Turn the bumpbot off. I don't think we need it anymore. You're using it for retarded shit anyway: >>1415964
nah
Yeah, I too can type three-letter gibberish and call myself *the* bumpbot.
Not your personal janitor.
>>1415967
You shouldn't have a bumpbot at all.
That one was marginal and I actually took it off before you posted.
>>1415983
Having a bumpbot = sliding
It should turn off to all but a few threads automatically when people stop spamming and sliding.
>>1415967
I think we need it
What would you put on the list?
>>1415987
It's keeping decent threads alive when someone else spams. It's not bumping every thread.
>>1415992
As long as you're deciding what is decent or not it needs to go.
And by spamming and sliding I mean an objective measurement. I'm not talking about the frog spam, for example, which seems to be done maliciously, but isn't contributing that much to the measure. I acknowledge that the bumpbot itself contributes to that measure, but I try to keep the threads on the list down, and the catalog speed seems to recover after the bursts I've seen people do, so I don't think it's at the point where it's keeping the speed up.
>>1415993
If it's not me, it will just be someone else. And there are other people bumping threads they like, it's not as if I'm enforcing a monopoly on what's allowed here.
In fact I would argue that this place would be more vulnerable to people removing things they don't like from the catalog without the bot. The bot isn't bumping things indefinitely, it's keeping active threads from being mown down by spam.
>>1416018
triggered lol
>>1416018
bumpbot btfo
>>1416018
You (or someone else) were doing that already, so it's not like you have leverage through doing it. And by bumping garbage you bring the bot closer to activation on the larger lists.
>>1416026
lol
>>1415993
>
/qa/ more like /qay/
>>1416128
Lol nice.
>>1416128
all me
>>1416128
How the f**k do we stop these losers.