Take the test, post your results
http://www.celebritytypes.com/faces/test.php
>>34409326
Fucking Disloyal Roasties REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>34409326
Lel these faces reminded me of Oblivion characters.
R8
Originally
>>34409326
>green from 75 to 100
what does that mean
I value masculinity. And the fact that this shit is tribal tells me send the strongest fucking dude to do everything.
Shit shit guys, did i just fuck it up?
am i too redpilled?
>>34409555
You picked the more masculine face for everything.
Lmaooooo
The non masculine face looked too funny looking
stay woke fampires
who /reasonablechoicesonly/ and /againstthegrain/ here?
all hail the matriarchy
No surprise here
Origina
Interesting hypothesis
It is relatable I guess
Though not completely accurate, I lean left in most of the important subjects
Your INGROUP DOMINANCE PERCENTAGE is: 41.7
Your OUTGROUP DOMINANCE PERCENTAGE is: 41.7
Your TOTAL DOMINANCE PERCENTAGE is: 41.7
Like most people, you prefer a Cooperative leader to handle internal matters.
Unlike most people, you prefer a Cooperative leader to handle external threats.
Overall, your choice of leaders suggests that you are politically left-wing.
Who here /bluepilled/?
refugees welcome
brb prepping the bull
>>34409326
Is this shit useful?
>>34409326
I am the spearhead of human evolution
middle ground wisdom
weird line 2bh, my foreign policy is too lax
>>34409326
>test is made by a female social """scientists"""
fuck off
I suppose?
originalio commenterino stupid original buster
Hahahahhahaha
Whew
this is just normal right ?
why is this equating that its right wing to send strong looking people to sort stuff out in tribal matter?
>>34409326
INTJ spanish right winged here
Here's my result
Dominance is important. The weak don't last.
It said I was politically left-leaning, which is true.
I picked the lighter skinned face every time.
Yep, was not surprised to get this result. Did not like the more feminine looking faces because in these hypothetical situations they seemed more likely to back down and be submissive in the face of adversaries, rather than act/fight.
Not really THAT right wing though, I just chose what I thought was people who looked like they had experience and a certain confidence about them
They still some ugly ass faces tho
>>34409326
uuuh yeah, i don't want some submissive woman in charge
that makes me right-wing?!
>all these positive inclination line plebs here
>>34411196
>not having a straight 100% line of domination
I didn't even have to look at what they were being chosen for I just picked the face I found the most trustworthy/good looking and I got 100%
took like a minute
>>34409552
I ended up with the same thing, for the same reason.
What the fuck does this even mean?I chose the the feminine face for the cooking/food(non hunting) related shit
>>34409326
topkek I literally just picked the person with the lightest skin every time.
I think (((someone))) is trying to imply whites are less masculine
>>34409326
>Picking people for certain tasks based on their facial features
Not sure how it comes to the conclusion I'm left-wing since I seem entirely deviant to both.
I'm a gommie :D, why can't we all just get along?
So I prefer dominant leaders a little more than others.
>>34411109
>Yep, was not surprised to get this result. Did not like the more feminine looking faces because in these hypothetical situations they seemed more likely to back down and be submissive in the face of adversaries, rather than act/fight.
Obviously you'll need the stronger, masculine men to deal with external issues (in general), but its not a good idea to use them to resolve internal issues. Cohesion of the tribe is very important, if some ooga booga Chad is used to resolve all/most internal issues it will just end in him using force against anyone that steps an inch out of line, which will result in alienation and people turning on eachother. The true patrician choise is cooperative stance on internal issues and dominant stance on external issues.
Yee boi's and nignogarillos
>>34411338
Darker skin is positively correlated with greater testosterone. Obviously darker skin due to melanin is a completely separate factor and isn't connected. If you're going to be autistic at least be knowledgeable about the shit you're autistic about.
>>34409326
Hmm, make me think, really.
>>34409326
Politically speaking, I'm basically a pro-market authoritarian who doesn't care what people do with themselves in private.
This is too stupid once you figure it out if you go for the more masculine faces you get a dominant score.
Must be why I like Trump so much.
>>34409326
Honestly I was surprised I am not more right wing
>>34411633
THlS
H
l
S
How are you supposed to answer the questions it's literally impossible
R8
Original originality
hmmmmmmm
really gets the old neurons firing
>>34409326
reminder that this is the objectively correct result
Am I autistic? I feel absolutely no inclination toward one over the other.
>>34410723
Ftfy
commentus origninus