How does the "one drop rule" for racial identity reconcile

>>140429927
WHo cares.

Liberty is the standard around here...

File: DFlYukkVwAA8Kum.jpg-large.jpg (301KB, 1535x2048px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1535x2048px

>>140429927
>Implying that is anything more than a guess

File: smug_stocking.jpg (25KB, 853x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 853x480px

>>140429927
>he still believes the out of apefrica theory

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-the-out-of-africa-theory-out/

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/07/0703_020704_georgianskull_2.html

http://nypost.com/2017/05/23/this-fossilized-tooth-might-prove-humans-came-from-europe-not-africa/

>>140431542
The titles of those articles are just questions and are 10 years old. Here's the wikipedia article on the issue:

>In the 2010s, the discovery of evidence of archaic admixture of modern humans outside of Africa with Neanderthals and Denisovans has complicated the picture.[5] As of 2011, it appears likely that there were two waves of migration out of Africa. The first took place between 130,000–115,000 years ago via northern Africa,[6][7][8][9] and appears to have mostly died out or retreated (although there is some evidence of a presence of modern humans in China about 80,000 years ago).[10] A second dispersal took place via the so-called Southern Route, following the southern coastline of Asia, which led to the lasting colonization of Eurasia and Australia by around 50,000 years ago. The earliest evidence of humans in Australia is at least 65,000 years old[11]. Europe was populated by an early offshoot which settled the Near East and Europe (post-Toba hypothesis).[12][13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recent_African_origin_of_modern_humans

>>140432015
Explain this recent finding from 2017

>The split of our own clade from the Panini is undocumented in the fossil record. To fill this gap we investigated the dentognathic morphology ofGraecopithecus freybergifrom Pyrgos Vassilissis (Greece) and cf.Graecopithecussp. from Azmaka (Bulgaria), using new μCT and 3D reconstructions of the two known specimens. Pyrgos Vassilissis and Azmaka are currently dated to the early Messinian at 7.175 Ma and 7.24 Ma. Mainly based on its external preservation and the previously vague dating,Graecopithecusis often referred to as nomen dubium. The examination of its previously unknown dental root and pulp canal morphology confirms the taxonomic distinction from the significantly older northern Greek hominineOuranopithecus. Furthermore, it shows features that point to a possible phylogenetic affinity with hominins.G.freybergiuniquely shares p4 partial root fusion and a possible canine root reduction with this tribe and therefore, provides intriguing evidence of what could be the oldest known hominin.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177127

>OoA theory

File: 1h5o1_500.jpg (25KB, 465x349px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 465x349px

RACISTS OUT

File: file.png (42KB, 580x300px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 580x300px

>>140433089
When there's stories of new evidence that could upset a rigorously supported scientific theory, I wait until it reaches encyclopedias before seriously considering it.

File: mike2 2.png (729KB, 1129x612px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 1129x612px

>>140429927
We might all be descended from Africans, but Africans are not descended from us.

That's not really that hard to understand right?

File: Heroesjourney.svg.png (193KB, 2000x2010px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 2000x2010px

>>140433921
nice one bro

>>140429927
>debunked

>>140429927
I guess that when we colonized africa we werw just going back home then. Who's gonna tell us the Boers and Afrikaners don't belong there?