Do you think a blue off-topic / discussion board would work,

It's too hard to say. But ideally you'd want to go with a policy of moderation occurring only once every 24 hours or some long time interval like that.

That's technically /vip/ (and /qa/).

File: 1488938630913.jpg (74KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 500x500px

/qa/...

>>1562635
>What standards would you set for moderation?
My own personal standards. Meaning at least half the people to ever post on it would get banned.

>>1562635
>What standards would you set for moderation?
No image dumps, no softcore porn.

>>1563044
Too difficult; it would never work.

>>1563053
You're right, its a completely arbitrary rule. But I still want it, so the actual solution is to make it a textboard.
I'm actually confused as to why 4chan doesn't have a straight random textboard.

>>1563057
>its a completely arbitrary rule
You know better than that. And no text boards because people didn't use them as much as the imageboards.

>>1563079
Yet /po/ exists, and /news/ exists. They were axed because they couldn't be bothered moderating them.

>>1563083
Well, yeah, that too. Even if the number of mods doubled, they would still be overwhelmed by the website as it is without textboards.

Random never lasts for very long...

>>1563091
why dont they just hire new mods then

>>1565099
From the pool of candidates on 4chan? As if most people here have the heart or brains to do a good job. Also laziness. Think a bout the people bumping and making garbage threads here on /qa/. Those are the average people that want to be a mod/janitor on 4chan.

higher

>>1565563

discussions