Which board has the least amount of femanons?

/diy/ or /toy/ probably

/k/ or /pol/

>>28459597
/toy/ has plenty of femanons

I would guess /sci/ does not have a lot of femanons

/jp/ probably

probably /g/
the biggest concentration of females is on /soc/ and /cgl/

>>28459682
Really? I would think a lot of the girls that come to this site are weebs

>>28459682
Nah, they're definitely up there with the amount of "femanons" lurking. Tons of landwhales on there.

I'd say /g/, /s/, /k/, /k/, and /pol/

>>28459579
/soc/ of course!
XD

/o/ most likely

>>28459719
there are girls on /g/ they just aren't vocal about it at all

I'd say /k/ and /o/

>>28459579
I would say /his/ probably doesnt have too many girls

/f/ and /gd/ probably don't have too many either

>>28459579
/his/ I guarantee it.

>>28459579

I use /int/ regularly and almost no one ever, ever claims to be a woman, nor is there any reason on a default basis to suppose that any given post is written by a woman. This is truer on /int/ than it is on other 4chan boards that I use regularly.

There is a sort of global masculine bro-culture that persists on /int/, which is exactly its appeal. Of /course/ you should talk about territory (clay), past wars, post softcore porn, etc. 4chan's moderation staff really doesn't give a shit about the porn that is regularly posted on /int/, it should be said. I suppose it's the... yeast, of their worries.

I would imagine that more specific/autistic boards such as /k have an even lower RL female quotient, though. But I don't use them enough to have an informed opinion.

>>28459754
This 100%

Anything involving machines like cars or weapons turn women off

>>28459579
/biz/ fucking women don't know money for shit.

>>28459830
you think that board does?

>>28459719
Of the active boards /k/ is by far the most masculine board, followed by /sp/ (even though /sp/ is shit now). Some of the niche boards are probably even more male dominated though, /m/ or /o/ I could see having literally zero female posters.

>>28459788
yea, probably only like a handful of females on /his/

women don't like history, the past DOES NOT matter

>>28459839
We organize our pump and dumps very vigorously

File: xlsyvwH.png (192KB, 939x418px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 939x418px

>>28459797
You must be new as fuck to /int/ if you think there are no girls there. It's actually one of the more popular boards on the site for women, there have been multiple attention whoring tripfag women who have posted there over the years (see pic). Go into any one of the generals and there's probably a resident girl or two.

>>28459797
>use /int/ regularly and almost no one ever, ever claims to be a woman

are you kidding me? have you ever gone into a general other than /brit/?

>>28459809

on the contrary, cars are socially acceptable status symbols and an everyday part of normie life, so plenty of women are interested in cars. However guns are sufficiently "anti-social" enough that the women has to be sufficiently culturally conservative/crazy-slut-bitch to have an interest in them. Women naturally have a baseline interest in cars, but in guns, not so much.

Witness the internet fragments which r9k gleans, to the effect that women have very specific taste in cars, specifically, what cars say about men. Cars offer a big strong machine "vehicle" whereby to judge men, compete with men, achieve autonomy.

>>28459896
no, women don't give a shit about cars or want to talk about them, as long as the car is expensive that's the only thing that matters

all women would cream over a honda civic if it cost $150k

Any board catered toward masculine interests and extremely niche interests.

From browsing /g/, /k/, and /o/ on a consistent basis, I can tell you that there are no girls in those boards. No girl is interested in technology beyond the latest Apple product. No girl is into weapons, but the southern "country" girls who would be into guns aren't browsing 4chan. Finally, no girl gives a fuck about cars other than if it's "cute" or not.

Prove me wrong.

>>28459876

I am not new to /int/, and my appraisal of the board is more accurate than yours. The avowed female presence is still surprisingly low, given its "general interest" status, and also the travel-angle that women superficially like.

>>28459895

Again, you are actually wrong, and now I know that you, like the other guy, actually use /int/ less than I do. The stuff you two are vaguely holding out (data?) are the outliers, which map lower than most other boards. Every tenth post on r9k, for example, is some female. even other blue boards such as /tv/, /lit/, /his/ and even /sp/ have larger detectable self-reported female presence.

/pol/, there arent any women on there surprisingly.

>>28460021
Nah m8, you're both new as fuck to the board and you haven't actually explored much of the board. Interpals threads were like 50% female when they used to be popular. Generals are rife with women (/balt/, nederdraad, sverigetraden, etc. all have/have had female regulars, look for some meetup pics).

Not placing /int/ on /r9k/'s level by any means, but it had a notable female presence even during the Riley days when it was smaller. Saying it's less feminine now than /sp/ or /tv/ is laughable.

>>28459936
>this is what /k/ and /pol/ believe

>>28460111
Not true, I visit /pol/ daily.

>>28459936
Women like how certain cars look and what the car could do for them but they don't like to talk about the specific workings of a car or any of that boring shit.

File: 1462453469098.png (363KB, 645x627px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 645x627px

/lgbt/, /s/, /d/, /int/, /mlp/ and of course /out/

>>28460168
at best a girl will say "cute car" "ugly car" "hot"

that's really it, typical superficial shit. they don't give a fuck about technical details. usually the more expensive the car is, the more they want it, regardless of anything. that's just how their brain works. they see dollar signs like how men see tits and ass.

>>28460168
As if /o/ ever talk about the mechanics of a car, either. A quarter of /o/ are busriders

/o/ has had one girl, ever

>>28460283
Probably was a trap, too

>>28460257
Discussion can be had but as soon as you mention valvetrains shitposters derail the thread.
>>28460168
They literally only look at the badge.

>>28460131

No I'm not new to /int/. I've been using it for about five years, and have poked around the generals in that time.

It is necessary that you understand the actual case. /int/ is more of a sausage fest than /sp/ or /tv/, with very casual usage of these three, for instance.

You will be made to accept that I am right about this, and that you are wrong. Not because I want it, but because it is actually the case, as borne out by repeated observations. You are wrong anon, and it is time for you to grow up and admit that you are wrong.

It is very important for you to understand that you are wrong about this. Here is the central premise, to review: /int/ is not the most sausage-fest board on 4chan, but it is up there, as in among the top-10 boards or so in terms of male percentage.

/hm/ trust me

>>28460131
There are literally no women in nederdraad and in there has never been a woman at a nederdraad meetup.

You could make a lot of arguments for least, but most is /co/, /soc/ and obviously /cgl/ = /ck/.

I'd say /tg/ also seems to have a fair few, based around the normie/reddity way the board acts nowadays.

>>28460465

good man. this anecdote buttresses my toast.

Any of the less entry level hobby boards. The kinds of hobbies that require actual effort have the fewest """"""""femanons"""""""" for obvious reasons.

Everyone is forgetting /out/

>>28459579
Are you talking Femanon density or total?

>>28460466
>I'd say /tg/
I'd agree with /tg/ too.

>>28461959
>>28460466
/tg/ has fucking tons.

Now, /diy/. /diy/ has no women in it, I guarantee. >>28460964 is correct -- the same goes for boards like /3/, /p/, etc. /k/ has only a couple, but /o/ has lots.

/v/ has less and less ever since GOOBUHGATE and /soc/ peeling away all the gamer grills.

File: mosaicb4c8901b2c13eb98e91195ff8a105e49d53e74e5.jpg (229KB, 920x920px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 920x920px

>>28459788
True, but it's slowly going downhill now that they're trying to make a board culture by being lefty-pol and making memes out of philosophers and shit. Once it's gotten to the point where they're making 'What was the best BRAAAAAP in History?' threads, then you'll see more.