Optimizing PNG images results in ~30% smaller file size. For

make your images 30% worse and save 30% space. hmmm. hmmmm.

Because I have over 10TB of space.

>>1533206
>he doesn't know how lossless compression works

>>1533211
>compression
>lossless
that's impossible, even for a computer

>>1533207
It isn't just the matter of space!
If you make a large chart that exceeds 4MB, you can easily optimize it instead of resizing or saving it in JPEG.

Because I'm not a freakin' nerd.

>>1533212
No it isn't, see run-length encoding.

>>1533212

There's this new thing called PKZip, it'll blow your mind anon

>>1533398
Why do you care so much about a person's preference?

>>1533202
How?¥

File: NANI.gif (1MB, 446x270px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 446x270px

>>1533212

and here comes the image equivalent of that arguement that nerds swear they can hear the difference between FLAC and V0 mp3's...

I don't know how.
*depressed sigh*

>>1533795
PNGGauntlet is an easy program that runs your PNGs through several optimizers and picks the one with the lowest file size.

File: 1500257679729.png (341KB, 615x540px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 615x540px

Researches have shown that smaller images are more likely to be viewed on imageboards.
Want to get more views of your images? Optimize them NOW!

>>1534497
It's for aussies not phonefags

optimize is important

OK? how do

>>1535712
See >>1533802

>>1533748
Get better audio equipment

>>1537210
Your ear introduces most noise in the sound processing chain

What is the optimization method? If a 30% size reduction is possible by discarding placeholder data it would take precisely 5 hours to decompress.

>>1537304
higher compression level

>>1533212
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
LO*20L

File: 822160.png (1MB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2560x1600px

Optimize your images and then you get 30% more images to shitpost with!

optimization is love
optimization is life

>>1536393
it doesnt work losslessly above 1024x1024 or something

>>1539754
no, wrong thing, i was thinking of something else someone showed me far earlier

test

Imagine 30% off on SSD price

>>1541257
Imagine if all I stored were png images.

File: 1501957270567.jpg (115KB, 368x356px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 368x356px

>>1541259
>not having millions of shitposting images

>>1541277
>.jpg
Yeah...

File: 1496433053399.jpg (110KB, 535x545px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 535x545px

>>1541286
>jpg can't be optimized

>>1533802
well first of all archived.moe only has 5 or so mentions of "PNGGauntlet" across five years of all boards it archives, so it seemed really sketchy to me

it took 39 min 10 sec to reduce a 7,500.23 KB image to 7085.97 KB, saving 414.26 KB (program doesn't do the % math). I suppose for lossless compression it of course helps but I expected to be able to move enormous images to a mobile device at significantly reduced space requirement.

Will use for "Untitled.png" anythings I create but otherwise this will gather dust for me.

>>1542919
Sorry it does offer the percentage, it's 94%, where the other compression information was at the bottom of the window.

>>1533202
Because I don't fucking save noisy shit as PNG in the first place you dunce. You shouldn't either.
>b-b-b-b-bb-but muh pixel perfect waifu pics

holy shit he's mad

>>1543443
Even if optimization opportunities were available, that doesn't mean the software used to create such an image took them.

Also apparently I can't sage.

>>1544213
Did you accidentally put sage in the name field?

Bump for optimization

File: 1501009829849.png (142KB, 500x460px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 500x460px

optimize this

File: optimally_optimized.png (15KB, 500x460px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 500x460px

>>1545649
Enjoy

File: 1502567969628.png (14KB, 500x460px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 500x460px

>>1545668
not small enough

File: optimized.jpg (11KB, 500x460px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 500x460px

>>1545671
JPG wins again lol

>>1545678
Cheating isn't optimizing

O

>>1546920
P

File: 1504032545789.jpg (4KB, 500x460px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 500x460px

>>1545678
optimized it for you

File: 1504123267856.jpg (1KB, 500x460px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 500x460px

>>1547228
This one's more optimized

File: 1503170578892.png (3MB, 2554x2112px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2554x2112px

>>1533202
Here's your optimized PNG.

>>1533202
>>1534438
>>1539022
>>1545649
>>1547247
Using PNG for these images is as pointless as your lives.

>>1547220
TIMIZE

>>1544544
This

File: Optimize this Nards.png (301KB, 749x570px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 749x570px

>>1547243
Passing by this image always makes me laugh

>>1533202

File: d27.png (182KB, 622x626px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 622x626px

>>1533212

>>1550295
>>>/a/

>>1551040
I'll do it later

>>1548808
>>1550295
>>1551040
Did you optimize?

File: Newfags, this is your mindset.png (4KB, 220x160px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 220x160px

>>1550295
Die you fucking Buzzfeedfag
http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/973114-bait-this-is-bait
(My image was already as optimized as I could reasonably get it)