With sex dolls starting to go more mainstream and more companies

>>34556651
They already are. There is even a short film about it

I think men will get more out of it, a sex bot can't be a provider.

>>34556717
There would still be a market for male sex bots. Plenty of girls buy dildos already.

>>34556651
>at what point do they start being fashionable for women?
When the porn industry introduces some new content where women abuse/pleasure sex dolls. Creating a need and new trend for the dolls. The next gen stacies will be the ones to take this off.

>>34556772
sounds like some kind of spooky feminist angle

>>34556762
But there's nothing taboo in society about that

File: Screenshot_4.jpg (17KB, 201x280px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 201x280px

>>34556651
Sex Dolls will never become fashionable for women

men need sexdolls for their holes, this replaces the woman's immediate function

women need sexdolls to install plumbimg, maintain HVAC, build highways, check and maintain miles of powerline, enforce order against violent men, weld deep sea oil rigs to produce energy and materials, develop computers, write code decent enough to run them, maintain the sewers, roof the house, put up drywall, grow large amounts of grain, raise and slaughter cattle, whatever, you get my point

Would any fembots be interested in this? Be honest. I know you are reading.

>>34557241
at the end of the day, they still need the d

>>34557051
just like one day there will be nothing taboo about women buying sex dolls. Or rather women get their providers to buy them sex dolls