I'm looking for an algorithmic way to decide if a thread is good or not.
How should I do this?
Would some combination of buzzword concentration, complex vocabulary and post length work?
A shitposter can very easily manipulate all of that.
>>1428005
dumb weebposter
Pessimists need not answer.
Looking at OP only wouldn't work: >>1403185
Threads are good because of their content.
>>1428030
Ya, I can imagine it would become a game of hunting for the exceptions to the rules.