>Part 1/2 Why are women so fucking liberal these days? I

>>34624513
>Part 2/2
Let's not forget that, especially in the mid-twentieth century, and the entirety of the twenty-first century thus far, women have chosen to breed with certain groups and ethnicities who could not be any more a consistent and formidable degradation of the make-up and anatomy of not only the woman's ethnicity, but *our* ethnicity. Our ethnicity, which isn't so backwards and adherent to the dominance, and progress, of the human race, when we're talking about the world stage that is human evolution. Choosing to breed with certain types of "people" who are nothing more than left-overs from a bygone era. An era that left most of them to die off, and for good reason.

Yet women are choosing to breed with those bygones. Perpetuating certain breeds of humans who, throughout evolutionary history, are basically pollution to our viability and biology. Who shouldn't be called human, since they're so low on the list, it's insulting to think of them as the same as us. And prejudice aside, you can look at crime statistics, you can look at current wars and conflicts, the increasing nature of them, and realise just how detrimental to our species. Their continuation just means degrading us both physically and mentally.

But still, women choose not only to breed and advocate for their existence, they subscribe to politics, ideologies, and philosophies that promote such dangerous ideas and ways of thinking; ways of thinking that are just simply wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. And straight up promite the decline of the species.

And the worst part is: almost all women support these ideals. Almost all of them commit these crimes. I can't remember the last time I met a girl who was a case member of this bullshit. I just can't. I don't even know where to find them even more. But almost all women align to these politics and ideologies. And it's going to cost us so much in the coming years and destroy us.

File: 1462596793437.png (699KB, 622x570px) Image search: [Google]

699KB, 622x570px

>>34624513
>>34624518
GO BACK TO /POL/
YOU DO NOT BELONG HERE

>>34624513
I'm still pretty mad at your hive for getting threads I like deleted and telling me I'm not a "real robot" even though I'm a near-wizard and I've been here since '08.

Fuck commies, but you shat up my fucking home, so fuck you too.

women biologically love big government and socialism. thats just the way it is. they will of course edit their beliefs to copy their provider's beliefs, but all single women are inherently commies

sorry bro

>>34624518

Racism is really the lowest and most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man's genetic lineage and the notion that a man's intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors.

Racism claims that the content of a man's mind (not his cognitive apparatus, but its content) is inherited; that a man's convictions, values and character are determined before he is born, by physical factors beyond his control. This is the caveman's version of the doctrine of innate ideas or of inherited knowledge which has been thoroughly refuted by philosophy and science. Racism is a doctrine of, by and for brutes. It is a barnyard or stock-farm version of collectivism, appropriate to a mentality that differentiates between various breeds of animals, but not between animals and men.

Like every form of determinism, racial tribalism invalidates the specific attribute which distinguishes man from all other living species: his rational faculty. Racism negates two aspects of man's life: reason and choice, or mind and morality, replacing them with chemical predestination.

>>34624593
I'm not really a liberal but I do lean towards big government. I can't help but like stability. I'm not however at all in favour of multiculturalism. I like a lot of cultures but in my opinion the simple fact that people can barely get along with their own people tells me that integrating on a mass scale is suicide.

>caring what women think

kys

Women are inherently more maternal, they're naturally aligned to the left

>>34624513

tl;dr

Women have always been liberal because liberal politics plays directly into the way their brains think.

>>34624513
Come down to the south, we have our fair share of sjws but most women down here are pretty conservative or just don't care.

>>34624629

impressive post


m'riginil

Half of women are still conservative though, just like half of men are liberals.

>>34625945

Wrong, more people in the US self-identify as liberal than conservative.

>>34624513
>Dating American women.

Are you ok in the head?

>>34624536
Hahahahahahaha

Have you ever been in a woman hate thread you fucking redditor?

>>34624513
You literally just posted this on /adv/.
Shut up already.

>>34626017
Not by much. The numbers are roughly half and half give our take a small percentage.

>>34624629
What the hell is a Theologian doing on r9k?

>>34626017
>more people in the US self-identify as liberal than conservative
There are more women than men so obviously but it's not a blowout. It's like 60:40 at worst.

File: numale with some tumblrinas.png (358KB, 583x468px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 583x468px

>>34624629
>Racism is really the lowest and most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man's genetic lineage and the notion that a man's intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors.
>Racism claims that the content of a man's mind (not his cognitive apparatus, but its content) is inherited; that a man's convictions, values and character are determined before he is born, by physical factors beyond his control. This is the caveman's version of the doctrine of innate ideas or of inherited knowledge which has been thoroughly refuted by philosophy and science. Racism is a doctrine of, by and for brutes. It is a barnyard or stock-farm version of collectivism, appropriate to a mentality that differentiates between various breeds of animals, but not between animals and men.
>Like every form of determinism, racial tribalism invalidates the specific attribute which distinguishes man from all other living species: his rational faculty. Racism negates two aspects of man's life: reason and choice, or mind and morality, replacing them with chemical predestination.

Pic related is you

>>34624629
Careful dude someone from pol might show up and call you names as a rebuttal

>>34624513
>>34624518
About half of American women are liberal. About half of them are conservative.

Also, you're delusional. I know you won't agree, but I'm not here to argue; I just want to let you know.

>>34626090
the paragraph that the original poster made is the exact opposite of the ideology of SJW hillary voters

>>34626017
thats because its 2017 and being a conservative is pretty backwards desu

>>34626208
>that's because it's the current year
great argument, libcuck

File: 1459674368179.jpg (41KB, 480x582px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 480x582px

Conservatives - Haven't you ever realized that conservatives have never been on the right side of history before?

Society progresses over time. Why do you hate this?

>>34626331
Because they just do.

>>34626296
lol ;) why are conservatives always so angry

File: 1483483257733.jpg (125KB, 849x1052px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 849x1052px

>>34624629
Where are you drawing your definition of racism from? It seems to me as though you're making a lot of implications, and extrapolating where no extrapolation is needed.

>>34626449
They restrict their humanity

>Sure, we finally have a white man back in office.
How does that have anything to do with being right-wing?
This is why people hate you.

Because you're wrong. Being liberal is the right thing to do. Accept it.

>>34627394

true, assuming you're a woman

>>34624513
>waah waah, I can't get my peepee wet

Fucking pathetic.

>>34626048
those threads does not hate women for their political views you dumb redneck

File: grenades_are_sexist.gif (2MB, 400x253px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x253px

>>34628910

Their political views are a valid reason to hate women. They shouldn't be allowed to vote. They are nation wreckers.
>tend to be single issue voters - so many of them think abortion is the only thing that matters, fuck jobs and economy and national security we just want to kill babies
>they consistently vote for bigger government and more welfare because women benefit from larger government
>they have no concept of protecting their territory and borders since they are not and never have been protectors, libfags exploit this through appeals to emotion "Oh look at that poor crying brown person we have to let in millions of Africans and Muslims now since they ruined their countries :'("
>sperg out over the misleading wage gap, it only exists due to the jobs men and women choose to perform but millions of them believe having a penis means you automatically earn 23% more than she would if she had the same qualifications and the same job

>>34629002
... and that's the reason you should back /pol/

>>34629002
Honestly, these reasons are why I can't help but wonder if letting women vote was a good thing in the long run. I even know other women that have told me they don't think women should have voting rights, and they know women far better than I do.