Why do people here claim that dumb Chads propagating their genes is for the best and just survival of the fittest/natural selection when we no longer live in a world that prioritizes their skillsets?
>>34775861
The world doesn't but 190,000 years of built in human mating urges do
just world meme + contrarianism
>>34775861
>implying Chad is dumber than the average normie
Sure, there's the stereotypical drugdealing lowlife chad, but the usual 6'3 college educated Chad making 6 figures certainly isn't stupid
Because a lot of robots see intelligence as the only thing they have going for them they assume everyone who outperforms them at something else is automatically stupid
>>34775861
>>34776156
Exactly. Evolution is about adapting. There is nothing wrong with being physically strong and built for sure, but it's not the only thing that's good for adapting. Intelligence finds a way around physical strength too. But humans are still animals and still ruled by their subconcious and primitive instincts since they refuse to develop the self-awareness it takes to control these things.
So it becomes a rationalization of the "I think it looks good therefore I want to pretend it's automatically good" mindset of halo effect.
>"He just has better genes for better offspring TEHEHEHEHE... but he won't stick around to raise the offspring ooohhhh weeellllll teheheheheheh some other guy will!"
It's going to take a thousand years but eventually women will get a clue.
>>34776299
>but the usual 6'3 college educated Chad making 6 figures certainly isn't stupid
Actually he is. He gets by on his good looks so he never actually takes the time to develop his intelligence at all beyond whatever is required to fulfill the education systems bullshit standards.
>>34776333
I'd post a picture of a neckbeard but I'm too lazy
>>34776156
I never claimed that's not humans are wired to do, but people here seem to argue that it's the way it OUGHT to be as well.
But what >>34776302 is a pretty solid answer. I don't have a problem with the idea of strength in and of itself on paper, but when success has been directly tied to not just any strength, but natural strength, life becomes a game of who has the biggest cheat codes to bulldoze their way through life as that overpowered bullshit character. Natural IQ gives people a similar leg up for sure, but they still have to invent and achieve things -- with natural frame and height you can literally win just with your mere presence.
>le Chad Meme
>le boogeyman of /r9k/
>muh board
The amount of losers browsing this board is huge
we live in a world that prioritizes Jewish greed and double-dipping in everything.
even if the skillsets aren't what they used to be, people still want to double-dip for whatever stupid fucking ego reasons, to brag, to feel better about themselves, to dangle their superiority over people's heads, because what else is there in life.
>>34776642
Noticed I got a little off topic from the initial point of discussion so what I will say to add to the topic is that those "cheat codes" probably contribute to low effort and low achievement characteristics that are by far a major net negative to society. It's a trait that gets far too much favorable treatment without giving the necessary contribution to man's advancement in reciprocal.
>>34776685
>implying that not everyone here including you is a massive fucking loser
face it, r9k is the board for social defects and losers.
>>34776685
GIIIIDOUT OF MY BOARD YOU NORMIE SCUMMMMM REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>34775861
>implying all attractive, physically fit men are idiots
>>34776156
/thread, any other answer is bullshit
the way our brains are hardwired changes way, way, waaaay more slow than how our world is developing in the last 50 something years
>>34776333
And the average robot develops his intellect? Or the average normie?
Also we're talking about genes, not intellect. Ao long as he is tall, healthy and naturally smart that's all that's needed to make kids with good genes
Someone who maxes out his potential may outperform Chad, but still won't have the same quality of genes
>>34776685
You wouldn't complain if you weren't here since yesterday.
>>34776192
This. STEM autists are more beneficial to the functioning of an advanced technological society than the now obsolete instincts of Chads.