Why do females complain about guys being bitter, but they don't

why do you call women "females"

I know I find bitter women obnoxious.
But generally bitter women don't end up murdering men, and bitter men do sometimes chop up women, shoot women, choke women, rape women, throw women in front of trains, etc.

>>34520792
would you pick on someone that called cars automobiles?

>>34520792
women can have penis, female can not

>>34520837
not that anon, but I definitely would, and with other people around so we could all laugh at that person.

>>34520837
but he didn't call guys "male", he said guys

>>34520743
>tfw I barely ever speak to females anymore
>tfw don't know what complaints are

I guess indifferent isolated from society people are the only ones who don't know these feels

4chan is my connection to society...

>>34520743
because you're supposed to shut up and be the storm drain for the abuses of their social hierarchy. you complaining messes their never-do-wrong normie ChadStacy morality.

so make as much ruckus as you can and never let them get away with it

>>34520743
Girls have it harder in life.

>>34520892
In many cases, it depends on the role the word has in the sentence. Perhaps some prominency or something, or perhaps contrasting.
But this doesn't feel like the case here. It was probably just a bad habit.

>>34520792
Complaining about this is a very feminist thing to do, though. I question the people who bring this up's right to be here.

>>34520801
Traditionally females were more likely to get away with murder because they would use less violent means. E.G. poison
Males would maybe go attack a different village or tribe but they'd try to capture a female to take back with them as a wife. Most males are over protective of females and would put themselves at risk for no reason without thinking of why they're doing it.

File: 1485590018130.jpg (42KB, 541x498px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 541x498px

>>34520975
Either way I wouldn't want to be one.

>>34520976
>the people
don't you mean "the homo sapiens"

File: 1477419779280.png (55KB, 217x190px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 217x190px

>>34520975
>Girls have it harder

>>34521251
Should I have said "those"?
Maybe it would look better, but I think "people" works fine too.

If I'm gonna go full SJW, it's problematic to specify species like this. Being a human is not the defining part of my argument, and by unrelatedly bringing up specificness that just happen to include all presently relevant parties is very dangerous. It sets a precedent for other situations, where it may not be as clear. For example, imagine someone said "men and women", which would be very excluding to non-binary people. It is very dangerous to start restricting in unrelated ways, because the risk of accidentally excluding someone is always possible.
In this specific case, while not currently relevant, it's also a case of exclusiveness. We don't have it currently, but I think our language should be universallym inclusive and relevant. If another species reads this in the future, they may end up feeling bad for being dismissed for being non-human.

File: 1480845843398.gif (338KB, 538x572px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 538x572px

>>34520975
Great bait my friend

>>34521377
this post reminds me of those
>this is your mind on drugs
tv commercials except it's more actually like
>this is your mind on mental illness