Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4
File: IMG_0088.jpg (113KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
113KB, 1280x720px
There are two kind of thinking models when doing routines: the procedural way and the functional way.
In the procedural way you are stucked in an seemingly endless loop and check the progress frequently hoping the condition meet and the torture ends sooner. You are just doing the same things over and over and will get bored quickly.
In the functional way the routine becomes something you can delve into. After you doing that thing you start exploring the routine deeper and deeper, and when you reach the end point you will have the greatest feel of achievement.
Why don't you start thinking functionally, /qa/?
>>
not really. no
>>
>>1536029
Good thread, bonus point for using my favorite underrated anime
>>
>>1536076
It's getting a season 3!
>>
File: 1502292233227.jpg (116KB, 548x407px) Image search:
[Google]
116KB, 548x407px
>>1536077
I know!
>>
>>1536039
This post sums it up pretty well.
>>
>>1536040
Think functionally
>>
>muh recursion
>muh pattern matching
>muh TCO
>muh car
>muh cdr
>muh eval
>muh apply
>muh !computer !science
>muh computer spells
>>
File: what's the problem.png (8KB, 225x235px) Image search:
[Google]
8KB, 225x235px
>>
>>1536029
But the exponential explosion
>>
>>1538885
sage does not go in any field!!!!
>>
>>1537404
it's cooler if you think functionally
>>
>>1540181
Hey bot lol.
>>
>>1538581
wtf
>>
File: 1496859004118.jpg (12KB, 331x331px) Image search:
[Google]
12KB, 331x331px
>>1541182
brainlet
>>
>>1541185
no u
>>
functional thinking
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 4
Thread images: 4