HELP US!
/V/ IS GETTING ATTACKED
>>1446402
By what?
>>1446402
>/v/ is filled with furshit
How is this different from any other day?
First /vg/ then /v/, I hope this isn't a pattern.
You'll be fine
t. /vp/
Please start nuking /r9k/ Bui
based
>>1446448
who is Bui? Is he an angsty furfag that wants a /vpp/ board for porn, or is it just a le master trole?
I've heard both
/qa/ is next
t. knower
>>1446466
t. /int*/
>>1446461
Some faggot that wanted /vp/ to be a red board for poké porn. He became "famous" on /vp/ for having moot personally banhammer his ass into oblivion back in 2012, and he fucked off to some other chan. Now he's back, spamming /vp/ this past week, and /v/ today, because he wants a partner who'll roleplay with him on Discord, playing a little Pokémon who dominants Bui with its feet.
>>1446477
Bui is the Dio of shit posters, back to fight a whole new generation.
He is doing it again
>>1446759
Got cleaned up fast. Got a plot of his spam rate though while he was at it. Y axis is thread age (minutes) and X is catalog position.
>>1446850
Better version of that, I had the age based on the current time (when the plot was generated).
>>1446850
>catalog position
*when sorted by creation date
>>1446887
He managed 14 threads in the first 5.872 seconds.
>>1446956
Then things slowed down, but he got 31 threads in 47.501 seconds. And then there was a little pause.
>>1446986
How is he bypassing captcha? Some Chinese sweatshop solving them for him?
>>1446999
You'd have to ask him. It's possible to get them by script through random guessing, although the rate is fairly low (1 per few minutes on one machine). If you did some actual image recognition, you could do better than that, probably. It's also possible to have Google let you through without solving a captcha by tracking cookies and waiting, but there are a limited number you can get that way per IP per day. Buying them human workers for cheap might be the most efficient way, and it would take the least work assuming you had the money to spend. And I think they're fairly cheap, I'll look up some prices.
>>1446999
>>1447048
Here's the first quote I found; there may be cheaper ones. This would put the cost of wiping a 150-thread board at 42 cents.