/d/'s content problem

>>301074
Doesn't matter, the already niche community of /d/ is split now and they won't come back as long as they can post on /aco/.

Even of /aco/ were deleted /co/ posters would migrate to /d/ and we would actually need the western rule enforced to keep out poor quality art, changing the rules on /aco/ to disallow /d/evident content would have similar results and the mods would need selectively delete western content and the whining would never end.

/d/ is kill.

>>301152
fuck off /a/ I'm not giving up yet.

let /aco/ be for western normal cartoon porn stuff or whatever /co/ wanted, let /d/ stay as it was before the mod went full hitler on anything vaguely related to not-japan

>>301152
>Doesn't matter, the already niche community of /d/ is split now and they won't come back as long as they can post on /aco/.

Most of /d/ wants to go back to /d/ tho

>>301152

Fuck you, I'm sitting here waiting until i can go back to /d/

I'm a /d/eviant not some shit on /aco/

/d/egenerates can all burn in hell anyway

fucking faggots

>>301278
>>301276
Nothing is stopping you, just don't post western.

>>301152
>Doesn't matter, the already niche community of /d/ is split now and they won't come back as long as they can post on /aco/.
Like fuck we won't!

>>301276
>Most of /d/ wants to go back to /d/ tho
Indeed!

>>301350
Keeping faggots from Deviant Art like you is a prime example of why this purge was necessary and will do a lot of good in the long run.

>>301074
It's better off without western. Stay on /aco/.

>>301369
No it isn't...
/d/ is near dead, /aco/ is near dead, nobody knows where to post because of this completely arbitrary split...

The claim that keeping western art off of /d/ will keep the board quality high is false. There are tons of low quality eastern art, just actually take a look at sites like Pixiv.

Forcing fetish threads on /aco/ has caused the same problem /h/ had that was fixed by creating /d/. To force fetish threads out of /d/ is going against the reason /d/ was created in the first place.

>>301495
>you're wrong on /aco/. Its actually doing fine since all the /d/ fetishes had to go there
Eh, maybe it's just the uneasiness of /co/ not wanting /d/ there then that has me worried...

>>301495
>>301379

/aco/ is actually extremely fast. It's two boards worth of content sharing space

Fix it

>>301074
I honestly did not even know /d/ had such a rule and I went there not daily but regulary. Are you telling me all the maxed out dmitri threads or all the other stuff with western content was never allowed?

>>303868
All those thousands upon thousands of images and posts were always banned. Just like nudity on /a/.

File: Screenshot_2014-09-25-19-10-29.png (542KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 1280x720px

>>303872
It amazes me you are still mad you got kicked out of your illegaly occupied board.

>>303868
>Are you telling me all the maxed out dmitri threads or all the other stuff with western content was never allowed?
Technically they weren't, but by Mod fief dmitri and other "quality" western artist were allowed, so the western art rule was basically only enforced as a means of quality control...
Now however, whoever is controlling /d/ has used the creation of /aco/ as an excuse to banish anything, including FETISHES, they don't like under the claim that they are "Too western, and western belongs on /aco/ now."

Holy shit /d/ users are above and beyond autistic.

>>303904
>Holy shit /d/ users are above and beyond autistic.
Well duh.
>>301074
>>301074
There is absolutely no point in letting western material be posted. The current ruling of having it be okay as long as it's in asian style is perfectly fine and helps the board retain a minimul modicum of cultural coherence.

Just deal with it.

>>303913
>There is absolutely no point in letting western material be posted. The current ruling of having it be okay as long as it's in asian style is perfectly fine and helps the board retain a minimul modicum of cultural coherence.
>Just deal with it
It's KILLING /d/ because half the uber fetishy stuff is getting shoved onto ANOTHER board!
And the ONLY fucking reason they've given up the "Asian style" bit is because they can't actually tell a difference anyways!

>>303904
Nope. What's truly autistic is the desire to separate drawn porn based on origin or style.

File: 3a3184fde4e4acdcf125c8baa0b46bbd.jpg (12KB, 236x227px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 236x227px

>>303904
>Post fetish pics on /d/
>Get banned because it was drawn by an artist in a western country despite being anime styled
>Post same fetish on /aco/
>Get banned for posting something in anime style
>Post fetish pics on /d/ drawn by eastern artists of western /co/ related characters
>Get banned for posting "western style" art
>Post fetish pics on /aco/ by western artists in western style but featuring characters from anime
>Get banned for posting "eastern" art
>"Holy shit /d/ users are above and beyond autistic."
Yes. It certainly must be me that is the autistic one here. I'm just such an autist because I have good quality porn to post and literally nowhere to post it.

>>305030
Except standing ruling is to allow western art in anime style.

PLEASE stop lying. It's painful and does not help your case any.

>>305242
>Except standing ruling is to allow western art in anime style.
Except that still hasn't prevented the Mod from purging things based on their personal preference...

>>305242
>This happened to me.
>It's impossible for a mod to not go by my interpretation of the current ruling!

>>305267
That's completely irrelevant to this topic. Incoherent mod enforcement happens all the time and using it as justification to push this agenda is kind of embarrassing.

>>305242
Gee, it sure would be nice if the mods knew as much about 4chan's rules as you do.

>>305272
>Incoherent mod enforcement happens all the time and using it as justification to push this agenda is kind of embarrassing.
Problem is this isn't "incoherent" mod enforcement, it's mod favoritism!

>>305275
>Gee, it sure would be nice if the mods knew as much about 4chan's rules as you do.
Lurk more.

>>305030

Is it futa? I bet it isnt

>>301152
>they won't come back as long as they can post on /aco/.
Literally no one from the /d/iaspora wants this, and /aco/ doesn't want dickgirls.

This isn't difficult. The majority of /d/ is fine with western and the tantrums come from those who come to 4chan to pretend they're in Japan. That population is becoming marginal whether or not the mods like it.

/a/ shouldn't absorb /co/ and no one's suggesting it, but /d/ is content more than origin.

Let it be that way and if the present janitors don't want to accept this, find something else for them to do. Like not being janitors.

If mods think /aco/lytes can absorb cocks, then mods can absorb western.

> but this isn't a democracy and if you don't accept our authority we're not really mods any more

Funny, innit

I think we can come to a mutual understanding here.

> well if you don't like it go back to reddit

I've been here since 2006 across various boards. I don't even have a reddit account and only go there when someone links me.

>>304122
>What's truly autistic is the desire to separate drawn porn based on origin or style

It's passable on /a/ and /co/ because there's a huge thematic as well as artistic gulf between the two.

Porn is porn and it generally divides first among subject and not origin. Stop pretending porn is aimed at higher cognitive functions where people even bother translating it more than at a rudimentary level.

> but my porn is a higher art form than your porn and I see no reason to allow yours in here

Maybe it's time you grew the fuck up.

Much of this seems like a problem of semantics and personal pride. If 4chan got rid of the 2D porn boards as they are now, and instituted something like /nijie1~10/, with no strict rules on what the content of each board should be, users would probably self organize and establish a dominant culture on each board.

This may seem too radical, but it's how it was done on Futaba.

>>306448
>it's how it was done on Futaba
and when we're asians who are raised to cooperate with one another and/or stomp the little guy dead, that'll work

/d/ is /d/aijoubu

>>306448
>Much of this seems like a problem of semantics and personal pride. If 4chan got rid of the 2D porn boards as they are now, and instituted something like /nijie1~10/, with no strict rules on what the content of each board should be, users would probably self organize and establish a dominant culture on each board.
>This may seem too radical, but it's how it was done on Futaba
Yeah, that's probably the worst thing you could do right now, as it would just increase the organisational cluster-fuck caused by the /aco/-/d/ split to encompass all the other red-boards.

>>307212

The "organisational cluster fuck" was caused by the mods, wasn't it?

I think without mods and janitors to manipulate into playing favorites because of increasingly arbitrary, esoteric and arcane definitions, people would actually be forced to learn to co-exist and self-organize. There would also be no need to create a new board for every fetish, just increase the number of boards when traffic warrants it.

That would be the best case scenario, anyway. I fully acknowledge this is something the Japanese are exceedingly good at, and probably won't work nearly as well here. But I think the more we encourage making fetish specific boards and redistricting everyone, the more "deletionist" mentality we will breed on 4chan. People won't ignore shit they don't like, because they are incentivized by moderation to push out, report, and cause all kinds of havoc and change the board to suit their own tastes.

>>306436
> but this isn't a democracy and if you don't accept our authority we're not really mods any more

You pointed out the problem. If mods give an inch they feel like they're giving a mile. The mod/user relationship has been an us vs them one for ages.

Mods want to control. They're not here for helping the boards.

still a problem

>>301074
Would be nice.

Would also be good if they put up a sticky on /d/

>>307258

Ah that's a good point, it'd be like admitting they made a mistake, can't have that, they're gods after all

I was always under the impression that "No shitty western art" meant "No deviant art tier shit" rather than no western artists period.

>>301074
Out of /d/ I mostly just like futa and also prefer western art over eastern, the current solution is better for me since the non futa stuff on /aco/ is much more interesting for me than some fucked up stuff on /d/.

>>315134
>Out of /d/ I mostly just like futa

congratulations you are the cancer

>>315618
>fetishes I don't like are bad
Western art is cancer

>>301303
Stop sucking modcock.

>>315762
>art I don't like is bad
You are the cancer

>>303881
Die, and take your blobby-faced loli whore with you.

>>316000
Good you can stay separate from me on /aco/. Enjoy ~

File: dolphins.png (61KB, 1066x600px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1066x600px

Alright, just to throw a reasonable, middle-ground opinion out there.

When I was in like middle school or whatever, when I first started fapping, I came to like hentai more than real porn. It wasn't really hentai, as I wasn't a fan of the art and format and wasn't really a weeb, but the western style characters. Familiar characters you thought were hot, that's all.

So, for a long time, there wasn't really a place for that on 4chan, or a place to go seek it. It sucked. I've come nowadays to prefer real porn, but sometimes I like to go back to the drawn stuff. As such, hearing /aco/ was going to be a thing was neat, it was very welcome.

I was pretty frustrated when I actually saw it. As someone who isn't a frequent browser or patron of either board, as a kind of impartial third party, there is a clear demographic issue. The people that initially wanted the board wanted, basically, a Rule 34 and OC board, to give a western equivalent to /h/. /d/, to my knowledge, has always functioned fine with western AND eastern art, and it was only after they decided to send them off to /aco/ upon creation, for some fucking reason, that it was even a problem.

Now, the people who asked for the board don't want to use it, because there's a bunch of diaper, inflation, vore, etc. threads, and futa and fetish stuff thrown in the normal threads, so it just becomes western /d/ with a bit of a soft side and people bitching about it. The people that wanted it aren't getting what they want, most of /d/ isn't getting what they want, and it's a shame.
There's nothing wrong with the fetishes or having a board for it, but the mixed content is causing the board to not be used for its intended purpose.

It is a trial board, and should be treated as a trial. It is currently a failed experiment. The mods need to fix it, or delete it. Just treat it like western /h/. Allow it back on /d/, create /wd/, or delete the whole thing entirely, because it is currently a failure.

>>318004
i didn't read this

>>318024
Don't worry it's shit anyway. I think everything is fine as it is

HIROOOOOOO

>>318004
Is there any evidence for this? From what I see /aco/ is still very popular and not a failed experiment. I think it’s mostly just /d/ fags that are complaining.

>>318458
>I think it’s mostly just /d/ fags that are complaining.

/d/ is complaining because they were kicked out of their board and into /aco/. /aco/ is complaining because /d/ is filling up their shiny new board with stuff they didn't want. The board is fast because it contains 3+ boards worth of content within one board.

Nobody is happy with the situation, but they've got nowhere else to go so they're all piled up in a single board. A board which by design discourages image dumps, since the OP cannot bump his own thread.

You don't use either board though, so you literally don't understand what you're talking about. TY for posting though. <3

>>318472
>nobody is happy
Lel.

Fix it

>>318472
>/d/ is complaining because they were kicked out of their board and into /aco/. /aco/ is complaining because /d/ is filling up their shiny new board with stuff they didn't want. The board is fast because it contains 3+ boards worth of content within one board.
Got her in one!

>>319809
>im about to agree with ND

i agree

why are you not actually telling anybody about this? Hiro fucking said to complain on the boards the rules affect

>>320234
Because the mods doesn't allow any kind of complaints in both boards.

>"More porn, less bickering. "
> t. Mod.

>>320276

So Hiro said to discuss things, and the mods don't want anyone to?

Sounds like a coup to me desu

>>320310
>eating the filter that hard
Conspiracy fags everyone

baka

>>320319

baka senpai, desu

every day until its fixed

>>286891
Hiro please, don't treat /a/ as your special snowflake again like moot did. /d/ actually needs this content not to be removed unlike some shitty fanservice webms.

>>313564

Acting like all of DA is shit is just as bad as acting like all of Pixiv is good. They're both the same shit but Pixiv makes an attempt its embarrassments under the carpet.

>>318472

>since the OP cannot bump his own thread

Are you sure about this?

>>320605
>moot was /a/
>only hired/a/ mods
>doesn't give a shit about other boards
>moot quits
>hiro comes in
>mods are still /a/
>tell hiro /a/ takes precedence

If any board should be the one that gets the most attention its /v/ or /sp/. They get the most traffic.

>>321422
You don't understand how the moderation works, it's not board specific

>>321427
I'm not sure you understand how English works

We can divide the porn into Eastern and Western, and also into deviant and vanilla. Let's assume that the mods are coming at this from the perspective of "Eastern vanilla stuff is best, contain everything else onto different boards so people into Eastern vanilla don't have to look at Westernshit or deviant garbage." Fine! So we need two containment boards, one for Western and one for deviant. The only problem is that some stuff is both, so what do we do with that? Which distinction is more important, East/West or deviant/vanilla?

People into deviant stuff don't care if their porn is Eastern or Western, and they don't care about seeing other deviant stuff around them in the board. The stuff they're into is too fucked up for them to care, and there's not enough of it for them to be picky.

People into vanilla stuff don't want to see deviant stuff on their board. They also have enough content that they can afford to care about whether the art they see is Eastern or Western.

It makes much more sense to favor the deviant/vanilla distinction over the East/West one. Make /d/ a containment board for deviant stuff (regardless of origin), and make /aco/ a containment board for Western stuff that doesn't belong in /d/. Everyone is happy.

>>321818
Option 2: Keep on keeping on

>>321818
This.

Hiro pls

Can someone explain to me why this split is necessary in the first place? The way I thought it was was because western artists often complain and take legal action against sites with their stuff on it, so western was just blanket banned. But if we have /aco/ that obviously isn't being respected anymore. So if you ask me at this point we should just get rid of /aco/ and remove the no-western rules from all of the nsfw boards.

>>324896
Mods on a power trip. Only reason.

>>324896
Weeb mods wanted a pure Japanese board

>>324896
>The way I thought it was was because western artists often complain and take legal action against sites with their stuff on it

That hasn't been true in a very long time. Fuck, if anything the Japs are more sue happy about their stuff leaking these days, while big time western artists would actually take requests and show up in /d/ to discuss shit. Some of them even started at /d/.

How many Japanese drawfags were there at /d/ before this? How many Japanese artists would drop in to fuck around and practice with anon requests?

>>325346
There was a jap artist who hung out in the Giantess threads, but that was only so he could DMCA any links to scans of his stuff.

>>324896
>The way I thought it was was because western artists often complain and take legal action against sites with their stuff on it, so western was just blanket banned.

This has genuinely never happened. Other chans and sites host western shit all the time and people can't do a fucking thing about it.

The only reason it was banned back in the day was because most of the mods were (and still are) /a/ posters since it was moot's pet board. /d/ allowed western content for years and there were never any lawsuits.

Why are caption threads deleted so much on d

>>301074
>The "no Western" rule had gone unenforced for years, and no longer served the needs of the community.
Fucking this. I've been a /d/eviant for over ten years now and I refuse to become an /aco/rn. /d/ was perfectly fine before /aco/'s creation / Ma/d/ Mo/d/. I do not disagree with /aco/'s existence, it's just that it is no place for /d/'s fetishes. The /aco/rns do not want our fetish content and we exiled /d/eviants want to go back home. Period.

>>325624
Because you can just type the caption in the fucking post, rather than mutilate the image.

>>326157
You combine the caption and image so they can be saved as one image.

>mutilate
You don't know what you're talking about

>>301269
>https://archive.loveisover.me/d/thread/6509652/
This!

>>325624
Because almost all of them are shit. There's a reason graggarthkkhen.jpg is a thing.

File: 1446697182010.png (122KB, 296x299px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 296x299px

>>301483
aaand this

File: fuck_off_back_to_d.png (49KB, 536x207px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 536x207px

/aco/ here.
Please take your dickgirls and diapers back to /d/.

>>327784
>/aco/ here.
>Please take your dickgirls and diapers back to /d/.
That's exactly what we want to do, anon....

>>327784
That is the entire point of this thread m80

I am officially migrated.
/d/ has always had pretty shitty mods, as well as a greater than 50% rate of bafflingly specialized futa threads.
It is good, as someone not fired up by chicks with dicks, to not have to sort through pages of "blue skinned short haired uncut futas with onaholes!" Threads just to find something I can enjoy.

Besides, I never really found eastern art styles very appealing. The goofy facial proportions and massive eyes were always a bit "uncanny valley" for me.

/aco/ is just a better fit.

>>328286
The problem is that if you have a fetish that is more specific, you generally pull content from both the East and West.

Something like the big butt threads was generally split down the middle, and it was fine.

The futa issue has always, always been a problem on /d/ because of the shit mods, but that's something to fix once the board isn't fucking dead.

The problem is that /aco/ is where all of /d/ got bussed off to, but its also shared with vanilla art. Which is fine- when the board was requested of Hiro they asked for a red /co/. Nobody asked for a Western /d/, because /d/ was both.

>>328286
>"blue skinned short haired uncut futas with onaholes!"

Those kind of threads hadn't been a problem on /d/ for a while now until the /aco/ bullshit brought it back from the dead.

>>329180
Now that is just a baldfaced lie.
I have lurked /d/ daily for nearly 7 years. And I can say with ABSOLUTE certainty that kind of bullshit has been happening for 3 or more years steadily. No reprieves. If there is someplace where one can view old topic names and breakdowns, please have a look. If the data exists, I will be vindicated.

May as well just say the hell with it and make /d/ the dickgirl containment board. And if /co/ doesn't want freaky fetishes, create /fet/ for all non-futa fetish.

Why /d/ so whiny? Also why so salty at futa? It's a fetish just like yours, stop crying because more popular or has more art or whatever the case is

>>329325
Noone is salty, just non-fans are sick of it. Popular futa thread? Good stuff. Good for you. 37 different futa threads? Man, fuck off. You're flooding the place with your fetish. If we all have to share a hotel room, noone likes the guy who brought 37 bags of clothes.

Check the catalog. Is there an open futa thread? Go post in it. Don't make a new one.

>>329363
Why not? If they have enough content it makes no sense to stuff them into generals that will clog up board with dead threads either way because no 404 fast enough after image/bump limit

>>329368
If there is enough content, then yeah, makes sense. But don't be surprised that the other fetishes don't want to hang around anymore. You're crowding them out.

No saltiness, just people leaving.

>>329376
Complain on /qa/ not salt? You don't leave quietly, you don't just ignore what you don't like, I say upset.

>>329376
To expand on that, for people NOT into futa, it's usually a bonerkill to see it. So it gets very tiring, wading through a ton of futa threads to find a thread you like, then to be looking and posting in say, a monster thread when BAM, some futa fan just cannot contain themselves to the 37 futa specific threads and posts a futa getting plowed by a monster. Suddenly, bonerkill.
Why? You already had so many threads? Do you need to put it everywhere? And god forbid someone says "no futa". Apparently that means the futa posters will now flood the thread with futa, complaining about being excluded, as if they didn't have dozens of threads up already.

>>329393
I did leave quietly, but someone linked this thread to me.

I am just trying to explain it.

Personally? I don't care anymore, I have already abandoned /d/.

>>329408
You on fetish board dummy. Thicker skin and filters, people probably don't like all your kink either if there's overlap just ignore.
>>329415
Good for you. I wish people stop asking to ban just because it upset them on boards, not even /d/ but futa does nothing wrong

>>329429
Sure, thicker skin could let you put up with it, but the question becomes "why bother putting up with it, when there are alternatives."

Noone needs to ban futas, but if futas look around one day and go "why did everyone leave?" Then this is why.

I am not posting because I want anything to change. I am posting here because it seems like the topic needed some clarity.

The remaining /d/ community is in this thread saying "where did everyone go? We need to reunify!" But the people who left have no desire to go back unless something changed.
No change? No problem. But obviously then we are not coming back.

>>329454
The people who want to reunite are not the people post in futa I think. Aren't they upset banished to /aco/?

>>329463
If there really is a large group of non-futas who really want to stay on /d/ despite being futa dominated, then my question is "why"? Is it worth trying to slog through the futa?

Or of course, they could make a containment board like for /mlp/. Futa is more of a modifier for other fetishes anyways. Like male rape has a different fanbase from female rape which has a different fanbase from futa rape.

So if we have different boards for yaoi and yuri... why not a different board for futa?

>>329515
Or for sexy women board and handsome men board.

>>329515
/d/ is futa board. At least it was originally, best solution leave it be. Maybe ask for an actual fetish board include everything western too and maybe 3D

>>329515
>If there really is a large group of non-futas who really want to stay on /d/ despite being futa dominated, then my question is "why"? Is it worth trying to slog through the futa?
Because there is now an arbitrary content split enforced by Moderator fief, and non-futa fetishes are starved for content by it.

>So if we have different boards for yaoi and yuri... why not a different board for futa?
Futa fags will then argue that /d/ was created FOR them, which IS true.
So what you're asking for is to have the fetish that created /d/ in the first place get moved to its own board just so other fetishes can have /d/...

While I'm not a fan of penises in the first place, that still sounds like a pretty dickish thing to do to them.
I think the recent proliferation of futa threads is just a symptom of this arbitrary content split issue that's forced half the non-futa FETISHES off /d/, as well as half the content of everything remaining as well.
I think it's only been a year since the "If you don't like futa, post something else" movement started on /d/, so what's happened is that all those non-futa fetishes aren't able to compete with futa under this stupid "Western Rule Enforcement."

>>329557
I agree fully. Change the name to /d/ - Dickgirls and make a /fet/ - Fetish board
>>329559
Futa shouldn't move, everyone else should move away from them. They had /d/ first, leave it for them. Also, to keep futa to the futa board, the "no western art" rule on /d/ should be eliminated. It was a bullshit rule anyways.

/fet/ will move slow initially, but it would still move much quicker than many other existing boards.

>>329579
Problem is I don't think a Fetish board would move all that fast without futa...
I mean, /d/ is now super slow as is.

>>329598
>futa keeps your board alive
>get mad at them for it
Why /d/eviants so stupid?

>>329598
But a lot of /d/ has left.

Have you ever been on /s/?

/fet/ might move slow, but who cares? /s/ goes by at a trickle. I check in there maybe once every 2 months and REGULARLY find my own posts from last time. Or /wsg/! I currently have a bookmarked thread that I wished happy first birthday... several months ago.

/fet/ would still move faster than that.

A slow moving board would still be better than a board divided by bickering and endless mod abuse, which is bleeding users at a staggering rate.

>>329598
/fet/ would be a fetish discussion board like /d/ was, so it would naturally be fast.

Futa doesn't speed up the board at all; they just dump a picture now and then and bump their threads so they can take up space

Hiroooooo

Bum.p

>>331429
Cry more desu

>>329309
It really wasn't anon. I won't lie and say it was never a problem, but it hadn't been much of one for a while up till this recent clusterfuck.

>>329363
Yeah, nobody was making 37 different futa threads. I counted a week or so before /aco/ was born to win a petty argument on /gif/ and found 11 explicit futa threads with 9 borderline (transformation, gender swapping, etc).

>Is there an open futa thread? Go post in it.
Futanari is a bodytype fetish. It has more in common with big tits and hair color than specific situations like BDSM or bimbofication. You might as well get mad that people don't keep all the busty chicks in one thread. I know you don't like seeing it but that's exactly why keeping all the futa in one thread is not a realistic solution here. It'd just be one thread full of incoherent content due to how broad the fetish used to make it is.

Also, it's starting to become apparent that anytime someone complains about /d/ being split on retarded east/west lines people come in and start bitching about futa to completely derail any momentum the discussion had.

I'm not shouting conspiracy, but this is happening to such a regularity I'm starting to wonder why when the original argument of east/west style has nothing to do specific fetishes. Just as many artists who are known for lots of futa (Incase, Lucien, Sparrow, etc) were booted from /d/ for being western too.

>>301074
Most of the western art posted on /d/ was pretty terrible with the exception of Dimitri's stuff. It's nice to clean out so much of the trash at once.

>>331577
The problem is that you have dumped all that shit and more into /aco/ which is supposed to be something like /h/, not /d/.

Please take your garbage back and deal with it yourselves.

>>331684
>which is supposed to be something like /h/
If that were true the rules would reflect it. Just because /co/ asked for the board doesn't mean they get to make the rules.

>>331567
>Futanari is a bodytype fetish. It has more in common with big tits and hair color than specific situations like BDSM or bimbofication.

This is a lie and you know it. Chicks with dicks is chicks with dicks. Shortstacks and fat are "bodytype" fetishes too and they keep to very limited threads.

Please fuck off with your tumblr shit.

>>331687

These rules where implemented by western hating /a/ mod (who apparently was know before for fucking up more than half of /tg/ content creators in past) and just tried to turn /aco/ into a still born board. Not only that, you CAN post some specific western artist work but anything else gets instantly removed (Even is its made in anime/manga style AND even when its made by japaniese mangaka)
Also this is pretty much aginst of what Hiro wanted and hopefully once he improve his english skills as well as understanding of this community he will be able to fix that (sadly it will probably take a year to do that) and tell the weeb mod to gtfo just as he told to the lewd hater mod.
>>330844

>>331577
Demitrys was absolute shit. But I guess there's no point in guessing where your biases lie, eh futafag?

>>331713
This entire post is speculation minus the inconsistent deletions

File: dreamcast.png (39KB, 755x387px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 755x387px

>>331687
>>331713
>doesn't mean they get to make the rules.
and also rules can be hanged, we just need to spam Hiro posts until he (accidentally ) read one.

>>331722
>they've been ignoring our crying for months
>LETS CRY LOUDER
Heh

>>331687
>Just because /co/ asked for the board doesn't mean they get to make the rules.

It actually means just that. Why bother to make a board of you're not actually going to let it serve the purpose it was intended for unless you're intentionally trying to tank it.

>>331713
To add some information, the current culprit is thought to be a mod called "Kittenmod" from /tg/, who banned anything they thought was "not /tg/," which primarily included every single draw- and writefag on /tg/. And they just didn't come back.

Another point of contention was that anything thought to be "lewd" or suggestive was banned on sight. This stopped happening until recently, where it became grounds for a thread to get pruned for linking to NSFW images.

The reason people think it's Kittenmod on /d/ is because for a while, any post specifically mentioning that name was pruned from every single thread immediately.

>>331737
>To add some information, the current culprit is thought to be a mod called "Kittenmod" from /tg/, who banned anything they thought was "not /tg/," which primarily included every single draw- and writefag on /tg/. And they just didn't come back.
>Another point of contention was that anything thought to be "lewd" or suggestive was banned on sight. This stopped happening until recently, where it became grounds for a thread to get pruned for linking to NSFW images.
>The reason people think it's Kittenmod on /d/ is because for a while, any post specifically mentioning that name was pruned from every single thread immediately
Has any progress been made in tracking him down?

>>331737
>it actually means just that
No. Mods think your boards a good idea they're still going to tweak it to fit what works for them. You aren't the boss senpai. The board was made for western containment what you wanted is irrelevant to what it is

>>331759
What is the obsession of you weebs with the idea of "containment?" Boards can have legitimate purposes beyond keeping your peas from touching your blobby doe-eyed mashed potatoes you drooling autist.

>>331752
Ay ND the mods are gonna lose their shit if you start talking about finding out their IRL ID's. Ideally there would be some kind of identifier for individual mods on the site itself but 4chan's mods would never ever agree to anything that held them to any kind of accountability.

>>331770
Are you seriously implying that mods didn't turn it into a containment board? Get real, what you wanted is not reality

File: 1433448157724.png (133KB, 500x353px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 500x353px

why don't we just spam /d/ with western art for 3 days until the mods give up and go back to fucking their hot pockets?

>>331847
It's worked before. People spammed /tg/ for a month straight to get /wst/ kicked off.

Might as well try the same thing.

>>331759
/d/ was made for containment. Some of the shit is leaking.

It's time to fix the leak.

>>331684
If you want to wade in the garbage quality art that makes up most of /aco/, that's up to you. We're just glad to be rid of the eyesores. If chicks with dicks is enough to make you uncomfortable, then you really do need to be desensitized. Futa is a fetish for the boring people on /d/.

>>332178
Futa is a tumbrl-tier fetish

>>332265
The fuck are you on about? Chix with dix is hella oldschool as a fetish. It has nothing to do with genderfluid pansagendered snowflakesexuals.

HIROOOOOOOOO

>>301074
>The "no Western" rule had gone unenforced for years, and no longer served the needs of the community.

This is what I don't get. The board agreed that they want western and the rule was old and never actually enforced, but the mods just decided to start enforcing it for now reason.

>>332833
The funny thing is the second half of the rule is "No fanart"

Uh... Like everything posted there is fanart. Unless it's OC, it's all posted by an amateur artist from Pixiv of an established character or some other amateur artist.

So it's not just the fact it's an arbitrary, sudden enforcement of a rule that's really had no bearing on a board that was already slow, but it's also a double standard since it's not even the full rule enforced.

/d/ rule 3 just needs to go.

As a sidenote to the people complaining about wading through pages and pages to find non-futa threads... please, lurk moar. If you don't know how to use the catalog and quick search, then your power level is pathetic.

>>332857
Yeah, there was a small group of people insisting that "rules as written" take precedence over unwritten rules, but barely any art would be postable on /d/ if you actually followed the rule.

The only reason they still exist is because it gives the mods indiscriminate power to delete whatever they want.

>>301074
>Hiro has agreed that a relaxed approach to rules and honoring standing exceptions is preferable to doubling down on moderation and alienating a board's community
Only for /a/ because reasons.

>>332857
>The funny thing is the second half of the rule is "No fanart"
That is as wide to interpretation of a rule as no low quality.

>>332890
Any rule open to that kind of interpretation should go

>>331577
I know tastes are tastes, but several of the more popular western artists aren't any better or worse then what you get from the east either.

>>331711
It's really not anon. It's just more popular than shortstacks or chubby chicks.

If you make a latex thread with the only stipulation that a chick has to be in latex to be there you'll end up with shorties, chubbies, redheads, skinny chicks, busty chicks and of course futanari.

The fetish is nothing more than putting a dick on a chick. There might be popular trends and other fetishes people drag along with it on their own time, but there's absolutely nothing to futa other than that dick being on a chick, that's why it's so easily paired with everything else. It's a bodytype fetish.

>>331719
I think he's full of shit and I'm both a futafag and a Dmitrys fan. Stop attacking the fetish itself when your beef is with assholes within it. I mean this seriously. All you're going to do is bring more people down on yourself who would otherwise join you in fighting the assholes.

>>331759
It's a trial board and Hiro specifically said thoughts and feedback were to go on in said board and yet any thread that tries is deleted on site.

>>331772
Does it make any sense to kick content off one containment board where it's been for years without problem onto another beyond petty arbitration?

>>332265
Futanari is older than that. You're also mistaken if you think that since it's often the target of hate there for breaking any number of "isms," that tumblrites love to whine about. The whole Doxy affair started because a 17 year old took issue with the word "futanari," being "transmisogynistic," violence and was able to get the artists' blog deleted.

>>333600
>It's a trial board and Hiro specifically said thoughts and feedback were to go on in said board and yet any thread that tries is deleted on site.

This. The mods have already decided what they want /aco/ to be, trial status and community be damned.

A lot of people are fairly certain it was an intentional effort to sabotage the board, because the mods have fought against an adult /co/ for years.

>>333764
>the mods have fought against an adult /co/ for years
Why? This doesn't make much sense.

>>333764
>because the mods have fought against an adult /co/ for years.
This is retarded, even /co/ admits the moderation position towards /co/ is "who gives a shit?"

What i think happened is, the western content that was accepted in the porn boards (it isn't only /d/ the one purged of western) because it didn't have nowhere else to go, suddenly got a board for it, so mods redirected that section there.
I think it's quite mean towards them, in that they gave you a place to post while you didn't have nowhere else, now that you have one, stay there, learn to live with other fetishes.

>inb4 "your a mod!!!"
Were it for me, you'd all be banned together with your /co/cksucker motherland

>>331847
>>331976
>why don't we just spam /d/ with western art for 3 days until the mods give up and go back to fucking their hot pockets?
I never stopped posting whatever the hell I felt like, be it "western" or not. So yeah, I say we all do the same.

>>332861
>barely any art would be postable on /d/ if you actually followed the rule.
Hence why /d/ now stands for /d/ead...

>>334639
Why is it so hard for weaboos to realize that nobody but them care about whether porn is from Japan or not?

>>335114
See, everyone understands that, they just don't care about worthless westernshitters like you, it's not that they can't see you are bothered, but together with the normalfag boards like /pol/ or /b/, you are second class posters, so what you want will always take the backseat to what weebs want.

>>333600
It's never been a "trial" board. The mods made their decisions and were never going to listen to users, lets be honest

Holy shit guys, there's actually a discussion thread on /d/ that hasn't been deleted yet!

>>>/d/6536762

>>335482
Damn it, what the hell mods? The thread is still "there" but posting has been disabled because it "doesn't exist." I found it in the catalog only a few minutes before posting the link here. What in the actual fuck....

https://archive.loveisover.me/d/thread/6536762/

File: hiro.png (3MB, 892x1066px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 892x1066px

>>335482
>>335498

https://archive.loveisover.me/d/thread/6526217/

We've tried it before, even screenapping hiro's statements on how board issues were to be handled. They just refuse to allow threads about it.

There are a lot of threads discussing it on /d/ and /aco/ though, mostly when someone complains about how the board is dead or someone complains about fetishes on /aco/.

>>335498
That thread was deleted in seconds of being posted here. Also >>335576 thread and the companion /aco/ thread both received threatening posts right before being deleted.

The mods are keeping an eye on us to delete any dissent they see. It's pretty disgusting

File: Mr_poopy_butthole.png (94KB, 250x730px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 250x730px

>Anonymous communities are this elitist and autistic.

>>335498
>>335576
>>335609
>Global rule 8: Complaining about 4chan (its policies, moderation, etc) on the imageboards may result in post deletion and a ban.

>>335756
Uh huh, except that isn't what Hiro said.

I know you and the mods think you know better than Hiro, though.

>>301379
/aco/ and /d/ should be remerged with no rules about origin or style. Anyone who complains should be banned.

Then make /co/ a NSFW board and be done with it.

>>335846
If Hiro doesn't want it that way he should change the rules. You can't just take one out of context quote and tout it as the law

>>335894
/aco/ is a fine idea. /co/ should get a porn board. If you make /co/ into a red board it'll just become a porn dump board anyway.

But merge /d/'s fetish stuff back into /d/, because it doesn't belong there. And for God's sake don't make a /dco/ and split things even more

>>335923
>people asking for /dco/

Why

>>336603
Because /aco/ doesn't want /d/, and they assume /d/ actually wants to be on /aco/.

>>>/d/6535654

>yfw westernshitters try to justify their presence

Why won't /d/eviantart fuck off?

>>335482
>>335498
>>335576
>>335609
>>335756
The thread's still there, only hidden. Is it just me?

>>>/d/6536762
https:// boards.4chan.org/d/thread/6536762

File: image.jpg (20KB, 217x216px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 217x216px

>>331976
>People spammed /tg/ for a month straight to get /wst/ kicked off.
Proof /tg/ really DOES get shit done when they put their minds to it.

>>337360
It was actually like one guy from the archive.moe Quest Thread Generals. He uses a script to generate shitposts.

>>337551
>Questfags

Of course

/d/ has always been the "freakin' weird fetish" page. With the split to aco, that content has died. /aco/ is just normal porn.

There's already multiple pages for normal japanese drawn porn.

There's now a page for normal western drawn porn.

Where does the fetish stuff go? That's the problem.

>>338034

Nailed it. People have a few responses to this:

>It goes in /b/!
/b/ is unusable for anything

>It goes on /d/!
The mods delete it.

>If it's western, it goes on /aco/!
Which runs into the entire reason /d/ was split from /h/ in the first place: vanilla porn and fetish porn are two very different things, and don't work together.

>make a /cod/!
This still splits niche content into two different locations. If you are interested in Vore, you want to look at vore art. Since vore is a niche subject, it pulls art from both the East and the West to fill out threads and provide new content.

There's no reason to split /d/ into western and eastern boards because there simply isn't enough content to warrant it. /d/'s current dead state attests to that.

>>338034
>/aco/ is just normal porn
According to who? Certainly not according to it's description/rules

>>338076
The userbase and the people who requested the board in the first place.

Again, trying to force /d/ into /aco/ causes the same problems that arose on /h/. It is why /d/ was created in the first place.

>>338088
>the usebase
Is still posting weird shit, so obviously they dont mind all that damn much.
>the people who requested the board in the first place.
Irrelevant, asking for a board does not give you any sway over it's rules

>>338074
why /cod/ is such a bad idea? We would not have to cope with weeaboos(the ones who can't stand the profanation of their sacred mangu) and we would not have to cope with angry /aco/ users.

>>338090
We've been through this. If someone asks for a board about Lawncare, and you make it, but then make the whole thing about hiking, what was the point of making /lawncare/ in the first place? You're intentionally subverting the intention of the board out of nothing but spite, and not solving any of the actual issues the board was supposed to be created for.

>they're still posting weird shit
Actually, they're not. That's the whole problem. /d/ has slowed to a near standstill and simply doesn't get new threads. Meanwhile western /d/ threads can't exist on /aco/ outside of a few big generals because the board is now housing three boards worth of posters.

>>338098
Because then we're still having our threads split down the middle. Weaboos complaining about western art were never an issue on /d/ because nobody gave a shit.

>>338102
Lawn care and hiking are completely different things though you moron. Western porn includes both vanilla western and fetish Western. They were not fucked over they just dont what to share.

>three big generals
>they're not
Pick one retard

>>338102
>intentionally subverting the intention of the board out of nothing but spite
I know it's dumb, but people are big babies about it. If i could change people i would do that, but that's not an option

>>338107
>nobody gave a shit.
Heh, you've never been in /size/ threads :^) . But that's probably cherrypicking examples on my side, since size threads are as toxic as /b/

>>338117
I used to go to size/Giantess and never really any problems that I noticed. Don't know about size/Vore or size/Growth

I think I heard the Diaper threads had some shitflinging (heh) in them though.

>>338112
>entire board reduced to only three generals
>all other topics discarded completely
Well hey board saved problem solved

>>338125
Obviously they weren't very big topics anyway so who cares? Well outside of the ragtag group of crybabies on /qa/

>>338130
Are you new to 4chan or something?

>>338141
No but you obviously are, as demonstrated by your hissyfit on this board

>>338141
Don't engage him. These fucks have no argument beyond antagonizing people with shitposting. They're not going to listen to any of the points you make because they're not here to discuss, just whine about other people whining.

>>338180
Sounds like you got BTFO

>>338125
The diaper thread is funny because it has a few very loud shitposters whining about how terrible the western art was while treating their thread like a /soc/ discussion on diaper acceptance. There's no self-awareness whatsoever.

Is there really enough Western content of some fetishes such as corruption to warrant threads on /aco/? Obviously not.

Allowing Western stuff on /d/ is the easiest solution to this problem, I'm surprised this is still being talked about.

>>338552
There is no problem

>>338552
I'd say a real problem with this is the wall that has been pulled between us and anyone with authority, just silent bands and deleted threads without any sat down explanation. I still remember shortstack getting banned from /d/ because it isn't an eastern fetish

>>338560
>Everything is fine
>There is no war in Ba Sing Se

>>338565
That wall has literally always existed you moron, it's written into the global rules. You're lucky they let you bitch here

>>338574
But that isn't a very good way to find a solution to this problem is it?

>>338581
There is hardly a problem in the first place. You keep saying the sky is falling but no one else sees it

>>338586
>>338570

>>338594
>t-the sky is falling
Okay dude whatever you say. Obviously it isn't a big enough deal for action to be necessary

But it is a problem, for reasons that have repeatedly been laid out in this thread

>>338600
Because you dont like it? Okay then, I'm sure the mods will take your dissatisfaction into account from now on.

>>338601
>>338552
>>338102
>>338074
>>338034
>>335923
>>325657
>>325346
>>321818
>>318472
>>306436
>There is no war in Ba Sing Se

>>338610
I'm not going to read through your wall of bitching faggot, condense it down to a few sentences and tell me what the actual issue here is that isn't just you being upset about being quarantined

>>338615
>/aco/ gets made to be a nsfw /co/
>Instead all western porn gets shoved there
>No one but a vocal few want it
>/d/ deals with niche fetishes with not as much art for many of the, so arbitrary policing the art not only splits the groups between two boards but has dropped /d/ to a standstill
>/co/ posters are forced to share what was going to be their porn board with all of the /d/ content that was forced there
If you say the no western rule is still relevant to /d/ I'm done fucking spoonfeeding you

>>338615
We were quarantined, and then abruptly had half our weird shit shoved out of quarantine and out onto a vanilla porn board.
Our weird shit, by virtue of being WEIRD SHIT, doesn't have a lot of content to post to begin with, so splinting it between two boards by arbitrary mod fief is killing a lot of the niche stuff.

>>338619
So what I'm getting is
>/co/ is pissy because they didn't get exactly what they wanted and have to share
>western /d/ is mad because they have to follow the rules that they think shouldn't count because they got away with breaking them for years
Am I missing anything?

>>338620
>vanilla porn board
This is objectively false though.

>>338623
>Brings up rule 3
What did I say. Fuck you. You aren't here to do anything but stir up shit

>>338630
That was a fairly objective statement though, you don't think the rule should !matter because it hasn't been enforced and mods disagree. This is not a true statement?

I can't ignore the rule when it's the main point of conflict

>>338623
Yes, the entire god damn point, but good money is on you being yet another /a/sshat.

/d/ ended up with a lot of western content BECAUSE the more niche fetishes had little art from EITHER side of the Pacific.
This weird ass shit suddenly being thrown into the /co/-goers faces naturally had an adverse reaction, and THE ONLY GOD DAMN REASON THIS HAPPENED is that A MOD SUDDENLY DECIDED TO ARBITRARILY POLICE CONTENT!

ENTIRE FETISHES got banned despite using Eastern Images for their threads, because the MOD told them THAT THE FETISH WAS "TOO WESTERN."

>>338631
The rule doesn't matter and the mods have ignored it for years. What possible reason could give it relevancy now, when all it does is beak down already small fetches communities between two boards. It is such an arbitrary and pointless distinction.
Tell me why it is a good idea

>>338633
God the shortstack threads before they were banned were like graveyards of deleted images

>>338626
>This is objectively false though.
No, it's OBJECTIVELY True, since a majority of porn will be vanilla.

>>338635
FURTHER MORE, they've outright overstepped the bounds of the Rule anyways, using "Too Western" as an excuse to push out ENTIRE FETISH THREADS despite them using EASTERN ARTWORK!

>>>/d/6537546
Look at what they have turned /d/ into

>>338633
If you could refrain from calling me a boogeyman that would be great.

While /co/ may have asked for the board they do not own the board and if they can't handle the content posted the should filter it or not go there.
>arbitrarily
Actually the line of thought is quite clear in my opinion, western stuff really couldn't be posted anywhere else before hand so letting it go made more sense or perhaps mods had just been ignoring /d/ in general as a lost cause and /aco/ lit a fire under their asses.

Banning fetishes may be over the line but if the threads were constantly problematic like >>338636 suggest then it makes sense.
>>338635
>the rule doesn't matter
This is your opinion, the rule didn't matter but mods have clearly decided it now does in retaliation to western being given a home. Some people dont like western content and mods have decided to pander to them, this goes against your opinions and perhaps the majority opinion but that doesn't really matter unless the mods decide they want to listen
>>338638
No, no. Nowhere in the rules, description or sticky is it specified as vanillas western. If /co/ was mostly cartoons would that nullify it as a comic board? Of course not.

>>338647
>just shut up an follow the rules
>There is no war in Ba Sing Se

>>338648
Good job ignoring every point made in this thread. I hope you choke to death on that mod cock you fuck

>>338633
>>ENTIRE FETISHES got banned despite using Eastern Images for their threads, because the MOD told them THAT THE FETISH WAS "TOO WESTERN."

This guy's not kidding, I've witnessed people literally "whistleblowing" on trap threads that are long gone by now.

Which were hosting Eastern art.

>>338652
I told you I wasn't going to read through your wall of bitching, if you failed to mention something critical in your summary feel free to bring it up now. Lashing out like child is not helping your case however.

>>338635
Seriously they might have well made the distinction between line art and sketches

>>338648
>Nowhere in the rules, description or sticky is it specified as vanillas western.
Here is the problem with your counter-non-argument:
The ENTIRE reason /d/ came into existence was that /h/ did not want all the weird ass dick-girl hentai.
Do you think this would be ANY different when it comes to Western pornographic art?

This is what outs you as a "boogyman," you blindly take the Mods side even though we keep saying THEY are the ones CREATING issues here.

>>338657
Whats the point if all you are going to respond with is Rule 3 Is Law and ignore all the posts that argue against it

>>338660
It's clear this isn't about the rules or /d/, it's a demographic dispute, one group trying to kick other out.
I agree though, you westernshitter have shit taste and stink of tumblr and deviantart like our namefriend slut here. Were it for me you'd be kicked out of the site.

>>338659
That has nothing to do with /aco/ being a vanilla board though. It isn't one, you want ot try to make it one.

>blindly take the mods side
I don't think I've technically taken either side though, I've not said whether I think rule 3 is good or bad only that it is personal opinion and your opinion does not mesh with the mods.
>>338660
Well right now it is law, would you like me to close my eyes and tell you it doesn't exist? I'm asking you to show me the real issues so far the only things I can gather that I consider valid are the board being slow, which isn't necessarily bad and fetishes being banned despite being eastern. If we could sort out the fetish banning then I dont see why you couldn't learn to live with everything else. Plenty of other anons seem to be doing just that.

The problems with /aco/ can be summed up perfectly with a raven thread being sandwiched between a bodyhorror TF and diaper thread

>>338667
>It isn't one, you want ot try to make it one.
No, everyone ELSE wants it to be one, I was fine with just /d/ for all my insane fetishy ideas not safe for /tg/...

>I don't think I've technically taken either side though
No, you've taken the side of the mods by virtue of your conservative assessment of a situation, of which you have a very bias opinion of while still trying to maintain an air of impartial superiority.

Most of /co/ didn't want /aco/ to be a western /d/, while the "western" portion of /d/ never wanted to leave in the first place since most of us don't fucking care where the art comes from as long as it scratches our freaky itches.

Hell, some "WESTERN" art is STILL allowed on /d/ because the Mods like them and aren't in any hurry to push it onto /aco/.

>>338690
You are the perfect example of why the western portion of /d/ is deviantart cancer, not only do you write like a retard (how many ellipses can you use,/co/cksucker?), but you actually have a deviant art.

>>338691
>Can't even be bothered to defend his point anymore
Character assassinations are a poor way to make arguments

>>338691
>You are the perfect example of why the western portion of /d/ is deviantart cancer
So you want to shove that OUT of the Containment board?
...Grade A logic there...

>>338690
Even if the majority wants it the point is still moot, saying it is a vanilla board is incorrect. You want it to be a vanilla board or we want it to be a vanilla board is correct

Please point out anything biased I've said, just because I refuse to jump on your angry bandwagon does not make me your enemy.

>>338690
Yeah, hell the damitrys thread is still up despite being western. Why is that?
>>>/d/6498657

>>338698
Then why bother calling it /aco/. Which is always been used to describe a /h/ board for /co/? /co/ asked for a porn board and it sure as fuck isn't what we got.

>>338695
I'd permaban you in particular, you clearly don't belong here.

>>338694
I'm not that other guy, I support the /d/ purges on a userbase point of view, even considering western is shitty, the dangerous part is that westernfags are cancer, usually with high overlap with /co/, tumblr and deviant art.
Having them contained to /co/, /mlp/ and /aco/ is an improvement.

>>338704
This
All we wanted was a board for casual porn dumps of /co/ characters and storytime nsfw comics. But then all the other porn got forced into the board for no reason

>>338698
>Please point out anything biased I've said, just because I refuse to jump on your angry bandwagon does not make me your enemy.
You just did!

>Even if the majority wants it the point is still moot, saying it is a vanilla board is incorrect. You want it to be a vanilla board or we want it to be a vanilla board is correct
As a "general" western porn board, IT WILL BE "VANILLA" BY DEFINITION!

>>338701
>Yeah, hell the damitrys thread is still up despite being western. Why is that?
The best you'll get is a "It's eastern STYLE!"

>>338704
What /co/ wants is irrelevant, always has been, why are you surprised? Most people from /co/ stand out as foraneous elements in the rest of 4chan, go back to tumblr if it bothers you.

>>338705
Show me where tumblr or any of that nonsense has every been a problem on /d/. Or are you just going to keep spouting your elitist weeaboo opinions

>>338711
Then why make the fucking board at all if it wasn't for /co/?

>>338711
>What /co/ wants is irrelevant
fuck you /a/

>>338714
You have a namefag a few posts above you being the living example of how disgusting the users of /co/ are, a much higher percentage of the users at least.

They aren't just my opinions though, they are the moderation's, so good luck with that. This was never a site meant for your kind, i don't see why you are surprised the moderation decisions don't match your interests.

>>338705
>I'd permaban you in particular, you clearly don't belong here.
How about you actually aspire to go somewhere that isn't the "asshole of the internet?"
If you think the echo-chambers of tumblr and deviant art are somehow WORSE than 4chan, you are hopelessly delusional...

>>338707
>All we wanted was a board for casual porn dumps of /co/ characters and storytime nsfw comics. But then all the other porn got forced into the board for no reason
And most of "WESTERN" /d/ feels for you guys, we no more want to shove our freaky-ass fetishes in your face than you do.

>>338711
Again, escape this hellhole of social site if you want a better internet community.

>>338704
What /co/ says is not valid as an actual definition. The board was created, not as they imagined so you can't apply their definitions to things that are not theirs
>>338710
>you just did
I did not, you are quite clearly upset, this not up for debate
>general = vanilla
No that is not by definition, im not sure which dictionary you have been using friend and actually it's not even described as general I don't believe, I may have made a mistake. Anyway bottom bottom line it's all encompassing western board with the exception of global rule violating content

File: 1444663779157.jpg (66KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1280x720px

>>338716
Containment for all the western in 2D porn boards.

>>338719
Luv you too /co/cksucker-kun.

>>338723
Holy fuck /co/mblr is real they aren't even denying it anymore

>>338721
Then point out what he said was disgusting
>This was never a site meant for your kind, i don't see why you are surprised the moderation decisions don't match your interests.
>Muh japanease cartoon porn is better then yours

>>338721
>You have a namefag a few posts above you being the living example of how disgusting the users of /co/ are
>>338727
>/co/mblr
I'm a /d/eviant mother fucker...

>>338723
I was here first and you clearly feel uncomfortable here, me and anons with a similar view will just keep pushing you out by destroying the things you like until you are forced to leave because there is nothing for you here.
As a matter of fact, I want a more agressive community, you act like a 11 year old girl.

>>338725
>What /co/ says is not valid as an actual definition. The board was created, not as they imagined so you can't apply their definitions to things that are not theirs
If the board wasn't created to house Adult Cartoons like every other chan then why was it made at all?

>>338730
You're cancer and I'd nuke every porn board on this site and /tg/ if it meant you would leave

What's wrong with posting western art, as long as it's quality?

>>338730
No, you are an outsider and every time you post you drag down your cause by your mere presence.

>>338728
Not really the issue, the problem is that western communities are infested by subhumans like the namefag here, same as /v/ with underages.
Shitpost all you want, I'm not the one being relocated.

>>338734
It was made for western drawn porn, that doesn't make it /co/'s property nor does it mean they get to make the rules. Their opinion is worth as !much as everyone else's

>>338736
It attracts subhumans like this namefag. Plus, most western is shit.

>>338734
Containment, why would mods give something to /co/?

So the only arguments for the change they can muster are
>Muh irrelevant rule 3
>Muh superior Japanese porn
>Tumblr boogeyman
Why don't you fucks go to pixiv

>>338741
Why don't you learn moonrunes and shitpost on actual jap sites then?

>>338740
Then why didn't they call it /wsp/? Why this elaborate bait and switch? No one wanted this except for a couple vocal chucklefucks

>>338742
Because i have /d/ now. And you have /aco/.

>>338742
>irrelevant rule 3
Mods disagree, just because you say it over and over doesn't make it true
>muh superior Japanese porn
Opinions are opinions. Some people dont like western
>tumblr boogeyman
Except it's already been admitted to in the thread, so it's real.

>>338744
>Why don't you learn moonrunes and shitpost on actual jap sites then?
Because that would require him to actually improve himself...

>>338744
Japanese are retarded, I just like their medium.
You forget too, this site is for weebs, run by weebs and built by a weeb, I don't need to find a better place, you are the one that has too.
If you could claim that the policies have changed would be one thing, but you are clearly getting shafted with every decision because this site is geared to some other kind of people, make your own chan if you want a chan to pander to you, i'm not giving you mine.

>>338745
Because boards can't be custom made just to please you even if you ask for it originally. You basically wanted a place for western adult content (read: porn) and that's what you got
>>338749
You coukd just post on /aco/ or go to a different site but that would require some maturity and a dropping of your persecution complex

>>338749
We are improving 4chan by shunning you out.

No really, if you want to help the /d/ western cause i recommend you stop posting, neutral anons that see you will pick our side just by how cancerous you look, outsider.

>>338748

>Mods disagree, just because you say it over and over doesn't make it true
Then why did they not enforce it for years, then go on a banning spree out of no where?
>Opinions are opinions. Some people dont like western
So all this shit about western being inferior is just opinions?
>Except it's already been admitted to in the thread, so it's real.
Where

>>338751
>site is geared to some other kind of people
Daily reminder that /b/ is 100% normie and basically unmoderated, and /a/ doesn't get their loli

>>338753
That is not what /co/ asked for and you fucking know it

>>338755
>Then why did they not enforce it for years, then go on a banning spree out of no where?
My guess is that they were being nice because you had nowhere else to go, now that you do, it's time for you to leave a board that was never meant for your kind.
>Where
I'm on a phone so i'm lazy, the namefag admitted he thinks deviant art and tumblr are better than 4chan. Look up.

>>338759
>I'm on a phone so i'm lazy, the namefag admitted he thinks deviant art and tumblr are better than 4chan. Look up.
No, I said:
>>338723
>If you think the echo-chambers of tumblr and deviant art are somehow WORSE than 4chan, you are hopelessly delusional...
I never said they were BETTER, just your delusional to think they are WORSE...

>>338755
>out of nowhere
I'm loving this meme, it was in direct retaliation to western being given a home. Western had a home so they no longer needed to stay on /d/.
>so this whole ... Opinions
Yes pretty much, mods just happen to share these opinions. But of quality western is still being allowed on /d/ like you say then maybe they aren't so bad after all
>where
The namefag has all but posted a link to her profile and even bashed this site while doing it

>>338757
It's been said, no one cares about what /co/ wanted. This is a containment board.

>>338756
Legal conflicts, it's a thorny issue from almost day one, moot himself never liked it. /b/ is no longer 4chan either, shutting it down would mean a flooding never before seen sadly.
Other than that, can you even pretend /a/ doesn't get deferential treatment?

>>338759
Well where do you think porn artists post their work? Also that is a real shit think for mods to do after years of fostering coexisting generals for such small fetishes with even smaller art content. It's all but killed the drawthreads outright

>>338756
There a loli thread on /a/ right now senpai

See? A /co/mblr/d/eviantart fuckface.
>>338762
>I never said they were BETTER, just your delusional to think they are WORSE...

If you honestly think tumblr and deviantart are equal to 4chan in quality then you have no business being here, and i'm glad you feel slighted and have your community destroyed, subhuman.

>>338764
Well like >>338701
said it feels like the mods are using the rules to pick and choose what porn is allowed. Why is that thread and the one with modeseven art up if it breaks the rules when so many others were deleted for much lighter offences

>>338766
>Also that is a real shit think for mods to do after years of fostering coexisting generals for such small fetishes with even smaller art content. It's all but killed the drawthreads outright
Exactly!
Most of /d/'s content providers are WESTERN artist, but because the Mods can ban things based on "STYLE" they basically have free reign to ban WHATEVER THEY like.

>>338766
I repeat, screaming to the winds how you prefer tumblr is very bad publicty for your cause.

>>338770
>If you honestly think tumblr and deviantart are equal to 4chan in quality then you have no business being here, and i'm glad you feel slighted and have your community destroyed, subhuman.
>>338773
>I repeat, screaming to the winds how you prefer tumblr is very bad publicty for your cause.
Kettle, have you met Pot?

>>338773
And where did I say that? I said that artists post their art on tumblr. In fact a lot of Eastern porn gets posted there too

Drawthreads dont even belong on /d/ western or not

>>338776
Eastern=/=japanese, nips use pixiv and other nip websites.

>>338782
Hey, guess what they also use?
2chan!

>>338782
Then why don' t you go to a nip website

>>338787
>>338785

Why don't you go to a non weeaboo site senpaitachi?

>>338785
Not really, 2chan is quite niche there, you tumblr landwhale.

I don't see why you keep insisting we leave, when you are the one clearly unwanted, that keeps getting shoved around because he clearly doesn't belong. I'm not going anywhere? Why should I when we are slowly retaking the rest of the site

>>338790
But I'm not on 2chan friend

>>338790
Why should I? I'm perfectly comfortable here, I'm not the one on a forced exodus.
You could go to tumblr or 8gaga or wherever if this bothers you.

>>338792
Nip =/= weeaboo
>>338793
I'm not a /d/ickhead

>>338792
Trying to shitpost will not make this website any less weeb, second class anon.

How does it feel being a lesser user?

File: 1443043458465.png (128KB, 1200x1078px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1200x1078px

>>338795
Meant for the anon above you, gomenasai.

>>338791
Because an ACTUAL JAP will eventually evict you when he sees how your assholery is directly affecting his Ad sales.

>>338800
>this is what normalfags actually believe
>even after Hiro spent two days talking to /a/ about nipples
You're grasping at straws you know, Hiro isn't the savior your outsider ass desperately hopes he will be. /d/ is never going back and you can blow me

>>338802
>you can blow me
>>>/y/

>>338800
Can you tell me how that feel? You are the one getting kicked out by a nip.
The sooner you accept you are unwanted here and will never have a home here, the sooner you can move on to a more fitting site, like tumblr.
It's because of outsiders like you that poor actual anons had their board butchered, retards like you made this purge necessary, you disgust me.

>>338804
That'd be western, it goes to /aco/.

They might as well just make /wsd/ at this rate
/aco/ is the western version of if you mashed /h/ and /d/ together

>>338807
Depends on how we draw it

>>338779
Why? There were tons of artists there making shit for free. Lots of big artists occasionally dropped in or even got their start there. That's 100 times better than just being an image dump board.

Also why are you guys even bothering responding to this guy, he's an /a/non who blatantly flaunts the fact he thinks /a/ doesn't need to follow rules but bases his entire argument on them anyway.

jesus Christ, just stop responding to the weeb

Good

Ni

>>340250
Bumpo

>>340250
Bumperino

>>340250
>>340250
Hehe bump

>samefagging to bump a thread over the bump limit

that's some serious butthurt

>>340266
Still less pathetic than bumping a thread by yourslef for weeks on end

>>340268
Screenshot it to show people how utterly assmad /a/non shitposters get when a problem that doesn't concern them gets discussed.

>>340471
"2 months, only autistic shitposters care"

>>340474
You're right.. hold on...

>>340268
Again, screen shot it so to show why engaging with these asshats is wasted time and energy. /a/ shitposters are to be ignored.

>>340474
There.

>>340481
"Everyone I do not like is from /a/"

>>340486
Doesn't matter where they're from, ignore them all the same.

Also...
>learn to greentext

>>338755
>Then why did they not enforce it for years, then go on a banning spree out of no where?
Because they are fucking lazy. If you actually browsed any big board, you'd know this. They starting actually enforcing it now that western has a actual home

>>340494
"Doesn't matter where they are from, I will blame that place anyway"
>>340496
I say "Congratulations"

>>340496
>now that western has a actual home
It was fine where it was though. There was no need to move it. If the rule is almost unanimously disregarded once it stops being enforced and the community doesn't have a problem with it then what's the point of the rule existing in the first place? To simply justify itself? That's circular logic.

>>340498
Plenty of the shitposters when engaged have defended /a/ more passionately than someone unaffiliated with that board would.

Regardless, you didn't seem to understand that I didn't blame the board, I blamed shitposters from there and when you pointed out how not everyone shitposting necessarily comes from there I conceded that point by revising my own to say the shitposters should be ignored regardless of where they come from.

>>340501
"No"
>>340503
"I just want to upset you, boards that actually get attention are good bait"

>>340505
"Whoops"-me

>>340505
You forgot something I think.

>>340509
>>340506
"Whoops I did ot again"

>>340496
>now that western has a actual home

Except /aco/ was for adult comics, not western /h//d//u//y/etc. It's the mods that sabotaged it into becoming this jumble of failure it's become.

>>340958
This. /co/ wanted a place for adult comics to be posted. They asked Hiro for it. Then they got it. Except then the mods decided to use it for whatever the fuck they wanted.

It's like how /tg/ got used as moot's dumping ground for Quests just because he didn't want them on /a/.

They're not trying to actually make the site a better place. They're trying to make hugboxes for themselves and fuck over everyone else.

Hiroo