Fascism failed Communism failed Conservatism failed Libertarianism

>fascism failed
Stoped reading right there
Sage

>>140219780
It objectively failed.

Your feelings on the matter are irrelevant, albeit amusing.

>>140219350
>>140219945
>National Socialism failed because they lost a war
That's not how it works.

>>140219350
>Social Democracy WORKS

Not with millions of third-world leeches it doesn't

File: 1500503232821.jpg (189KB, 800x965px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 800x965px

>>140219945
It was destroyed by outsiders waging war against them, it didnt fail due to itself falling apart like communism.

But Natsoc and fascism will fail too, all societies grows old and dies. Nothing is eternal.

Societies reflect human nature, we are young then we grow up and achieve wealth, then we grow old and wither away and eventually we die and leave for the next generation to build.

>>140219945
Failed like it collapsed or it produced a civil war? Or did the natural progress of giving people more liberties with time took place

>>140220128
>Not with millions of third-world leeches it doesn't
This.

It only works in Nordic countries because we were 99% white, which meant 90% of the adult working population had jobs.

Somalians have 30% employment.

The trust people have in government and their nation disappears once you go multi-ethnic.

>>140220205
Why did Franco's Spain collapse then?

>>140220717
It didn't collapse. He grew old and died.

>>140220839
Isn't one of the most important measures of a government is that it can last beyond its founder's lifetime?

>>140219350
Monarchy Works, and has worked longer than any of these shit systems.

Gnostics have an idea how to defeat (((them))).

We are all Sovereign over the Archons.

File: 1461974859306.jpg (698KB, 2500x1771px) Image search: [Google]

698KB, 2500x1771px

>>140220962
The ultimate fascist system would be similar to that of the wolves. A system were the strong dominate.

The invention of the gunpowder has ruined any chance of such a system ever being created again.

The gun was the great equalizer, even women could kill strong men with a gun.

File: 20170831_134720.png (575KB, 720x508px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 720x508px

>>140221096
Fascism is monarchy monitored by the people basically

>>140219350
Social democracy is just a tool to demolish the cultural identity of a nation and replace it with (((multiculturalism))) which leads only to degeneracy and wage slavery.

File: ZiQWRfm.png (264KB, 549x566px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 549x566px

SOCIAL DEMOCRACY YES!!!!

File: 1504535941914.png (101KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 480x800px

Ancap should work
For a while

File: 1461974813902.jpg (158KB, 900x1351px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 900x1351px

>>140221096
>>140221418
A monarchy is established in order to protect the people from foreign invaders.

The people give their allegiance, in return the king protects them from foreigners and establishes the rule of law.

The strength of monarchy is that you only need 1 person (the king or ruler) to be wise in order for the system to work. A democracy needs the majority of the population to be informed and wise.

The upside of democracy is that it takes quite a bit of work to corrupt and direct the mass of people, thus corruption is generally less in democratic societies, whereas all you need to corrupt in a monarchy is the king.

A strong monarchy with a strong monarch will always be better than democracy, but the monarchy is easier to corrupt.

The problem with democracy is that it will always lead to a system of greed. Greed drives all things in our world. They import thirld world shitskins because they want cheap labour and a steady population growth to keep the growth schemes alive.

Democracy will always put money ahead of culture, race and people - even if it dooms society.

Hitler looked classy as fuck in a suit

>>140220044

Did it succeed in Spain?

In all seriousness, social democracy combined with national conservatism and Christian morals sound perfect.

>>140219350
You're forgetting two big ones
>democracy failed
>liberalism failed

All that's truely left is reactionaryism

>>140219350
Social Democracy = Popular Capitalism

Which consists in generational accumulation of ever growing private debt. It provides a boost for a few decades, then it leaves the country on border of bankruptcy.

The european countries with lower capital reserves (eg. greece, portugal, spain) are unable to accumulate as much private debt as others, and are the first to fall. Rich countries will take more time, but will fall aswell.

We are witnessing the fall of socialdemocracy

>>140222181
Whelp, they didn't have huge fucking lines for food at least. Anyway being the only fascist state in a half communist europe does not bold well for your trade relations. Eat biological refuse you genderfluid transfat libtard commie antifa scum.

>>140219945
In Spain it didn't. We had years of prosperous fascism before Franco but the regimee ended and the one that was crafted afertwards, which was a social democracy that sinked us into a corrupt shithole, failed hardcore.

If you develop an irrigation system that keeps your plants alive and well would you say it failed because someone took and axe and broke it?

>>140222511
Constitutional COnservatism deserves an honest shot.

>>140219350

It's almost as if the system of governance doesn't matter as much as the state of mind of the people themselves. A perfect king can't successfully rule over an unruly mob, and when he inevitably fails they will blame him for all their woes since he's in charge, right? Our democracy was filled with a bunch of materialists who cared only about their high standard of living and retirement (boomers), and now it's increasingly filled with the third world. If the people have no common vision, if they don't have a single aim, then they pull the country in a million directions. An authoritarian government provides that unifies vision or aim, but sometimes the people rebel against it because they feel disenfranchised, or they're trash, or the leadership truly sucks.

>>140220044
>>140220247
Fascist started the war. They propped themselves up upon debt and required new land and slave labour and forced market access and stolen resources to facilitate growth, they tried and they objectively fucking failed.

Facts might hurt your poor little feelings, but your tears do not soften them.


>>140222958
Franco wasn't even a fascist. You have no idea what you're talking about, which is exceptionally pathetic.

>>140223751
Wait, are you retarded? Do you know the meaning of fascism? You think that during Franco there were other political parties allowed in Spain?

The fact that you used the word pathetic after barfing such an autistic comment makes me wonder if your parents dream about leaving you in the forest when they go to sleep.

>>140222087
>The strength of monarchy is that you only need 1 person (the king or ruler) to be wise in order for the system to work.

Nah. If the people suck then there isn't much the king can do. They still need men of science, scholars to teach their younger generation, strong men to wage war against invaders. If the people have little or no virtue then They will have little regard for their king, as well. Then the king is spending most of his time trying to hold his kingdom together rather than trying to expand and improve his kingdom.

>>140223751
Anglos started WW2. Hitler only wanted german land that was stolen. He tried to make peace with europe stop shilling so hard