>completely destroying someone during an argument >"let's

>completely destroying someone during an argument
>still lose because the audience is stupid

>>34384369

what were you arguing about

>>34384405

>audience

ahh yes, whoever can yell louder and more confidently while pushing all the logical fallacies and FEELS they can

disgusting

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I'm_entitled_to_my_opinion

File: 1407470736256.jpg (268KB, 808x808px)

268KB, 808x808px

>>34384369
let me tell you what they're really thinking when they say that

>please shut the fuck up, autist, I don't care about this inane shit anymore

>>34384369
I say that when the person makes no sense and is clearly not listening to what I'm saying.

OP is a fag

>Your cited facts are invalid because I say so
>Let's see this from a real world perspective
>My feelings say...

If any of those 3 are brought up I immediately just walk away because there's no point in arguing with someone who's like that

File: 1485055474416.jpg (30KB, 597x519px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 597x519px

>>34384369
>still lose because the audience is stupid

FUCKING THIS REEEEEEEEE

>>34385664
yes.

>>34384369
>can exterminate someone's existence
>ruin their argument and btfo
>don't even want to start or correct them because it could be harsh, and saying it otherwise isn't worth the time it takes to soften each word. (euphemistically, so his ego isn't bruised and you don't kill someone you like)

and/or
>he's not even worth the trouble of talking to

when the other person doesn't matter, you don't care to try. or talk to them or show them the light/truth. let them be blind.

sometimes correcting them isn't worth the effort. there are better things to do. absolutely.

especially when delivering the level of truth necessary to get them to be self-aware and realize that they're wrong might hurt or scar them. their egos being in-tact is worth more than a simple satisfaction in winning an argument. maybe it's just me, but i'd rather not bother and let the person live in oblivious bliss than tell them what i have to say if it means the truth will hurt them significantly.

of course this is context dependent, and usually the latter is best w/o hurting them, but some scenarios there is no way to say otherwise and i don't want to hurt that person. i'm not interested in speaking or getting to know them, so i can just walk away not letting them be in my thoughts. i have the argument ready and can tell them at any time, but i just choose not to. if they were in my life or to be in my life, sure, but if that person's nothing then it doesn't mean anything at all.


tldr some people aren't worth the effort lol :(
if someone's arguing with you, that means they care.

>>34384369
>"let's just agree to disagree"

some people say that because they don't want to fuck you over. they're saving your ass, think of it as a good thing they didn't continue or you would be fried.

>>34384405
https://youtube.com/watch?v=qC9Pch4__M8

File: image.jpg (57KB, 320x469px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 320x469px

>>34384369
>completely destroying someone during an argument
>they start shitposting

File: 1484152969765.jpg (179KB, 1024x493px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1024x493px

>>34384369
>unironically arguing on the internte

>>34384369
>>34384405
>>34385686
Found the autists who think they're smarter than everyone and don't realize they're actually wrong.

>he takes journals and citations as 100% bulletproof truth
>tries to quote science articles
>doesn't realize reality and truth don't exist

>>34386363
>he confuses pragmatic and philosophical truth in an argument that doesn't even involve philosophy

File: 1465873985265.jpg (11KB, 255x255px)

11KB, 255x255px

>>34384369
>he wastes time "discussing" things on 4chan
You people should try to do something more productive.

File: 1481109178820.gif (324KB, 489x909px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 489x909px

>friendly debate with someone
>Im winning
>"Anon why do you always have to argue? This is why no one likes you"

>>34386363
No need to go that far. Probably 95+% of scientific research in psych and related fields (i.e. what /r9k/ talks about) is bullshit even if you assume reality exists.

>>34384405

>circumcision debate in class
>class laughs at you for saying circumcision is wrong