/furry/ board when? it could even be shortened to /fu/ to capture

>>324193
that was more of a prank than an actual attempt at creating the board

it was still funny desu but I think it's about time a real board was made

>>324187
Kill yourself

File: image.jpg (53KB, 616x519px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 616x519px

>>324187
Yiff in hell

Sorry, there's a huge stigma on 4chan for you guys. I think it's irrational as there are tons of horrible fanbases here but for some reason you guys stick out the most. I don't care for furries but 4chan is super autistic and wrong for singling out people out.

>>324187
you have /b/ /vp/ and /mlp/ go wild

>>324187
no

>>324321
>wrong for singling out people out
wut

>furries demanding shit on 4chan
Hahahahahah

Kill yourself

>>324340
This meme's getting tiresome. Hiro knows that there's no real problem with furries. Eventually he'll create a board and you won't be able to do anything.

File: image.jpg (14KB, 276x357px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 276x357px

>>324354
>there's no real problem with furries.
Surely you jest.

NEVER
_V
_E
_R

File: 1445038465509.jpg (25KB, 254x247px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 254x247px

Never fucking ever.

You will always be hated here, it's a tradition as old as the site itself. Go kill some other website

Hiro if you see this please keep in mind that "Furries" are disgusting homosexual pedophiles who LOVE drama and they're all always on IRC anyway, so why do they even need a board
Awful, awful people

>>324381
Don't call me Shirley. That's a pretty bad name for a girl anyway. I prefer Erika.

>>324402
Nah, there is some straight furries who likes Krystal, Amy Rose and Isabelle too.

I can see it happening just because furries are a pretty polite and peaceful bunch and the rest of the community is a bunch of angry raging bitches.

>>324321
I know right. What I don't understand is why 4chan is ok with bronies and gives them their own board. mlp fags are usually worse and more autistic than furries.

>>324487
>more autistic than furries
zoz

If 8ch's /furry/ is any indication, a /furry/ here would be awful and would please neither furries nor furry haters.

What would be a better idea, in my opinion, is to just slightly relax global rule 3 on /aco/ and /d/. For instance, allow furry on /aco/ if the characters come from an actual series (videogame, cartoon, etc). In this way, you'd make /co/ happy, while still restricting most of the unwanted furry content to /b/.

>>324187

Really /fu/ and not /fur/?

This is why you can't have a furry board. You're too fucking retarded to even think of the most logical board name.

>>324321
>irrational

Fuck off. It's not irrational. They take perfectly cute and sweet funny animals and turn them in to sex objects. I just want to search for Talespin without finding loads of pictures of Baloo changing Kit's diaper.

>>324487
We're not, but good luck getting rid of them now.
Take your furshit somewhere else. You aren't wanted here.

File: 1419450790526.jpg (42KB, 400x462px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 400x462px

>>324487
/mlp/ fags can fuck off as well.

>>324187
There are like a hundred different images boards created for degenerates like you. This is not one of them, now leave and take your furfag and take your friends with you.

File: 19478c79db6c9ac293c5a80d8f8a1909.jpg (397KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1280x1280px

>>324585
>>324598
>>324628
I think you guys are overreacting too much, it's just erotic draws of cartoon characters and you don't need to browse /fur/. Same thing for /d/ stuff like futanaris, traps and other weird fetishes.

>>324731
Don't fuck dogs.

>>324736
You know, I could generalize about other fetishes
>muscles make you gay
>futa makes you gay
>lolicons are pedophiles
>NTRfags are keks in training
But I think responding means you've won somehow, so I guess going slightly meta and calling that out also cancels out the 'hurrhurr he responded that means hes mad' stuff.

>>324753
All of this is right though

>>324753
I don't think you're mad, I don't think anything about you. Don't fuck dogs.

File: 1446629548681.jpg (35KB, 363x541px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 363x541px

>>324381
Yeah, I mean, they're WEIRD.

File: bill_nye.jpg (38KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 640x480px

>>324187
>/furry/ board when?

Why not a catch-all board called Mental Illness?

We could call it /fuktup/

>>325087
We already have /r9k/.

At this point /pol/ users are worse than furrys.

How many times are you guys going to try to push for this board before? This just shows how unrelenting and retarded furries are.

>>325165
>>325165
How long were people pushing for /his/ and a western porn board? They said those would never be real, and look where we are now. This is the age of dreams, why dream small?

I think /fur/ would be just fine.

MLP should be banned on it though, just to shit up bronies more.

>>325087
>what are /b/, /r9k/, /lgbt/, /mlp/ and /soc/

>>324753

At least those are all humans. Fuck off and go live in the jungle if animals are so great.

>>324187
>even a blue board would be ok

No. Blue Board would have no content. The only people that would want to post there is the lifestylers and fursuiters, and they have other places to post.

A red board would just be a porn board. That's what people want

>>325338
>Blue Board would have no content
That's quite an assumption you're making.
>A red board would just be a porn board. That's what people want
Another assumption but I can't really say anything to the contrary. In all honesty I'd rather we just allow board related characters on /co/ and /aco/ because it would make since and doesn't mean adding another board.

>>325362
>In all honesty I'd rather we just allow board related characters on /co/ and /aco/ because it would make since and doesn't mean adding another board.

Well, I agree with this.

Just shut the FUCK up. Furries are a dying group anyways. There's nothing to be discussed, you can already discuss shit that might interest furries in their respective boards. The only thing that shit is going to turn into a shitfest about their little fandom. Just fuck off senpai senpai.

>>325398
>Furries are a dying group anyways
Nah.

There's nothing to be discussed, you can already discuss shit that might interest furries in their respective boards.
You contradicted yourself there. There is a lot to talk about but in terms of talking about things on certain boards the mods have a tendency to selectively enforce rule 3.

>The only thing that shit is going to turn into a shitfest about their little fandom.
If this was FA I'd probably agree but this is 4chan
I know its in people's nature to generalize but you're assuming the furries that go here are those types of people and that none of them avoid drama.
And the only kinds of drama I can think of are artist and site related. Which i'm pretty sure don't happen here and can be avoided by making it against the rules.

>the only kinds of drama are the most obnoxious and petty kinds of drama, oh that and relationship drama of course, because we're literally all actually gay with each other
zuz

>>325418
Which doesn't change the fact that it doesn't happen here. And like in most other cases you won't hear from those avoiding it.

>>325422
I don't know man you seem pretty whiny already like you're about to break down into tears, honestly
already edging up on some drama of your own here

>>325424
How is it whining to tell you that you're wrong.
I'm pretty sure you're just baiting but really?

>>325398
Weebs are dying. Furries are mainstream

>>325510
You're not helping.

>>325261
if you faggots would quit fucking cutting it down i just might

>>325510
Ha ha ha ha
Furries aren't mainstream. Far from it, they're a pretty obscure group to the average person. Weebs are far from dying since they're backed by anime, a whole cultural art style from another country. Furries on the other hand stick to content from their little fandom. I think a census put them at around 3 million from the 80s till today. In comparison bronies number somewhere between 7 million to 12 million.

bumping for /furry/

hiro pls respond

if you're going to make a board for anthro animal porn, don't make it /fur/ - Furry, make /kemo/ - Kemono.

kemono doesn't have the same "toxic" baggage as furry and goes in line with the idea of 4chan being an eastern-culture centric site. it also shuts out fursuiters, "lifestylers" and other extreme degenerates who everyone is so afraid would flock to the site if such a board was created

either way it's pointless to keep making these threads since they all just devolve into LALALA I CANT HEAR YOU between /pol/-tier goon shitposters and furfags who can't compose convincing arguments for shit. there are bigger issues that the site needs to fix before the idea of giving furfags what they want becomes even remotely relevant

I have a better idea.
Worldfilter furry to cancer.

>>324585
Going to the right boorus and searching "rating:safe" (or just blacklisting whatever shit offends you) will usually help.

>>326034
What would be the point in that?
Making /kemo/ wouldn't make much sense since most people just want a place to post /co/ related characters.
There are plenty of kemono fursuiters and people that are anti furry will still just see all of it as "furshit".
And I don't see why the mods deleting /co/ related stuff that isn't even lewd or off-topic isn't reason enough.

>>326034
I like the idea of a kemono board. It should still allow western styles, but it won't be the main focus.

>>326092
it's literally just to differentiate actual dogfuckers with people who just want a place to dump porn. even if kemono fursuiters exist it's a fandom that's a lot less tainted than western furry.

>>326034
>and goes in line with the idea of 4chan being an eastern-culture centric site

So it goes in line with something that's completely untrue?

>>326070
"meme"

>>326134
You seem to believe there are no feral kemono artists and that feral is what most people want to post.
And how does this differentiate anything?
The taint is more prevalent in furry because it gets more attention from normies and the media.
You're overgeneralizing a small, loud group to represent all furries as a whole, just like people do with every other fandom.
People who have fursuits are still a very small minority that you constantly see in documentaries and in the news because they like to go out to cons and show off their suits.

>>326160
I don't know how I can make this any more clear to you -

You want hiro to make a furry board, right? Yet you have a dozen or so oldfag SA goons trying their hardest to shut it down by screaming loudly. Don't you think suggesting the board in a way that doesn't trigger these shitflingers would be the most likely to have a favorable outcome?

Let's ignore what both of us know is the actual true implications of these words and look at it like this:
people see "furry" and think of faggots dressed up as animals taking turns fucking each other in the ass
people see "kemono" and either think animal people drawn in a typically eastern style or of nothing at all because they haven't heard the word before.

I am overgeneralizing because that's exactly what the people so opposed of this idea are doing. I know it's not the truth but why does it matter when the opposition doesn't give two shits about the "truth" either?

Honestly i'm a furfag and even i'm against /fur/ simply because I know full and well it would be nothing but pokemon which has the most porn out of any other series in history and my little pony which in it's short time has the third most amount of porn dedicated to it behind touhou.

It would be flooded with this and little else. Thats why even various furrychans separate pokemon and mlp and give them their own boards.

This of corse is talking about the active and willing community, I haven't even touched on the trolling.

>>326253
I say

>lift anti-furry rule for /aco/
>make /mlp/ red
>make /fur/ keep pokemon in a general

>>326226
Don't get me wrong i'm not trying to say you're idea is bad or that you're wrong but I'm pretty sure the oldfag SA goons don't care about whether or not a board is /kemo/ or /furry/.
It would still just be the furry board to them.
putting a different coat of paint on it doesn't change what it is especially no to them.
Which is why I say we should ignore them and make a specific type of board.
I think the biggest concentration of furries is on /co/ and /v/ which is why I think a good idea would be to make a /fco/ or even a /fcov/.

I'm not even all in when it comes to making a new board and would prefer if they just changed the rules for /co/ and /aco/.

>>326266
>changed the rules for /co/ and /aco/
Only because you screaming queens need to be seen carrying on your ERP, for some reason. You always have to do your nasty shit in public because you're all exactly mentally crippled and need any attention, positive or negative, to reinforce the idea that you somehow count
You don't count. You shouldn't get a board, furry shit should be even more banned than it already is and gay bestiality pedophile ERP should be made literally illegal. Nobody wants to see your roleplaying, relationship drama, and shitty, terrible artwork
Yiff in exactly hell

>>325338
>>326337
Get better bait sir.

>>326354
None of those groups bring inherent incestual relationship drama with them. Again, you're all gay with eachother on IRC and you just want to be seen carrying on your ERP. That's the only reason you want a board. the ONLY reason
You NEED to have your histrionic sissy tantrums and gay yiff parties out in the open or you won't get that delicious attention every single last one of you pedophiles deeply craves
This is not bait. This is explaining to you why you can't be around. We tried with you, it didn't work. You lost your chance, tbqf.

>>326253
I would imagine the the board could self moderate itself in a way where there could be one thread /mlp/ and /vp/ shit each

But even then that really only sounds doable on paper considering there is still the issue of straight, gay, anthro, and feral topics.

And Waifuists.

It's tricky.
making /mlp/ red could be an answer but by that same token /vp/ would have to be red as well which would be a horrible decision.

>>326372
>None of those groups bring inherent incestual relationship drama with them.
>implying fags and trannies don't do engage in more drama than any other groups

>>326376
>self moderate itself
you people can't even self-moderate your own lives. Jesus Christ. Talking about yourselves like you're somehow sane, zuz
Nobody wants to see your gay furpile role play. Splash around in Drano

>>326337
>>326372
I'm not sure what you're even baiting about right now. Is this just that shitposting script garbling up buzzwords again?

>>326380
>w-w-we're just like trannies!
great. Wonderful. Well, I'm sold. Crown furries the new queens of 4chan immediately.

>>326383
You know everything I said is true and so do I. That's why your only response is >b-bait!, because you have absolutely no other rebuttal.

>>326372
>None of those groups bring inherent incestual relationship drama with them
Except they do.

>>326367
meant to only quote >>326266

>>326390
You didn't say anything. You're just frothing at the mouth yelling at clouds.

Do you have any actual arguments, or would you like to continue your irrational shitposting for a bit?

>>326381
>you people can't even self-moderate your own lives.

No that's /r9k/
infact a lot of furrys have a shitton of money to spend be it coming for rich family or having very good jobs using the money they earn or are given on this fetish.

>>324187

There doesn't *need* to be a furry board.

But there should a practical evaluation of the "no anthropomorphic media" rule on /co/, /aco/, /v/, even /a/ and /h/.

That is, unless Hiro enjoys the prospect of being buried by complaints whenever that furry anime movie comes out. But considering how he handled nipplegate on /a/, moderators really should just nip this in the bud.

I agree that 4chan's stigma against furries is absolutely retarded and people who get riled up by anything remotely anthropomorphic are stuck in 2007 or just memeing for the sake of it, but I don't see the point in a /fur/ board either.

>furry porn dumps
Most imagedump boards on 4chan are already pointless wastes of bandwith for autists who don't know that internet exists outside of 4chan. Just use furaffinity, e621 or whatever. In the worst case just allow furry in /aco/.

>fursuits and fandom drama
Let them have a /soc/ general. There.

For the record I think /mlp/ and /jp/ were also mistakes and 4chan shouldn't pander to every fandom in existence.

File: image.jpg (412KB, 1350x1080px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 1350x1080px

Permaban all furshitters

>>326337
Furry isn't just about animal lolis and creep gay stuff, it's just a genre of art. People draw humanoid animals for millenniums, they exist in a lot of comics, cartoons, video games, religions, and, of course, also in pornography. And we have good artists like Sindoll doing high quality artwork nowadays.

I don't understand why people get mad so much about it, I just want a place to post cute pics of my /fur/ waifus.

>>326392
Nah. You're the only group of people where
A) everyone knows everyone else
B) you're all, quite literally, gay with each other
C) you're histrionic drama queens who carry on like screaming sissies, which brings points A and B into play. You all know eachother, you're all gay with eachother, and you need to scream and flap if Yiffyskunky or Redknot or Hornybadger or whoever the fuck decides to break up with Cumweasel.
We've all tried this before. It doesn't work. You lost your chance and you need to deal with it.

>>326399
This deflection isn't going to work, my friend. You have no argument, and >b-bait! can only take you so far.

>>326405
>Most imagedump boards on 4chan are already pointless wastes of bandwith for autists who don't know that internet exists outside of 4chan. Just use furaffinity, e621 or whatever. In the worst case just allow furry in /aco/.

by this same logic there shouldn't be ANY porn boards because you can just find the images somewhere else. /c/, /e/, /gif/ and /wsg/ should also not exist because of that.

/jp/ is there so /v/ and /a/ don't get taken over by touhou...Though it's become a better board than /a/

/mlp/ is there because ponies were taking over /co/ and spreading to other boards as well.

>>326422
We shouldn't allow your particular porn board because it'll just turn into an extension of IRC, which you already use. You can yiff each other there quite handily, you don't need a public forum with which to get gay with each other.

>>326410
>everyone knows everyone else
Bullshit.
>you're all, quite literally, gay with each other
Got any stats for that claim?
> you're histrionic drama queens who carry on like screaming sissies, which brings points A and B into play. You all know eachother, you're all gay with eachother, and you need to scream and flap if Yiffyskunky or Redknot or Hornybadger or whoever the fuck decides to break up with Cumweasel.
4chan isn't anyones blog so I don't see why this would be an issue.
>We've all tried this before. It doesn't work. You lost your chance and you need to deal with it.
You mean Moot's prank?

>>326424
>People talk on irc,
Well then better delete all of 4chan, we have IRC!

>>326426
>I don't see why this would be an issue
And that's the problem. You don't see the cancer in -anything- you people do. You lack self-awareness.

>>326433
You're reducing my quite salient and correct point into absurdity because you have no rebuttal. Please don't even try if your efforts are going to be this weak.

>>326438
You are saying because of the existence of IRC that furry should not be considered being included which is an absolutely retarded thought.

>>326448
Please refrain from using hateful language if you wish to be taken seriously.

>>326434
>You lack self-awareness
Nice to see you can't prove everything else I say wrong.
I know you're baiting but you assume that that kind of drama is allowed on this site in general and that people who don't want to be a part of that drama don't shy away from it.

People are aware, they just aren't going out out of their way to make sure everyone is aware of it.

Just go to 8gag

>>326405
>Most imagedump boards on 4chan are already pointless wastes of bandwith for autists who don't know that internet exists outside of 4chan

I agree with this. Which is why I'm perplexed that the moderation on /aco/ really forced it to be a porn dump that still bans a full 3/4 of on-top subjects because of no loli/no furry rule.

I just wanted a /co/ that wasn't full of moralfaggotry. I guess I'm still waiting.

>>326449
Ah I was being trelled.
I bit. I'll stop.

>>326455
>Which is why I'm perplexed that the moderation on /aco/ really forced it to be a porn dump

This baffles me too. And they did the same to /d/; it was a fetish and OC discussion board in addition to porn dumps, but for a long time the mods were hostile to the idea of writefag threads. Then they just decided OC wasn't allowed anymore

>>326451
Alright, let's reset. No bait, no anger, let me ask you straight up and down: what else would your board be for? Sharing the same pictures that are already on your booru, right? The novelty of that would wear off in maybe a month tops, and your relationship drama, drama with artists, sissy slapfights about who owes who a pawjob, asterisked *actions* erotic roleplay would start to creep in.
People might write yiffy stories, and the replies would be "I'm pawing so hard!" with nothing but tripcodes. You'd single out "Yiffboi" because he's 13 and you all know it, so you'd reply to him the most. "mee tooo" you would say, hand fully on dick. From there it'd be full on, full out gay cybersex.
You'd make threads about the current drama of who's cybersexing who, who's yiffy, and what the current hot childrens' show with anthropomorphic characters is so you can invade their forum and stalk the kids. You know all of this, ALL of this is true! You can't deny this shit. We all saw it happen, and it'll happen again if we let it. You lost your chance. Deal with it.

File: 1417279191538.jpg (5KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 200x200px

>how dare the admins censor gamergate discussion on /v/ or moderate my nigger speak through wordfilters! this website is supposed to be the pillar of free speech on the internet! you should be able to post whatever you want without the fear of offending any thin-skinned faggots! end censorship now!
>RRROOOOOOOOOOOOO BAN THIS SICK FURRY FILTH! 4CHAN ISN'T YOUR ERP BLOG! MENTALLY SICK DOGFUCKERS, TAKE YOUR DEGENERACY ELSEWHERE!

>>326455
>no loli/no furry
good to see furries equating themselves to pedophiles

>>326470
Laid low by the truth, time to meme. Throw in some fursecution too for bonus meme points there why not

>>326468
Except this can literally be said about every single porn board on this site and they function just fine.

>You lost your chance.
It was a prank though. hardly any real "chance".

>>326468
I guess I have to repeat myself then.
4chan is no ones blog. You're assuming people won't give the same old 'not your blog response as everyone else.
And who's to say that there wouldn't be a rule against drama?
>You lost your chance.
You seems to have a short memory because I already said that /fur/ was a prank.
Plus discussions can range from tv to movies and games and then also to books since none porn furry books do exist.

>>326471

That wasn't an argument for furry or loli. That was an argument against /aco/ being a porn dump board. Why would anyone go to /aco/ for the porn leeching needs when a bunch of other sites already offer the same, and without loli/furry restrictions?

/aco/ was badly conceived from the start.

>>326478
>It was a prank
If you're not old enough to remember when Furries fully tested their limits with the greater internet over a decade ago, you aren't old enough to be on 4chan. You gambled and lost your chance.

>>326475
No need to get angry and project friendo pal. I have already expressed my opinion here >>326405, I have a mild dislike of the furry fandom and I don't care whether they get a board or not.

I do, on the other hand, love seeing the leejun grasp at straws to justify their hypocrisy.

>>326490
You're baiting, and I know it, my dearest and most cherished friend, but just for the record, comma, I don't care one lick about Gamergate beyond the qt redheaded grille mascot.
Steady on, my most closest of brothers

>>326226
Frankly I never heard of kemono until it was brought up as being a codeword for furries.

>>326496
it's not a code word, that's legit the jap name for it.

>>326496

Kemono is literally "beast people." They are Japanese furries. There's just less stigma attached to them because, in the usual Japanese manner, they don't create much internet drama.

File: 1442711263772.gif (171KB, 375x375px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 375x375px

>>326468
>I don't know how to concoct an argument without exaggeration

>>326505
>in the usual Japanese manner, they don't create much internet drama.
I'm not sure about that. I think it's because of the language barrier that we don't get exposed to most of their drama.

For all we know they could be just as bad, if not worse, than western furries.

>>326426
Mad agree.

>>326410
Really doing a disservice to critical thinking if you're making an entire claim upon "b-b-but orgies evrywear!"

>>326409
You got it backwards. Furry is a fandom centered around anthro or talking animal art. It's a shame that furries gave stigma to a legitimate style in their efforts to appropriate it

>>326514

They don't. This is just the natural result of having a shame-based culture. Everyone's ashamed, and they know well enough to keep their power levels hidden in public and hang with their own kind in private. That healthy separation of public and private life is why otaku are allowed to exist.

The only group that causes real drama are hard right wing nationalists. They'll talk to everyone and won't shut the fuck up.

>>326500
>>326505
Right. I don't think there's less stigma attached to them on 4chan because most of the users associate them as another name for furries.

File: 1420218500205.jpg (52KB, 376x419px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 376x419px

Just why the fuck are people still responding to the same tired fallacious bait that is posted in every one of these threads? They've already made up their mind, how about you give actually constructive posts attention instead of pissing in an ocean of shit?

>>326544
Furries in full retreat after being unable to handle the truth.
And in record time, too.

>>326544
he's giving out free bumps so might as well humor him.

>>326582
le puppetmaster
furries were in control all along

File: wow.png (78KB, 297x212px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 297x212px

>furfaggots are still trying to get their own board
It'll never happen, and for good reason. You're the worst. Kill yourselves.

>>326470
underrated post

File: I have altered the deal.jpg (50KB, 500x208px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 500x208px

I think the problem is that most people think of "them" being this sort of boogymen who would completely ruin the foundation of any board that would be associated with furries. Although by definition, any board made with furries in mind would most definitely have most of the negative attributes associated with the fandom be against the rules, such as ERP and bestiality.
I made a set of rules in another thread relating to this some time ago, and I edited it down a little. If there are so many people interested in a new board, then a fair set of rules should at least be agreed upon.

>/fur/ - Furry
>1. All discussion and posting of furry and furry related artwork and media goes here.
>2. Furry is defined as any artwork with noticeably non-human characteristics, such as snouts, muzzles, paws, etc. Moderator discretion will decide what is furry and what is not furry. "Catgirls", or artwork with little to no animialistic attributes belong in their respective boards.
>3. Rule 34 is allowed, but must be of furry origin. Discussion of popular media that contains animalistic or "funny animal" characters (ex. Bugs Bunny) is discouraged outside of their respective board. Eastern furry art or "kemono" is also allowed. General non-furry western art belongs in its appropriate board.
>4. Global rules ARE still in effect, no trolls, flames, or indecipherable text. Try to keep the drama to a minimum.
>5. Erotic artwork and media is allowed. "Extreme" fetishes such as scat or gore is not allowed.
>6. Real life pictures of animals belong on /an/. Bestiality is not to be posted; all posts must not violate United States law. (Rule #1)
>7. No roleplay. Rule 13 will also be strictly enforced.

>>326837
>Moderator discretion will decide what is furry and what is not furry.

NOPE. Stopped reading there.

Stuff needs to be defined or mods will use it as an excuse to self-destruct the boards.

>>326865
Is it defined though. Either way, moderators would decide what shouldn't be posted. If not them, then who?

>>326869
You set up beforehand what is and isn't furry, even if it's the "dangerously cheesy" image. You can't ever leave room for mods to twist the rules against you.

If you don't say what is and isn't furry then they'll delete everything. There's a good chance that if there's ever a /fur/ they'll refuse to moderate it like they did /qa/ a while back. Then they can see that the board is bad to get it removed.

Hiro is understanding. The mods are manipulative psychos

>>326874
How would you make it better, then?
If there was proper moderation, would there not be a problem?

To me, completely discounting a board being created over what moderators "might" do isn't fair.

>>326837
>no extreme fetishes
plsno, mods will abuse the fuck out of that

>>326924
How so?

File: 1446651058952.jpg (16KB, 196x257px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 196x257px

>>326929
Slob is one that comes to mind, and that sucks for me who likes that

>>326946
I like to think if a particular fetish isn't allowed on /d/, then it wouldn't be allowed on /fur/. I think that'd be fair.

Just go to 7chan please.

>>326929
Seeing as how mods on the other fetish boards have basically removed whatever they don't like they'll likely ban most of the shit on /fur/ to try and kill it off.

File: 1419430933147.jpg (61KB, 488x727px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 488x727px

I'd love for Hiroshima to make a fur board, but only so I can witness the inevitable shilling of popufurs trying to advertise their FA/Tumblr/Patreon pay wall only to be shut down and called a faggot.

Also, paid site content, Fchan is pretty much dead because of it's adherence to it's DNCA rules and as a result pretty much every artist in the entire fandom has their name on that list simply because they think it will make people think they are a "super important artist". Even e621 is starting to suffer the same fate and only continues to thrive because most less popular artists acknowledge it as the best way to advertise their art (with most popular artists eventually ordering a DMCA on the site once they reach a level of popularity where they no longer need the "advertisement" of the site to support a flow of commissions).

This is why if you look back on all the old images in e621's archives you'll pretty much find only shit art since all the good art was long ago taken down, the same will eventually happen to all the other quality art on the site unless the artists that posted them never rise in popularity.

>>326837
Ha ha ha. Wow, I cringed. Thank Allah you people are never getting your board since its unnecessary. No such thing as furry mefia boychick. Do you think Disney and other cartoonists make cartoon and movies for a very obscure fandom? Nay, boy. It's media that everyone enjoys. No reason for this bs when /co/ exists

>>327009

Also, U18 has the right idea of telling everyone that orders a DMCA on the site to go eat a dick, they've received dozens of threats of lawsuit but none of the furfag paysites/artist that issue the order have yet to go through the proper legal procedures to get a proper DMCA other than retarded "lol take down art gib monies nao" emails because they know if they went through with an actual lawsuit they would be laughed out of court.

>>327018
Yeah, if paysite content can be posted on u18 where it essentially stays on the site indefinitely, then it can most definitely be posted on 4chan where stuff gets purged all the time.

>>327017
That's why it says
>Discussion of popular media that contains animalistic or "funny animal" characters is discouraged outside of their respective board.
It means that media containing anthropomorphic characters should be discussed on another board because it isn't considered "furry", or at least doesn't fit the definition of furry set in place for a board dedicated to it.

>>326837
Bestiality draws are illegal in USA? If these rules, no one can post a lot of great pictures of Amy Rose doing stuff with human characters, for example.

Just make it like /d/ with only furry content.

>>327094
Bestiality = real pictures of animals in sexual situations. Feral artwork would be allowed.

>>324187
I do not want a furry containment board. I want the rules to stop singling out games, comics, shows, etc. for moderation just because they have animal characters.

If someone is posting off-topic or dumping porn then by all means they should be moderated, but it's seriously autistic that anthro gets singled out in Global Rule 3. It's outdated and long overdue to be revised.

If there is a /furry/ board it will just be a containment board for all the gay shit. I do not want to go there just to discuss some movie or game I'm interested in just because it happens to have anthro characters. Global Rule 3 needs to be changed.

>>324187
You already have one, it's called /4x2chins/

File: anime nose and anthro nose.jpg (42KB, 909x480px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 909x480px

>>325261
>implying anime is human

>>329200
Дayн.

>>327009
I never really understood that. Like, do these artists get paid by the click or something?

File: 1436381349593.jpg (96KB, 1338x716px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1338x716px

>mfw fchan's DNP list

holy fug

>>329164
this

>>330128
bumping a dead thread to upvote yourself
see my head shake family

>>324187
Furries are disgusting degenerates who exceed even mlp levels of faggotry. However a containment board might be a good idea. Make furry shit bannable on all boards except /furfag/ or /autism/ or whatever you wanna call it.

>>325159
Hiya reddit

>>330144
but anon
furry shit is already banned
you wouldn't perchance be flying a false flag now would you

>>330171
If it's bannable then why do I see threads of it that never get deleted?
>false flag
>paranoid delusions
Furfags confirmed mentally ill

>>330219
>If it's bannable then why do I see threads of it that never get deleted?
Maybe because like the furry fandom, you think anything with an anthro character is part of the furry fandom. You are as deluded as your enemy if that is true.

>>330219
>F-furries are awful! Terrible!
>Better make a board for them, heh, make it a red board too, that'll show em.
zoz

>>329675
That's old as shit but yeah. That's why people who what furry porn to be allowed on /aco/ demand a rule against posting fursonas and OCs.

>>330144
Yeah and while we're at it let's make a rule that nothing with anime aesthetic can be discussed outside of /a/. I think anime is autistic and I don't want to see it when I'm on /v/.

>>330419
*in case it wasn't obvious I was being sarcastic

This whole idea of splitting up boards so that everyone can have their own little hugbox is stupid. Part of what makes 4chan so lively is that it's chaotic. Global Rule 3 is unenforceable when it comes to anthro in context to certain topics like video games and cartoons / comics, so it might as well be removed. If people start getting autistic and blogging, talking about their special snowflake OCs, trying to arrange hookups, or dumping porn then go ahead and ban them because that should be applied to anyone whether or not furry is involved. However, banning someone because they want to talk about a cartoon or game with anthro characters, or banning drawfags because they draw them is just stupid and autistic, and currently it's enforced with no consistency. One day you will have a cool mod who doesn't care, and then another day you will have an autist who gets triggered by anything resembling "furry" and they will ban everyone. That needs to stop, and we need to have consistent enforcement of the rules that do not go after one particular aesthetic just because a mod doesn't like it (or in the original case, Moot).

The fact that Moot is gone is all the more reason to fix Global Rule 3. Zero tolerance towards anthro characters was because of Moot's personal preferences and nothing else. This isn't his site anymore so there is no reason to keep it that way.

>>330289
wouldn't it still be possible for artists to demand art to be taken down even if it's deriviative work of existing characters (say pokemon or star fox) instead of OCs?

Kek, you have no idea how much furries hate each other. Trying to shove them into a board would be a complete disaster.

>>330471
They can ask but since they don't own the character I doubt that it would be taken seriously. In fact it doubt any takedown request will be taken seriously unless they are a company or someone famous.

>>330478
So, /a/

YIFF IN HELL FURFAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>330495
This phrase should be filtered to say "have fun in 4chan."

>>330289
Seems reasonable enough to me. I don't get what the point of opening /aco/ was if there's to be no furry at all, but not allowing OCs and fursonas is a reasonable compromise, as long as it's a rule that's applied consistently without singling out anthro.

>>330478
On cripplechan it did not take long for the gay furries to take over the /furry/ board and turn the place to shit (often times quite literally with all the fetish threads they had).

>>330500
It probably won't single anthro out on paper but in practice it will. Personally I would like an anthro only rule meaning no talking animals because that is too close to bestiality.

>>330508
But what about Nala?

>>330510
She goes along with the dogs from Balto, most of /mlp/'s porn and female non-anthro dragons.

Good news guys, you got your board
>>>/trash/

daily reminder that we need a /furry/ board

>>330913

no, we just need r34 board with allowed anthro

File: penn.jpg (6KB, 268x188px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 268x188px

>>330600
>it's real
Furfags finally have the board they deserve. We did it, anons.

>>330964
I'm ok with this. Furries get their board with the bronines, the guro psyhos, and pedos, all that good stuff, in the trash, right where they belong

this is probably the brightest timeline

>>330986
Loli is far more acceptable than furryshit and it's not allowed there.

>>330986
Lots of errors in this post but I'm too excited to delete it! I've never been so happy for furries! They got just what the deserve!

>>330988
I have a profound dislike of furries but loli shit is worse because it implies you want to fuck children
go away pedo

>>330600

A board for furshit and brony trash
how appropriate

>>330600
Thank God

>>330995
0/10 bait

File: 130704042206-sesame-street-muppet-oscar-grouch-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg (172KB, 980x552px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 980x552px

>>330600
I LOVE /trash/

File: 563959356.jpg (27KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 480x360px

>>330988
>wanting to fuck consenting adults from fantasy races is worse than being a pedo
Whatever you say, Nick.

>>330600
No thanks I'll keep using /v/ and /co/.

>>331276
come home, you autistic rebel
come home to >>>/trash/

>>331274
>consenting races
:^)

>>324187
hehe can someone post a picture of him tied up i would just like to see it for some laughs haha

Reminder that >>>/trash/ is your home.

Im not reading this whole thread, but they still need to change up global rule 3.

4chan loves trannies but hates furries?

Sure is "born in the 1990's" in here

Seriously, was anyone else even a goon before moot ran off and made this site?

Everywhere is shit now.

>>324187
nobody wants it. fuck off.

>>332231

A lot of people want it

>>332231
I kinda do.

>>332278
A lot of people don't want it.

Your move.

I want it just to shut them the fuck up. I don't want all this fur/mlp shit in /trash/. It's gonna end up a repetitive as /b/.

>>332294
A lot of people don't have to go to it.

>>324187
>/fur/
No.

Kill yourself.

>>324187
FUCK
OFF
FURRIES
THE ONE SINGULAR GROUP NEVER WELCOMED ON 4CHAN
F U C K O F F
U
C
K
O
F
F

>>>/trash/
it's your home

>>332309
a lot of people have to share a site with it
fuck that shit, you fucks have your own chans and websites to shit up

>>332432
You already do a share a site with them.

>>332439
yeah but i don't want the management to start pandering to you
plus with the addition of a new furfaggot board, it'll bring even more in, can't have that

You got a board.
>>>/trash/
It's where you belong.

>>332448
Snodat. Go there will all the memers, roleplayers, bronies, pedos, and all the pther undersariables. Your never getting your own board senpai

>>332448
Great, now rename it fur so all the furries know to be contained there and problem solved.

>>332464
>furries
>being contained
Kek. Nah, any real /fur/ would just act as an incubating for furfaggotry. In /trash/, nobody even needs to pretend to support them. Board isn't listed, so it doesn't draw attention from outside furfags. Board isn't named after their attention-whoring community, so it doesn't breed their cancer. >>>/trash/ is perfect. It's where they belong.

>>332525
>a board that isn't listed and isn't for furry is perfect for furries

Okay...

File: 1416115278109.gif (3MB, 300x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 300x360px

>>332532
Exactly. It's the ultimate furfaggot dumping ground. It's what they deserve, and where they belong.

Nobody here except for furfaggots wants a board that will make furfags happy. Just sweep them under the rug to a land where we don't have to look at their filth or acknowledge their sick existence. A board that isn't listed and isn't explicitly for furry is perfect. Nothing could be better.

File: 1399649660951.gif (1MB, 285x212px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 285x212px

>>332543

>furfags got exactly what they wanted
>anti-furries perform enough mental gymnastics to think this means they won
what

>>332627
How did they get what they wanted?

>>332543
>>332627
>>332448
>>332419
Uh, no. /trash/ is just a breeding ground for /mlp/ and /s4s/.
The furries are just sticking to other boards.

>>330600
I'm really not looking forward to the shit that spills out of this incubator board.

>make /fur/ containment board
>permaban all furries who even breathe outside their board
I'd prefer this honestly.

>>332880
>make /fur/ containment board
>leave it open for a while
>after like a month permaban everyone who posted in it
just like the good old days

come home furries
come home to the >>>/trash/

What's worse, furfags or ponyfuckers?

File: 1410880906496.jpg (221KB, 983x818px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 983x818px

>>333582
>what's worse, furries or furries?

>>324731
What is it about furfags that causes them to compulsively post pictures of furshit? Do you not have any normal pictures on your comouter or what? Why do you post shit that people hate you for?

>>333757
>Why do you post shit that people hate you for?
You're assuming that all the people who do this are furries.
Do you know how easy it is to trigger someone on here, especially when it comes to furries?

Into the >>>/trash/ it goes.

>>333757
I have a blue furshit folder of starfox/sonic/etc both gay and straight that I use to pretend I'm a furfag and see autists flip on /v/

>>324187
>>>/trash/

>>324187

>>>/trash/

>>324426

The only Shirley I knew in real life went by her middle name.

Come home you autistic fuck
come home to the >>>/trash/

>>333961
>>333763
Well that's all well and fine but furfags and ponyfags do this shit constantly. In video games, in other forums. It's terrible. They rub their shitty fandom in everyone's face and wonder why no one likes them.

>>334670
I've only really seen ponyfags do this so I don't really know what you mean. Is it common on steam?

>>334680
>only seen ponyfags do that
Nigga, how new are you? Furries were the bronies before bronies even existed, and they still do this shit in any given forum.
Disclaimer: not that anon

>>334680
>Is it common on steam?
It has reached cancerous levels on tf2 and steam in general. Furry porn sprays should be punishable by having your steam account disabled for 30 days.

File: 1416716939260.gif (464KB, 433x446px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 433x446px

>ponies and furries now have their own porn board in /trash/
>lolifags still don't have their own board and probably never will

Almost makes me feel bad for the pedophiles, getting excluded so hard

>>324187
Dear Multiple Requester for /fur/

No.

You've been told this multiple times.

Fuck off.

Sincerely,
Everyone.

>>335290

Now, now, if Hiro sez "Yes" to OP's request, then it happens.