Has anyone owned or used a Realdoll? I've been spending the last few weeks saving up for one and making final decisions on a configuration, but I want first hand testimonials before I officially take the plunge.
I already have a couple of Fleshlights (Jenna Haze and Alexis Texas from the FL Girls series) and I enjoy them but fucking a plastic canister leaves me wanting.
It's great for technical sex.
>>34785403
Technical? Elaborate.
I personally don't have one, but to me they seem to be too far in the uncanny valley. Sure, they're pretty close to what a woman would look like, but their hair will never quite look or feel like real human hair, their faces, always holding the same expression, would never truly look exactly like a real person. It'd be like making love to a mannequin. It would be more disturbing than hot.
>>34785367
>tfw KHHV
>tfw can never even have a sex doll because NEET with no NEETbux and live with parents
i was seriously thinking about getting on of the WM dolls models:
https://www.dollhouseofpleasure.com/blank-cczr/fb29799f-b2cf-3b02-627e-21d8a46a68e3
But then I went on doll forum to look at people's home pics of these things and without the professonal photos/lighting/clothing/angles they look less enticing.
Plus then you have to hide it and clean it, etc.
I also ordered a sample of the TPE they're made of and it wasn't that exciting once I felt it to have an entire giant doll made out of that crap to maintain.
Na.
I'm just going MGTOW.
>>34785367
I'm just gonna wait until they can get em past the uncanny valley stage. Maybe a combo of the real doll with VR would do the trick? Some kinda augmented reality porn.
>>34785855
Not good enough. You would see everything, but not actually feel it
>>34785969
You could feel it. I.E. you have the doll irl but put on the VR goggles so when you're fucking the doll irl it looks like you're fucking a real person through the VR goggles.
>>34785969
Real dolls are at least supposed to feel like the real thing. If they made some that actually moved along with what was happening in VR, it would be pretty damn good.
>>34785824
Wouldn't the Realdoll "skin" be better quality considering it's thousands more? Would the material be distracting if I put it in a bodystocking which I plan to do anyway if I get it?
>>34786017
that's actually a good idea. guaranteed would be too expensive for /broke/bots though.