https://thinkprogress.org/trump-nam es-climate-science-denie

>>140047287
bump

File: 78.png (422KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 640x480px

>>140047287
>Why do we have a literal climate change denier in charge of NASA? Fucking Drumpf is so fucking retarded.
climate change denier is a buzzphrase and could mean anything
>You have a woman who has never been in public school, and who wants to get rid of them entirely, in charge of the Department of Education.
I went to a lutheran private school from preschool till 8th grade and then I went into the public system to finish junior high and high school. Take it from me, private schools are better.
>You have a man in charge of the Department of Energy that did not know the Department of Energy is in charge of our nuclear arsenal.
And the House Rep. for Guam was worried a MEU deployment would make the island tip over
>Then you put someone who was working for the big telecoms, someone who thinks American citizens don't need high speed internet, in charge of the FCC.
where did he say americans shouldn't have high speed internet?
>In charge of the Justice department is a man who wants the war on drugs; who supports civil forfeiture.
I live in california so sucks to suck

anything else?

>>140048000
The dude in charge, Jim Bridenstine has no scientific credentials on him unlike the previous NASA chiefs. He's clearly unqualified.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUcsAFnwC7k
and hes caught on video demanding Obama apologize for funding research into climate science.

>>140048000
well?

>>140048306
>According to NASA, the role of the Administrator is to "lead the NASA team and manage its resources to advance the Vision for Space Exploration.
there goes your scientific credentials argument. the previous record holder for longest tenure as NASA admin was a guy with nothing more than a bachelors in mechanical engineering.

>and hes caught on video demanding Obama apologize for funding research into climate science.
and what if it turns out obummer was funneling money into research programs to push an agenda? they've been caught fiddling with results before, anyways.

Aint no weather in space nigga

>>140048663
>and what if it turns out obummer was funneling money into research programs to push an agenda? they've been caught fiddling with results before, anyways.
source?

>>140048663
also,
>>Then you put someone who was working for the big telecoms, someone who thinks American citizens don't need high speed internet, in charge of the FCC.
>where did he say americans shouldn't have high speed internet?
the dude wants to get rid of net neutrality, thats why

>>140048923
John Bates, who retired last year as principal scientist of the National Climatic Data Center, accused the lead author of the 2015 NOAA “pausebuster” report of trying to “discredit” the hiatus through “flagrant manipulation of scientific integrity guidelines and scientific publication standards.”

In addition, Mr. Bates told the Daily [U.K.] Mail that the report’s author, former NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information director Thomas Karl, did so by “insisting on decisions and scientific choices that maximized warming and minimized documentation.”

“Gradually, in the months after [the report] came out, the evidence kept mounting that Tom Karl constantly had his ‘thumb on the scale’ — in the documentation, scientific choices, and release of datasets — in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming hiatus and rush to time the publication of the paper to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy,” Mr. Bates said Saturday on Climate Etc.

The June 2015 report, “Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus,” which updated the ocean temperature record, was published six months before the U.N.’s Paris summit.
>>140049090
net neutrality only tries to regulate a market booming with growth and competition. that does nothing but fuck the consumer.

next

>>140049482
wheres the link to both sources?

>>140049676
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/feb/5/climate-change-whistleblower-alleges-noaa-manipula/

are we done yet?

>>140049876
>“I also want you to know that, while climate science knowledge is evolving, these reports do not change our fundamental understanding of climate change,” said AGU president Eric Davidson.
This debunks everything youve just said.

Net Neutrality is the definition of a free market dude.

>>140050177
It doesn't debunk anything I said. Just makes it that much more believable to think that people who need those federal dollaroos might manipulate the dateroo to keep it flowing. You're an idiot if you have full faith in any govt agency.

>Net Neutrality is the definition of a free market dude.
it's the literal definition of a government mandated regulation which has a tangible effect on US businesses and their business models. Protip: the US govt has no fucking clue which business model is best

hell yeah we're getting the real fucking experts in here not the brainwashed marxist drone goys

File: 1503386038243.gif (836KB, 317x320px) Image search: [Google]

836KB, 317x320px

>>140050177
I'll take your silence as conceding the argument.