/p/ol here So we finally have come to the conclusion that film

>>139939389
Digital looks better.
That's not darker skin, it's just the camera actually capturing shadows properly.

Sleep with the lights on if you're this worried about skin temporarily looking darker even though you know it's not.

>>139939389
not politics, fuckhead

>>139939389

I know what you mean about film normally being better, but in this specific example the girl looks better in the digital shot.

>>139939596
>Digital looks better

Said the racist. Disgusting.

>>139939389
Film looks dreamier, digital more lifelike. Depends on your style

they're both jpegs. false premise.

Cameras are for jews

Left looks like a doll, right looks human

I unironically use a 7 year old digital point and shoot. That I've dropped on the ground.

Deal with it /p/.

On a computer screen they are both digital, stupid fucktard hipster children.

File: grainy chocolate marshmellows.png (2MB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x1080px

>going against the grain
Film will always win out.

File: [EG]Outlaw_Star_Pilot_BD(1080p_10bit)[35CE1E2E].mkv_snapshot_00.33_[2017.01.30_09.00.51].jpg (880KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 1440x1080px

Digital was a mistake.

>>139939389
Being fond of photographs is for faggots and/or hipsters.

Just take care of your visual memory and take your time to simply watch your surroundings instead of taking pics of every stupid thing.

>>139939389
The shading chnged between photos, and a breeze made her look better. Not good comparison

Film shot looks like it was shot with Helios-44, a biotar design soviets stole from the nazis and produced in the millions. Bash the fash glass, /pol/ btfo!