/pol/ is too big and too different for 4chan's own good.

>>1437412
t.butthurt spic

Um, I don't remember asking for your opinion......?

suck my cock dude

>>1437412
People who ask to delete boards are the wrong types of people here from the wrong types of places.

Half the threads on /pol/ have 10 or less replies.
I wonder why that is.

>>1437412
blow it out of your ass

File: 1499269139188m.jpg (197KB, 879x1024px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 879x1024px

>>1437412
We're all in this together now bucko

>Solutions To Fix /pol/ A 2,000 Character Essay
>While hiring more moderation and janitors is always an option, in actual practice it does not solve the problems of a board as large as /pol/; the janitors make mistakes and take time to learn the proper way to handle the board.
>A far easier solution exists, one that makes the board better. First off, certain keywords, such as news network names, will be merged. That is if a thread OP has similar enough words to another OP, the new thread will instead be posted in that thread, along with a subject line.
>How will /pol/ get rid of it's kiddie /b/ users? Simply, set up spam traps. Each thread at around 120 posts will get one of those dubs roll games posted. The post can be inserted earlier in the thread with fake replies as well. Then anyone who replies to that roll post gets an automatic 3-day ban.

>>1437812
Oh Jesus Christ, so much hate. Why the real people can't take it easy? Don't they see we are in process of creating the greatest joke that even God will be laughing at it.

>>1437906
Implying he isn't already?

>>1437812
This. Ever since the Christfag raids from ŕeđďįť, /pol/'s quality has tanked.