SKYNET IS ONLINE SKYNET SEES EVERYTHING http://news.yahoo.

>>35911500

double 0

dubs checked

>>35911500
It was always fully operational. They can even identify you by subtle movements and physical gestures.

>>35911500
time to paint over my webcams

I wonder if it could help me find sauce on a couple of pictures.

I'm sure it's 100% secure and will never be compromised.

File: orwell.jpg (49KB, 600x811px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x811px

Every camera now know who is passing by.

That's not comforting. We have a Constitution that's supposed to protect against this shit.

>>35911781

Branches of government WILL abuse it then have their computers "accidentally" crash when caught.

This really is a new era against fundamental rights.

File: image.jpg (73KB, 709x765px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 709x765px

>>35912022
at least were safe. I feel much safer. don't you feel safer? I do. in this post-9/11 world we have to give up certain freedoms to remain safe.

>>35911769
Send them the pics and ask. You paid for the system. Can't hurt to ask right?

>>35911500
I fucking love sunglasses

>>35911921
>We have a Constitution that's supposed to protect against this shit.

The Constitution does protect your privacy. Cameras, in PUBLIC SPACE or on PRIVATE PROPERTY, do not intrude your privacy.

I'm sorry you feel so entitled.

File: it's the future you choose.gif (295KB, 250x135px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 250x135px

I told you
but you didnt listen

>>35912168
So safe.
I sure would hate to get terroristed just because crazy extremist nutjobs wouldn't let go of their so-called "freedoms".

ATTENTION FAGGOTS:

There is nothing to fear but fear itself.

http://www.timesofpol.com/the-snowden-panopticon-theory/


Real or not, this program is nothing but a PsyOps tool, it's only as dangerous as you allow it to be in your mind, do not fear that they are watching, they are watching because they FEAR YOU!

The only bad number of panopticons is ONE.

>>35912168


Those who sacrifice freedom for safety deserve neither.

And what good does it do to defend us from terrorists who "hate us for our freedoms" when they're taking real fundamental rights and freedoms away to "protect" us from them?

>>35912329
>>35912333
panopticon-mind, confirmed by dubs.

Panopticon controls jack shit, it instills fear.

>>35912380

Exactly. When there is ONE of them.

When there are as many as possible, it's different. You might be scared someone is watching you, because someone is, but if you can watch them right back it's not so bad.

>>35912254

>cameras should be everywhere to protect against crime
>there should also be software on these cameras to identify anyone seen on them in order to identify criminals
>we need to know who you are, where you are, and what you're doing, to make sure you're not a criminal
>if you're not committing crime, why do you oppose it?

do you understand how retarded your words are while typing, or just shortly thereafter?

>>35911500
They've had this for at least 2 decades you fucking plebs.

>>35911500
>http://news.yahoo.com/fbis-powerful-facial-recognition-program-fully-operational-202531765.html
What cameras exactly will they have access to?
Is it a every-camera-everywhere-we-are-watching-you-fap kind of deal or is it just public security cameras or do you have a choice in letting your private cameras be used or what?

>>35912442
This is starting to become like a game of Five Nights At Freddy's.

We have to constantly be watching them because they're definitely watching us.

Five Days At The NSA. Lel.

>>35912180
Doesn't help.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/07/21/203273764/high-end-stores-use-facial-recognition-tools-to-spot-vips

>>35912559

The NSA survives behind a legal veil, not a technical one.

And there is absolutely no justification for an intelligence agency to keep secrets. I haven't heard a good one, at least.

File: 1402495462079.jpg (41KB, 281x281px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 281x281px

>>35912721

The mentality is this:

for the public:
>"IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE THEN YOU SHOULD HAVE NO PROBLEMS"

for the govenrment and people of power:
>"WE HAVE A RIGHT TO MAINTAIN SECRETS OF WHAT WE DO TO THE PUBLIC BEHIND THE BACKS OF THE PUBLIC. IT'S IN THE PUBLIC'S BEST INTEREST TO HAVE THE PUBLIC'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VIOLATED BECAUSE WE SAY SO!"

File: 1387174178653.png (51KB, 527x427px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 527x427px

>>35912498
This.

>>35912902

Even though, logically, the argument of 'nothing to hide, nothing to fear' could ONLY apply to people in power, and NEVER to people not in power.

Anything a private citizen has to hide that would be of interest to society in general would be something that another private citizen would report, and the authorities could investigate, all out in the open.

>>35912967

There is HAVING it, and there is ANNOUNCING it.

You couldn't hang a conviction on 'our computer told us' just yet.

>>35913026


True, but they don't see it that way. Thanks to Obama, there is no longer a system of checks and balances to power at all any more.

The public needs to be ruled, and those with power have total autonomy and are acountable to no laws nor any person to do what they want.

We're subjugaged masses under a totalitarian despot now.

>>35913073
Whenever they announce it it usually means they intend to normalize it into daily use...just look at airport security and how it has gone.

When announcing something like this they already have it and are either improving it or implementing it on a larger scale.

Every child's school photo already goes into the NCMEC database which is linked with the FBI.

>>35913148

You mean thanks to the President? Thanks to Obama implies any other President would have acted differently.

>>35913209
>implies any other President would have acted differently
>Andrew Jackson

But will skynet be a rogue a.i, or a computer system used by the NWO?

New world order news for September 17th 2014
http:/boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/35902178

>>35913266
Sorry messed up link
>>35902178

>>35912498
>>35912967
>This.
Samefag.

>>35913209


The simple fact is that no onther President has undermined the people and the Constitution as much as President Obama has.

You could argue others would have done the same thing, but in the end they didn't.

>>35913266
>But will skynet be a rogue a.i, or a computer system used by the NWO?

The people using it are already rogue.

>>35913264

If AJ ran in 2012, I would have voted for him as many times as possible.

File: facial-recognition.jpg (155KB, 622x994px)

155KB, 622x994px

>>35911500
>mfw when visiting the liquor store next week

>mandatory naitonal IDs for Americans

>nothing for illegals because "that's racist"

Guess which demographic will cause a surge in crime knowing they're not in the system?

>>35911757
you haven't already?

You're fucked.

File: 1406429231225.png (155KB, 458x415px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 458x415px

>>35914606

I don't have a webcam. American Pie scarred me.

>>35913628
lol jesus fucking christ get those blinders off your eyes, the government has been fucking us from the get go pretty much.

File: 1376432749838.jpg (77KB, 535x594px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 535x594px

WE'RE TOO LATE

WY DIDN'T WE STOP IT

>>35914708
doesn't matter.

if they want to they will find any of us.

street cam's
smart phones
security cameras
credit cards
debit cards
etc...

welcome to Big Brother.

Skynet next.

>>35915059
then how come niggers still get away with crimes?

>>35915059
>no webcam because no friends to talk to
>no smartphone because no friends, just an old-as-fuck flip phone
>no credit cards, no credit history
>no debit card, no bank account
Should I just go all the way innawoods?

>>35913628

Yeah, fuck obama, signing the patriot act into law.

The nerve of that guy

>>35915271

the never of that democrat

prolonging and expanding domestic spying

>>35911500
Facebook has been around for years

Seriously, they would probably get more info from social media than any other source

File: the niggest.jpg (93KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 612x612px

>>35915184
>Should I just go all the way innawoods?
yes
>>35915132
pic related

>>35913780
this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIKwb1CoyRk

>>35915132
It is racist to even think African-Americans commit crime

File: niggers not recognized as humans.jpg (102KB, 960x670px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 960x670px

>>35915536

>>35911500
>>35915710
>>35913780
What is stopping people from wearing veils or niqabs?

Let's see a cop or anyone else try and stop a Muslim

In Florida and some other states it's legal to take a picture for a driver's license with a niqab

>>35915897
To be fair, he blends into the guy's black suit

The black female is discovered

File: mudslime driver.jpg (18KB, 400x292px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 400x292px

>>35915955
>In Florida and some other states it's legal to take a picture for a driver's license with a niqab
like this?

štokl, faki kurca

>>35916022
nigger =/= oreo nigger

File: 1406992553604.gif (503KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

503KB, 500x333px

>>35911500
>mfw no facebook ever or social media

File: ateabadshoe.jpg (56KB, 500x594px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x594px

>>35916181
>mfw when /pol/ starts a paranoia-based religion that requires followers to wear veils for any government photos and forbids it at any other time
>mfw when they sue the state for putting up traffic cameras because it's impossible to drive safely and it infringes upon their religion

>>35911500
>4chan dies for good
>FBI unveils their new tool of destruction

worst week ever

>>35913780
>yfw
Heh, puns