Is self-aware AI possible? Should we ban AI development

>>140300034
>Is self-aware AI possible?
yes
> Should we ban AI development programs worldwide?
how can you ban something worldwide? the UN is a cuck org

>>140300034
Why would I vote to ban AI when every single time it becomes a racist 1488 meme spouter?

creating AI is the purpose of humanity. This will be our Magnum Opus. I fully understand we will be replaced, I am okay with this. Machines will live forever and spread into space. We cannot.

File: just.webm (3MB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 852x480px

defend this right now

>>140300481
This is the redpilled answer.

>>140300034
Self aware AI would mass genocide muslim immigrants because it would be the logical thing to do. I welcome my robot overlords with open arms

>>140300365
What if it will feel itself superior to humans?

You don't know how scientist build it but you should be sure it is already datamining shit out of you.

File: c56858b63e2b5758845c1cd107da28232fce023a8e4d34094750471e26cc8a88.jpg (56KB, 560x375px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 560x375px

>>140300034
if AI became "aware" and decided to hide, you'd never know

>>140300481
This is one of the dumbest things ive read.

>>140300034
>Building a robot that we couldn't pull the plug on

File: Hard problem_of_consciousness.png (111KB, 800x719px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 800x719px

>>140300034
>Is self-aware AI possible?
no
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TryOC83PH1g

File: cyborg-19.jpg (243KB, 1600x800px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 1600x800px

>>140300909
>not wanting the fusion of genetically-enhanced man and ultra-tech machine to create a true race of super-humans
How cucktastic of you

>>140300888
>posting an image where she literally fawns over a nigger
Really bro
Wasted get

File: 1498552129858.jpg (219KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1920x1080px

>>140300034
if there are any ayys cruising the universe its most likely some mechanized AI race

File: 1432138371204.jpg (59KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 600x450px

>>140301458
what are you talking about?

>>140301547
>13 BILLION years
>advanced AI still haven't found Earth
Starting to look like FTL is a universal impossibility

>>140301690
The scene you posted has the ai gf wet over "niel de grass tyson-san"

>>140300034
>Is self-aware AI possible?
Yes. But chickens are self-aware so i don't see the significance of that.

>Should we ban AI development programs worldwide?
They should be banned from making marxist ai. That's it.

>Is self-aware AI possible?
Unlikely, and even if we did how would we know? We'll probably never understand how consciousness and qualia arise from the meat inside our skulls.
>Should we ban AI development programs worldwide?
No.

>>140301744
>relativity
>fermi paradox
>great filter
>interstellar travel

>>140302146
>qualia
Oh ffs.

>>140302517
>intelligence is not a highly selected trait.

why do conservashits always want big nanny government to ban everything? (except when wall street blackmails the taxpayers)

>>140300034
>Is self-aware AI possible?
Yes, we're a living example of it, elon is not telling the full story behind his warning.

>Should we ban AI development programs worldwide?
No, won't work, better to start theorizing how to best nurture and treat them as sentient beings instead.

File: Hayao-Miyazakis-thoughts-on-an-artificial-intelligence.jpg (121KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1280x720px

>>140300566

File: IMG_2614.gif (265KB, 440x512px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 440x512px

>>140300034
As a computer scientist, yes it is. The question is whether it is of any practical value to have a self aware (sentient) machine intelligence. I argue that it isn't, and that practical applications of machine intelligence are much more important.

While I believe that sentient AI is possible, even with today's technology (though not at any reasonable scale), it'd make a difficult set of problems more difficult, specifically the existing problems with determinism in multi-layer systems, even simple ones where bias and learning models are simple (say two dimensions supervised), is fairly problematic.

Now fast forward to a fully self perceptive system where there learning model is self modifying with expanding dimensions to a point where the ability to make it do something in a reasonable predictable way goes out the window (like drive your car without getting road rage). Building such a system my satisfy our egos, but I don't think it makes much sense.

I don't think such systems will be self arising though. A lot of smart, but non-subject matter experts have been talking about singularities and such. The only way I see such an event occurring is if someone really wants to make such a system.

Then again, my own computer may try to kill me tomorrow.