what is the purpose of having a big dick when it cant even fit

Stop thinking about dicks anon

It is a sign of virility and excites the female mind. Practicalities do not enter into the equation.

Because its a normie meme

>>34659829
This.
>>34659772
Source?

>>34659772
Source? Pls boss. Am in need of God sauce maturial

>>34660016
>>34660071
>not recognizing the back tattoo and dick

>>34660016
>>34660071
>not knowing that girl and that dick
amateurs both of you.
Riley Reid + Shane Diesel.

>>34660102
I'm saddened by the fact that I instantly know as well.

I'm happy to report from the other side of the virgin wall that the two gfs I've had seem to legitimately think dicks above a standard deviation are painful and not enjoyable. If a girl enjoys this kind of porn, you know she's absolutely demented. This is literally imagery of women being sexually abused. I'm trying to ween myself off of it.

nice subtle bbc cuckposting

>>34660171
What are you talking about? It's common knowledge that women only want foot long dicks.

>>34659772

if there's anything i've learned from porn, it's that women can take any size of dick
i'd bet that she takes the entire thing, or at least 90% of it, at some point in that video

>>34660345
Common knowledge to whom? Statistically, the evidence doesn't bare that out. Maybe you'd be best to watch less porn.

>>34660621

He's exaggerating, the general female preference is more like 8-9 inches.

>>34660171
...or she just has a large vagina. trust me, some do.

>>34660651
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3220940/The-perfect-penis-SMALLER-think-Women-prefer-slightly-average-appendages-bothered-size-long-term-relationship.html

My girlfriend said her first boyfriend had an eight incher and her second boyfriend, who had a five incher, was the moment she realised sex actually feels good.

>>34660651
Nope.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0133079

>>34660721
Some, but there are limits. My step-sister prefers eight inches, but obviously these things happen. I also knew a girl that thought six was far too painful and preferred four or five.

>>34660651
It's more like 6 or 7 inches long and 5 inch girth that make most women feel "full".

>>34660743
>>34660765

>implying women are ever honest about anything, especially their sexual preferences
Also, this seems like pseudo-science to me. It means nothing if they're not actually being fucked by these objects while arousal is being measured somehow.

>>34660892
>Anything that goes against what I believe is lies

Sure thing bro.

>>34660892
This post just screams "I have a small dick".

>>34660989

No, it's pseudo science because it's assuming that selection of a 3D printed model is a reflection of what size actually feels best for sex and that there aren't any biases or dishonesty involved in their selection.
The only useful dick size preference study would involve somehow comparing arousal response when women are having sex with guys that have small or average dicks vs large dicks. Or even just small to average sized dildos vs large dildos. Anything else is meaningless data.

>>34661153
>Anything else is meaningless data.
>It's meaningless to ask women what size they prefer

How can someone type that and not think it sounds retarded?

>>34661223

>women who don't want to be seen as sluts, or don't want men to feel bad about themselves
>women who have never had sex with a small or large guy before, and don't know what they prefer

It's meaningless because it's not an objective evaluation.

>>34661524
>It's meaningless because it's not an objective evaluation.
>Meanwhile my refernceless ravings on an anonymous chinese basket weaving forum are 100% legit

kill yourself my man.

>>34661591

I never said I have a better reference. I just said that the 3D model experiment doesn't prove much of anything.
Maybe someday an ambitious and shameless dicklet scientist will do the experiment I'm talking about (measured/recorded arousal response during sexual activity comparing dildos or dicks of varying sizes) to settle this.

>>34661702
>I just said that the 3D model experiment doesn't prove much of anything.
>I just said that giving women 3D replicas of dicks and then asking them to pick the ones that are most appealing doesn't prove much of anything.

You understand why I'm not taking your seriously, right?

>>34661702
That's not how science works though.

Some evidence for theory A> no evidence for theory B

Until some more strict study comes along and proves this one wrong, this should be considered the truth

>>34662309

But the evidence you've provided is worthless for proving theory A.
Porn alone (including amateur porn) is stronger evidence that women have a near universal preference for larger dicks. Some things about arousal are hard to fake by acting.

>>34661223
>women know what they want
How can someone type that and not think it sounds retarded?

>>34662776
>Porn alone

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!