Real talk. Are there any fembots here that are in a good enough

>>34673973
DO NOT GET THIS MEME

this is next lvl bogposting

>>34673973
>I want a girl that is into being a sub, has that nerdy girl look, and is not damage goods.

News for you bro: the nerdy looking girls that are into bdsm are the most damaged ones

>>34674646
how are they damaged? submissive means damaged? lol you are on one

>>34673973

>Are there any fembots here that are in a good enough mental state for a relationship?

What site do you think are you on? Check your address bar.

>>34674646
pornstars must be pure saints

lmao you're fucking dumb

>>34674646
This.

The reason they're into being a sub is exactly BEAUSE they're damaged.

Their self-esteem and self-respect has reached critical levels to the point where they feel they deserve, and even get off, on the fact that someone's violating them.

>>34674701
you can have high levels of self esteem and confidence and be submissive. i know you only get washed up used whores, but there's a whole world you don't know of.

submission isn't always equated to damage. some girls are simply nice, are you saying all nurses and nuns are damaged? little girls? kind people?

fuck off retard.

if the sub is the one that chooses who gets to be dominant and allots that power to someone else, isn't the sub the one in control?

don't be an ignorant cunt. submission has nothing to do with having low self esteem or being damaged. get your distorted thinking together.

>>34674737
I think we're using the word "sub" differently here, anon.

What you're describing is a caretaker. Not a submissive person.

I'm talking about the kind of person who wants you to call her a slut as you choke her into climax.

maybe they have enough self esteem not to go with a beta bitch ;)

>>34674737
All of this I'm a confident and in-control person in my daily life, that's why I'm a sub. I want someone to take that control away from me so all I have to think about is being a cock sucking whore.

>>34674765
a sub is submissive. some people are submissive by nature, who would also make perfect subs.

not because they are damaged, but because they are submissive by nature. if you're not submissive as a person, why would you be a "sub"? the fuck? lol. the kind of person you're talking about can still be a nun or a nice/submissive person and still be a sub, and nOT be damaged or fucked in any way whatsoever. god your mom is retarded.

I'm subby, nerdy, and thin but I'm completely mentally fucked up..
The sole reason I ever came to 4chan was that I was too fucked up to post any place else.

>>34674778
i heard some people have that, where they 'relinquish control' and that's fine

another thing is, maybe someone is so alpha / so confident & liked and have people falling at their feet, that they need someone who will just take them and lead them because that sets him apart from every other guy. whereas to everyone else she's irresistible, he finds her irresistible but he's not afraid to make her his. as in he's not intimidated by her, but the other way around. then she knows she's no match for him because of his dominant nature, and he is more powerful than her.

if i was a girl i would not want someone weaker than me as a husband or even a boyfriend. dominance is sexy, perfect, lovable, respectable, honorable.

and i enjoy obeying my husband <333333 :) i love him like a king/god <333 and me his baby angel princess <3

>>34674809
>I'm subby, nerdy, and thin but I'm completely mentally fucked up..
Can you be my gf and we'll be fucked up together? Thanks

>>34674809
Explain how. And what caused it?

OP here.

>>34674820
i want someone to do something no one else will do.

ex: rape, choke, dominate, etc..

tie me up (only if i misbehave / punishment) or for whatever reason -

this doesn't mean i'm a whore or that i like it. maybe i do but maybe i also struggle/resist?

either way, the power dynamic is sexy. like a lion and a hare <3

if anything a girl who is sub is more faithful

>>34674809
Be my gf. A fucked up gf to a not-fucked up bf.

>>34674809
>Haha, le edgy maymays on Reddit!
>Huh, what's this ... Fu- Fourchin?
>lol even more memes xDDDDD
>lol so randum and mentally ill, haha I conflate my meme autism and perceived social ineptness with real autists and demented people! :DDDDDD

Shout out to all the lonrly Fembots out there xoxoxoxx love youuuu

Saying being a sub is way to general. I'm a sub but I do not like degredation and humiliation. I want a master who wants to improve me abd better me as a person and as a sub.

I'm not perfect but I'm not damaged goods either. I have overcome and I'm here now.

>>34674902

Really depends on what you mean by sub.

If you mean she generally wants to place her man above herself, then maybe.

If you mean "sub" as in she just likes being whipped, choked, tied up, punished, told what to do? Then no, theres no reason to expect more loyalty from a person just based on their kinks.

File: 20170206_171707.jpg (323KB, 784x861px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 784x861px

>>34673973
Pick me. Robotobekindthisisoriginal

>>34676137
I never understood this, you're not even restraining their limbs, they are literally unimpreded. Whats the point? At least bind their wrist or something