ROBOT SURVEY

Finished, pls no mute, bby

>>30444884
>One of the first 3 people.
>Check results
>Someone else had almost identical results as me.
Who is the mystery person in the 26-35 range that also started coming here in 2007?

>>30445098
Mystery person is OP, actually!

>>30444884
alright i filled out the thing

>>30445528
>>30444982
Thanks, robobos! I'm glad everyone seems to be getting the moon question right. Last time I did this, everyone was retarded.

The pen dies like we all will eventually die.

>>30445656
I love that response. Person who said that should be proud of themselves.

Who's Emily and why should she/he be banned?

File: Agrid.jpg (28KB, 376x335px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 376x335px

>you lose it
technically true

>>30445656
This and the person who said it would make history for pens [and penkind]

Whoever said it would float needs to finish high school.

>>30446056
I said that it would float away then felt like a moron after pressing the enter button.

>all those people who have had sex
I'm going to throw up. Fucking normalfags.

>>30446199
You so jelly, anon. Delicious angry jelly.

omg... all those people who said it would float.... whyyyy

>30-40% of r9k has had sex

fug :DDDD

>>30446459
I was one of those. The question was pretty ambiguous. I assumed you drop the pen from earth, so it wouldn't reach the moon before floating away.

To the person who asked, there's no erroneous diagnosis option because those diagnoses are not valid. Since you don't really have them, they don't matter. Only what might actually be affecting your mental state matters in that question.

>>30446649
Ah, shit. Sorry. I should have been more specific about the situation.

>>30446658
Fair enough.

Hey OP, is there a way to see the answers in a spreadsheet (tabular) form?

>>30446738
Requires an account, which I haven't had for years and can't be bothered to remake.

I can't demand that you look into allowing anonymous access, not after you've done a good job designing the questions already (thanks), but I imagine it should be possible.

Who's right?


>I don't accept the stereotype. It's just us/them mentality and therefore dumb.
>Virgin
>I have no opinion on this
>Ugly, socially awkward. Virginity not required.
>being a whiny faggot
>KV status
>Socially Repulsive
>Social autism desu
>Being an outcast
>I ain't got no friends senpai
>Shy
>I don't believe in stereotypes because this thread is for all sorts of things; like a random blog.
>Being male, fembots don't exist.
>Not being a normie *reee*
>Being angry at the world
>Lonely
>Idk
>Socially inept to an extreme
>not having felt love, not even once
>Virginity
>The inability to function in social situations to such a degree where maintaining or establishing relationships becomes impossible or incredibly difficult.
>Being Abnormal
>disliking of being around others
>Social Exclusion
>I hate my life
>I think anyone that feels really fucked up about themselves and is alone 95% of the time is a roboat
>Thinking about things' causes and consequences rather than feeling about them.
>Antisocial, few/no friends, introvert, tfw no gf
>Short, shit skinned, easily forgotten
>Being genetically inferior and an outcast
>autism
>being anxious on social situation, unable to hold conversations with people, no friends
>ugly fat and a virgin
>Involuntary lack of social connections
>ugly
>being fucked up in the head
>Social anxiety

>>30446776
>>30446691
I found the option to share it!

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sW0TtaaExeGISweLDS8M9jv4jlM1fQ72rU8mk7VQ4LU/edit?usp=sharing

>>30446794
Awesome! Thanks.

thxblx

>>30446777
>I don't accept the stereotype. It's just us/them mentality and therefore dumb.
This person is most correct.

Person who asked what this is for, it's just out of curiosity. Also, I'm interested in mental health in general, so it's interesting to me.

>>30446815
>that answerer is a female studying mental health

No wonder that they believe that 'we're all unique don't generalize'.

EVERYONE WHO DOESN'T KNOW WHAT PENS DO ON THE MOON:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5_dOEyAfk

>>30446977
We are all unique. Generalizing only works on very large sets of people and/or long periods of time.

>>30447054
People who say that just are just shirking the responsibility to find (or state) behaviour patterns.

>>30447084
Not at all. It's more complex than that. You need to be able to consider the large-scale patterns AND accept the individual details.

>>30444884
Who is Hestia Lamar and why are they viewing the data?

>>30447125
This is exactly the kind of rhetoric which is used to meaninglessly-but-pseudoplausibly connote that a finding, e. g. racial, is somehow flawed. 'Yes, race X in general is Y, but you should focus on the individual rather than broad generalizations.' Or: 'Yes, robots in general or normals or general are such-and-such, but you should realize that your definition of a robot/a normal is arbitrary', as if arbitrariness of definitions which we can use in empirical studies isn't a perk and not a 'flaw' (as it is almost uniformly referred to).

I'm honestly rather embarrassed that I have to spell it out as if you weren't aware of all this.

>>30447192
Hestia Lamar is my throwaway identity. Hello, there. I'm viewing the data because I created the survey.

>>30447298
>isn't a perk
*weren't

>>30447298
Ah... the age old psychology versus sociology war continues...

>>30447361
>psychology versus sociology war

Hmm?

To be honest I might have never heard of this. Care to elaborate what the disagreement is?

why can we send in multiple times?

>18% underage

Children get off this filthy methadone clinic review forum and go to bed!

>>30447408
Because if I were to limit to 1 response, you'd be required to sign in with google. So we're on the honour system here.

>>30447452
Other differences from board-carried surveys is, I believe, very few females here and relatively many 16+.

>>30447499
I meant, differences from other surveys carried directly on here /r9k/.

>16+
*26+

>>30446794
The version with visual graphs:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf7fSVcMi3rvvI4qqQp8sdjB4Km5h8aGthFvrtVP_bgwL6vxA/viewanalytics?usp=form_confirm

>>30447397
Psychologists say that individual differences in cognition/behaviour are so varied and complex that we cannot use most research to predict human responses.

Sociologists say that overall patterns are the best way to predict human responses and that outliers in data don't matter in the long run.

Obviously, both are correct, but everyone has a personal bias toward one or the other. We need to keep both perspectives in mind.

File: IMG_2319.jpg (98KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 680x680px

>>30444884
>someone who took this lives in Brazil

I'm so sorry anon

File: 1469065146101.jpg (179KB, 706x706px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 706x706px

>>30444884
>What is your age?
>Under 18
>19-25
first question and you've already fucked it up, sasuga robot kun

>>30444884
>someone besides me wrote the pen will stay there forever

WHAT DOES IT MEAN??

>>30447600
I see.

That's nonsense. The first 'position' is literally just 'the patterns are too many for us to ever know perfectly waah', with a connotation to give up (or, as I described, to dismiss politically inconvenient findings). Sure there's always room for new studies to conduct, the proverbial relationship between eating candy and shoe colour. But I don't find a 'limitation' of science, as the former would have it, but rather its infinite flexibility: we'll never run of things to study! The 'if you are too attached to generalizations, you are hurting the individual through prejudice' is just a pretext; nobody saying this really has the invividuals in question in mind.

>>30447639
How do you know? Some linguistic calque that you spotted?

File: 1466354050727.gif (87KB, 192x197px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 192x197px

>>30447677
FUCK

Thanks, anon... fixed it. Hopefully that doesn't skew the results too much.

>>30447703
>how do you know? Some linguistic calque that you spotted?

No go see the results. Interesting stuff

>>30447716
>Hopefully that doesn't skew the results too much.

I must say that except for your unhealthy amount of acknowledgement of the 'remember not to overly generalize' angle, you really seem to care to do everything by the book. Pleasure to see this, and I hope you (or someone else) keeps this thread bumped.

I think I'll even dare ask you if you considered adding a question about professionally measured IQ.

>>30447764
Kind of funny they chose to mention their country out of all things.

File: 1467493512266.jpg (90KB, 760x760px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 760x760px

>all the underage newfags

>>30447794
(Though, you should have done a preliminary reconnaissance and made a thread asking robots what kind of questions they'd like to see in a comprehensive survey. I did that once; except I wasn't sufficiently clear (even though I thought I was) and 95 % of replies were people replying to my *draft* of a study rather than suggesting new questions...)

File: 1470091597588.png (56KB, 786x590px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 786x590px

>equal amount of """females""" and trannies
fucking knew it

>>30447938
Speaking of this, I never know if 'female (MTF)' means their current 'gender' is female, or the original one was. I only assume it's the former.

>>30447959
MTF means they are 'female'
FTM means they are 'male'

both are equally mentally ill

>>30447959
I always take MtF and FtM meaning they're in transition (taking pills+injections, usually pre-surgery) most of the time if they've completed the transition they'll say I am that gender or I am a transexual [insert post-op gender]

>>30447959
mtf means transitioned male to female
ftm female to male

>>30447979
>>30448045
...Wait, right, I fucked up, didn't I. Sorry. I meant that if someone says they're a transsexual male or female, without specifying the direction.

>>30448011
Post-op. OK.

>>30445656
>>30446017
'It's eroded by vacuum' is good too.

>>30447794
Hey, thanks. I've had some practise doing these surveys on /b/ a few times, so I've figured word questions so the responses are more accurate. I thought about including an IQ question, but honestly most people have never been measured reliably and will just guess or answer what some online test told them. I've tried it a few times and it was pretty meh, results-wise.

>>30447846
Feel free to suggest them here and I'll include them in my next survey.

>>30447959
It stands for male to female, so they started male and now identify as a female. They might still have a dick or they might not anymore. You can't change your chromosomes, though.

>>30447979
I actually think that they're not so much mentally ill, as they feel like and enjoy things a typical person of the opposite gender would feel/enjoy. A very feminine man wouldn't feel comfortable if people assumed things about them that are very opposite to how they feel. So they start to call themselves female as a way of helping society understand who they are.

I think getting your dick cut off/your vagina sewed up is taking it a step to far, though. Let the men wear dresses and the women act butch. No body needs surgery for that.

>>30444884
just so you know mtfg on /lgbt/ linked to your survey to mess with your results

>more bisexual females than hetero females

>>30448189
Why do they come here? Why not just go to /lgbt/ or something? Do they come just to laugh at us?

>>30448189
>that 1 ftm person

what is life like for you senpai

>>30448056
>Feel free to suggest them here

...Can't find the thread. The archive must have been down at the moment.

Shame, it was a good thread, I distinguished between ( ) (x) and [ ] [x] in the draft.

One could scour [1] for potential questions.

[1] http://desuarchive.org/r9k/search/subject/survey/type/op/

>S P E R G - L O R D
I appreciate this.

>>30448169
Wonder if Google Forms have an option to store the HTTP referer.

>>30448258
([1] is suggested as a workaround.)

[1] https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/docs/0TfmS3EGHFI

>>30448169
I saw the post, actually. I'm bi, so I frequent the place. It's fine. Good, even. It's just more responses and that's what I'm looking for. We just have to keep in mind that the amount of MtF responses is no long indicative of /r9k/'s demographics.

>>30448322
Except the thread title is no longer accurate.

File: 1469756955256.gif (101KB, 235x235px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 235x235px

Who /pickedoptionsatrandom/ here?

>>30448343
Fixed. I changed the title to just 4chan instead.

>>30448358
aw, maaaan...

>>30448437
I wolud still rather read solely about my home board of /r9k/. Home board is a variable; there should be a question for it.

>>30448437
Perhaps picking answers at random could be, in the future, detected by measuring mouse movement patterns and time of hesitation.

>>30444884
>17 bisexual robots
>16 MtFs

Will one of you be my GF?

>>30448508
(Also, the thread was posted at /lgbt/ at 00:18.)

>>30448508
I agree. I'd hoped it would be /r9k/ only, but you can't control who responds. It's not meant to be scientifically viable anyway.

>>30448509
sry i have a bf

>>30448509
I'm married, sorry. Good luck, though.

>>30445595
interesting results. i cheated on the moon question and googled it though.

File: GASP.gif (875KB, 500x318px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 500x318px

>11 bisexual females
My people! You exist!

>>30448600
>you can't control who responds

You kind of could, but it would only work for tripfags. You could ask them to reveal their tripcodes; if the tripcode matches, the answerer was really a long-term /r9k/ poster.

>>30445595
>I'm glad everyone seems to be getting the moon question right. Last time I did this, everyone was retarded.

Ah, so that's your secret substitute for flat asking for IQ!

File: 1468812832296 (2).jpg (55KB, 600x628px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 600x628px

>>30448437
That's what happens when you post a survey on a board as D E V I L I S H as this one.

>>30448697
I'd rather not restrict the responses too much, to be honest. Tripfags are their own demographic and... I kind of hate tripfaggotry on an anonymous image board

>RE: moon
Kind of yes. It's funny to see how many people don't know how gravity works.

>>30448744
wait what?
how the fuck would anyone get that wrong?

File: plsnobully.jpg (29KB, 599x439px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 599x439px

>>30448744
I answered wrong but I now see my error and it's too late to make myself look less retarded.

>>30448744
>It's funny to see how many people don't know how gravity works.

After some time, I belatedly had the idea to say 'The moon is attracted by the pen and falls into it.' Would be 100 % accurate, too.

>>30448762
I honestly don't know. But... whenever I ask, at least 40% of the responses say "It would float." Sometimes it's a lot more.

>>30448789
It's okay. I think most people just don't think long enough about it. It doesn't mean you're dumb, just not paying close attention all the time. :)

>>30448790
>The moon is attracted by the pen and falls into it.
Best response I've ever read.

>>30444884
Confirms what I already know.

I'm older than most of you, I've been here longer than most of you and you're all a bunch of whiny faggots that are so deluded regarding your own assholeness they can't even see why they're the sole reason they're alone.

>>30448887
At least you missed the quads.

>>30448887
>boo hoo robots complain
Cry moar faggot

FUCK I FUCKING LOST THE GAME

I WAS DOING SO WELL

>>30448887
>Being proud of being old and an elderfag
What does it feel like, to know that being older and on an anime website for longer than others is a point of pride for you?

Prideful oldfags are no better then babyboomers claiming that they were the best generation and everything that came after is shit. Go ahead and call me underage because anyone under 35 to you is the cognitive equivalent of an infant any anyone that came aboard post-2008 is a "newfag".

Age does not equal wisdom, buddy.

>under 18
>19,2%
What the actual fuck?
I knew there were a lot of underages here but THAT many? I'm honestly ready to leave this place now.

OP here... I love you too random anonymous person!

>>30449074
>I knew there were a lot of underages here but THAT many?
If you're here around the late spring time of the year you'll realize it by the amount of prom and finals and college applications posts.

I actually once counted 7 active threads that all but confessed to being underageb&

>>30449074
There might be some self-selection, them jumping to boast their underage.

But you're basically right.

>>30449074
don't take it too seriously. Since you can vote multiple times I did underage mtf with other silly options 5 times

>>30449208
>I did underage mtf with other silly options 5 times
why?

>>30449219
Lack of autistic respect for all things data.

>>30449249
Okay then... thanks for... contributing, I guess? Not sure why you bothered.

>>30449267
I'm not him actualy, I'm the follower of this thread.

My reply came from a general impression how things like the imperative of data accuracy is determined by personality, largely innate.

>>30449309
Ah, my mistake. I don't know why people would want to mess with the results. It's not for anything, so it doesn't really do anything but make the survey less interesting for those of us who are curious about the data.

>>30449208
Hey! We're on the honour system here! It ruins the fun when you spam rando answers....

the moon landing was fake jfk was a reptilian alien

>10% of r9k has participated in an orgy/3way

...

Someone with more time should into who said those but I have to guess it's the women or faggots

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sW0TtaaExeGISweLDS8M9jv4jlM1fQ72rU8mk7VQ4LU/edit#gid=2124699680

>Look at this.
>Half the mtf are underage
Wtf? How accurate is this?

>>30449358
just delete all the faggots/mtf people or maybe women since htey are probably where all the jokes will be

>>30449358
>my mistake

No it wasn't, there was no way for you to tell it was me, not even post formatting.

>I don't know why people would want to mess with the results.

Chaotic evil, the evolutionary instinct to alter failing to be overriden by the evolutionary instinct to cooperate, whatever.

OP again... and OMG I love you too other random anon!

>>30449358
if you want more accuracy why make a poll you can vote in multiple times?

>>30449430
He answered this. It's an accuracy-# of answers tradeoff.

>>30449444
I mean, one of us could perhaps write a custom quick survey script using some library that would use all techniques given [1] here to prevent doublevoting without registration, but Google Forms have graphs et c.

[1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Fingerprinting#Data

>>30449381
Not even slightly anymore. A bunch of people from lgbt have spammed random responses, I think. Too bad, but that's what happens sometimes.

>>30449430
>>30449444
I'm a she, actually. I did it because it would have required having a google account and that eliminates a bunch of people. But yes, I thought the honour system would be enough to keep the responses down to 1 per. It's not super surprising that it didn't work this time. Maybe it'll work next time.

>>30449487
>I'm a she, actually.

And that's after I've taken care in hundreds of posts to always refer to posters of unknown gender as 'they'.

Also, get the fuck out, you useless whore.

>>30449487
Hestia Lamar why are you doing this for real though?

>>30449513
That's very nice of you to do that. I also prefer using they.
>Also, get the fuck out, you useless whore.
hahaha yeah no

>>30449537
I'm very interested in mental health, especially relating to sexuality. I like to see what people really think and what their lives are like.

>>30449513
Gee, any girl would be lucky to date such a gentleman!

>>30449576
He's not asking for a date?

>>30449603
I am not.

Timestamps before trampstamps.

>>30449618
extra bumpereeenoo

>>30449576
Why would he want to date a "woman" from your survey? Those "women" are all trannies and whores.

>>30449618
No one is dumb enough to actually respond to tits/gtfo.

>>30449635
You are talking to a person who has Googled >"your tits just gtfo" more than once.

Dem results. This survey is fucked.

>>30449739
Pretty much. It was fine for the first 60 results, but now it looks like the ones I make for /b/. Oh well.

>>30449782
So basically when /lgbt/ started getting it got destroyed? Kinda like how they destroy this board with their constant raid threads?

>>30449827
Yes, OP was unfortunate to make this iteration at this time.

>>30449827
Well... kind of yes. It was mostly /mtfg/, though. Honestly, they have the right to be mad at /r9k/ though. This place is full of terribly judgmental people and they have suffered a lot of judgment in their lives. They can't tell if this survey is promoting the hate or just randomly amongst it.

It's not promoting the hate, though... just so you /lgbt/ people know.

>>30449902
>This place is full of terribly judgmental people

Hey, just because you revealed you are a woman doesn't mean that you have to begin to talk like one.

>>30449902
>Caring what a bunch of men in dresses think.
I may be an almost 30 virgin but I know a lower level human being when I see one.

>>30449936
Whatever, man.

>>30449948
Double whatever.

>>30448056
>>30447959
I put that as a joke. People can lie/talk shit in surveys.

Oh. uh. Hi person who will kill themselves if I don't say hi. Do you feel validated?

>>30449902
mtfg has no right to be mad at r9k, r9k should be mad at mtfg

mtfg posts all the neverending tranny threads on r9k and they constantly seduce robots into being their beta orbiters and buying them steam games

and if you ever call them out on that shit to their face they just tease you and be mean to you

>>30444884
To all you STUPID fucks who thought "it falls towards the ground at 1.62 ms^-2" or "1/6th the speed of on Earth" was the right answer, it is NOT, it ACCELERATES at 1.62 ms^-2. Anything written in ms^-2 is not even a SPEED!

Fuck me am I sharing this board with morons or what now