Why where the colonies in North America so much more successful

>>140015203

Because Anglo Colonization was better than Spaniard Colonization.

>>140015203
Cause the South American colonies became the USA´s main drug producer.

>>140015203
South American colonies relied heavily on African slaves, making up more than 90% of the slave trade. They revolted and mixed with local populations. The peak of the resulting culture is Mexican guitar music and tacos.q

>>140015604
Note, Mexico will try to fool you that they are North American, but this is not true.

>>140015203
Because the North American colonies were founded by France and Brittan, while the south American ones were founded by Spain and Portugal. Spain and Portugal didn't have as much respect for the rule of law and practiced more cronyism with regard to government giving a pass to powerful families. French and British governments had a respect for rule of law as opposed to the will of nobles and applied it more evenly to subjects. They also had a dependence on trade and labor, rather than on resource extraction, which are stronger in the long run. The practices of Spain and Portugal led to corruption. The governments of the colonies, when the broke away, carried these principles with them.

>North America
Northern European, Nose the grindstone culture, protestant, liberalism and democracy as the foundation, minimal government

>South America
Cathloic, muh dick, siesta, socialism

The North American colonies made sure to wipe out the indigenous population and colonize the land with their race, while in the South American they mixed heavily with the non-white population.

>>140015203

>Fill country A with white Europeans
>Fuck country B into half-breeds
>Haiti

Gee I can't figure out why all the countries in the western hemisphere didn't turn out the same

More whites.

>>140015203
because the conquistadors conquered and raped the native population, creating a hybrid race with the violent and lower iq aztecs.

the puritans only fucked their own kind, and killed off the native population through disease and warfare. keeping the white race pure, which kept the iqs higher of the united states population.

>>140015203
British knew how to colonize better than spaniards who did fucked up shit like the inquisition and conquistadors

>>140015203
wypipo. its actually more a factor of south americas terrain and flora/fauna being a total nightmare.

>>140015892
Pretty much this.

>>140015203
Because Germanics are genetically superior to Iberians.

All the other things mentioned in this thread are merely consequences of this fact.

British and French, they sabotaged the governments,financed pro-independence rebel groups, and invades countries because they wanted a monopoly...

>>140015203
Because most of the south american colonies had large peasant populations with farming economies which they kept till now. The north american colonies had a lot of empty land with sparsely populated indian populations west of the appalacians so they invited millions of european immigrants and industrialized their economy and urbanized their society.

>>140015203

Because anglos genozided and replaced all natives while spaniards tried to convert them and use them as cheap labour. Big mistake.

>>140016369
> flora/fauna being a total nightmare
This is incorrect

>>140015203
Because in the North you had native tribes that were kind and peaceful you also had tribes that were savage and warred against other tribes, while in the South, motherfuckers were worshipping flying serpents by sacrificing humans to them in rituals. Supposedly, there is even a tale told by natives on the East coast that at some point in their history before America was colonized, the natives were attacked by a tribe of demon worshipers that lived south down the coast from them, and the natives were helped by tall, white, pale men, that visited them in long boats.

>>140016812
What genetic evidence do you have for this claim? If you go by IQ(actual IQ not meme eupedia maps) or PISA scores then they're pretty much the same

>>140015203
The Spanish fucked Indians and became Mexicans.

The British killed Indians and remained British.

>>140015203
There wasn't nearly much race mixing in North America as in South America

>>140015203

For some reason Hispanics are more corrupt.

Many Latin countries don't embrace laisez-faire economic policies. So economic growth it low and they're burdened with socialist programs.

>>140019354
What the fuck. Did a bot break?

There may be a lot of factors, but one that is important to remember is the heavy race mixing and amount of slaves imported.

>>140015203
Kys svenne bög.

>>140019291
This.

>>140019937
Why is this on every thread wtf?

>>140016369

>Implying having shitty flora and fauna makes a colony bad

Fuck off, we turned one of the most poisonous plants into a chest rub and despite losing a war to basically armless raptors we still did great

Dont mix with the natives

>>140015203

Not enough wypipo in south america. Spaniards are already mixed with moors so when they mixed with amerindians they became triracial which automatically made them all ugly abominations except for the elites who are all from northern spain and didn't mix.

We were always better at making settler colonies and keeping order in them. Yes, we had the yanks rebel on us, but the Spanish had Simon Bolivar. That, and Portugal sought to civilise the African natives more than we did (we gave more importance to settling).

1) The Jews choose the JEWnited States to be their attack dog so they facilitated the rise of the USA to World Power.

2) Low amounts of Europeans went to South America colonies. The preferred colonial method was more of a feudal system with the Europeans on top and the imported and native slaves and peasants at the bottom. Completely different from North America.

3) When the Jews "liberated" the lower races point "2" was worst for South America for obvious reasons, their decadence was much faster.

>>140015892
great post my friend. pretty much this.

>>140015203
Spain and Portugal had much less population than Britain or France. So they didn´t colonize their colonies with only their own people, they had no number's to do that, and it seems they just wanted to explore the land, the resources and not built a country there. Also Usa had much much more european immigration

>>140015892
That's another way to put point 2 i made in my previous post. I agree with you except it wasn't exactly "cronism" it was a feudal system.