Daily Reminder.
Circumcision is a form of child torture, and has no modern medical benefits.
Agreed. However, the Jews have too much of a grip on western society. I doubt that circumcision will become less common
>>34062168
In the 80's, it was done to around 80% of newborns.
Now it's the 2010s, it's dropped to 50%
It's dropping.
But not fast enough.
As long as american doctors and "cultural" defenders keep up their shitty propaganda it won't end.
I'd say take it one step at a time. Start by making Americans see it as socially bad and the legislation will get there.
>>34062687
I'm trying my best personally.
I'm glad to see this topic is finally going mainstream.
>>34062862
Let's keep pushing to make it more mainstream.
The thing is, the more we talk about it, the more people realize it's wrong.
It's a win win, let's piss everyone off, because everyone will realize we make more sense.
And let's outcast those who disagree.
>>34062879
>The thing is, the more we talk about it, the more people realize it's wrong.
It's like they say--they more you know, the more you're against it.
If you haven't already I really recommend reading Cold and Taylor's incredibly detailed review of the foreskin's anatomy to answer back to the mistaken notions of the "it's just a little flap of skin" crowd.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1034.x/abstract
"The prepuce" was published in 1999 in the British Journal of Urology, and to date is likely the most detailed review that explains just how amazing an organ the foreskin is and how unethical it is to steal it from people.
>>34062955
Thank you.
I'm bookmarking this.
We intactivists must stick together, and pass around good information to one another.
>>34062955
This might help you too:
http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/
If anyone claims doctors support it.
>>34063103
Much appreciated.
Check out Dr. Carmack's site. She's another ethical doctor who opposes MGM.
>>34063424
Thanks!
She looks wonderful.
Food for thought here. Please share this image, especially if you get into an argument with someone misinformed about just how similar FGM is to MGM.
There are many forms of both. One is not inherently worse than the other. The rationales/excuses given often largely the same. Oftentimes FGM is performed by doctors, at the behest of women who want their daughters to look like them. Now where have I heard that before?
>>34062115
I had to have a medical one cuz my foreskin was wrapped tighter around my dick than a Saturday night hookers lips, Still lost a load of sensation tho and I had mine in my twenties.
it's a crime against men
>>34063696
Saved
>>34063806
I second this
Who cares? Didnt get to keep mine, will continue the cycle if given the chance, if only if that means not saying anything negative when it comes up with normie friends and family
>>34063920
>Who cares?
A lot of people care. I certainly care that my foreskin was stolen from me.
>Didnt get to keep mine, will continue the cycle if given the chance
What if your son grows up to resent you for it, considering that now ignorance is no longer an excuse?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmToXLVrZ7c
>>34063920
Doctors care.
Doctors oppose it.
>>34063806
Male circumcision is a crime against women, too. Women with circumcised partners are more likely to experience painful intercourse--male circumcision distorts the form and function of the penis by removing its ability to function like a well-lubed piston, instead turning it into a rough, dowel-like structure.
>Circumcision was associated with frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men and with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment. Thorough examination of these matters in areas where male circumcision is more common is warranted.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947