Pro-Trump Arguments

File: trump.jpg (257KB, 800x2330px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 800x2330px

Improvement of US-Russian relations

File: .jpg (4KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 200x200px

>>67775505
Nice proxy, Svalbard.

>>67775505
I think a better question is how were going to make Lorderon great again there's all these cultist coming they're bringing crime, necromancy, the plague of undeath. we need a wall

>>67775505
Okay then.
Is a racist because he wants to block all muslims from entering to America. How do you respond?

File: 12814059_1132806856737649_4481383575690432230_n.jpg (22KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 500x376px

>>67775505
use their dirty tactics against them

>sjw: TRUMP IS LITERALLY HITLER, ARE YOU KIDDING ME!??

>red-pilled man: Really fag? ARE YOU DOWNPLAYING THE HOLOCAUST? YOU ANTI SEMITE! HITLER KILLED 6 MILLION JEWS!! TRUMP JUST SAID MEAN THINGS. I MEAN COME ON

File: berxtc1.jpg (112KB, 699x601px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 699x601px

>>67775988
also this

>>67775988
anyone think this would actually work

File: 1458184272917.png (17KB, 683x553px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 683x553px

>>67776062
and this common argument of
>its impossible to round up all the mexicans

>>67776113
doesn't mean we cant round up enough to make difference

File: 1456380777630.png (1MB, 1264x852px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1264x852px

>>67775505
>Is there any /pol/acks who could help me with some pro-trump arguments and possibly answers to the most common anti-trump arguments (Trump is racist, KKK endorsed

Simple. "Prove it" is all the argument you need.

As for the KKK. It is, and always shall be, the Democratic Party's extremist terror wing. Pic related.

>>67775505
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw8c2Cq-vpg
Watch this

>>67775505
There are no pro-trumps arguments, only anti bernie and anti clinton

>>67775879
>Is a racist because he wants to block all muslims from entering to America. How do you respond?

Muslim isn't a race.

>racist
He is opposed to illegal immigration, not Mexicans exclusively, and has said this countless times if they would ever actually listen to what he says. Also Islam is not a race, so it can't be racist. Additionally, he's said he would pause Muslim immigration until people can be properly vetted so we know they aren't terror suspects.

>KKK endorsed
He's disavowed them multiple times and wasn't even endorsed by a current member, the guy was a former member and is no longer associated. Hillary Clinton has been endorsed by a current high ranking member and has not been promoted to disavow, showing the obvious media bias.

>Mexico wall
Walls work, ask China and Israel - the illegal Mexican population decimates the economy and depressed wages for low income American citizens in addition to putting them out of jobs. Census data show that the jobs that are thought of as "illegal immigrant" work are still majority done by American citizens. If they are people that only care about "white peoples jobs in offices" then they are simply being racist to immigrants.

>>67775505
>yet another thread where OP wants to be spoonfed and the cucks on /pol/ do so in a heartbeat

>>67775879

Yeah this is where I would struggle to put my arguments into credible sentences. I think baning muslims is a great idea, even though it is just because "of a few rotten apples".

>>67775988

I am using this debate as an opportunity to red-pill more Norwegians on Trump. Right now they only know what the media has shown them, aka. litterally Hitler maymay.

>>67776172

I would rather stump them completely instead of just simply stating "prove it".

>>67776113
Eisenhower deported 6 million in the 70s

I imagine we're much better at it now.

>>67775879
Islam is a belief, not a race.

I figure too at least the way he means Mexican or wherever, it's less like "You are of Mexican ancestry" and more like "You're a citizen of Mexico who is entering our country without permission." So, in this context Mexican is not really a race as well so much as a nationality.

>>67775879
Muslims aren't a race. It's more racist to think Muslims can only be one race when there are black, white, asian, and Hispanic muslims.

>>67776246

So there is nothing good that is going to happen if he gets elected into office?

>>67776480
Eisenhower was president in the 50s, but your point still stands

>>67776588
how much harder do you think it was back then

>>67776588
That's what I meant breh

>>67776666
Noice

File: 1439836137771.gif (49KB, 69x120px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 69x120px

>>67776666
BREH

>>67777777

>>67775505

>Big cock
>best sex ever

In all seriousness though. Trump is a rich asshole. A rich asshole that wants to bring jobs back to America.

Illegals have to go. This needs to be addressed. I work with illegals. They all speak of how much crime there is back home. Where do you think the criminals are fleeing to? Not only that, but they send earning back to Mexico. This is having a major impact on our econmy and its only getting worse.

>>67776666
Satan breh

File: rNDQkB9.jpg (325KB, 1148x1280px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 1148x1280px

>Trump is in it for himself argument

>>67775505

>that picture

brings back so many memories

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nE_kh7KgDFI

File: fc7c758d52f48d6f356ec42657135f9a.jpg (8KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 236x236px

>>67775505
> I will be pro-trump
> I feel I am not informed well enough

File: 1457832302692.jpg (65KB, 640x320px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 640x320px

>>67776441
>I would rather stump them completely instead of just simply stating "prove it".

You could point to the diversity of his support base.

>>67776309
Wrong.
That is not the answer you're going for, even if it's a truthful one.
The correct answer would be, "Donald Trump has never said that he wants to prevent all Muslims from entering united states. What Donald Trump has said is that he wishes to place a temporary halt to Muslim migration into America, which means that any Muslims who live in US, or have citizenship will be free to come and go as usual."
If they insist that this is still a racist policy, just point them out this.
"Which country destabilized the middle-east? USA. Which country is the main target of the muslim extremists? USA. Which country is at this very moment conducting military operations in Iraq and Syria? USA. Which country is allied Israel, the number 1 enemy of every single Muslim nation in the middle-east? USA."
"All Donald Trump is asking is for a temporary halt to muslim immigration until they can put in place a proper protocol to prevent people who are from countries that are outright hostile to US from entering. This action is not unconstitutional and has a historical precedent when USA prevented Japanese and German immigrants from entering during WW2."

He would end the durian war by working with the Russians. It really is the only reason why this war is going on, Obama wanting to take down pro Russia Assad by funding the "rebels"

>>67775879
"What? Banning muslims is racist? Are you saying all muslims are of a single race? Nicely marginalized there and no, trump wouldn't be banning people based on arbitrary traits which they couldn't change. He is banning a bad ideology which is a harm to america and its people."

-norvegian guy 2016

>>67775505
Present yourself as a moderate and highlight his more liberal views. The goal is to make them realize they know nothing about Trump and just subscribe to the media's portrayal.

>>67776500
Can someone tell me why no one ever mentions this? Am I wrong, or what?

>>67777310
And what are his more liberal views?

File: _Stump_him_.jpg (278KB, 640x479px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 640x479px

>>67777103
Beautiful

>>67777354
You're not wrong. Leftists just cry racism at anything they don't like.

Defending trump on immigration:

To start, we need to agree that the U.S. does not have to allow people to immigrate into the country. It isn't something that we owe people. It's our country, and we get to decide who is allowed to become a citizen.
^This is an important premise that you need to get them to agree on.

With that in mind, we should think about the benifits and drawbacks of letting particular groups in. We should only let people into the country if we have a good reason to believe that doing so will benefit the country. If it won't, we shouldn't do it.
An open mexican border (as it is now) removes our ability to make informed decisions about who can come in.
Illegal immigrants are a group of people that knowingly deny us our right to decide on this issue. In absence of this evaluation, they should be removed.

If there's a significant portion of the muslim popluation that wants to kill us and destroy our society, we shouldn't let them in. We should first find a way to separate those that want to kill us, from those that don't. If we can't, it doesn't make sense to let them in. We would be knowingly and willingly importing our own destruction. This is an insane course of action.

>>67775505

>temporary ban on muslims until they can 100% be sure there's no terrorist in between them.

This is a safety precaution anyone with a functioning mind would do.
Cologne and Paris are good examples of that.

>he's racist

The man has never said anything racist, prove me wrong.

>he hates mexicans

No, he wants to deport illegal immigrants, since mexico and the current borders can't stop them from getting there, a wall will be built.
Mexicans coming is fine as long as its done legally.

>but borders should not exist!

Then why do you lock your homedoors when you leave?


Just a few.

>>67777487
For one, he's not a fan of the heavy vaccinations.

>>67777199
That won't work. You're debating from an underdog position, which means that proving your opponent wrong is not enough.
You must also prove yourself right.
By displaying that your opponent's argument is poorly constructed by mockery, all you're doing is proving that he's a poor debater, you're not advancing your own cause at all.

Your goal when debating, is to take a single step forward every single time towards convincing the audience of your viewpoints, not to convince them that the guy in front of you is a baboon.
If he is a baboon, he'll do that for you.
If he isn't a baboon, all they see is you resulting in attacks on character and defamation tactics, which leaves a bad taste in their mouth.

>>67777487
Supporting Planned Parenthood, which really everyone but religious freaks agree with.

>>67777617
Alright, thanks

Was scared I missed some important detail, or whatnot.

>>67775505
Okay, let's see how you guys handle this.
"Donald Trump is a racist because he wants to deport mexican immigrants and build a wall to keep them from returning."
How do you respond?

>>67776113
>implying they are Mexicans
they are central americans hence why mexico built a fucking wall on its southern border and why nearly half of illegals came on an expired visa.
It wouldn't be that hard

File: image.jpg (38KB, 300x297px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 300x297px

The wall

Keeps illegal immigrants out which is not only a crime problem but an economic problem. Not only do illegal immigrants raise crime rates, rape rates, but they also take jobs from US citizens, do not pay taxes, and send the money they earn back to their families in Latin America bleeding the American economy dry.

Muslims: Muslim values are not compatible with the US and sharia law zones are unamerican. Every country that accepts Muslims in mass numbers gets the same problems. Higher crime rates, higher rape rates (Sweden is +500% rapes and 99% are from "foreign" men)

If people get outraged this maybe tell them a story about what life is like for a Christian Slave to a Muslim family in Libya. And yes in Muslim countries you have Christians serving Muslim families. The girl said she had to work with her shirt off and be the "first woman" to each of the Muslim families sons. Ask the women in the class what they think of that.

Trade deals: Trump can fix trade deals with all these countries that are ripping us off. Just listen to his rallies to understand his point. He's an expert negotiator.

If they mention his bankruptcies say the company just used his name and he was one of many shareholders he was not the sole owner of the company.

>>67777487
Healthcare, abortion, gay marriage, drugs, claiming that CEO pay is essentially too much and decided via circlejerk. Probably some other stuff i cant remember off the top of my head.

>>67776113
Holy fuck

File: BUILDWALL.jpg (95KB, 980x514px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 980x514px

if you're in Oslo, dont go lol

Do you guys actually think he will build a physical wall? Walls work, I get it, but it will be a hideous sight. Why not just build enough border patrol outposts and promote drone usage as well as working with the various military air bases there and somehow get student pilots to fly routes closer to the area with surveillance equipment?

>>67775842
No. We must purge them all.

>>67778254
he just want's to follow mexico's stance on immigration whats wrong with that?

>>67778254
Trump only wants to deal with illegal immigrants and illegal immigrants are harming the USA in numerous ways (lower wages for low skill workers, crime, etc).

The USA shouldn't place Mexico's interest before its own.

>>67775505
HERE ARE YOUR TALKING POINTS

1. Trump supports New Deal policies, when he says MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN he is talking about a return to the policies of FDR.

2. Trump is not racist, this is a misperception. Trump is generally against mass immigration for the same reasons that Lenin and many other famous socialists opposed it: It is predatory towards the American worker.

3. Trump is a WORKING CLASS candidate, the first in decades for the GOP.

4. The Democratic party is NO LONGER the working class party. Bill Clinton signed NAFTA, Obama is pushing TPP, the globalists control both parties.

5. Globalization, as it is taking place, is NOT an inevitability, it is a controlled process that is being guided by business elites who seek to maximize profits by opening world markets and destroying the working class in the west in order to create a slave class in the rest.

6. Trump is not any more fascist than FDR was (keep in mind FDR put people in concentration camps) and very little that he says is actually radical from an American perspective. Muslims have indeed been banned from entering the US before (Jimmy Carter banned Shiites for a few months), Undocumented Mexican migrants have been deported en masse before (Eisenhower) and the border wall has been proposed for a long time.

7. The other anti-globalization candidate, Bernie Sanders, is systemically barred from office. The DNC's superdelegate rules have prevented him from being nominated, period. Without Trump there is no real choice on economic issues in the US election, at best you get pro-globalization Ted verses pro-globalization Hillary.

He is the only candidate who is not influenced by special interest.

Bernie may be, but he's a socialist.

Money in politics has wiped democracy out in post WW2 America, and if they aren't going to create legislation to bar money in politics, then a vote for Trump would be the ultimate fuck you to those that are influenced by special interest.

Billions have been poured into fighting Trump by those special interests.

>>67778593
>Trump Wall
>hideous sight

It'll be a goddamn world wonder

>>67778556
Why not?

>>67778254
The correct respond would be somewhere between these lines.
"Donald Trump said that he wants to deport ILLEGAL immigrants from US. Anybody who has citizenship or is otherwise staying in the United States legally will have to worry about being deported."
"The wall's purpose is not to prevent Mexican immigrants from entering, it is to make sure they enter legally. This means that the people who are affiliated with the organized crime that the mexicans fleed from the first place will be denied entry, making latino communities a safer place to be."
"Furthermore, illegal immigration creates a problem for latinos where they're expected to work for next to nothing, because the illegals do not pay any taxes. By getting their papers in order, you'll be getting rid of dishonest business practices and guaranteeing them a far more humane living enviroment."

File: 1444874168416.png (267KB, 800x820px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 800x820px

>>67775505
I think the toughest question on illegal immigration has to be

>what about the poor people who were brought as children with no choice in the matter, and were raised in the US and want to be citizens?

I hate this question, being a spic myself but here LEGALLY - proud American.

Any advice on how to put them down gently /pol/ ?

pic definitely related

>>67777829
That's not a liberal or conservative stance that's a pandering-to-anti-science-retards stance.

>>67779262
Don't have a good anwser.
Blame the parents, why would the US or any countries be responsible for that?

>>67779197
The key thing is when arguing with a leftist is to really push it in that by lobbying for illegal immigration, they're lobbying for exploiting sweatshop that do not guarantee the safety of the worker, proper compensation or anywhere near reasonable working hours.

They cannot go against worker's rights as left wing without betraying their ideology.

>>67779262
What about children who's parents robbed a bank and bought an expensive house with the money? Should the U.S. deprive those children of such an important heirloom from their parents?

>>67775505
Norway get back here, We Northern Europeans have other more important issues.

If you want to engage in healthy dialogue or debate simply state each one of Trumps major policies, how he hopes to achieve it, and why it would be a positive change.

>Legal Immigration only

This would entail deporting roughly 11 million people, over some period of time. If these people are working it will create job openings, if they are not working then they are a drain on the economy and will clear up resources. It may not be morally correct to deport families with roots in this country. But it is unlawful to enter the country by running a border, and we rule by law not by morality. There is no moral police, or court of moral opinion. Petition to change the law if you so desire, but do not call someone who wants to uphold it racist. Immigration laws exist to protect the natural citizens of a nation, in the case of North America, it's Southern Border faces an entire continent of people who want to escape to a better life, those choosing to break the American laws are acting immorally by taking the rightful spot of someone who would try to follow the legal process.

Do you want doctors and educated people into your country? Or criminals who have already broken one law coming in. There is a distinction between people, fundamentally we are not all equal, we are judged by our actions, and not all actions are equal.


>Abortion

Trump is pro-life, but will keep Planned Parenthood because they do provide other health services to women. This is a position no other Republican candidate has taken.

>Gun Control
Extent concealed carry to every state. Uphold the American Constitution.

Gun violence and murder rates are highest in the most gun controlled American cities. If people acquire guns illegally they are likely to continue to use them illegally and irresponsibly.

File: t2016.jpg (141KB, 1225x799px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1225x799px

>>67779839

>Foreign Policy

Trump wants to focus his Foreign Policy on trade. Which is a revolutionary change after 50 years of American Imperialism and aggression around the world. He is a smart and savvy businessman and sees how much China has progressed in a few decades by focusing on their trade, and whats to do the same for America.

>Taxes

Reduce taxes.

>Government

Reduce and cut government agencies.


You can simply ask them to google "trump positions" and read through them carefully, citing which ones they disagree with. Google has a nice overlay on their website you can click through and read exact quotes of what Trump has written or publicly stated.

>>67778776

This is good, I can memorize this. Don't know about drowning my opponents in abbreviations if I don't know what they mean myself. (I knoiw FDR = Franklin D. Roosevelt)

>>67775505
You could also mention he's funding his own campaign, unlike the other candidates, so once in office he's not in debt to the banking, medical industry, weapon industry, etc. It's important to mention these industries, find as many examples as you can find and refer to those as the rich elite, the 1%, who have no interest but their own. The lefties you face will already be biased against that. Then point out that he can govern autonomously, without any strings pulled behind the scenes, so there's no need for him to back down on his campaign promises, unlike the other candidates who promise one thing but once in office will do what their financiers tell them to. He's too rich to be bribed. Don't mention it's mostly mr. Shekelstein doing the pulling behind the scenes. No memes either.

Another thing might be to look at how mr. Trump handles a debate. Unapologetic and without anger.

You may not convince many during the debate if they are too deeply invested in leftist ideology, but you may sow some seeds in their minds that will develop later.

>>67779262
I've got the answer for that one.
To Quote Donald Trump himself: "I want them to get out, but I want them to come back legally."
"Any Green Card holder in US can petition for their family members to be allowed into US to live in their residence."
"United States Economy at it's current state employs a tremendous amount of illegal immigrants and there is very little worry that Donald Trump would kick those people out for good as it would have a tremendously negative impact on the economy as quite a lot of the workforce would suddenly disappear and as the left wing likes to quite often say "They do jobs nobody else wants to do.""

Of course, we all know that the jobs they do, quite a lot of people would actually like to do if they were given proper compensation for it, but we don't need to mention that.

How can any PP supporter claim the Hyde amendment as being a legitimate defense of PP's abortion stance? How can you justify that the funding that they do get is in no way associated with abortions?

>>67775879
Why are we letting refugees from the same countries that we have had conflicts in where the main inhibiter of destroying the enemy was the inability to distinguish friend from foe and that now have training camps to teach people to kill us. Why the fuck are we going to give the civilians of our country the same chance at distinguishing friend from foe as the highly trained soldiers and special forces we sent. Let alone the same chances for surviving walking in the park when soldiers are getting blown away in our fucking homeland in broad day light!

You ask them that and if they think that walking down an afghan street is any different from walking through a majority muslim neighbourhood. Its total bullshit man.

File: 1453246569951.jpg (287KB, 931x650px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 931x650px

>>67780469
We'll if you want to be efficient and cheap about it, it'd probably be a lot easier to simply pose large and extreme fines/penalties, or even a complete shutdown to any business caught employing illegal immigrants.

In addition, you could also subsequently offer a green card reward and a small cash reward to any illegal immigrant who reports their employer.

File: 1458079646897.jpg (191KB, 1261x1084px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1261x1084px

>>67778593
>Do you guys actually think he will build a physical wall? Walls work, I get it, but it will be a hideous sight.

Do you think Trump would put his name on something hideous? The thing will probably be plated with Canada's gold.

How will he get Mexico to pay for it?

>>67781194
;_; It's true. It's all true.

>Gun Control
If they ask about this, just tell them that United States of America is not just a country, it's a democratic federation states and as such, there is always the risk that the highest population states with the most delegates will band up and start exploiting the smaller states by imposing unfair taxes.

Every single state in US is more or less the size of an European country or larger and there's 50 of them.
The wealthy states could bully the smaller states to submission and establish a tyranny of the majority, in which a landmass that equals the size of a country does not have the right to decide their own laws and suffers unfair taxation to keep them poor while the rich states get richer off their backs.

This is why it's absolutely necessary for the 2nd amendment to exist, which means every state has the right to a well armed and well regulated militia, which guarantees their ability to resist occupation from not only foreign powers, but also from the federal army.
To remove this right from US citizens is the equivalent of EU banning the presence of any armed forces, with the exception of the EU's own task force which only answers to EU.


You can also make the point that because US is so huge, there are many states in which the population density is very low, in which case it's necessary to own a gun because the police may take an hour to arrive and if the people don't have methods to defend themselves, criminals can just go robbing from house to house because as long as they leave no witnesses, there's no chance of getting caught as the police won't arrive in time and there are no pictures.

File: 1457120594761.jpg (286KB, 1294x1230px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1294x1230px

>>67781349
70% of Mexico's exports go to America. We give them a lot of aid. They wouldn't be shit without us. Their economy would crash without us. We hold the upper hand in anything we want from them, because they are dependent on us.

>>67780932
I think there already are sanctions that are imposed on companies using illegal immigrants as labour.

The problem is, the big companies subvert this by hiring contractors.
These contractors then contracts and organizes several construction companies to get your job done.
These individual companies hire the illegals.

As far as I'm aware, the contractors and the big companies are pretty safe while the small companies just file for bankruptcy and start another company.
Then again, my info is very old, so I'm not sure if they still do it this way.

>>67781972
Ideally.. but isn't the struggle for power a complete shit show down there? How can we expect them to organize anything.

>>67781697
>Every single state in US is more or less the size of an European country or larger and there's 50 of them.

With economies and HDIs to match. Hell, nothing highlights how much we are basically a federation of similar countries than the clusterfuck political process going on right now with all the different processes and rules in each State.

File: 1457211678944.png (199KB, 435x431px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 435x431px

>>67778331
>If they mention his bankruptcies say the company just used his name and he was one of many shareholders he was not the sole owner of the company.

I dont understand why democrats latch onto this like its the biggest sign of Trump being unfit. The dude is a literal billionaire, one or two ventures going under is all part of the game. For each investment that failed, he's got dozens more that didnt.

>>67781194
there is no more gold in canada.

File: romney_stumped.jpg (148KB, 680x881px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 680x881px

>>67782439
If they can't cough up the money, we can just start taking it out of the billions in aid we send them.

>>67782541
Exactly. Wasn't it the Trump wine that he started just for the purpose of having fun and competing with his buddies?

>muh Trump steaks

They were a mail order deal. They would send the steaks packages to your door with dry ice and shit IIRC

>>67779262
bumping for justice

>>67775505
>mexico wall etc.)

Mexico has a wall on its southern border with Guatemala.

Israel has a border wall with Egypt

Vatican City has a border wall all around it

etc

>>67780226
>North American Free Trade Agreement
>Trans-Pacific Partnership
>Democratic National Committee

>>67779262
so the state should look after them? They go with their parents and can re-enter the country as citizens when they are adults.

>>67775505

Play to their fear of corporations

State that a country must always be more powerful than a corporation or else it devolves into tyranny and trump would do his part to make a strong State

File: image.jpg (24KB, 230x307px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 230x307px

>>67783130


If OP doesn't know enough about a candidate to defend their positions on their own then they have no spine.

>>67779262

Simple, make it easy for those children to apply for entry legally.

Boom, done.

I think people need to be reminded and, perhaps, enlightened a bit, about how Trump is using and playing the media with experience born skill; the things he says that have been making headlines week after week since last June are not by mistake. His speeches are often characterized as rambling but when I see some of the more controversial things (like the original "they're rapists...") I think it is well calculated on his part, almost as if he had that particular sentence planned out word for word, knowing that that specific bit would attract a lot of attention to him immediately right off the bat. I don't think Trump is trying to appeal to every single person's individual intelligence, since, as verified by Dr Ben Carson, Trump behind the scenes is more cerebral than he might seem to people who turn him into a caricature based entirely on his rally speeches, which are meant to be engaging and entertaining. As they say, Trump is a great showman, his events tap into the same crowd spirit as sports events. If he is to win votes, he has to appeal to voters who probably don't spend all that much time researching things, who will be more thrilled seeing a character like "public Trump" (as per Carson's 'Two Trump' theory) dominate every headline with charisma, humor, balls. Trump has to somehow appeal to millions of different kinds of people, of different levels of intelligence, etc and he must have reasoned that his over the top persona would win over more people than the highly intelligent mind in private.

>>67776379
Für Drumpf, unser konig!

File: 1457388130364.png (89KB, 601x1729px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 601x1729px

My advice is keep your cool. Be more calm then you ever thought possible.
Let them spew hate while you debate.
Also, RECORD RECORD RECORD IT ALL!

File: 1456194956386.jpg (22KB, 637x480px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 637x480px

>>67784138
Also, am I the only one who remembers Democrats wanted slaves and today's Dem Want Illegal cheap work...
Slavery then, and they want to keep it going now.

>>67777049
MAKE AZEROTH GREAT AGAIN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNv9nR7QVPk

>>67784342
They want cheap immigrant labor and impoverish blacks who will vote dem to get welfare

>>67784342
>Also, am I the only one who remembers Democrats wanted slaves and today's Dem Want Illegal cheap work...

Not only that but...

>gun control

Originally promoted by the Democrats and the KKK to disarm niggers and keep them under control

>planned parenthood

Founder explicitly promoted abortion as a means of the genocide of Blacks

>welfare

"I'll have those niggers voting democrat for the next 200 years!"

The Democrats are not, and have never been, the friends of minorities.

File: AsianvsNiggs.png (240KB, 359x662px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 359x662px

>>67784342
No, you're not the only one. Most blacks are locked into perpetual servitude to the state right now. Their children grow up fatherless and unsuccessful, the mothers popping children out for more welfare money, and the children grow up to vote for Democrats and gibs because that's what they've been taught by their momma and the liberal public schooling. It's a vicious cycle.

Their low Avg IQ's and violent natures don't help either. They're leeches on society and the Democrats are all too happy to oblige because it's free votes. And it works, seeing as 90%+ vote Democrat.

>>67784837
>And it works, seeing as 90%+ vote Democrat.

Silly, felons can't vote.

>>67784748
>>67784797
>>67784837
Glad my brother was raised white -_-
Use to buy left wing crap do to having a half bro, black, who currently builds servers and the like.
Didn't put 2 and 2 together that white dad and mom set his ass with standards.
No Gibs just work.

>>67775505

Don't. Trump never bothers to be good at debates (on an informative level, he kills it in the personality department). Just use tricks like the double bind and compound yes/no questions that make the person unsure if they should answer one way or the other.

Also, NEVER look at your opponent, make them react, make them look at YOU. Don't even bother glancing their way and have this look of disbelief on your face every time they speak. Don't interrupt, just let your audience SEE how much you think the opposition is lying. Also, when something negative is said about your argument, take it in stride and make a joke, and then follow up with a strong statement. People can't reconcile such polar opposites of their emotions fast enough, so when you get them to laugh, they'll almost HAVE to accept what you say next. Also, use a lot of repetition.

Trump never bothers to study for his debates, so why should you? Do what Trump does and you'll win.

File: nmhpixel.jpg (7KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 480x360px

>>67775505
Lucky for you Norway, most leftist liberals are severely uninformed, so you really don't have to be that smart to dismantle everything they say. There's basically a handful of talking points that these kids will throw out there:

>Trump is Hitler
He couldn't be further from Hitler. Hitler wants a socialist society and wanted to exterminate an entire group of people and have zero immigration. Trump wants people of all color to help make America great and encourage a free market.

>Trump is racist
He's not racist at all. He employs thousands of minorities and simply wants to stop violent, illegal criminals from entering the US unchecked. This is simply a precaution to save American lives.

>He'll just want war
He's anti foreign war. He was against the Iraq war from the start. All he wants to do is make America an economic powerhouse. He's not interested in wars.

>He's endorse by the KKK
Obama and Hillary both attended the funeral of a known KKK affiliate. Grow up. The KKK is irrelevant in the US and they always pop up around election time. They are a nonissue.

by this time you'll have already won and even if they're still standing in front of you, they'll probably just loop back around and try to reword one of the 4 talking points again.

>>67786231

>he's not interested in wars
>threatens Mexico with war

Dumbass

File: y0ah4xwqv1ef85m6sak9.jpg (167KB, 636x358px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 636x358px

>>67786529
Seeing as their government is practically run by the drug cartels, it wouldn't be surprising.

He just wants to starve them out by closing the borders, filling the tunnels, etc.

Mexico is nothing without us. We import most of what they export, we send them aid, etc. If we turned our attention to the cartels, which are far more dangerous and close to home than ISIS, we'd stomp them out anyhow

>>67786231
>endorsed KKK
when was the last time the KKK did an actual hate crime besides say mean things about African Americans

>>67786529
even if it happened, it would be a political war. building the wall would be 95% of the war. the other 5% would be hiccups with border patrol. there would be zero American casualties unlike the middle east disaster.

>>67786529
>threatens Mexico with war

[citation needed]

>>67787129
Honestly the US could send a strongly worded letter and Mexico would take it seriously

File: no_mexican_is_safe.png (767KB, 636x900px) Image search: [Google]

767KB, 636x900px

>>67787401
We send them billions in aid and billions more for their exports. They'd collapse without us

>>67775505
http://www.untruthaboutdonaldtrump.com/

>>67780469
>come back legally
To be fair, they would probably starve before they get approved for a visa or whatever legal means of immigration.

File: 1455741473381.jpg (288KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 640x480px

>>67775505
Trump tax plan:

Mr. Trump’s tax plan would substantially lower individual income taxes and the corporate income tax and eliminate a number of complex features in the current tax code.
Basically remember this:
*Those making up to $30,000 will pay 1 percent.
* Income from $30,000 to $100,000 results in a flat 5 percent.
* $100,000 to $1 million income will be taxed at 10 percent.
* On $1 million or above will be taxed 15 percent.
^^^"Tax those dirty 1% more, am i right senpai?"

Reducing the number of illegals:
"illegal immigrants is not a particular race, its 2016 you shouldn't label an entire group of people like that"

It costs the tax payer SIGNIFICANTLY LESS to deport those who have cheated true immigrants who have earned the right to join America than to pay for the lives of illegals and the crime rates that carry over with them. Trump enforces LEGAL immigration as it is the corner stone of the American dream he wishes to revitalize.

"we shouldn't be paying for those who are cheating minorities a right to a better life they choose to strive for, am I right senpai?"

Muslims:

Trump never said to deport Muslim immigrants who have came over legally with proper documentation. Hes nothing like Jimmy Carter, you know, the face of Democratic good deeds who forced over 50,000 Iranians during an overseas hostage crisis to report to immigration centers for visa checks forcing over 15,000 to be deported and stopped ALL Iranian people from coming into the country for a period until the situation at hand was settled. Trump simply wants the protection of American lives while still employing LEGAL immigration, he doesnt want to close our borders but only wishes to enforce them.

see the last lib-tart reasoning for this too but add "wow democrats arent really about our libertarian ways huh senpai?"

Trump is racist:

Unfortunately Trump is not racist he employs a WIDE variety of ethnicity and has never said anything racist on account.
OUT OF CONTENT SPACE u do the rest

>People will defend Arthas even though he's a beta bitch that got cucked by a fucking SWORD

>>67789720
How the duck was he cucked by a sword