“The Fascists of the future will be the anti-fascists.”
>Be me drinking with friends >subject of politics comes up >everyone says what they believe in a lot greenpeace/Liberal/Left wing believers >comes to my turn >explain that my beliefs are right wing >some people say nothing but >instant abuse shitstorm happens >get told that I am wrong and a horrible person >get asked to leave the table >one guy even threatens to punch me >I just sit there and laugh and continue to drink my beer
So it seems now that unless you are willing to bend over and get fucked up the arse by the world and accept the fact that you can not be proud to be white people will give you abuse.
Because Fascism is indeed the strongest type of rules. Even in its perverted washed down modern liberal form it is more than enough to enslave to entire world. Imagine if it was in good hands. Oh wait, it was. Eat shit. This is the future your granddaddies chose which you feel so proud of.
This is why I refuse to label my political beliefs. I will talk abouy any topic under the sun but I will never come out and say I'm left or right, democrat or republican. When you label yourself, people judge you based on the label and not the quality of your ideals. Fuck that.
>>42640345 Then what is with all of these "hurr durr" fascism sentiments? Literally just a buzz word which cowards from all other shitty special snowflake ideologies use to cover the possible abuse of authority in their shitty Utopias.
You don't get it, we live in backwards/opposite world now.
Only in a world like this can people proclaim to be saintly beacons of love and tolerance one moment then turn around and be openly hostile spitting/cursing cunts that call for violence against anyone that doesn't agree with them.
Doesn't bother me too much, I'd rather people be honest so there won't be any bullshit on the table when rope day comes... it'll make it easier when we decide who gets to stay and who goes.
>>42640016 you have shitty friends if you get asked to leave the table because of your personnal beliefs and they don't do nothing about it. You even got threats of physical injury? What the fuck, why are you calling these maggots your friends?
No, I have never had something similar happen. Some years ago when I still went out with some leftist "friends" whener we talked about politics we just had civilised conversation, mainly on my part, because they would go apeshit, but not asking me to leave. Friendship and good relations come first. Now, with all that stuff happening in my country and rise of G.D. I havent seen these people for some years and I am glad about it. My close friends though are nationalists m8.
>>42640620 But couldn't you figure that they would get upset? Why even bother then? You would just make them angry then... that they get angry is another point, but do you really have to provoke it in such way?
Sorry I should have stated in the original post when I say friends I mean Uni class mates in a sense they are my friends as we all have a common interest but last night was they first time we talked about politics. Tbh the one who wanted to punch me is a little twat and does not scare me at all.
I said that my views are to the right, I personally feel that people have way to much freedom nowadays with feminism and SJW's really taking the piss. I said that I feel we are too tolerant that a non white could come over to a table and eat your food and spit in your face and you would have to accept or be labeled as a racist and I said that I feel that a Totalitarianism government would be best and we should bring back national service.
>>42640016 Well, a word "liberal" or "right winged", "left winged" means something else in US and something else in Eastern Europe and so on. It's always better to talk about ideas which you think are equitable.
I don't talk about politics, i frame things in terms of history, or economy, or whatever and then convince people of my views on those, which can lead to them re-examining their political views. The way modern politics are set up, talking in terms of left or right is just asking for a fight.
>>42640815 > Tbh the one who wanted to punch me is a little twat typical leftist mag, heh
Alright I get where you come from. Try to avoid talking about politics or just don't tell them your actual beliefs(if for example you are a nazi etc.)
From my experience talking about politics with leftists isn't getting you anywhere, it is a waste of time, really. Try talking about that topic with more rational people and check if there are any nationalists in your college if you want to talk politics without having an idiot screaming at your ear
>>42640016 me in my city right now. every fuckign crab ass here is leftist anarchist dumbshit. here i am, stable minded centrist, and they all argue me up and down a tree about how "well man, dont you see that as wrong?" and "BUT ITS WRONG"
>>42641420 its hard m8. learned that a good friend was gay after a few years. saw how happy he was with his partner and how much it improved his life to stop pretending. he's a major conservative, too. seems like tradition isn't always right for everyone. it's hard to go from that back to hating queers.
also americans are mutts and we brought multiculti on ourselves with greed, so most racialism here is based on retarded premises.
>>42641331 Yeah this happens to me too, the trick is to double-jew them by deceiving them into thinking you agree with them and then directing the conversation into an area where their leftist-double think creates it's own contradiction.
You don't even have to tell them they're wrong, they figure it out on their own... the trick is playing dumb well enough so they don't initially figure out it was you that administered the red pill.
>>42640016 >Unite against fascism >Left wing socialist organization >Many members don't realize that their ideal is similar to national socialism with the national bit replaced with a multicultural one. >Call others fascists
How would Multicultural Socialist Western Workers' Party read in German? Could we call them MUZI's?
>Be me drinking with friends >subject of politics comes up >everyone says what they believe in, only right wing believers >comes to my turn >explain that my beliefs are right wing >we talk about how niggers and sandniggers are not people >we laugh at UK and france >I just sit there and laugh and continue to drink my beer
>>42641585 I think pol is off about gay people, it could be a mental illness or whatever, I mean we don't know how the brain really works, but judging by how widespread homosexual behavior is in nature and historyit seems like certain people really are just gay. While I think we need to revert to a more traditional family structure and sense of community, I don't really see how gay people threaten this. It's not like they're the cause of the modern breakdown of culture and family.
>>42641677 >want government control over almost all business and commerce >want everyone's speech and thoughts controlled >get violently angry when someone has different views >"shut it down" mentality >want to create the perfect eugenic master race by blending everyone together
>>42641863 I bet he complains when the government does authoritarian things that don't agree with him. That's the thing about authoritarians it's easy to want to limit speech and what not for them when it's only speech they disagree with, but if you limit speech they agree with (like hate speech) they chimp.
This is exactly how it's done. If it seems like you agree with them on all their most important ideological principles, but then innocently ask questions - especially under the guise of genuinely not understanding something yourself, because that assumes their intellectual superiority - you can lead people to face some really uncomfortable inconsistencies in their belief systems.
Gun law's should be changed we should have the right to own guns, discrimination only happens when deserved act like a normal human and respect others and you will not experience discrimination. Immigration of no Europeans is destroying Europe's culture.
>>42642342 So if you're the /pol/ type of fascist I think you are and it sounds like you are you would have no problem with legal repercussions on yourself for saying hateful things towards Jews, blacks or Muslims? Fantastic.
And you just said people had too much freedom, how do you even mean? Especially if you're for gun ownership.
>>42640016 All the time. It's really sad. Running out of reasons to participate with these subhumans. I entered society with their views and the way that they treated me I was pushed into /pol/. Reading /pol/ I found I was in good company as they were the only words I read that accurately represented my views in some cases where as where I am from I have zero representation.
Too much freedom in expressing that I should give a fuck if someone is offended, or that I should have to put up with feminist shit or put up with shit from blacks or I will be called racist.
We live in a world were people think that their view is important to everyone I do not give a fuck about a kid who wants to become a woman or some bitch that feels oppressed send that slut to the middle east and she will see real female oppression.
>>42642779 You do realize none of what you're describing has anything to do with freedom? Do you want to use the government to take away people's voices because you disagree with them? I'm assuming yes since you're a totalitarian child.
Tell me something, how would you feel if there was a totalitarian government that enforced the opposite of what you believe but in the same way you wish to impose things on others? Not good right?
>>42642576 Chinese are proud of their people, the mexicans are proud of their people, even middle-easterners are proud of their own people, so why can't white people be proud?
It's not because you are trying to have pride in something yourself have never achieved, but what your people did and continue to do. It is literally an invitation to a community that you only can get by birth.
>>42640016 Do you lift britbro? I've noticed these faggots are generally weak and effeminate, but they are usually vocal and in numbers, so be physically intimidating will certainly help. Perhaps take up boxing classes too. Cheers m8.
I've gotten into more than a few heated debates with this type, and whenever I see them tensing up, I always laugh at them and say, "What.. are you going to hit me because we disagree politically? That's rather barbaric of you don't you think?" with a cheeky grin. Idiots.
He wants a totalitarian government, if there was a totalitarian government that enforced some things he didn't like he would likely despise it and he would be living under oppression, but if there is a totalitarian government that agrees with his views than its correct and necessary.
>>42640016 >Antifascists >Inheriting anything I've met London Antifa and they're a bunch of very silly little cretins with big mouths and nothing else. I confronted them man to man in Leicester square all on my lonesome and they retreated. People are starting to wake up to their bullshit as well and realise they are just a bunch of crypto-commies.
>>42643877 >HURR DURR PEOPLE ARE USING THEIR HARD EARNED, BLOOD PAID POWER TO DEFEND THEIR VIEW >STATIST Maybe you should take a look at your lolbertarian hugbox on /k/ and what it takes to keep it that way. A passive ideology involving sitting around all day screaming "statist" is literal shit. The world has always been bound to authorities. Even communists and antifa shits are more respectable than some shitbird lobturdian. Webm related. I see two type acting out against what they dont agree. Dont see any lolbertarian!
>>42640016 The future of civilized society will be based around re-programming humans. Anyone who believes they have the potential to be better than the peasants around them will be re-programmed to enjoy being a sheep. Any opinion you have will be discredited, unless all the sheep agree. Only absolute truths are allowed, no maybes or central ground. Grey is a color the future does not know. Only black and white. You are either a racist/sexist pig, or you are part of the herd.
>>42644518 Wait, he said that classical liberalism would oppress people and what not? the whole idea of classical liberalism is a minimal government that maximizes liberty. Just look at the pioneers like Locke or Bastiat.
Please support this website by donating Bitcoins to 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5 If a post contains copyrighted or illegal content, please click on that post's [Report] button and fill out a post removal request
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that 4Archive shows an archive of their content. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.