Are new cars designed to look gay?

If you post this in /o/ i will reply to you there

>>>/o/15985027

>>92551254

yes

>>92551254

1950-60 was golden age of automobile aesthetics.

File: 1476134161528.jpg (550KB, 1836x2448px) Image search: [Google]

550KB, 1836x2448px

>>92551254
They're designed to function well in a wind tunnel, that's why they all look like gay amorphous blobs now.

File: 2017-Lincoln-MKZ-Review-SlashGear00006.jpg (643KB, 1080x810px) Image search: [Google]

643KB, 1080x810px

The only people I see driving old 70s bangers are "tough guys" who probably have small penis

>>92551254
fuck, the 80s looked grim.

it has nothing to do with any kind of conspiracy you're thinking of...

they're designed to be as brutally efficient as possible.

File: 1475531873964.jpg (28KB, 440x301px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 440x301px

No, they are designed to serve Allah

Pic related, it's the digital compass on the new Mercedes E Class

>>92552970
NYC was so freaking cool back then

>>92552831
>driving a lincoln
>that isn't a towncar
literal faggot

>>92552970
pretty sure that's just film development and large cities
>cocaine wars

>>92552831
>it's okay that my car looks like a buttplug because i can project my small penis onto others
wew lad

>tfw I drive a VW beetle

Doesn't get any gayer than that.

File: 2016-Cadillac-CT6-Midnight-Edition-White-1024x683.jpg (180KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1024x683px

>>92553637
>Driving a town car
>>92553637
Wew lad

>>92554443
This one looks okay.

What looks cool about old cars is that they have flat hoods. Unfortunately these are rigid and when they hit something/someone all the force goes to the driver or the thing being hit. That's why all modern cars have curved hoods and panels, so that they collapse and absorb force upon impact.

File: 1d76093d-55c3-46a8-83b0-bfd3fb6ef318..png (1MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x2560px

i made this comment the other day to my gf

we were in a parking lot and everycar was the same exact one to a certain degree

>captcha : select cars

spooky

File: image.jpg (96KB, 1280x546px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1280x546px

>>92551254
There are some that are designed to appeal to our "lizard brain" but it's becoming fewer and fewer. We live in a World where schools go on lock-down if someone spots a clown...

>>92551254
No. They have always looked like dicks, faggot.

File: 1475277415061.jpg (1MB, 3477x2730px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3477x2730px

>>92552970
I think you mean awesome

>>92554443
Why they don't make sick coupes and convertibles anymore? I want to buy a decent American coupe or convertible and American manufacturers didn't make them for quite a while

>>92557198
Cadillac has a couple coupes, Buick just released a convertable, and I think Lincoln's working on one

>>92551254
they look okay now, they hit their worst in the 80s-90s.

I prefer 30s-50s, but they're not efficient.

>>92557687
>Cadillac has a couple coupes
Ugly CTS\ATS are ugly. Interiors look and feel too cheap for that price.

>Buick just released a convertable
Buick make Opel knock-offs, nothing decent anymore.

>Lincoln's working on one
I don't know why they didn't release a luxury version of Mustang like a decade ago.

nah they have to have smooth fronts for tar babies riding thier bikes with zero self awareness of the cars on the road

File: 1967-Cadillac-Eldorado-front-three-quarters-view.jpg (914KB, 2048x1360px) Image search: [Google]

914KB, 2048x1360px

>>92552831
>lincoln mkz
absolute faggot

>>92552343
>67 eldorado
most beautiful car ever

>>92552501
pretty much this

File: 1366x500.jpg (563KB, 1366x500px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 1366x500px

>>92552501
also crash standards

>>92557687
lincoln is not working on either


>>>92558118
buick IS opel, not knockoffs you fucking idiot

cadillac is working on two coupes and one convertible

>>92557198
i work for gm/cadillac ama

>>92551254
Those cars aren't new, but yes, they are ugly as fuck.

Most cars are designed for 'safety' now, basically if you hit a pedestrian with those old square blocky cars you'd fuck them up, pin them into whatever you're probably going to hit and outright kill them. Newer cars have a more domed front and rounder edges so pedestrians can roll to the side / over the top if they get hit, less likely to get completely irreparably fucked.

>>92551254
No, you just have shit taste.

>>92552501
Is that Ben Shapiro?

File: ford poster 70s.jpg (83KB, 487x635px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 487x635px

>>92557998
>they look okay now, they hit their worst in the 80s-90s.
I'm sorry about your shit taste, man.

They looked great in the 80's, and the early 90's were the final evolution of Greatest gen. Car design. mid-late 90's were a mixed bag, everything that was boxy in the 80's, became smoothed and rounded, and since headlight restrictions eased up, everything got special molded headlights.

then after the turn of the millennium things got rounded and even more "aerodynamic" because of fuel economy concerns, and styling kept going wilder because computers started taking over as the dominant design tool, whereas before it had to work with a block of clay or wood, making more angular boxy shapes more attractive to make.

then obama started upping regulations, and now you have sky high beltlines because "muh pedestrian safety", and then Ford started the trend of globalizing car design, so instead of having region specific cars with region specific styling, that new Ford Focus has to sell in both the US, and Europe, so naturally, it will pander to Europe's tastes and sensibilities first and foremost. So everything tries to imitate coupe hatchback designs, without actually being hatchbacks and still having 4 doors, and since Large displacement engines are

A. problematic in Europistan, and B. taxed to shit here because "muh trees", everything is 4 or 6 cylinder cuck engine with turbos slapped on. What Ford pretentiously calls "ecoboost".

legacy cars like Mustangs, Camaros, etc are the only cars really made with big V8's anymore, and even the Mustang may be losing it's V8 soon in favor of "ecoboost v4"

I do wonder though, if there is also deeper significance behind horrible styling these days- after all, if a man can get a rustic, manly looking SUV, he might get troublesome ideas of masculinity in his head and we can't have that, so all SUV's are mommobile bars of soap bloated with "safety features"

File: 1476065138004.png (103KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1000x1000px

>>92553519
.................... This is not harem