or progressive women fight against slut shaming with slutwalk and then act as if sex was so special and throw a tantrum if you complain that you don't have sex and call you entitled. Many are also against porn or sex work because something something. If sex is nothing special why is it so bad to have sex for money or with a friend who has some physical flaw. But of course sex is special that's why sluts are sluts.

>>34882350
Anybody can be in an LTR with tard girls.

>>34879914
Seriously, what is with you Americucks and thinkign having a car is so important to get girls?

>>34882577
For the vast majority of the US, if you don't have a car, it means you can't go anywhere because nothing is in walking distance.

Unless you live in a big city, you need a car to do anything.

>>34882540
Op and r9k in general say all girls

>>34882620
This is very true but girls give no fucks about the type of car as long as it's not abnormally shitty.

>>34882620
Its called a bus homo. I havent had a car for nearly a decade and still get laid. Unless she's materialistic, she wont care.

>>34879914
Lol. OP, do you have any source to your claims? What, did one girl reject you? Now you fucking shit on an entire sex. If anything, the only universal slight on women is they tend to be behind the curve on internet culture.

>>34879914

Kill all the sluts Anakin.

>>34879914

If OP is still in the thread I have a theory

Females have never been gatherers or do-ers. They never had to actually obtain food, shelter, clothing for themselves as its always been provided for them. This dates all the way back to the start of societies. females are more social creatures than males on average and like to have things and be with people that will make them appear as better in some way. Even in current times with "muh feminism" everywhere, the majority of women do not provide for themselves. It's going to be very hard to reverse possibly thousands of years of conditioning that trained women to be provided for and have them start being the providers.

>>34882906
>Unless she's materialistic, she wont care.

Every girl is.

If you're a NEET with no money living at your mom's house, it doesn't matter if you're a 10/10, no girl will initiate a long-term relationship with you.

>>34883048
That doesn't make someone materialistic. If you are a neet you are fucked up in plenty of ways. I wouldn't date a neet girl.
Only extremely thirsty guys would btw. They are the ones ruining it for everyone by giving women even more power over the relationship situation than they already have.

File: 1485240422156.gif (289KB, 447x415px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 447x415px

>>34882923
Don't you have some normal place to be to do normie things, normie?

>>34883048
"Every girl is"

Nigger, I have dad bod but I'm 6"2 and funny so act aloof. If a girl cares abotu money, fuck her. There's either hipster chicks or girls as poor as you who would make waifus as long as you have SOME plan to better yourself.

Women dont NEED money, they want someone with at least SOME ambition. All these faggots who say they want a QT virgin waifu to basically watch them play videogames are lonely for a reason.

>>34883121
> I wouldn't date a neet girl.

Well there's tons of guys who would, in fact MOST guys would prefer it.

The more career-oriented a woman is, i.e. the more money she makes, the LESS her value in the sexual marketplace is.

Only extremely thirsty guys would want a housewife? Are you a fucking retard?

>>34879914
because that is how nature made them. women become handicap during pregnancy and children are expensive so they need a man who can take care of them. nature made women gold diggers.

>>34883169
>Has extremely fragile argument questioned once
>Well...you-you-you're a normie

>>34882577
because that is how American women are they are not going to date you unless you have a car.

>>34883190
>Nigger, I have dad bod but I'm 6"2 and funny so act aloof.

Not caring about your looks doesn't mean they aren't materialistic.

>If a girl cares abotu money, fuck her.

Every single girl on Earth cares about money. If you actually practiced what you preach, you would never be in a relationship with ANY girl, or you're just so blind and stupid you can't see that your girlfriend/wife wouldn't be with you if you weren't producing money, or working towards it.

>he just needs ambition

That's a euphemism for "he just needs money or to be working towards it".

File: 1486019807404.jpg (57KB, 840x544px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 840x544px

>>34883190
>There's either hipster chicks or girls as poor as you who would make waifus as long as you have SOME plan to better yourself
You see, here is where you refute your own point, Norman. Women are greedy materialistic whores and this proves it because nothing is never enough for them. It's not enough for a woman to just live, oh no, her man needs to be constantly earning more and more to satisfy her materialistic desires.

Because they need financial stability. They don't want to marry a loser.

>>34883242
>That's a euphemism for "he just needs money or to be working towards it".

No, faggot, it means you have some sense of where you want to go in life. Is money involved in being succesful? Yes. Is it the litmus test for someone wantign to be with you? No.

Take 2 twins. Both are 5/10. One is a NEET who stays at home, or MAYBE has a min wage job working at 7/11 and is comfy doing that and going home and smoking weed all day and NEVER changing.

Take the other twin, who works that same job at 7/11 but wants to be an artist or musician. He might not make money off it but at least he has goals beyond vidya and smoking weed. The other twin is INFINITELY more attractive,

They are obsessed with social aproval and status. It's not the money but the status that come with it.

ITT: autistic sperglord neckbeard NEETs who try to convince themselves they are superior to normies and Chads and women are too stupid to realize that.

File: 1486639521996.jpg (39KB, 640x818px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 640x818px

>>34883303
Except that women themselves usually don't have any ambition and just use other men to fill that. It's okay if she's a stay at home wino mom, god forbid she actually go out and make her own money or have her own ambitions, because that's what a man is for, after all. Women are literal parasites leeching off of the success of men.

>>34883244
See: >>34883303
FUCKING OREGANO COMMANENTO

>>34883303
You're just proving my point.

Your entire post was just a long way to say: "You need to have money, or to be working towards making money, or no girl will be with you".

>>34879914


>>34882979
>>34883211
Both are absolutely true. Feminist narratives are a lie for sure and women at the end of the day are biologically programmed to be this way. Women want security and stability. It is literally in their DNA.

Why this is so difficult to come to terms with today is because we live in a gynocentric society that lies to itself that women are independent beings and not materialistic and shallow but instead enlightened and generally nice.

I would actually almost say that if you meet a woman who cares about those things it is a good thing because it means she is looking to settle down and/or start a family. The reason this seems wrong is because we have all been raised in a society that told us women were not this way but can do nothing to stop women from naturally being this way.

File: 1464521753967.jpg (69KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 400x400px

>>34879914

Grow up man. Realize being with women isn't for you and move on. They aren't worth torturing yourself over. There is plenty of porn to keep away the loneliness.

>>34881533
sounds like you're a romantic rather than a realist then

>>34879914
This is odd because I don't have this kind of relationship with my mother.

>>34883400
It doesnt have to be a LOT of money. It means being able to afford a 1 bedroom apartment and not living at home at 25 like some drooling retard. Is this bare minimum THAT hard to achieve for you?

>>34883340
>Women are literal parasites leeching off of the success of men.

Yes. And because of this reality that has away been true that is why patriarchal societies make sense and were formed all over the world. Women naturally play the part of the caregiver and dependent (because they are biologically programmed to do so) and use the material wealth of the man and men, being the independent beings, are ultimately in charge of society as a consequence.

Society is fucked up today because the dependents have take control but refuse to play the part of the independents. They want to have their cake and eat it too.

>>34883470
I don't get that saying... If you have a cake, should you get to eat it?

>>34883470

>Patriarchy

Patriarchy is basically just a myth that SOME MEN, those with power, use to control men without power on behalf of women. 'Patriarchy' was literally never a thing. The average man everywhere on earth anywhere in time lacks and has lacked power compared to women.

Notice how in 'our' times women use "Patriarchy" as an excuse to do literally anything to even the most powerless men? Women love to point at male superiority and male agency to manipulate men into doing things for them.

>>34883405
Finally a person who accepts reality for what it is. Also for all the poor guys with girlfreinds let me tell you this. Your girlfreind is going to leave you if you dont get your shit together. She is only dating you because she sees potential in you but if you dont show results after she gets serious in the relationshit she is going to leave you.

File: 1485543421633.jpg (26KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 251x242px

>>34881864
>is a normie/roastie on r9k
>complains about people on r9k
>gets absolutely btfo
>"FAILEDNORMIEFAILEDNORMIE"
>actually thinks the anon who rekt him is the one who got btfo

>>34879914
>They're like big children, I hate them
It's pretty much like they're man children who get to live on easy mode because their women. That's why I hate them too.

>>34883684
>LE WIMIN CAN BE REBETS 2

File: Anakinchoke.png (933KB, 1670x816px) Image search: [Google]

933KB, 1670x816px

>>34879914
But not just the men, but the women too, they're like animals, and killed them, every single last one of them, I hate them!

>>34879914

Lol. Because you're domesticated and willingly play their game.

Don't hate the players.

>>34882923
A shit load of scientific evidence on female hypermany from dna evidence to data charts from online dating that show 80 percent of womenonly want the top 20 percent of males. You just have to look around and use your brain.

>>34883190
That is still a gold digger you retard. Women like ambious guys because they are going places which leads to making money. Women are clever at hiding the fact that they are gold diggers who just want your money. You just have to stop and listen to her to realize she wants your money.

>>34879914
>>34880935
>>34880960
>>34881228
>>34883211
>>34883308
Supply Vs. Demand
it's simple more cock then pussy exists
Not every cock is gonna find a pussy
But every Pussy is gonna find a cock

>>34881273
What other options do women have? Would you prefer they tell you the truth?

"Oh hey no offense but you're fat/ honestly kind of ugly. I have no interest in helping someone get out of the senseless emotional pit they have decided to dig for themselves because 1. It's a lot of work and 2. You're honestly not worth it.

I mean, let's be honest, would you want to build a future with someone who is so insecure they believe that emotional connections are not special unless they happen only once? Would you want to be with a person that seriously believes that, because they're desperate and have no standards, the opposite gender isn't allowed to have certain standards as well?"

That's kind of harsh to say and read. It's easier on you if they just ghosted you, because upon reading this most men have their ego bruised (which is a reasonable reaction) and they either become even more depressed or act as if you had no grounds to be honest with them and get mad that you're explaining exactly why they are so unattractive to you.

I don't want to be bruising egos or hurting feelings. And if I try to be nice, most men get either vindictive or persistent. So ghosting is usually the best way to get the message across.

>>34883944
Do you not want someone that is going places? Like, realistically, would you not prefer a woman who is emotionally and financially stable?

If you prioritize a woman who will meet your emotional needs vs. financial, you're still looking for someone to leech off of. The only difference is that it wouldn't involve draining money, so much as hours and hours of time and energy that could be spent somewhere more productive. Men aren't gold diggers, they're time wasters usually, which tend to be just as bad.

>>34884041
But isn't that statically untrue?

I think the general demographic divide on the sexes is usually around 48-49% men and 51-52% women... at least in the U.S. I'm pretty sure that is true.

God this thread is proof betas need to either shape up or die.
look. Not all women are like this, my girlfriend makes 8K more than me a year and my cock is only 6.5 inches. No one won the lottery here. But we keep bills paid and both cook well and life is happy we basically just have each other.
So what I'm saying is keep lookin I was 26 when I met Kate who knows. Just don't give up fag
And never listen to lifelong bots slash neets. They are literal human refuse who ruined r9k

>>34884120

Not him but you're ignoring the way demographics are weighted across age groups. Men die earlier (because of women mostly), so in general there are fewer men than women, but when it counts - in the younger age groups, men outnumber women, enough that it makes a huge impact - and that's BEFORE hypergamy even comes into things.

>>34884139

>just man up bro!
>just be yourself!

File: 1485966981-20170201.png (327KB, 684x992px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 684x992px

>>34879914
OP in a nutshell


italian seasoning

>>34884139

>Hi I have measured my penis and my girlfriend earns more than me
>I will now proceed to designate myself "Alpha" and you guys "Beta"
>Did I mention I met my girlfriend at 26 long after her prime?
>Betas!

>>34884169
Weew, good thing he literally spelt out his point, otherwise his retarded audience would't have got it.
Western webcomics are trash.

>>34879914
This is why you lie and tell people you're dirt poor. Not just girls, but people in general. Even regular people size up your money.