Hey soo... the state simulator had an update, so let's

>training license
SHALL

File: Sim.png (217KB, 1899x889px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1899x889px

Here's my old one for comparation.

>>139978568
?

File: 1461407605090.png (113KB, 399x536px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 399x536px

>>139978311
>homos legal
>trannies illegal
what a fag

>>139980421
>>139979448
Being a homo is a genetic defect, being a tranny is just mental illness.
Would fun be legal in that state ?

>>139978311
Each time I reduce the percentage of public ownership of various economic sectors, the dot moves right instead of down.

This thing is wrong. Never mind that left-right is a stupid axis anyways.

>>139981376
Dot should move in the direction of privatization which is right and down

>>139981176
if you are religious being a homo is a sin but being tranny isn't
>>139981376
it goes down too

File: 15043676899.png (62KB, 564x434px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 564x434px

Rate

>>139982083
t.Judaism

>>139981766
Dude a tranny is just a girly homo, the diference is that tranny are ''less'' gay in the eyes of an heterosexual.

>>139982083
Post the full picture.

File: 14826959896.jpg (102KB, 1040x522px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1040x522px

>>139982148
So the prophecy was correct. We have to out Jew the Jew.

File: 14825989685.png (251KB, 1686x439px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1686x439px

>>139982435
Not very interesting. Everything is at zero.
Basically the state has only the function of upholding religion.
Everything else is the hand of corporations. Including warfare.

File: r7.png (270KB, 1920x745px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 1920x745px

r8

>>139982843
if the king is so poor the corporations are gonna murder him

>>139982881
>>139982843
Why the hell are you guys so supportive of corporate interest?

>life sentence
>death penalty
Why not just dump em in an island? Banishment always worked and I wouldn't have to waste a single penny!

>>139983053
The state region leader is a corporate CEO himself.

Anyone got some links?

>>139983418
filteries com/politics

>>139983567
Oh the damn thing was in the OP
Stupid me.

>>139982881
Well that's a bit messy. The people don't chose their leader's and making a business must be hell since the state don't give gibs to companies.

>>139983127
It's going to happen anyway. In the future everything will be owned and organized by corporations. Even entire planets.
There will be no more fucking around and pretending.
It will be total open resource wars. Zero welfare. Unrestricted technology.

>>139980421
This looks pretty comfy senpai.

File: ss+(2017-09-03+at+03.10.16).png (201KB, 1912x656px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1912x656px

Welcome to the worker's paradise. The permanent revolution will be carried far beyond our borders, comrade.

The system is a Westminster system where labour unions replace political parties. No person is allowed to stand for parliament without having first held, for a number of years, a genuine frontline position in the industry to which union they belong. This means if you're part of the construction industry union you cannot stand for parliament unless you've been a bricklayer, or equivalent, for some years - for example. The executive forms the Prime Minister's cabinet and is drawn from the lower house, and the judiciary is appointed as usual.

Only those of the right ethnicity can vote.

The military is well-funded and often used to spread the worker's paradise across the globe. Others are subsumed as associate members in the co-prosperity sphere of the paradise and do not have equal rights to representation as the main ethnicity. There is no limit on immigration but immigrants are never put in a position to threaten the polity until many generations have passed.

Women have full rights.

The state invests heavily in all industries except agriculture, which it controls completely. Only workers, jobseekers, and retirees receive welfare. There is no "disability pension" for the mentally ill, for example.

Those who earn too much will have their excess wealth confiscated - upper middle class is the highest class. A big house and a few cars, but no personal yachts or private jets.

Apart from all that the paradise is relatively modernist and forward-thinking.

All corporations are formatted as worker-owned co-ops. The workers are all equal shareholders, but the internal processes of the co-op are for them to determine. If they want industrial democracy then fine, if they want traditional managerial structure then also fine - so long as they consent.

>>139983870
That's pure absurdity.
No one wants to work as a drone for big corporations when it does little to nothing to help the community.

We're in the place we're in now because any commodity has little novelty - it's all manufactured to break quickly so we invest more and more in corporations.
Once the right truly organizes itself, we'll likely see a more authoritarian state with locality being prized and promoted.
Men don't like to support families across borders. To suggest this sort of fate looms in wait screams idiocy to me.

>>139983870
The jewish wet dream.
I doubt that will happen but predicting the future is almost never accurate.

>>139984039
Comfy in the sence of be comfortable or die. I probably wouldn't mind living in it but dun would be really strict.

>>139984397
>No one wants to work as a drone for big corporations
Virtually everyone already does.

>>139983856
Am I blind? I can't find the subsidies part.

>>139984603
Which is why Unions are being demonized.
Which is why automation is being fought tooth and nail.
You can't seriously say there's not a lot of people around you making a big deal about buying local shit instead of feeding the walmart jew, etc.
I see it everywhere. What, are you from Chicago or something?

>>139984603
No anon, they DID. In the 1860s. Then we had massive reform and revolution, because they refused to put up with it.

>>139984844
>automation is being fought tooth and nail
Automation is good for corporations though.

File: utopia.png (177KB, 1347x347px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1347x347px

>>139985047

>>139985047
Are you fucking with me?
Of course it's good for corporations. People don't want to lose their already shit jobs - so they insist we prolong automation.
Having a job is better than not having a job. The point here is, however, that they'll eventually get fed up with always being treated like worker drones and always being threatened to lose their jobs to automation machines that they'll eventually say fuck it and stop paying the corporate jew.

>>139978311

So few one world technocracies. :(

>>139984133
>Those who earn too much will have their excess wealth confiscated - upper middle class is the highest class.
screams socialism to me

>All corporations are formatted as worker-owned co-ops. The workers are all equal shareholders, but the internal processes of the co-op are for them to determine. If they want industrial democracy then fine, if they want traditional managerial structure then also fine - so long as they consent.
This I like though - it seems to answer the corporation question.

File: o9zg.jpg (989KB, 1076x699px) Image search: [Google]

989KB, 1076x699px

>>139984844
>Which is why automation is being fought tooth and nail.
You can't stop technology. So you might as well fully embrace it.

>>139978311

Why military ruling? Why so low estate tax? Why fines for trans?

File: Noice_Place.jpg (219KB, 1884x894px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1884x894px

My nation-state is clearly superior.

>>139986226
Estate taxes are bugged to make way more than they should

>>139985962
I couldn't possibly agree any more with you.
I don't think that we shouldn't use it or anything like that.
My only point, which seems to have entirely evaded you from the beginning here, is that workers resisting it serves to insist that people don't like to be corporate slaves.
If there were a system like >>139984133
pointed out here
>All corporations are formatted as worker-owned co-ops. The workers are all equal shareholders, but the internal processes of the co-op are for them to determine. If they want industrial democracy then fine, if they want traditional managerial structure then also fine - so long as they consent.
it would make sense to decide that automation is useful in certain areas, so long as the workers decide it's necessary to help them accomplish their job.
However, when a corporate interest simply tells its employees,
>no more job for you because we don't' give a shit about you since you're just a number
it will make them want to leave and search for an employer that cares if their family starves to death.

Automation is good for us, and I definitely see its benefits. In fact, I see it as inevitable. I never meant to take a position on automation.

>>139982799

Why landowner requirement?

>>139986564
estate tax is based on the total wealth of a country which usually is much higher than all the GDP of a country

>>139986452
>Miscegenation
>Unrestricted
>Not Death Penalty

You had one job.

>>139983870

The developement of technology more or less requires a state.

>>139986711
Why would you want people that don't own land to vote?

>>139986918
Fug, let that one slip by! Mein God!

>>139986593
>My only point is that workers resisting it serves to insist that people don't like to be corporate slaves.
I don't see it. Someone working for Exxon or Boeing seems a lot happier than someone stuck in a dead end monotonous government job. Like the millions of welfare bureaucrats. Those guys all have dead eyes.

>>139987070
>Why would you want people to vote?

File: 4.png (242KB, 1916x756px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1916x756px

r8

>>139987160
Maybe it was an oversight. I see that now.
I was thinking that if government didn't/couldn't own real estate, people wouldn't sell their parent's property when they died. As a result, land inheritance would be much much more common.

>>139987270
Even Somalia isn't that shitty.

>>139986564

We can just pretend that the surplus is smaller then. I think being accurate with the policies is more important.

>>139987317
Also, less land foreclosure, etc.

>>139987093
The point I made originally suggested that corporate interest does little to nothing to help a community.

Having a government job certainly does a lot to help the community, especially if we make it harder for corporations to exist, meaning more incentive to stay local and buy/produce locally.

>>139986593

Have you investigated Technocracy Inc?

File: Noicer_Place.jpg (208KB, 1870x861px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1870x861px

>>139986452
UPDATE

I had state tax 0 to 100, wtfug, its now 0-0.
So I cut military spending by 9 trillions and put up some import tarifs. Also got rid of science gov spending.

>>139987070

Many poor people are intelligent and have good ideas.

>>139987591
I'm mildly familiar with them.
Expand.

>>139978311
300,000 refugees whooo!

>>139987606

WHY WOULD YOU EVER GET RID OF GOV SCIENCE SPENDING???

>>139987565
All government workers I know are giant anti sozial ass cunts.
The corporate oil workers around here are grade A good people that take pride in helping each other and are proud to show off their skills.

>>139987774
It's Communism by a different name. I wouldn't touch it.

>>139987769
I don't disagree.
I stated above that I can see how it was somewhat of an oversight.
I remember thinking while making it that if real estate wasn't really owned by the government to any significant extent, then more people would inherent land more often and be less likely to sell it.
Maybe that's wrong, and that's okay. At the same time, the ones who own property are going to be the most productive and most valuable.
Just let me remind you that poor people in congested cities often vote for higher taxes on people that earn more and the like. They also vote for more welfare and such, which is non-existent in my hypothetical country (beyond sizable pensions). If these same people value obtaining property to vote, they will also simultaneously desire welfare less and less and therefore be more individually valuable and productive.
I tend to think owning property, caring for it, and using it to be productive will often enable one to have a good basis for forming political opinions.
I'm fine with being wrong though, and I certainly think that's a good point.

>>139988046
So i can have a 10 trillion year military spending. lol

Realistically I would take 2.5 trillion from mili and put in science

And would make it a true democracy where people (that served, had children, land, only men) would vote on each bill from their computers, and each bill would stand alone (no cramming unrelated bullshit on 1 bill).

AND NO TAXES BUT CONSUMPTION TAXES AND IMPORT TARIFS. FUCK YEAH.

>>139987619
>100%private
>NatSOC flag
you seem to be a little confused

>>139988093
Then I suppose the problem with corporations I have surrounds its expanded nature.
I'm not against corporations, but I'm for making it more taxing or difficult for them to exist. However, that's only so as to enable a more productive and wholesome community, it's not because I think they're all greedy assholes.

>>139988487
It's ok. He is ancap that just really hates Jews and Niggers.

>>139988358
UPTADE.

Imagine this, where I would be the king to make sure shit worked right but a true democracy where people (that served, had children, land, only men) would vote on each bill from their computers, and each bill would stand alone (no cramming unrelated bullshit on 1 bill).

File: Even_Noicer_Place.jpg (221KB, 1883x884px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1883x884px

>>139988721
FUG, forgot the pic.

>>139988767
>no welfare
>all that consumption tax
everyone is gonna starve and wont be able to afford anything

File: mowmoomoo.jpg (200KB, 1588x786px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1588x786px

>>139978311

>>139990221
My country is for entrepeneurs who value political stability above all.

>>139982251
traps are gay
trannies are an abomination
end of discussion

>>139984133
>The state invests heavily in all industries except agriculture, which it controls completely.
inb4 holodomor
inb4 four pests campagin

File: mowmoomoo2.jpg (195KB, 1589x788px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1589x788px

>>139978311

Forgot to edit state religion , alcohol , pornography

>>139987774

Effectively it's an ideology which seeks to maximise the living standard thorugh improving the efficency of the economy. At the core of the ideology there stands meritocracy, and the organisation of the state to fit the industrial needs. There are many concepts so I recommend that you read the technocratic study guide, some of which you can skip if you understand sciences reasonably.

>>139990440

Usually welfare is necessary for stability. What do you think starving people with no hope will do?

>>139990944

Is that facist flag ironic?

>>139992463

Yes d: