Well /pol/ science found a human ancestor in Greece that app

Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 4

Anonymous
2017-09-04 05:01:36 Post No. 140235476
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: fossil-footprints-2.jpg (171KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:01:36 Post No. 140235476 [Report]

Well /pol/ science found a human ancestor in Greece that appears to me more developed than the ones in Africa. What does this mean?

http://newatlas.com/fossil-footprints-human-evolution/51163/?amp=true

>Until recently, the fossil record suggested that hominins originated in Africa and didn't expand into Europe and Asia until about 1.8 million years ago. But these prints indicate that something with remarkably humanoid feet was traipsing through Greece millions of years earlier
>researchers pondered whether it meant that the human and chimp branches of the family tree originally split in Europe, and not Africa.
>This discovery challenges the established narrative of early human evolution head-on and is likely to generate a lot of debate

Does this article imply that there was a European human ancestor that was more highly evolved than the human ancestors in Africa at the same time?

Does it imply that there are two branches of the human evolutionary tree?

What does this article mean for the study of human development?

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:04:11 Post No.140235761
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:04:11 Post No.140235761 [Report]

It means the darwinian evolutionist agenda is not relenting

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:04:22 Post No.140235776
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:04:22 Post No.140235776 [Report]

HAHAHAHAHAHA GREEKS CONFIRMED FOR SUPERIOR HUMAN SPECIMENS NO MATTER HOW HARD YOU JEW US WE WILL ALWAYS BE BETTER

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:05:46 Post No.140235926
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:05:46 Post No.140235926 [Report]

>>140235476
Evolution is still a theory and require more research before we have a full understanding of it because science is never settled?

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:07:19 Post No.140236103
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:07:19 Post No.140236103 [Report]

>>140235476
>challenges the established narrative
sutble. almost as if to say some people may have vested interests in hiding a million years of human history.

>Does it imply that there are two branches of the human evolutionary tree?
branch theory has been supplanted by the wave model.

>What does this article mean for the study of human development?
they're not modern humans so probably nothing. more data is needed.

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:08:05 Post No.140236177
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:08:05 Post No.140236177 [Report]

>>140235926
This. As we discover, we revise.

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:08:40 Post No.140236239
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:08:40 Post No.140236239 [Report]

>>140235926
that's antisemitic thinking anon. some things are settled for good

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:09:09 Post No.140236287
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:09:09 Post No.140236287 [Report]

File: 1487851805503.jpg (182KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1024x768px

>>140235476

ayy lmao it was me

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:09:33 Post No.140236332
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:09:33 Post No.140236332 [Report]

>>140236103

>branch theory has been supplanted by the wave model.
What do you mean? What is the wave model all about? Could you explain it a little bit? I don't know much about evolutionary science. Is there another species that is connected with the wave model?

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:10:13 Post No.140236413
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:10:13 Post No.140236413 [Report]

>>140235476
WE WUZ GREEKS N SHEIT?

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:12:54 Post No.140236692
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:12:54 Post No.140236692 [Report]

>>140235476
>Does this article imply that there was a European human ancestor that was more highly evolved than the human ancestors in Africa at the same time?

No that implies that humans might have branched off in another part of the world instead of Africa.

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:25:33 Post No.140238110
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:25:33 Post No.140238110 [Report]

File: Man_In_Geologic_Column.jpg (233KB, 600x1008px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 600x1008px

I think it means there's another human artifact entry to add to the Miocene layer.

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:28:58 Post No.140238501
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:28:58 Post No.140238501 [Report]

File: Ancient White Man.jpg (72KB, 500x619px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 500x619px

>>140235476
Every race evolve from whites. Ancient Whites experimented with gene splicing with monkeys and it in turn created every race that's not white.

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:31:25 Post No.140238775
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:31:25 Post No.140238775 [Report]

>>140235476
I'm still of the belief that humanity started in asia minor
The ice age forced much of humanity closer to the equator, thus migrating into africa
Then leaving africa again when the ice age ceased.

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:31:32 Post No.140238790
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:31:32 Post No.140238790 [Report]

>>140235476
Greek confirmed for ayy lmaos

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:43:13 Post No.140240121
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-09-04 05:43:13 Post No.140240121 [Report]

>>140238775
I could actually see that. It would make sense. The glaciers pushed everything south and back then the sahara was a temperate zone.

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/