>guys idealize and appreciate non-roastie vaginas >guys

>>34580275
both is retarded

>>34580275
4chan has misled itaelf into thinking that all outie vaginas are the result of slutting around when even girls with intact hymens can have the roast beef to an extent

>>34580348
They don't actually believe that.

>>guys idealize and appreciate non-roastie vaginas

For their aesthetics, sure. But guys who unironically think that roastie = slut are retarded

>>guys get butthurt if girls value and appreciate above average dicks

Do they? I'm sure guys with small dicks may well be salty but no one really disputes that bigger dicks are better (to an extent)

>>34580275
It's about hypocrisy. Apparently objectification of women is such an awful thing but men can be objectified with complete impunity.

>>34580418
But men are doing the exact same thing. They genuinely idealize non-roastie vaginas. It's not a just a meme or a ruse.

>>34580275
because pretty vaginas are pure aesthetics whereas bigger dicks are primal and masculine and a symbol of desire to be dominated if you crave it; aka women are weak

>>34580428
And if women get mad at us for objectifying them, we can get mad at them for objectifying us. Exact same thing.

>>34580428
>But men are doing the exact same thing.

It's not really the exact same thing. Yeah robots love to talk about how disgusting roasties are but I'm sure very very few men will actually turn down sex from a willing girl upon finding out she doesn't have a perfect innie vagina. It's not like the size of ones meatflaps really even effects sex on anything more than an aesthetic level.

Whereas the size of a guys dick pretty much directly ties to the quality of the sex, and girls will ready reject small dicked guys on principle.

>>34580275
a woman can avoid becoming a roastie if she isn't a slut

a guy can't control his dick aesthetics

>>34580505
This sums it up.
In a way that is completely original.

>>34580505
Women don't turn men down either when they pull down his pants and it turns out he isn't hung.

They are just not as happy.

Just like a guy isn't as happy when it turns out that his date has beef curtains.

>>34580494
Yeah but then you admit that men are just as retarded & shallow as women.

>>34580532
>Women don't turn men down either when they pull down his pants and it turns out he isn't hung.
BET
And even if they do it's pretty much guaranteed to be a one-time thing.

>>34580275
>girls vaginas become roasties through strenuous use
>penises are determined by genes

It's not a double standard, one is choice, the other is not. If you want to talk about chestlet shaming you actually have a bit of an argument there.

>>34580522
>a woman can avoid becoming a roastie if she isn't a slut

Do people genuinely believe this?

Like, the idea that having lots and lots of sex with large dicks might possibly elongate the labia is feasible, not that I've ever seen any actual evidence for it, but do people really not know that the labia thicken and grow during puberty? The meatflaps a girl has when she's 16 will be pretty much the same as the ones she has when she's 30. Young, tight virgin girls can have whole bologna sandwiches down there.

>>34580556
If you believe that the average women will tell her date or boyfriend to get up and leave after she finds out that his dick isn't above average you're delusional.

And a micro-dick would be comparable to REALLY LONG abnormal beef curtains and in that case most guys wouldn't continue either.

>>34580597
>And in that case most guys wouldn't continue either
Wrong once again

>>34580612
So you think if a guy pulls down a girls pants and he sees her beef curtains almost go down to her knees he would get hard and have sex with her?

>>34580532
>Women don't turn men down either when they pull down his pants and it turns out he isn't hung.

I'm sure there is a limit

Obviously unless the girl is a bitch/size queen then you don't need a big dick, but if the guy is genuinely tiny to the point that the logistics of sex would barely even work then I'd say that's a reasonable reason for turning him down.

>>34580555
Nice digits
But if they're gonna be retarded and shallow we don't owe them shit in return

>>34580627
Lol that's not a valid comparison and you know it. Not even sure if that's biologically possible

>>34580638
>Obviously unless the girl is a bitch/size queen then you don't need a big dick, but if the guy is genuinely tiny to the point that the logistics of sex would barely even work then I'd say that's a reasonable reason for turning him down.

Yeah but that's rare and an extreme case. That would be like EXTREME roasties, a case so bad, you can barely get inside of her vagina without getting tangled in the curtains.

One is a choice.

The other is genetics. It doesn't say anything about us as people. Might as well judge us by our skin color or gender.

>>34580627
>beef curtains almost go down to her knees

But that's hyperbole, Even the longest meat flaps don't prevent you from having pleasurable sex. Small dicks do.

>>34580275
because roasties can never be appreciated??
just...look at them....its like an alien. a dick still looks like a dick. big or not, they all look the same just in different size.

>>34580671
I'm pretty sure long meat flaps do get in the way of sex from what I've read about it. Like, they tangle and rub uncomfortably against eachother.

Not sure, maybe not. But even then women had more reasons to judge dick size whereas men didn't have as much base to judge beef curtains.

>>34580664
It's a meme and incorrect. Just stop, it's old and tired.

>>34580664
>One is a choice.

t. I've never fucked a young virgin with big cuntflaps

>>34580681
>just...look at them....its like an alien. a dick still looks like a dick. big or not, they all look the same just in different size.

Incorrect. A big dick looks visually more pleasing and impressive to most people than a tiny noodle.

>>34580690
>Like, they tangle

???????????????

I would love to see that

>and rub uncomfortably against eachother.

You know the penis goes in the vagina, right? Where is this rubbing occurring?

>>34580505
>Whereas the size of a guys dick pretty much directly ties to the quality of the sex

Nope. If you're about average then you're good. Sure there's a psychological component to arousal and sure a big cock will (at least in some case) increase that arousal, but you can still have great sex with an average sized dick. Literally every woman will tell you that and no, they aren't lying.

>and girls will ready reject small dicked guys on principle.

This is partly true. But most men don't need to worry about it.

Roasties deserve to be snipped

>>34580739
>but you can still have great sex with an average sized dick.

Well yeah, but by definition half of men are below average.

>>34580732
It's not a joke, here a part from a girl complaining her long labia causes her discomfort during sex:

"Sex can be a pain. I have not had so much sex. I've only had sex with my last three boyfriends. But it was difficult to have intercourse. For my inner labia was too long and got stuck in the guy's dicks, and my inner labia are usually supposed to be on the outside my vagina. But when they got stuck, they followed the dicks into the vagina and then my inner labia got squeezed between the dick and my vaginal walls (during the usual "in/out, in/out, in/out" of the intercourse). Painful like you can't imagine!"

Roasties are also dirty all the extra skin collects dirt

>>34580767
All of that seems like something that could be fixed with more lube.

>>34580767
>"Last three boyfriends"
>Total slut coincidentally has meat flaps
I-i-its totally a meme guyz

>>34580830
If you think three past boyfriends is slutty for any girl over 18 then you're going to be sorely disappointed when you actually talk to any in real life

>>34580830
It's a meme. There are virgins with meat flaps and porn stars with the most innie pussies you've ever seen.

>inb4 porn stars get surgery every month

Yeah, sure.

>>34580855
They get the snip

>>34580851
Sluttiness is not relative.
>>34580855
Uh huh.

>>34580855
>There are virgins with meat flaps and porn stars with the most innie pussies you've ever seen.

This is the thing I've always found hilarious, back when you'd get roastie threads calling roasties degenerate whores and posting pics of their ideal perfect innie vaginas (which happened to belong to literal porn stars who get blacked every weekend)

>>34580886
Then you're going to need a few more increments on your scale past regular phase 1 slutty

>>34580889
>What is a labiaplasty

>>34580762
Only if you assume a normal distribution. Which is besides the point since you don't need to be exactly average to still have great sex, it's perfectly reasonable to be within one standard deviation and still make a girl cum. In that case, about 70% of men don't need to worry about it.

>>34580913
Saying "last three boyfriends" like it's not even that huge a number qualifies as "objectively pretty damn slutty."

>>34580855
>There are virgins with meat flaps
Show me

>Yeah, sure.
Surgery wouldn't be required regularly, you idiot. Do they also get breast enhancements every month?

>>34580917
>What is a labiaplasty

Far too expensive to be had done by every porn star to maintain their innies

Not to mention the healing time, do you really think porn makers would encourage their girls to get surgery that meant they couldn't have any sex for weeks to months?

>>34580953
>Implying this is something that needs to be done consistently
>Implying these people shoot porn literally every day

>>34580942
>Surgery wouldn't be required regularly, you idiot.

But how quickly does lots of sex cause the flaps to grow? We need this information

So basically women shouldn't have regular sex with their husbands or long-term boyfriends because they will get roasties?

If a virgin has one boyfriend she should only have sex with him once a month or will risk a roastie, correct?

>>34580942
>Show me
>show me photos of virgins vaginas

You realize that if there are nude pics of a girl online she's probably a slut?

If you experienced teenage love then you'd have already seen

lmao reading through the replies in this thread... do these virgins actually believe girls' meat flaps grow as they have more sex? having a lot of sex doesn't imply the girl's a ho anyway; if she's had sex 10,000 but only with 1 partner in her life then there's nothing wrong with that. does she have bigger meatflaps than the girl who has sex once a week but with a different guy every time?

>>34580953
http://shesaid.com/au/porn-star-vaginas-hidden-dangers-surgery/
Also, this is another point of hypocrisy: labiaplasty stories always center around girls being "pressured" or "body-shamed" into it but mocking a guy for having a small dick is pretty much just comedy

>>34581004
>If you experienced teenage love then you'd have already seen

Where the fucking fuck do you think you are?

To the roastposers ITT, can the flaps detect whether the woman is being a slut or not? i.e. will they only grow if she has lots of sex with multiple men? rather than just with one long term partner?

>>34580275
>guys idealize non-roasties
some do some don't
>guys get butthurt if girls value and appreciate above average dicks
not if you keep your appreciation of large cocks to yourself, but if you start bragging to me about how big your boyfriends cock is and how his large cock is masterrace blah blah blah, then Ima get disgusted with you and think less of for it.

I mean really what kind of girl brags to other guys about her desire for large cocks?
trash

>>34581004
>I have no evidence so I'm gonna give you a hypothetical anecdote that I know no one on this board relates to
Not an argument

>>34581026
>think less of you

I actually idealize roast

>>34581018
Well yeah, obviously porn stars will get it done but to imply that every porn star (or even amateur porn maker) who has a "perfect innie" has one because of a labiaplasty is ridiculous.

>labiaplasty stories always center around girls being "pressured" or "body-shamed" into it but mocking a guy for having a small dick is pretty much just comedy

Well yeah, that's just the human gender dynamic. Guys are fundamentally less valuable, that's how female gated sexual selection works.

File: What-is-Steatopygia-3.jpg (18KB, 242x402px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 242x402px

>>34581041
Do you have evidence?

>The size of the labia minora is generally dictated by genetics, as evidenced in the case of some female members of the Khoisan group of people. In these women, the inner folds of the genitalia can be as long as four inches when they stand up.

Your turn.

>>34581041
>Not an argument

I'd put forward an argument if you did first

I'm curious, could you answer >>34581023 ?

>>34581084
>Haha this is just le "human gender dynamic" so you can't criticize it or disagree with it in any way
Humor is a social construct and is in no way related to biology, btw.

>>34581109
Not the same guy, brainiac.

Men are both more and less retarted, look at the IQ bell curve.

>>34581108
>"Evidence"
>A random picture and an uncited paragraph in meme arrows
This discussion is over.

>>34581147
>>Haha this is just le "human gender dynamic" so you can't criticize it or disagree with it in any way

That's not at all what I said dumbass

You can criticize it all you want, it's almost certainly never going to change

>Humor is a social construct and is in no way related to biology, btw.

Humor and laughter is a physiological response to increase social bonding.

>>34580590
I believe it. I assume roasties get roastier with the more sex they have and the more stretched they get. I wouldn't know, as I've never had a girlfriend.

>>34581182
>runs away

Nice source, loser.

>>34581184
I never said it was gonna change.
>Physiological response to increase social bonding
Shaming guys by joking about their dicks achieves the exact opposite function, thanks for proving my point

>>34580929
>70% of guys dont have to worry about it
Ok lets assume that made up number is correct, and lets say that in that 70% theres 20% above average ones, It doesnt matter they will still go for the cream of the crop without fail.

And if you are anywhere outside of that number, its just countdown until she finds it.

>>34581147
>Humor is a social construct and is in no way related to biology, btw.
u wot?

Humor is well understood to be an evolved trait that reinforces social groups and helps with bonding. There's a reason why people are much more likely to laugh out loud when they're with other people.

>>34581209
>Haha I win because I wasted my opponent's time and he got tired of the discussion
(You)

>>34581237
Of course. It's my thread, you help me bump it with your nonsense. It does help.

>>34581218
See>>34581211
Originalshsks

>>34581211
>Shaming guys by joking about their dicks achieves the exact opposite function, thanks for proving my point


You've really misinterpreted my posts. Humor being a biological trait was a separate point from the one about gender roles. I'd argue dick shaming is less "humor" and more just that, shaming and social ostracizing.

>>34581262
>Your nonsense
>he said while posting unsourced bullshit to substantiate his meme tu quoque argument

>>34581272
Shaming can definitely be done with humor, though. So again, its function in this case is socially constructed.

>>34581280
>unsourced bullshit
>too dumb to google a source

2/10, you tried.

>>34581280
To think about it, though, you're right. No more (You)s for this garbage thread

>>34581211
>Shaming guys by joking about their dicks achieves the exact opposite function
>the exact opposite function
>what are in and out groups

When a group of stacies find out a guy has a micro dong and reject and belittle him because of it they are all strengthening their interpersonal bonds through their joint contempt for the guy.

Similar to how a group of friends might mock someone they all disliked. It's not nice to everyone, but it's accepted within the ingroup one is trying to build favor with.

This is very basic psychology dude.

>>34581305
>It's his job to Google your argument for you

>>34580488
How are innie vaginas not primal and feminine and reflect the males desire to not lose his mate to better and more experience males, aka him wanting a virgin who only loves him instead of being one of many lovers

>>34581331
If he's interested, yes. Because then he can see how valid it is and if I cherrypicked.

File: IMG_2555.jpg (90KB, 1252x964px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 1252x964px

>>34581322
>This is very basic psychology dude
>Every time I mock something I invite 5 friends to my house to promote social cohesion

>>34581216
>Ok lets assume that made up number is correct

One Gaussian standard deviation makes up about 70% of the population (or 68.27% if you prefer).

> and lets say that in that 70% theres 20% above average ones

If we assume a Gaussian distribution we can say that about 35% will be between the mean - 1SD and the mean and 35% will be between the mean + 1SD.

>It doesnt matter they will still go for the cream of the crop without fail.

There's only about a 2cm difference (1.66 if you want to be precise) between -1SD and +1SD.

>And if you are anywhere outside of that number, its just countdown until she finds it.

I'm not entirely convinced this is a sentence. Outside what number? Finds what? It just doesn't seem to follow on from anything you've said.

The fact of the matter is, about 70% of men are within 1.66 cm of the average sized dick. 95% of men are within 2 standard deviations (that's 4cm) of the mean. I doubt that 4cm is going to be a huge, or even perceptible, loss.

This is of course assuming that dick sizes is normally distributed, and it might not be. But we can justify the use of a Gaussian by an appeal to the central limit theorem, and by noting that most other anatomical measurements are normally distributed.

>>34581368
>What is Hitchens' Razor
>What is the burden of proof

File: 79728f_5505754.jpg (64KB, 906x799px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 906x799px

>>34581387

Now you're not even trying

Plus, I'm sure you would if you had 5 friends to invite

>>34581416
>what is own research
>please feed me i'm too dumb

>>34581420
I'm sorry that you don't understand how an argument works, anon.

File: 5022464+_02de4e15163cb4968690cece020d8fd8.jpg (209KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 900x675px

>>34581387
>Tipping a fedora with such an awful analogy

If you were really enlightened you'd be a lot wittier

>>34581433
I'm sorry that you desperately need to distract from people asking YOU to post your evidence for the arguments you made.

File: Donald_Trump_NBC_smug_Republican.jpg (152KB, 710x450px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 710x450px

>>34581418
>Ad-hom right off the bat
Never change 4chan

>>34581387
So out of curiosity, what purpose do you think humor serves evolutionarily?

>>34581452
Not the same guy. Again.

File: 3156576-5530507674-origi.png (1MB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1024x768px

>>34581454
>right off the bat

try "right after the ad-absurdum bait analogy + le hat tip man"

>>34581484
Except ad-absurdum isn't a fallacy but good try

>>34581509
I'm not trying to catch you out on fallacies, I'm just saying that analogy was silly and not very relevant and you know it.

So if you're positing that humor in humans has nothing to do with promoting social cohesion within certain groups, what then do you think it's purpose is? I'm curious.

>>34581476
Then post some. Now it's your chance, nigga.

They really wouldn't care if they were getting laid. It's just funny that it does actually resemble a roast beef sandwich from Arby's.

>>34581537
>So if you're positing that humor in humans has nothing to do with promoting social cohesion within certain groups
I'm not positing that. Different poster.
>I'm just saying that analogy was silly and not very relevant and you know it
But you're not saying that at all because ad-absurdum is a legitimate device

>>34581560
>They really wouldn't care if they were getting laid.

This. Unless the guy was super autismo about it or was a super chad who wouldn't settle for anything less than 10/10 then it would take some freakishly huge meat flaps to make an average guy turn down a willing girl.

>>34581547
Because it isn't my argument?

>>34580275
roastie is more just an insult to women here, youk now if a robot found an attractive girl and actually got to the point of fucking her and she had a "roastie" vagina they woulden't care because they are getting to have sex with a girl they are attracted to hell in most cases they don't even have to be attractive since robots just want someone to show affection to them.

Women on the other hand, will literally make fun of a guy in bed for a small penis and most of the time refuse sex all together, even if you have a guy who is grossed out by your vagina whether it be from the roastie or the smell they won't say it to you at all and will keep it to themselves and still go a long with sex. Girl gets one look at a guys small dick she either leaves or makes you leave and laughs about it with all her friends the next morning.

>>34581601
So you agree that roasties are not caused by a lot of sex?

>>34580275
i have an above average dick and i find it off putting when females like that because they just like me for my dick and what i can do with it and not really value me as a person. plus they'll probably just go get dicked by someone with a smaller one and worse at fucking anyway because they are very shallow and superficial

>>34581579
>But you're not saying that at all because ad-absurdum is a legitimate device

It is, but you didn't really apply it very well. You pulled a random and niche and silly sounding situation out of your ass whilst ignoring many other more reasonable and realistic situations that could coincide with what I said.

You won't invite people over to mock someone, but you will be much more likely to mock someone when with a group of your friends.

People will find things funny when they're alone, but will actually laugh far far more when they're with others. As it shows an instant commonality (in what they find funny) and being around others laughing as well as laughing around others has tangible mental health benefits.

>>34581624
Dude this isn't true at all. Most girls and I do mean most girls don't really care. Girls actually are nice and also just want affection. Think about you fucking jackass if the girl likes you enough to have sex she isn't going to change her mind at the last second if your dick is below average.

Is there honestly a big difference to dick size and satisfaction? Outside of the dick being over the top huge or very, very small?

I (f, virgin) never had sex yet and I'm not sure what to believe. I read so much conflicting shit about that.

>>34581624
>will literally make fun of a guy in bed for a small penis and most of the time refuse sex all together,
Dude you are so far gone it's unreal. Women will mock your dick if you dump or reject them after having sex regardless of your true size, but if you are at a point where the pants are down and she is opening her legs for you, she is not going to suddenly up and leave because you are a dicklet. At the most she will experience mild disappointment which she will either keep to herself or post about anonymously on one of those advice sites in the same way a normie man might be disappointed to find out his gf has a roastie/loose vagina/saggy, small tits/whatever turns him off. The truth is, unless you did something else to piss her off, she is going to tell (lie to) all her friends about how large you are and masculine you are. Not only for your benefit, but because having an attractive partner increases her social value.

>>34581755

There obviously is.
But most women pretend that there isn't a major differecnce as a public service to keep dicklets from killing themselves and so they could say "i'm not like those other slutty girls lmao"

>>34581802
So what does that mean? Like 5' wont be as fun as 7'?

>>34581708
>>34581782
Maybe i'm just biased because I got made fun of a in MS/HS for being a dicklet by girls. Literally had the nickname "centimeter perter" stick with me for fucking years so excuse me if i'm too "far gone"

>>34581782

Women will mock guys with small dicks behind their backs with their friends even if it's the nicest guy in the world.
And they gossip about the guys that have large dicks.
t. someone who went to high school and had to overhear this shit

>>34580348
Then explain these >> >>34580522
>>34580564
>>34581199

>>34581878
>Yeah sourceless anon, explain these other sourceless anons!

>>34581802
This is retarded. As I've already said 95% of men fall between about 10 and 16 cm. The average woman isn't going to have had a man bigger than 6 inches.

>>34581912
>The average woman isn't going to have had a man bigger than 6 inches.

Bullshit. If you had said "bigger than 8" I might believe it.

File: 1479238751109.jpg (24KB, 478x477px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 478x477px

>>34581822
>"centimeter peter"
That's very amusing
I'm sorry. Did they actually see it or were they just having fun with your name?
>>34581857
High school girls are slightly meaner, it's true, and party/tinder sluts are a different breed of woman entirely. It's unlikely to happen with someone you'd get into a relationship with.
Have you never heard men talk about how ugly certain girls and their bodies are? Everyone is subject to mockery in this world. Most women are too concerned with how they look to you in bed to worry about your size.

>>34582003
>party/tinder sluts are a different breed of woman entirely.

Party/tinder sluts are just regular college women. They're not some special exceptions.

>>34581970
Why, the average is something like 13 cm and the standard deviation about 1.66 cm, supposing a Gaussian distribution, that puts 95% of men in the range of about 10 cm to 16 cm. Considering that the average woman has something like 5 sexual partners in her lifetime, it's incredibly unlikely that the average woman has met a dick bigger than 16cm.

>>34582003
>Did they actually see it or were they just having fun with your name?

Two girls did when I got shanked during gym in middle school. Then the rumors spread and the nickname stuck, they also made fun of my pubic hair the nickname "bush gardens" also was one that stuck . The two girls were sluts also one would brag about fucking a guy in high school and would just casually tell me "his dick is big not tiny like yours"

Sad thing is I don't think my dick has grown much since middle school, I'm in my mid 20s and its still only about 4 inches maybe 4 and a half when erect.

>>34582014
>Party/tinder sluts are just regular college women. >They're not some special exceptions.


They're not "special exemptions" but they're certainly not like all women

There's as much of a difference between the way women act as there is men, not all men openly put down and talk shit about girls being unattractive.

>>34582047

I haven't grown much since middle school either, I think it's from being chronically malnourished as a teenager and taking psychiatric drugs that screwed up my hormone levels.

>>34582034
>Considering that the average woman has something like 5 sexual partners in her lifetime

That can't be right?

Not even in a "all women are sluts" way, that genuinely seems very low? Most women I know surpassed that by 20. I recall reading that the average for men in a lifetime was around 9?

>>34580388
I do, I have turned down girls who 'said' they were virgins because of this

>>34582107
>That can't be right?

After I posted it I was thinking that it might have been within a particular demographic, off the top of my head something like the 16-25 demographic. So yeah, I might have gotten that one wrong. But I don't think by much.

>>34582137
>I do, I have turned down girls who 'said' they were virgins because of this

You know that you can normally check if a girl is a virgin or not, regardless of the state of her meat flaps, right?

>>34582003
>he thinks girls change the way they act when they get out of school
you do realize they spent the whole time in school being told they mature faster and think they're already being mature, what makes you believe they're going to change ??

>>34580973
The flaps dont grow retard they fall out, when they get snipped there is nothing else to plop out

File: gapping.jpg (7KB, 183x275px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 183x275px

Yes yes sex doesn't affect the vagina at all. It always just bounces right back into shape.

>>34582225
So all you need is one surgery then you're set to fuck as much as you want with no extra flap elongation?

Where are the flaps stored in their dormant state?

>>34582047
>got shanked during gym
Where did you go to school?
That's really cruel, but middle schoolers are cruel. I can assure you that no woman would walk out on you during sex because of your dick size, at least.
>>34582189
Everyone matures and grows as they age whether they will themselves to or not.

>>34582237
>Be me
>Take a shit everyday for 25 years
>Don't end up with a gaping anus

You can't explain that.

>>34582237
>I don't know the difference between a vagina and labia

>>34582183
What do you mean, how?

Organizing

>>34582034
I'm gay, and I have a pretty close group of girls as friends that frequently talk to me about this kind of stuff. None of them are super slutty by modern Western standards, but they've all had sex with multiple guys. They are all reasonably attractive and personable.

One of the girls is a very attractive Asian and dates similarly attractive men. She's had sex with 5 guys in her life and 2 of them have been 8 inches. Normally I wouldn't believe her estimation of size but she told me one of the guys had a major foot fetish and was always comparing his dick to her feet. She showed me a pic comparing her foot to his dick and it went from her heel to the tip of her big toe. I measured her foot at exactly 8 1/4 inches long.

Interest enough, she didn't enjoy sex with either of those guys. She said they weren't really good in bed and that the dicks were too big for her.

The point I'm trying to to make though is that it's a mistake to assume that the distribution of dick sizes correlates exactly with the distribution of guys getting laid a lot. I bet that guys with large cocks have way more sex than average guys, and guys with tiny ones have way less. This skews the distribution from a women's POV, especially if she's attractive.

Even if 90-95% of men are under 8 inches, I bet most women who have fucked 5-10+ guys have had at least one 8+ inch cock.

>>34582250
>be me
>get anally destroyed by tyrone
>have a prolapsed anus

There isnt any correlation between my anal devastation and the prolapse

>>34582308
Have you heard the word "hymen" before?

They can break from other things, but if it's intact then you know she's a virgin.

>>34582034

I don't know the source for that stat or the methodology, but I honestly don't believe it. And even if it's true, it doesn't necessarily tell the whole story.
Think of it this way: if there's five 7 inch and a single 1 inch (micro), the average is knocked down to 6 even though the vast majority are significantly larger than the average. Basically, what I mean is that you don't know if dick size follows a normal distribution curve.
Also, a lot of the smaller guys are going to avoid sex altogether, or get rejected, and larger guys are going to get around more, so the perception of average can be larger than the real average.

>>34582334

I doubt she would have saved pictures of that guy's dick if she didn't like it.
desu

>>34582237
That's a woman who has either been fisted, taken an excessively large dildo, or more likely, had a child.

>>34582443
>I don't know the source for that stat or the methodology

It was a meta-analysis of about 15,000 men, you can read the whole thing here:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.13010/abstract

>Think of it this way: if there's five 7 inch and a single 1 inch (micro), the average is knocked down to 6 even though the vast majority are significantly larger than the average

Right, but then the variance of you data is like 7.5 inches^2, which is crazy. In this study the variance is 1.6 inches^2.

>and larger guys are going to get around more

Why do you assume that?

>>34582237
Actually I just thought of something else. There is a fourth way that can happen, but it's really sad. In suspected child rape cases they will sometimes, almost always, do an examination, especially if the child is extremely young. They are actually looking for that. If a child is raped extremely young, their vagina will end up like that. The examination is to look for that type of trauma. When they grow up to be adults, it will look like that. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for porn stars to have experienced rape or molestation as a young child.

>>34582696
>Why do you assume that?

A few reasons.
Higher self-esteem, less fear of rejection.
Probably have more masculine/high testosterone traits in general, which is more attractive to women
Pre-selection from women telling their friends. Maybe sounds weird or fucked up, but it happens.

File: 1478882842590.png (244KB, 1200x4168px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1200x4168px

>>34580275
I wonder why?
in an state where one is moral based

>>34582780
>Higher self-esteem, less fear of rejection.

I doubt it. In the sense that most men aren't insecure about their size.

>Probably have more masculine/high testosterone traits in general

There is no correlation between "masculine traits" and dick size (cf. the previous study), save a very weak one with hight.

>>34582562
I'm a faggot bottom with a 6 inch dick so I have no dog in this fight, I'm just relaying what I've been told.

And for the record, she did love the way it looked and playing with it but she genuinely didn't like having sex with something that large. I don't know if vag size correlates with body size at all but she was a 4'10" Asian chick so there's that.

File: Screenshot_20161129-133607.png (2MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2560px

non-roastie vagina equates to a vagina that isn't used/whored out, not the appearance of the vagina unless you're retarded enough to take the meme at face value

this means that it's a woman's choice to have a roastie vagina, all a woman has to do to achieve not having a roastie vagina is not be a nasty slut.

we didn't chose to be born with below average penis sizes.

>>34582817
I'm not the anon you're replying to but I know of girls that have never had a big dick before and if they find out a guy is hung, they will fuck him just to experience it.

I knew a girl that did this and made fun of the guy to all her friends later cause he was terrible in bed and kinda of a douche. And she said after that she has no more inclination to sleep with hung guys. But the point is that she fucked him just because her gf told her he had a huge cock. Stuff like that doesn't happen to small or average guys.

I definitely think that hung guys get way more action, even if its from girls that have never been with a big guy before and end up not enjoying big dicks, they try it for the novelty.

>>34580532
>>34580275
>having sex before marriage
Just kill yourselves

Roasties look gross but most men don't actually care

Women do care about dick size though

File: 1366151364608.jpg (7KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 240x240px

I'm so fucking confused does a woman having lots of sex make her labia stretch out and become a roastie or what

Fucking someone please tell me the truth. I honestly don't know if sex actually has an affect on the vagina appearance wise. Please someone explain and don't troll

>>34582242
I might have worded that wrong with fall out, my bad. When they trim the labia there isnt much more to expand afterwards.

Would you prefer to be Chad with a 3 inch cock or a Stacie with 3 inches of protruding roast?

I can't decide what's worse

>>34584094

Roasties are better off for sure, and it's not even close.
Even if a guy complains about it, she'll have friends telling her it's not her fault and that he's just a shallow pig.
Men with unattractive traits usually don't get as much support from a social standpoint.

>>34584207
3 inches of roast is a lot though, that could get caught on shit and be a safety hazard

I do agree with your analysis though, but I don't think 3 inches is freakishly short to the extent of where Chad would struggle to get a girl still

>>34582817
Lol, then you don't know most men. That's like number one before anything.

>Pretend to be 3 different posters to confuse and enrage white knights
>Their circlejerk is still going strong
Ahh, all according to plan

File: roastie science.jpg (403KB, 1042x2430px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 1042x2430px

>>34583988
It's one of those things that's founded on an element of truth but has been exaggerated. There are some women born with an "outie" vagina (or it develops during puberty), but it doesn't become a full blown roastie until she's had lots of wear and tear on it, and a girl who was previously an innie can become a roastie from sex. It also can happen if a girl uses a dildo a lot.

And before you ask about porn stars, let me inform you that there is a surgery called labiaplasty that tucks the labia back down to make their pussies look less wrecked. I have no data on how often that procedure is done, but after looking at before/after pictures of labiaplasty I'd say it's plausible that porn stars use it.

>>34583988
Lol, you can always spot the underage posters

>>34584922
Thanks for the info anon. Hopefully when I see a vagina irl I'll be able to find out if she's a roastie or just born with it.

>>34580275
>your decisions don't affect the size of your dick
>your decisions do affect how pretty your vagina is
There's the difference, now fuck off, toasty roastie.

>>34585437
This.

Roastie is defined by how much of a slut the girl is.
The size of my dick is defined when I'm born.

File: dahnse.gif (1MB, 200x112px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 200x112px

>>34585520
>tfw male slut

>>34580532
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

But they can turn you down, then can also make fun of you to the people that know you and claim you have a small dick.

You, in turn, can't make fun of her beef curtains cause she's a lady, you can't mistreat ladies mmkay ? Baginas are perfect, all of them !

>>34585150
spoiler: all 'roasties' appear through puberty, and half of women have them, and that post is complete made up bullshit. There are lots of different sizes of labia, like there are lots of different penis sizes. Bigger labia may even mean a tighter vagina, because there is more skin surrounding the hole and thus it is protected. Labia helps keep dirt OUT of the vagina. But whatever, don't listen to me, not like I have first hand experience and struggle to even get a finger up there.
>inb4 gtfo you roastie slut