>tfw even /pol/ managed to have a succesful party with qt

Dibs on smug glasses

>>34811831
lmao why are they all asian?

File: 1479459991540.png (64KB, 658x901px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 658x901px

>tfw they all look more attractive/well adjusted then I do

File: 1460096150874.jpg (41KB, 429x377px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 429x377px

>>34811831
>qts
I can't see any

why did they meet in public?

>>34811831
they are all darkies

>>34811831
I counted literally 4 white people in that picture and one of them has blue hair.

Is this seriously a representation of the "we are the Aryan master race and anti-degeneracy board?"

File: 1486782040311.jpg (39KB, 249x235px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 249x235px

>normie attention whores

Boy, I bet they're the ones who are actually upset about the the direction our country is going in and want to do something about it.

>>34811924
we've been saying it's just satire and trolling for years and no one takes that to heart.

File: proof pol consists of cute japanese girls.jpg (338KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 2048x1536px

>>34811924
i though /pol/ was just cute asian girls

>>34811863
Theres only like 2 asians a handful of white latinos and the rest are "white"

>>34811831
Why are they all so attractive?

File: 1417921013467.png (364KB, 564x1086px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 564x1086px

>>34811971
And why are they all so normie? what the fuck is this shit?

The HWNDU threads were Reddit-teir from day one. Most of these people probably aren't even conservatives, just kids who live in NYC and wanted attention on 4chan. Now that the cam is shut down, that's one less thread in the catalog to hide.

File: bogdanon.png (558KB, 520x707px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 520x707px

>>34811991
/pol/ turns betas into alphas.

>>34811971
Especially that guy near the girl doing the jew pose.

Fucker looks like Daniel Gillies.

>>34811991
Normies don't put on naruto headbands, not even ironically.

>>34812016
Yes, I noticed hm too. He could play the male love interest in a hollywood movie.

>these are the losers i bait regularly with my blacked posts

lmfao

white people deserve to be replaced.

>>34812014
most jewish /pol/ster ever

>>34811971
>>34811831
is this what attractive is in america? haaah

File: 1485691327654.jpg (929KB, 2452x2839px) Image search: [Google]

929KB, 2452x2839px

>>34811924
>/pol/
>white

jej

>>34812014
Is that the greatest American hero?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb9fjjGUmu8

>>34812014
I've been on /pol/ since 2012 though and I'm still not normal.
>>34812025
but you see how they can talk to each other? And make jokes, shake hands, etc?
That's pretty normie to me.

>>34811831
>Females at a pol party

I'm surprised they weren't gangraped. Most people on pol that I've encountered think that women are property. So answer me this, how in the FUCK do they get gf's and I don't?

>>34811971
They're not. Most of them are completely bland, if not ugly.

The only ones who are above average or better are the guy next to the merchant girl, the guy to the left of the RIOT guy, the RIOT guy, and the guy on the right with the American flag on his jacket.

4 attractive people out of a group of 20 is hardly anything.

>>34811924
I don't know how this happened
But since when is /pol/ and white supremacy synonymous?

also /pol/ is the most down syndrome board on this site

File: Keking.jpg (25KB, 161x222px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 161x222px

>>34812128
Because they think women are property.
kek

>>34812128
Confidence. Confidence in believing even the most stupidiest of shit.

File: 1481329985619.jpg (133KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1080x720px

>>34812128
Women are attracted to alphas

>>34811924
You realize that white nationalism doesn't require the extermination of all other races, right?

Muhammad Ali spoke to the KKK on more than one occasion, and they really liked his message.

File: 1409626088302.jpg (327KB, 892x894px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 892x894px

>>34812128
Yeah. I can see why you would think that.

>>34812135
That actually follows a bell curve pretty closely.

>>34812181
It pisses me off
How men are held to this standard of being physically and socially alpha
while beta females who dress up as anime waifus on 4chan can still pull alphas and beta-orbiters

I wish I had pol friends but I live in a shit city and I am fucking black. no bullshit

>>34812181
>Women are attracted to alphas

Yeah, but not the ones who are mentally ill and have a 90% chance of having mommy issues (hence the reason of them hating women) or are just really faggots who have an inferiority complex.

>>34812156
Elaboration needed

>>34812159
I still don't see how a women is going to like a guy knowing that he thinks they should be property, unless they have severe mental issues.

>>34812225
Men look for youth, loyalty, and beauty in their partners. Intelligence is a perk, but not a requirement, so long as the other 3 qualifications are met. Women look for different things, because they want their partner to fulfill a different role.

>>34812214
That doesn't explain why they like men who have mental problems though. . .

>>34811831

how did a group of strangers choose the Riot shirt guy to be the leader of the group?

>>34812193
>You realize that white nationalism doesn't require the extermination of all other races, right?
Never said it does.

But white supremacy does advocate that whites are superior to other races (hence the name). Usually people of non-white races think (or at least like to express) that.

Able to follow that concept, brainlet?

>>34812271
You assume everyone on /pol/ has mental problems. You need to substantiate that claim.

>>34812193
Ali was a black separatist with the nation of Islam. They were working towards the same end as the kkk.

File: 453231.jpg (302KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1600x1066px

>>34811831
I always imagined an /r9k/ party would look something like this.

(minus the women of course)

>>34812292
I wasn't talking about white supremacy. I was talking about white nationalism. Two completely different things.

Most people on /pol/ don't give a shit what Africans are doing in Africa. They just want an ethnically homogeneous community. They aren't plotting to take over Japan or China, they just want to have their own country LIKE Japan or China.

>>34812241

>I still don't see how a women is going to like a guy knowing that he thinks they should be property, unless they have severe mental issues.

Well a person I talked to once said "she"s overheard women say shit like "women can't be in charge" etc, etc.

>>34812275
he's the most alpha /pol/ user in the area

he's also a professional wrestler
seriously

>>34812275

He Bane posted IRL on cam perfectly from memory.

>>34812330
Why are there no more r9k meetups in nyc reeeeeee I want to awkwardly sit somewhere staring at a fellow robot

File: 1486620799342.png (145KB, 1408x319px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1408x319px

>>34811924
You understand that /pol/ is deep 3/4 layer satire right? It is one of the most organically diverse groups on earth.

>>34812330
That looks like my family's Xmas parties

When did you realize /pol/ was a normie board and trump was a chad?

>>34812331
>I was talking about white nationalism.
Fair enough.

But again, most non-white people don't give a shit about white nationalism. So it's a bit surprising to see a group from a white nationalism board to have a white minority.

>>34811831
i'm embarrassed and i haven't even left my room.

please fucking spoiler next time

>>34812128
/pol/ is alphas. Go tell them you're from /r9k/ and see what happens

>>34811831
lol is the guy wearing the eye patch the same guy that said stop masturbating on that one stream

>>34812331
>have their own country like Japan and China
Except white. There's nothing morally wrong with being a nationalist who wants to focus on their own countries problems. It is morally wrong to assume non-white people's are that problem (that pesky "white" part of white nationalism).

>>34812275
Leaders don't really get chosen most of the time, they just "assume" it naturally. The Riot "Greeks are White" is by far the most Alpha there, looks, personality, strength, etc.

>>34812025
he still gets more girls than me

http://is.4chan.org/pol/1486884487551.gif

>>34812128
Women like guys with backbones. If you manage to say that women are property and you don't back down when they test you against it, they will like it.

>>34812442
You wanna suck his cock, huh?

>>34812406
the loudest are the ugliest

>>34812397
Well, to be fair, most people on the board are sympathetic to nationalism period. They just value ethnic homogeneity. India for Indians, Europe for whites, East Asia for East Asians. We can trade ideas and products, and even build off each other, without needing to actually mess with the ethnic homogeneity of a nation.

Ask any American on /pol/ if they would have a problem moving to Africa in exchange for letting all of Africa into the US, and you wouldn't find anyone that objects to it. All the infrastructure that we would leave behind would be built again within a generation, and we would be ethnically homogeneous with a bunch of natural resources to utilize, whether it is clay, diamonds, oil, etc.

They just want their own place. Nothing objectionable to that, which is why most women don't mind them, so long as they actually hear the argument being made.

>>34812487
personally I wouldn't mind it, but I'm a faggot. I assume most here are not faggots.

>>34812438
Mexico has in its national constitution a clause stating that it is illegal to mess with their demographics.

Japan is extremely selective about who they let into their nation. Whites looking for a place that is all their own is completely reasonable, considering pretty much every other ethnicity has that.

/pol/ is caught between two extremes at this moment:

>everyone on /pol/ is a white supremacist nazi racist!!!!
or
>everyone on /pol/ is an ethnic minority! hahahahahahaha!!!!

Either way, a more diverse /pol/ is a good thing. It's just a signifier of how broad the appeal of the right wing is right now. If anything screeching lefties should be happy with the progress they've made.

>>34811831
Where was this? Looks like some kind of university. Why can't gatherings like this happen in Arizona :(

>>34812554
American diversity is non negotiable. If you want to be an American nationalist, cool. But white nationalism is inherently racist when placed in the context of America, a place where diversity of population is heralded. You would have to go back and rewrite history in order for it to be feasibly non-racist.

>>34811831
How embarrassing...

I wouldn't be caught dead with these cringe-lords.

>>34812617
Astoria New York

>>34812654
Well then it's a good thing you're here Mr.Amazing

>>34812635
Nothing is non-negotiable. That's like saying slavery is non-negotiable due to the the slave culture that America had. It is entirely feasible to buy out the other ethnicities and pay for them to go to a different country.

I'm not in favor of it, but it isn't "non-negotiable." Other countries have kicked out whites and made it a law that whites can never own property again, without even paying them for it.

>>34812654
Whatya talking about the guy in the eyepatch doesn't seem like an insufferable self important twat at all m8

File: 1472160202673.jpg (370KB, 1280x1707px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 1280x1707px

AMERICA HAS NO RACIAL IDENTITY

"""""WHITE NATIONALISTS"""""" SHOULD GO BACK TO EUROPE

>>34812679
Buddy, it's one of the pillars of America. It's non negotiable. And I could care less what other countries do.

>>34812296
They think women should be property, at least from the ones I have met.

>>34812714
The Europe that is bending over backwards and taking it up the ass by Islam right now?

>>34812734
>One of the pillars of America
Right up there with only property-owning white males having the right to vote.

>>34812679
>O-Other countries did it why can't I?
Seriously, my dude? Seriously?

>>34812754
It's not a "Why can't I?" I'm not a white nationalist. But to say its non-negotiable, when it has been successfully done in other countries is a bold-faced lie.

File: 1387546172762.png (48KB, 540x442px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 540x442px

>>34812668
I'll always be with you F A M

File: programs.png (214KB, 476x368px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 476x368px

>>34811924
>tfw you realize /pol/ is actually the utopia leftist are aiming for

File: 1471623994693.jpg (39KB, 540x456px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 540x456px

Ha-ha haha I-I didn't wanna go anyway...

File: pol meetup hwndu all.png (1MB, 929x694px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 929x694px

>>34812797
every race and gender sieg heiling together.

>>34812679
using the phrase "non-negotiable" in terms of political science is incorrect. Proven Mathematical statements are non-negotiable. Experimentally verified physical phenomena are "non-negotiable" Nothing in Political "science" is non negotiable. I swear some political scientists are so far up their own ass, it's a miracle they publish anything that isn't a picture of their anal canal walls

>>34812751
Sure pal. If you want to try to put a whites only sign on America, you're very welcome to try. But I'm telling you now, it's non negotiable.

>>34812865
The South said slavery was non-negotiable. Time can change everything.

>>34812776
>"Successfully" done in other countries
Can I get list of those and the effects of them doing that?

>>34812877
I live in the deep South. I see interracial couples everyday. It's a myth that you can't legislate morality

>>34811831
This is not /pol/, I know that board is satire but this just looks too reddit and "normal". I could understand if they had a sperg stare off like on /fit/, but not this

>>34812877
But to make America non white you would have to displace millions of American citizens. So self respecting legislator would be down for denying the rights of us citizens. It's non negotiable. You would get laughed out of town.

>>34812936
look at the kek statue

File: zimbabwe.jpg (713KB, 3124x1068px) Image search: [Google]

713KB, 3124x1068px

>>34812850
Indeed. Take, for example, the idea of political violence. Right up to last election, you could have asked ANYONE if violence against your political enemies could be justified in the modern world, and everyone on the Left would have screamed "Absolutely NOT!"

Now they are "punching Nazis," despite the fact that almost none of them are racist, and if anyone is socialist, it's THEIR side (see: everyone who supported Bernie's campaign).

Time changes everything.

>>34812903
Sure. See pic related. Also: Israel.

>>34812954
You had to displace tons of business owners all over the world in order to end slavery. US went to war, but Great Britain simply purchased all the slaves in a country, and immediately freed them. One could purchase all the land from other races at fair market price, and pay for a plane ticket to wherever they wanted to go.

And before you say that isn't possible, keep in mind just how fucking large the British Empire was, and yet they STILL purchased each and every slave at market value.

File: 1486149399704.gif (491KB, 500x475px) Image search: [Google]

491KB, 500x475px

ITT: politics and philosophy are bullshit.

brb having an existential crisis.

>>34812996
>Sure. See pic related. Also: Israel.
>Zimbabwe
>Falls into economic ruin

>Israel
>Comparing a country of 8,000,000 where 75% are jewish to a country of 300,000,000.

This is as dumb as those facebook videos comparing the american prison system to the system on norway

>>34812996
>you had to displace tons of business owners all over the world in order to end slavery.
Freeing enslaved citizens is not comparable to exporting non whites.

>US went to war, but Great Britain simply purchased all the slaves in a country, and immediately freed them. One could purchase all the land from other races at fair market price, and pay for a plane ticket to wherever they wanted to go.
Then simply buy land and fuck off to snowball town. People have fought tooth and nail not only to get here but to make something of themselves. Fuck you for assuming they'd just bugger off to a separate country. You want the chance, you be the change.

White Flight 2017, get to getting.

>the British Empire
I don't care what the British empire did.

>>34813086
Yes, but they successfully got rid of all whites. The fact that the country was run poorly has nothing to do with the fact that he successfully got rid of all whites.

>>34813112
what did ole abe say? he didnt give a shit about slavery; he just wanted to perserve the union. America pulled an Afghanistan before it was cool
>invade country for the fuck of it
>later write books about how backwards the people you invaded were, and how awesome you were

I think it called revisionist history folks

>>34811831
>qts
Ha ha ha ha ha ha. There are two ugly chicks and oen of them is a literal Twitch whore.

>>34813112
>Freeing enslaved citizens is not comparable to exporting non whites.
>Taking what was considered rightful property is not the same as taking what is considered rightful property.
Ok.

>Then simply buy land and fuck off to snowball town.
Where could you buy land that would allow whites to live without some federal government forcing you to violate said policy?

>White Flight 2017, get to getting.
Not a white nationalist. But even playing Devil's Advocate, I'm mopping the floor with your arguments.

>I don't care what the British empire did.
>I don't care that the British Empire did exactly what I said was non-negotiable (upending property rights).

What you are saying is non-negotiable was not always a universally accepted idea, or even a majority-accepted idea. Again, only white male property owners could vote in the early days of the US. The US also used to be extremely isolationist. So that should tell you that just because you happen so sit on what is accepted right NOW does not mean it will always be accepted.

I'm not claiming that the US will ever become a white-only country, but I am arguing against your claim that it is a non-negotiable idea. In politics, NOTHING is non-negotiable.

>>34811924
Every board looks and acts about as opposite as the content they post. /r9k/ for example has a ton of normies.

>>34813157
Well, he WAS taxing the fuck out of the south to benefit his business friends in the north. He freed the slaves to have them rise against their masters, but then conscripted them into the Union military.

Once the war was over, Abe spent what remained of his life trying to evict them from the country.

>>34813117
Yeah sure, the same way Mao Zedong's killing of the sparrows had nothing to do with millions dying.

>>34813241
Are you saying that you don't believe that it is possible for blacks to run an overwhelmingly black society in the modern world, despite the facts that other ethnicities can (China, Japan, both Koreas, India, the entire Middle East)?

The dude successfully got rid of white people. It's not white people's fault that he did this, and it's not white people's fault that white people were the backbone of that country. They wanted us to leave, and we did. It was on him to ensure that the people who were left would pick up the slack.

>>34813184
>humans are property
Well, that's where you're wrong. The second those slaves were free, they were no longer property.

>where can I buy land
That's a white nationalist problem, innit? Us American citizens are just going to keep doing what we do. Enjoy snowball town.

>not a white nationalist
But you're representing white nationalism in this debate. And your mistaken if you think you're winning the debate. White nationalism isn't feasible in America because of the purposefully diverse population.

>in politics nothing is non negotiable
Sure, to some folks, but to others the idea is non negotiable. They won't hear your plan out, they will not negotiate, because the idea is ludicrously un-American.

If I thought Jimmy Carr was an alright dude and I wanted him to become president of the United States, how negotiable is that?

>>34813352
>Well, that's where you're wrong. The second those slaves were free, they were no longer property.
Those slaves were purchased as property, and then freed by the new owners of said property. The government was responsible for ending the valid ownership of slaves. Just like the government could, in theory, be responsible for the valid ownership of property by certain races.

>That's a white nationalist problem, innit? Us American citizens are just going to keep doing what we do. Enjoy snowball town.
By that logic, you haven't given a solution, so don't pretend that you have.

>But you're representing white nationalism in this debate. And your mistaken if you think you're winning the debate. White nationalism isn't feasible in America because of the purposefully diverse population
>Ending slavery isn't feasible in American because of their role in producing crops.
That's how you sound to me.

>Sure, to some folks, but to others the idea is non negotiable.
What you just did there is move goalposts. When you claimed "non-negotiable," you didn't add, "to some people," or, "at this time." You said "Non negotiable" period.

>If I thought Jimmy Carr was an alright dude and I wanted him to become president of the United States, how negotiable is that?
You would have a long road ahead of you, needing to change Constitutional Law. That said, it is entirely possible to do.

>>34813448
Yeah? Show me in the constitution where the government owning people as property is a thing that could happen.

You haven't given a solution either, boyo. Except buy em plane tickets, other countries have done x to whites, and freeing the slaves displaced. Business owners.

>that's how you sound to me
Well it's a shame your not attuned to modern American so you could understand how nonsensical you sound.

>non negotiable to some
To most, actually. Nobody will take white nationalism in America seriously because America is intentionally, proudly, diverse. It's a non possibility.

>it's entirely possible to do
Golly.

File: woman-using-binoculars-13252443.jpg (126KB, 1300x957px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1300x957px

>>34811831
>all females at the far back
>even the second girl (from left to right) which is the only face I recognize
Holy shit, /pol/ know their fucking shit.

>>34811944
Fucking this. The only reason why /pol/ is even a thing is because people think it's not satirical.

>>34813528
>Yeah? Show me in the constitution where the government owning people as property is a thing that could happen.
What is that an argument to? At the time, there was no law forbidding it, despite the fact that it was so prevalent that some of the people drafting the constitution had slaves.

>You haven't given a solution either, boyo. Except buy em plane tickets, other countries have done x to whites, and freeing the slaves displaced. Business owners.
That's more of a solution than you have given.

>To most, actually. Nobody will take white nationalism in America seriously because America is intentionally, proudly, diverse. It's a non possibility.
Whopee. You still moved goalposts. You are speaking only in the present tense, and even THEN, you admit that it IS negotiable to some. That's a FAR cry from "non negotiable," period.

And that right there is an admission to defeat.

>>34813575
How does slavery have anything to do with how modern American works? Or looks like? Or the attitude towards non white citizens? Your slavery argument is a red herring.

White nationalism isn't a problem I need a solution for. You still haven't convinced me it's even feasible enough to warrant as any real possibility in the context of modern America.

I no. I used weasel words and now my argument is invalid. Get real kid.

>>34813637
>How does slavery have anything to do with how modern American works? Or looks like? Or the attitude towards non white citizens? Your slavery argument is a red herring.

It is an example of a cultural norm that a big part of society was ok with being turned on its head all over the world. It's relevant.

>White nationalism isn't a problem I need a solution for.
Me neither, but you pretended that you offered a solution that wouldn't involve taking/purchasing property from others against their will, when, by your own admission, your solution was not feasible, whereas the taking/purchasing of property IS a feasible solution.

>You still haven't convinced me it's even feasible enough to warrant as any real possibility in the context of modern America.
I never claimed that it was feasible in the modern day. I just argued against it being completely non-negotiable for all time.

>I no. I used weasel words and now my argument is invalid. Get real kid.
Your argument was valid until you started making concessions all over the place. Now you are moving goal posts, and trying to change the argument into something that wasn't being discussed. I'm willing to walk down that road with you, I just wanted to point out that you are no longer talking about what we were discussing, and you never actually defeated my original point.

>>34813575
My original point was white nationalism is unrealistic because American diversity is non negotiable. If you want to draw a line in the sand over whether or not negotiating ineffectually with insane, out of touch Americans is in fact an honest negotiation, then I'm not going to stop you. But any American in power would be I'll advised to negotiate over what boils down to the soul of America. That's my point in its simplest form.

Whether or not you agree is really irrelevant to me. You obviously have a different view of what America is and what it's citizens would allow.

And that's cool, man. Later tater.

Whoopsie, this >>34813904 was meant for >>34813694
See ya around clownshoes.

>>34811831
I've never seen a sorrier handful of jews in my life

>>34811924

The real reason is that the actual WN and such would go to such an event. The people in that pic just browse /pol/ for fun and don't agree with most what's posted there.

>>34812359
this explanation picture you posted suggests that it's not satire despite what he's saying. although he's pretending not to be serious about the /pol /ideology he repeatedly trashes progressives and supports the idea that nazis were okay guys who got a bad rap. where is the satire then, since this is exactly what /pol/ says on a surface level too?

>>34812406
>tell them you're from /r9k/


>>>/pol/88888888/

We do not forget.

File: ed7.jpg (47KB, 596x628px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 596x628px

>>34811831
>that nazi march with heil hitler

And they call us degenerates

File: 1484794712315.jpg (30KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 480x480px

>>34812542
>I assume most here are not faggots
>/r9k/

>>34811924
>people in the current year take what is written on the internet at face value

I think the autism crisis has already happened and we don't realize how deep we are.

>>34811924
What are you talking about? /pol/ is a board of peace